Comparison Between Epidural and Bilateral Paravertebral Blocks in Liver Resection
Primary Purpose
Liver Disease, Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
paravertebral blocks
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Liver Disease focused on measuring paravertebral block, epidural block, pain management, liver resection, comparison
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) I to III patients aged over 18 years and scheduled to undergo elective open liver resection at UPMC Presbyterian/Montefiore Hospital will be screened for enrollment in the study. One hundred (100) patients will be enrolled in this study with equal numbers (n = 50) in each arm of the trial. In order to avoid skewed sex difference between the two groups, the sex will be allocated.
Exclusion Criteria:
- non elective surgery,
- ASAPS IV or greater,
- age younger than 18 years,
- any contraindication to the placement of an epidural catheter or bilateral paravertebral catheters
- chronic pain conditions
- preoperative opioid use
- coagulation abnormalities or patients who are expected to be on therapeutic anticoagulants postoperatively
- allergy to any of the drugs/agents used our study protocol
- preoperative chronic renal dysfunction, who requires renal replacement therapy or serum creatinine greater than 1.4 mg/dL
- altered mental status (not oriented to place, person, or time),
- any comorbid conditions that, in the judgment of the consulting surgeon or anesthesiologist, would proscribe the patient from any aspect of the study, -
- inability to provide adequate informed consent
- refusal to participate in the study.
Sites / Locations
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Bilateral paravertebral blocks
epidural block
Arm Description
Bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks for open liver resection
received thoracic epidural block for open liver resection
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain immediately after maximum incentive spirometry
Pain will be assessed using an 11-point verbal numerical pain scale (VAS) with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable;(21) pain will be determined 24 hours postoperatively immediately after maximum incentive spirometry.
Secondary Outcome Measures
date of the removal of the catheter
date of the removal of the catheter with any requirement of blood transfusion because of coagulation
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01407666
First Posted
February 17, 2011
Last Updated
December 2, 2014
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01407666
Brief Title
Comparison Between Epidural and Bilateral Paravertebral Blocks in Liver Resection
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Epidural and Bilateral Paravertebral Blocks for Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Open Liver Resection
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized study is intended to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks compared to continuous epidural block for open liver resection. Hypotheses: Bilateral paravertebral blocks are: 1) equally effective in controlling the perioperative pain; and 2) safe, with less frequent complications following open liver resection when compared to continuous epidural block.
Detailed Description
Background: A number of studies evaluating unilateral continuous paravertebral block demonstrate equal or superior analgesia when compared to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control (1-7). At the same time, these studies show a decreased incidence of side effects and complications, including: hypotension, pulmonary complications, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting and failed blocks. Several studies also indicate that bilateral paravertebral blocks provide adequate postoperative analgesia (8-14). However, no study has been performed to date that shows a direct comparison between epidural and bilateral paravertebral blocks in patients undergoing open liver resection.Objectives: This prospective, randomized study is intended to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks compared to continuous epidural block for open liver resection. Hypotheses: Bilateral paravertebral blocks are: 1) equally effective in controlling the perioperative pain; and 2) safe, with less frequent complications following open liver resection when compared to continuous epidural block.Methods: A hundred adult patients undergoing elective open liver resection will be randomized to receive a continuous epidural block or continuous bilateral paravertebral blocks for perioperative analgesia. The primary outcome will be the degree of pain control measured by visual analog scale at 24 hours post surgery (at rest and while the patient is performing maximum incentive spirometry). The secondary outcomes will include: 1) Assessment of pain (at rest, with cough, and with ambulation) using the verbal numerical pain scale will be performed postoperatively every 8 hours by floor nursing staff until discharge. During the night the patient will not be awakened for pain assessment. 2) Intravenous opioid requirement: In addition to pain score, postoperative intravenous opioid requirements [hydromorphone (mg)] will also be recorded daily; Frequency of side effects and complications; and other functional status (volume of maximum incentive spirometry, time to extubation, total time for initial ambulation, the length of the hospital stay, time to return of bowel function, readiness for discharge from the hospital, and length of hospital stay). At one month post surgery, health-related quality of life, mortality, and any morbidities will be assessed. Each variable will be compared between the paravertebral group and the epidural group to examine the hypotheses above. Clinical Implications: Bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks could be an equally effective and safe alternative to a continuous epidural block for perioperative pain management in patients who undergo open liver resection.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Disease, Pain
Keywords
paravertebral block, epidural block, pain management, liver resection, comparison
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Bilateral paravertebral blocks
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks for open liver resection
Arm Title
epidural block
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
received thoracic epidural block for open liver resection
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
paravertebral blocks
Other Intervention Name(s)
regional anesthesia
Intervention Description
use bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks for pain control
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain immediately after maximum incentive spirometry
Description
Pain will be assessed using an 11-point verbal numerical pain scale (VAS) with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable;(21) pain will be determined 24 hours postoperatively immediately after maximum incentive spirometry.
Time Frame
24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
date of the removal of the catheter
Description
date of the removal of the catheter with any requirement of blood transfusion because of coagulation
Time Frame
up to one week after the surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) I to III patients aged over 18 years and scheduled to undergo elective open liver resection at UPMC Presbyterian/Montefiore Hospital will be screened for enrollment in the study. One hundred (100) patients will be enrolled in this study with equal numbers (n = 50) in each arm of the trial. In order to avoid skewed sex difference between the two groups, the sex will be allocated.
Exclusion Criteria:
non elective surgery,
ASAPS IV or greater,
age younger than 18 years,
any contraindication to the placement of an epidural catheter or bilateral paravertebral catheters
chronic pain conditions
preoperative opioid use
coagulation abnormalities or patients who are expected to be on therapeutic anticoagulants postoperatively
allergy to any of the drugs/agents used our study protocol
preoperative chronic renal dysfunction, who requires renal replacement therapy or serum creatinine greater than 1.4 mg/dL
altered mental status (not oriented to place, person, or time),
any comorbid conditions that, in the judgment of the consulting surgeon or anesthesiologist, would proscribe the patient from any aspect of the study, -
inability to provide adequate informed consent
refusal to participate in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tetsuro Sakai, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparison Between Epidural and Bilateral Paravertebral Blocks in Liver Resection
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs