search
Back to results

Comparison Between Chromoendoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy (NBI, I-scan, FICE) for Detection of Neoplasia in Long Standing Ulcerative Colitis

Primary Purpose

Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Virtual chromoendoscopy
Chromoendoscopy
Sponsored by
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Ulcerative Colitis focused on measuring Ulcerative colitis, DALM, chromoendoscopy, dysplasia, virtual chromoendoscopy, FICE, NBI, I-scan

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis ( 8 years after diagnosis or pancolitis and 10 years after diagnosis of left-sided colitis)
  • Signed informed consent form
  • Previous surveillance endoscopy > 1 year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ulcerative colitis, > 20 cm from the margo ani
  • Personal history of colorectal cancer
  • Allergy or intolerance to methylene blue
  • Refusing or incapable to agree with informed consent
  • Age younger than 18 years
  • Pregnant women

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospitals LeuvenRecruiting
  • H.-Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen VZWRecruiting
  • McGill University Health CenterRecruiting
  • Copenhagen University Hospital HerlevRecruiting
  • Academic Medical center MaastrichtRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

OLYMPUS CHROMO

OLYMPUS NBI

FUJINON CHROMO

FUJINON FICE

PENTAX CHROMO

PENTX i-scan

Arm Description

Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1%

Group B: Virtual chromoendoscopy: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI)

Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1%

Group D: Virtual chromoendoscopy: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement n° 4

Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1%

Group F: Virtual chromoendoscopy: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan 2 settings

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The difference in total number of neoplastic lesions detected by chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy
The primary endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of total endoscopic procedure time and of endoscopic procedure time during retraction for each technique.
The total endoscopy time is recorded from the start until the end of the entire procedure. After the caecum is reached, time is recorded. Total retraction time is the time between reaching the caecum and the end of the procedure and includes time for rinsing, dye spraying, biopsy or poliepectomy.
The difference in neoplasia detection rate (i.e. the number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion) between chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy.
The endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.
The difference in the ratio number of neoplastic lesions/ total number of lesions between chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy
The endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.

Full Information

First Posted
June 12, 2013
Last Updated
July 25, 2017
Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
H.-Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen VZW, Belgium., McGill University, Maastricht University Medical Center, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01882205
Brief Title
Comparison Between Chromoendoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy (NBI, I-scan, FICE) for Detection of Neoplasia in Long Standing Ulcerative Colitis
Official Title
Endoscopic Screening for Dysplasia in Patients With Longstanding Ulcerative Colitis: Classical Chromo-endoscopy Versus NBI , FICE and EPK-i.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
H.-Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen VZW, Belgium., McGill University, Maastricht University Medical Center, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The risk for colon cancer in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis exceeding the rectum is increased and therefore patients should be enrolled in a surveillance program eight years after the diagnosis. Until today, official international guidelines for endoscopic screening in patients with ulcerative colitis advise to take 4 biopsies every 10 centimeters (with a minimum of 32) and of each suspected visible lesion. These guidelines are merely based on consensus during expert opinion meetings rather than evidence based. Recent studies have shown that chromo-endoscopy guided biopsies significantly reduced the number of biopsies for each procedure and detected more neoplastic lesions. Chromo-endoscopy is therefore considered the gold standard in this study in which we want to compare it to the performance and efficiency of new endoscopic imaging techniques. Narrow-Band Imaging (NBI) selectively uses certain wavelengths of the visible light leading to a shift in the excitation spectrum towards blue light. The first studies with NBI showed that the additional value of NBI in the detection of neoplastic lesions is comparable to chromo-endoscopy, but time saving and easier to perform. The Fujinon Intelligent Chromo-Endoscopy (FICE) system uses a similar theoretical principal as NBI but this is achieved via the use of post hoc computer algorithms, applying different filters to the stored endoscopic images and enabling a theoretically endless number of combinations of filters that can be used. The Pentax I-scan system also allows post hoc modification of the images. On the one hand, surface enhancement enables to better highlight mucosal changes. Spectral modification allows to apply different modes in analogy with to FICE system. These new imaging techniques have a theoretical advantage which is extendedly used for sales purposes but has however so far not been proven in ulcerative colitis patients. We want to test their clinical use in the screening for neoplastic lesions in patients with long standing ulcerative colitis.
Detailed Description
The risk for colon cancer in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis exceeding the rectum is increased and therefore patients should be enrolled in a surveillance program eight years after the diagnosis. Surveillance endoscopies are advised 8 to 10 years after the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. The first decade every 3 years, the second decade every 2 years and thereafter every year Until today, most official international guidelines for endoscopic screening in patients with ulcerative colitis advise to take 4 random biopsies every 10 centimeters (with a minimum of 32) and of each suspected visible lesion using standard white light endoscopy. These guidelines are merely based on consensus during expert opinion meetings rather than evidence based. However, some studies have shown that the sensitivity for the detection of dysplasia during colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis can significantly be enhanced by using chromo-endoscopy. These studies used methylene blue or indigo carmine as a contrast agent with or without high magnification endoscopy. Chromo-endoscopy guided targeted biopsies significantly reduced the number of biopsies for each procedure and detected more neoplastic lesions. It was therefore concluded that colonoscopy with chromo-endoscopy guided biopsies is more efficient and cost saving. Chromo-endoscopy with targeted biopsies is an alternative to white light endoscopy with random biopsies every 10cm. The European Crohn and Colitis association now suggests that the use of methylene blue or indigo carmine chromoendoscopy is an alternative to random biopsies for appropriately trained endoscopists and is superior to random biopsies in the detection rate of neoplastic lesions In this study we want to compare chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies as the gold standard with new new endoscopic image techniques called virtual chromoendoscopy. From 2005 new endoscopic imaging modalities have been commercialized and are now generally available to gastroenterologists. They all claim a theoretical advantage in comparison to standard white light high resolution video endoscopy. These new techniques are called virtual chromoendoscopy (VC). There are three different systems developed by the three major competitors of endoscopic equipment: Olympus, Pentax and Fujinon. Narrow-Band Imaging (NBI) is developed by Olympus inc. and selectively uses certain wavelengths of the visible light leading to a shift in the excitation spectrum towards blue light. The intensity of the blue bandwidth is also enhanced. This leads to a more superficial penetration of the emitted light into the mucosa of the intestine and enhancement of more superficial structures (e.g. irregularities, small flat lesions or polyps) and small superficial mucosal vessels (indicative of neoplasia). The first studies using NBI in Barrett's esophagus demonstrated that the additional value of NBI in the detection of neoplastic lesions is comparable to chromo-endoscopy (Kara et al., 2005). However NBI is time saving and easier to perform than chromo-endoscopy because there is no need to additionally spray dye onto the mucosa. In a standard population screening study, NBI has shown to aid in the detection and characterization of polyps in the colon. In particular the presence of a brownish meshed capillary network has a high diagnostic value in the prediction of the neoplastic nature of a lesion. In a very recent tandem study in which white light endoscopy was compared with NBI in 48 patients with longstanding UC there was no additional benefit of NBI. In the 25 patients who were first endoscoped with white light 8 dysplastic lesions were found. After NBI imaging another 7 lesions were found. In the 23 patients which were first imaged with NBI 7 lesions were found and an additional 8 after white light endoscopy (Van den Broek FJ et al 2011. The Fujinon Intelligent Chromo-Endoscopy (FICE) system uses a similar theoretical principal as NBI but this is achieved via the use of post hoc computer algorithms, applying different filters to the stored endoscopic images and enabling a theoretically endless number of combinations of filters that can be used. Currently 10 different spectrum filters can be used. There are predefined settings for visualization of the colonic mucosa. There are no previous data comparing white light endoscopy and FICE in the detection of dysplasia in longstanding ulcerative colitis. Finally, Pentax released a new high definition endoscopy system in 2007, the I-scan system, which also allows post hoc modification of the images. On the one hand, surface enhancement enables to better highlight mucosal changes. Spectral modification allows to apply different modes in analogy with to FICE system. For instance the p-mode for pattern recognition helps to accentuate epithelial features. The TE-mode helps to assess the vasculature of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Recently new filters were developed such as the colon mode, specifically designed for the colon. In one study VC with I-scan TE-mode was compared to CE and standard white light endoscopy in 69 patients. In both the VC and CE mode 11 dysplastic lesions were found (Hoffman et al 2010). Data about the improvement of detection of dysplasia are lacking until now. Adjustment of the light spectrum is usually combined with a better and higher image resolution of the new generation endoscopes. Fujinon and Pentax use a so called super-CCD to increase the pixel resolution of the scope to 1.300.000 and 1.400.000 respectively and combined it with a DVI output signal. Olympus opted for an improved video resolution by incorporating high definition television (HDTV) in the latest processors. These new imaging techniques have a theoretical advantage which is extendedly used for sales purposes but has however so far not been proven in ulcerative colitis patients. We want to test their clinical use in the screening for neoplastic lesions in patients with long standing ulcerative colitis. The scientific and clinical relevance of this study is clear. If NBI and/or FICE and/or I-scan have a better detection rate than chromo-endoscopy, the latter can be replaced by virtual chromo-endoscopy. Even if the detection by NBI and/or FICE and/or I-scan is not statistically different from standard chromo-endoscopy, they still can replace the latter because it is technically easier to use. If however these techniques have a lower adenoma detection rate than classical chromo-endoscopy we will be able to show that there is no place for these techniques in the detection of UC related neoplasia, despite the theoretical advantage. Because the multicenter character of the study, and the availability of only one system in most hospitals, we will test the differences between all three modalities and classical chromoendodoscopy. The endoscopic procedure as such is not much different from a standard endoscopic procedure that patient should be advised to undergo according to good clinical practice. The bowel preparation is similar as in a normal colonoscopy, and can be performed either at home or in the endoscopy department. The endoscopes used in the study include the H180Q series of Olympus, the 5000 series of Fujinon and the HD series of Pentax. They are not different in terms of design or size compared to standard colonoscopies and are all commercially available. Patients will be randomized between one of the following techniques: Chromo-endoscopy with methylene blue 0,1% (groups A-C-E) An Olympus spray catheter is used through the biopsy channel of the endoscope to apply the dye, a saline solution with methylene blue in a concentration of 0.1%. This technique was already validated in previous studies. Besides the extra time needed for dying the entire colon mucosa, no other manipulations are needed for this technique. Moreover, the time needed to dye can be recovered because only chromo-endoscopy guided biopsies will be taken instead of random biopsies throughout the colon, which normally also requires a considerable amount of time. Previous studies using chromo-endoscopy versus conventional screening colonoscopy did not show a significant difference in total procedure time. The endoscopes used do not differ from the ones used in the other randomization arms and include either an Olympus H180Q colonoscope, Fujinon EC 590 ZW/M colonoscope or a Pentax 3890i colonoscope. All three endoscopes are CE approved and are commercially available. Narrow band imaging with HDTV (Group B) This technique involves an Olympus H180Q colonoscope that is CE approved and commercially available. The procedure involves a normal white light endoscopy during progression of the scope. Once the caecum is reached the entire procedure will be performed in NBI modus. This has no influence or side effects for the patients because NBI modus is switched on by pushing a button on the scope. Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE) with super CCD chip (Group D) This technique involves a Fujinon EC 590ZW/M colonoscope that is CE approved and commercially available. The procedure involves a normal white light endoscopy during progression of the scope. Once the caecum is reached the entire procedure will be performed in FICE modus n° 4. This has no influence or side effects for the patients because FICE modus is switched on by pushing a button on the scope. I-scan with High Definition colonoscope (group F) This technique involves a PENTAX EC3890Fi colonoscope that is CE approved and commercially available. The procedure involves a normal white light endoscopy during progression of the scope. Once the caecum is reached the entire procedure will be performed in the TE- modus (Tissue enhancement mode) with surface enhancement on medium (range low-medium-high). This has no influence or side effects for the patients because the c- modus is switched on by pushing a button on the scope. Only targeted biopsies of visible mucosal abnormalities during chromo-endoscopy, NBI, FICE or I-scan endoscopy will be taken. This is in concordance with the standard approach during chromo-endoscopy directed screening colonoscopy for ulcerative colitis. The disposable biopsy forceps are commercially available (Boston Scientific) and do not differ from the ones used during normal endoscopic procedures. Power calculation A power analysis was performed to detect a statistical significance between group A and B, group C and D and between group E and F. In a previous study dysplasia was found three times more often using CE compared to white light endoscopy: 32/84 versus 10/81 patients. This wil give an increase from approximate 10 to 30 percent. It is expected that in both study groups the percentage of dysplasia equals. Inclusion of 67 patients in each group will allow to detect a 20% increase of dysplasia from 10 to 30% compared to white light endoscopy with a power of 80% (beta error 0.2; alpha error 0.05). We expect to include a total of (67 x 6 =) 402 patients in the study. 5.5 Co-variables Multiple factors will be used as co-variables Age Duration of disease Existence of PSC Use of medication Mesalazine/Sulfazalazine Thiopurines Biologicals

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ulcerative Colitis
Keywords
Ulcerative colitis, DALM, chromoendoscopy, dysplasia, virtual chromoendoscopy, FICE, NBI, I-scan

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
402 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
OLYMPUS CHROMO
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1%
Arm Title
OLYMPUS NBI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group B: Virtual chromoendoscopy: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI)
Arm Title
FUJINON CHROMO
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1%
Arm Title
FUJINON FICE
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group D: Virtual chromoendoscopy: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement n° 4
Arm Title
PENTAX CHROMO
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1%
Arm Title
PENTX i-scan
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group F: Virtual chromoendoscopy: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan 2 settings
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Virtual chromoendoscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Narrow band Imaging (NBI), Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement, I-scan
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chromoendoscopy
Intervention Description
Panchromocolonoscopy with methyleen blue 0.1%
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The difference in total number of neoplastic lesions detected by chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy
Description
The primary endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.
Time Frame
The primary endpoint can be assessed when pathology results are available : 2 weeks after endoscopy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of total endoscopic procedure time and of endoscopic procedure time during retraction for each technique.
Description
The total endoscopy time is recorded from the start until the end of the entire procedure. After the caecum is reached, time is recorded. Total retraction time is the time between reaching the caecum and the end of the procedure and includes time for rinsing, dye spraying, biopsy or poliepectomy.
Time Frame
The endpoint can be assessed immediately after the endoscopy.
Title
The difference in neoplasia detection rate (i.e. the number of patients with at least one neoplastic lesion) between chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy.
Description
The endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.
Time Frame
The endpoint can be assessed when pathology results are available : 2 weeks after endoscopy
Title
The difference in the ratio number of neoplastic lesions/ total number of lesions between chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy
Description
The endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.
Time Frame
The endpoint can be assessed when pathology results are available : 2 weeks after endoscopy
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
The difference in total number of non-neoplastic lesions detected by chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy
Description
The endpoint will be assessed in three subgroups comparing : 1 )Group A: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group B: HDTV Olympus colonoscopes and Narrow band Imaging (NBI) 2) Group C: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group D: CCD Fujinon colonoscopes and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement 3) Group E: HD-Pentax colonoscopes and Chromo-endoscopy, methylene blue 0.1% to Group F: HD Pentax colonoscopes and I-scan As such this is not a comparison between different endoscopy systems, but a comparison of chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy within each different system.
Time Frame
The endpoint can be assessed when pathology results are available : 2 weeks after endoscopy
Title
Number of biopsies per colonoscopy taken in the different groups.
Time Frame
Endpoint can be assessed immediately after endoscopy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis ( 8 years after diagnosis or pancolitis and 10 years after diagnosis of left-sided colitis) Signed informed consent form Previous surveillance endoscopy > 1 year Exclusion Criteria: Active ulcerative colitis, > 20 cm from the margo ani Personal history of colorectal cancer Allergy or intolerance to methylene blue Refusing or incapable to agree with informed consent Age younger than 18 years Pregnant women
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Vera Ballet
Phone
+3216341601
Email
vera.ballet@uzleuven.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hilde Willekens
Phone
+3216340396
Email
hilde.willekens@uzleuven.be
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raf Bisschops, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospitals Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raf Bisschops, MD PhD
Phone
+3216344225
Email
raf.bisschops@uzleuven.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc Ferrante, MD PhD
Phone
+3216344225
Email
ùarc.ferrante@uzleuven.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raf Bisschops, PD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gert Van Assche, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ingrid Demedts, Md PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Rutgeerts, MD PhD
Facility Name
H.-Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen VZW
City
Roeselaere
ZIP/Postal Code
8800
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Filip Baert, MD
Phone
+32515372
Email
mailto:fbaert@hhr.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Filip Baert, MD PhD
Facility Name
McGill University Health Center
City
Montreal
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Talat Bessissow, MD PhD
Phone
+15145017799
Email
talat.bessissow@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Talat Bessissow, MD PhD
Facility Name
Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2730
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Gasdal Karstensen, MD
Phone
+4538681358
Email
john.gasdal.karstensen.01@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakob Hendel, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Gasdal Karstensen, MD
Facility Name
Academic Medical center Maastricht
City
Maastricht
ZIP/Postal Code
6219 NG
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rogier De Ridder, MD
Phone
+31433876543
Email
r.de.ridder@mumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rogier De Ridder, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie Pierik, MC PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28986266
Citation
Bisschops R, Bessissow T, Dekker E, East JE, Para-Blanco A, Ragunath K, Bhandari P, Rutter M, Schoon E, Wilson A, John JM, Van Steen K, Baert F, Ferrante M. Pit pattern analysis with high-definition chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging for optical diagnosis of dysplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):1100-1106.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28698230
Citation
Bisschops R, Bessissow T, Joseph JA, Baert F, Ferrante M, Ballet V, Willekens H, Demedts I, Geboes K, De Hertogh G, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P, Van Assche G. Chromoendoscopy versus narrow band imaging in UC: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2018 Jun;67(6):1087-1094. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313213. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Between Chromoendoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy (NBI, I-scan, FICE) for Detection of Neoplasia in Long Standing Ulcerative Colitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs