search
Back to results

Comparison Between NCRT and NCT Followed by MIE for Treatment of Locally Advanced Resectable ESCC (ESCCNCRTvNCT)

Primary Purpose

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stage cT3-4aN0-1M0

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
Sponsored by
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stage cT3-4aN0-1M0 focused on measuring Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically-confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus;
  2. Tumors of the esophagus are located in the thoracic cavity;
  3. Pre-treatment stage as cT3-4aN0-1M0 (AJCC/UICC 7th Edition) (In case of stage cT4a, curative resectability has to be explicitly verified by the local surgical investigator prior to randomization).
  4. Age is between 18 years and 75 years,
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1;
  6. Adequate cardiac function. All patients should perform ECG, and those with a cardiac history or ECG abnormality should perform echocardiography with the left ventricular ejection fraction > 50 %.
  7. Adequate respiratory function with FEV1≥1.2L, FEV1%≥50% and DLCO≥50% shown in pulmonary function tests.
  8. Adequate bone marrow function (White Blood Cells >4x10^9 /L; Neutrophil >2.0×10^9 /L; Hemoglobin > 90 g/L; platelets>100x10^9 /L);
  9. Adequate liver function (Total bilirubin <1.5x Upper Level of Normal (ULN); Aspartate transaminase(AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) <1.5x ULN);
  10. Adequate renal function (Glomerular filtration rate (CCr) >60 ml/min; serum creatinine (SCr) ≤120 µmol/L);
  11. The patient has provided written informed consent and is able to understand and comply with the study;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma histology;
  2. Patients with advanced inoperable or metastatic esophageal cancer;
  3. Pre-treatment stage as cT1-2N0-1M0 (AJCC/UICC 7th Edition);
  4. Pre-treatment stage as cN2-3 or cT4b(non-curatively-resectable verified by the local surgical investigator, AJCC/UICC 7th Edition);
  5. Patients with another previous or current malignant disease which is likely to interfere with treatment or the assessment of response in the judgement of the local surgical investigator.
  6. Any patient with a significant medical condition which is thought unlikely to tolerate the therapies. Such as cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction within last 12 months), clinically-significant lung disease, clinically-significant bone marrow, liver, renal function disorder;
  7. Pregnant or lactating women and fertile women who will not be using contraception during the trial;
  8. Allergy to any drugs;
  9. Participation in another intervention clinical trial with interference to the chemotherapeutic or chemoradiotherapeutic intervention during this study or during the last 30 days prior to informed consent;
  10. Expected lack of compliance with the protocol.

Sites / Locations

  • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Arm Description

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is performed followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in enrolled patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is performed followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in enrolled patients.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall survival(OS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival(PFS)
Disease recurrence is defined as locoregional (esophageal bed or anastomotic or regional lymph nodes) or metastatic (supraclavicular lymph nodes or distant organs).
Pathological response rate(pCR)
The resected specimen following neo-adjuvant treatment are assessed by using standardised work up of the resection specimen in the pathology department and standardised histological criteria for tumour regression grading. The degree of histomorphologic regression is clarified into four categories as follows: grade 1, no evidence of vital residual tumor cells (pathological complete response); grade 2, less than 10% vital residual tumor cells; grade 3, 10 to 50%; and grade 4, more than 50%.
R0 resection rate
No vital tumor is presented at the proximal, distal, or circumferential resection margin, it is considered to be R0 resection. If a vital tumor is shown at 1 mm or less from the proximal, distal, or circumferential resection margin, it is considered to be microscopically positive (R1).
Positive lymph nodes' number
According to pathological reports, record the number of positive lymph nodes
Treatment related complications
Number and severity of adverse events that are related to treatment of each patients, and hospital readmission.
Quality of life(QOL)
QOL is respectively evaluated at randomization and 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and yearly after surgery among patients by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ-OES18
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)
RFS is defined in resected patients who achieved an R0 or R1 resection as the time interval from surgery to the date of first recurrence (local, regional or distant) or death, whichever comes first.

Full Information

First Posted
December 17, 2016
Last Updated
September 7, 2020
Sponsor
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Collaborators
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Chest Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Changzhi Medical College, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wuhan Union Hospital, China, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03001596
Brief Title
Comparison Between NCRT and NCT Followed by MIE for Treatment of Locally Advanced Resectable ESCC
Acronym
ESCCNCRTvNCT
Official Title
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy VS. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0):A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Collaborators
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Chest Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Changzhi Medical College, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wuhan Union Hospital, China, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy on patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0).
Detailed Description
It is a prospective randomized phase III clinical trial sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital with other eight hospitals in China participating in. 264 patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0) are recruited and randomly assigned into the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (NCRT group) and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NCT group) according to the proportion of 1:1.The safety,efficacy of protocols and prognosis of patients are compared between the two regimens.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stage cT3-4aN0-1M0
Keywords
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
264 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is performed followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in enrolled patients.
Arm Title
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is performed followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in enrolled patients.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Intervention Description
Before surgery, patients in this group receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. A total dose of 40 Gy is delivered in 20 fractions (5 fractions per week) for 4 weeks. Chemotherapy is delivered concomitantly and composed of four cycles of paclitaxel 50mg per square meter of body-surface area and cisplatin 25mg per square meter of body-surface area weekly at the intervals of radiotherapy. After neoadjuvant therapy of 4-8 weeks, minimally invasive esophagectomy is performed.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Preoperative Chemotherapy
Intervention Description
Before surgery, patients in this group receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is delivered and composed of two cycles of paclitaxel 135mg per square meter of body-surface area and cisplatin 75mg per square meter of body-surface area every 4 weeks. After neoadjuvant therapy of 4-8 weeks, minimally invasive esophagectomy is performed.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
MIE
Intervention Description
After neoadjuvant therapy, patients in groups receive minimally invasive esophagectomy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival(OS)
Time Frame
Up to the date of death of any causes since the date of randomization, up to 36 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival(PFS)
Description
Disease recurrence is defined as locoregional (esophageal bed or anastomotic or regional lymph nodes) or metastatic (supraclavicular lymph nodes or distant organs).
Time Frame
Up to the date of disease recurrence since the date of randomization, up to 36 months
Title
Pathological response rate(pCR)
Description
The resected specimen following neo-adjuvant treatment are assessed by using standardised work up of the resection specimen in the pathology department and standardised histological criteria for tumour regression grading. The degree of histomorphologic regression is clarified into four categories as follows: grade 1, no evidence of vital residual tumor cells (pathological complete response); grade 2, less than 10% vital residual tumor cells; grade 3, 10 to 50%; and grade 4, more than 50%.
Time Frame
Up to the date of pathological reports obtained since the date of randomization, up to 12 months
Title
R0 resection rate
Description
No vital tumor is presented at the proximal, distal, or circumferential resection margin, it is considered to be R0 resection. If a vital tumor is shown at 1 mm or less from the proximal, distal, or circumferential resection margin, it is considered to be microscopically positive (R1).
Time Frame
Up to the date of pathological reports obtained since the date of randomization, up to 12 months
Title
Positive lymph nodes' number
Description
According to pathological reports, record the number of positive lymph nodes
Time Frame
Up to the date of pathological reports obtained since the date of randomization, up to 12 months
Title
Treatment related complications
Description
Number and severity of adverse events that are related to treatment of each patients, and hospital readmission.
Time Frame
Up to 1 month after surgery since the data of randomization, up to 13 months
Title
Quality of life(QOL)
Description
QOL is respectively evaluated at randomization and 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and yearly after surgery among patients by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ-OES18
Time Frame
Up to the end of follow-up since the data of surgery, up to 36 months
Title
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)
Description
RFS is defined in resected patients who achieved an R0 or R1 resection as the time interval from surgery to the date of first recurrence (local, regional or distant) or death, whichever comes first.
Time Frame
Up to the date of disease recurrence since the date of surgery, up to 36 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically-confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus; Tumors of the esophagus are located in the thoracic cavity; Pre-treatment stage as cT3-4aN0-1M0 (AJCC/UICC 7th Edition) (In case of stage cT4a, curative resectability has to be explicitly verified by the local surgical investigator prior to randomization). Age is between 18 years and 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1; Adequate cardiac function. All patients should perform ECG, and those with a cardiac history or ECG abnormality should perform echocardiography with the left ventricular ejection fraction > 50 %. Adequate respiratory function with FEV1≥1.2L, FEV1%≥50% and DLCO≥50% shown in pulmonary function tests. Adequate bone marrow function (White Blood Cells >4x10^9 /L; Neutrophil >2.0×10^9 /L; Hemoglobin > 90 g/L; platelets>100x10^9 /L); Adequate liver function (Total bilirubin <1.5x Upper Level of Normal (ULN); Aspartate transaminase(AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) <1.5x ULN); Adequate renal function (Glomerular filtration rate (CCr) >60 ml/min; serum creatinine (SCr) ≤120 µmol/L); The patient has provided written informed consent and is able to understand and comply with the study; Exclusion Criteria: Patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma histology; Patients with advanced inoperable or metastatic esophageal cancer; Pre-treatment stage as cT1-2N0-1M0 (AJCC/UICC 7th Edition); Pre-treatment stage as cN2-3 or cT4b(non-curatively-resectable verified by the local surgical investigator, AJCC/UICC 7th Edition); Patients with another previous or current malignant disease which is likely to interfere with treatment or the assessment of response in the judgement of the local surgical investigator. Any patient with a significant medical condition which is thought unlikely to tolerate the therapies. Such as cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction within last 12 months), clinically-significant lung disease, clinically-significant bone marrow, liver, renal function disorder; Pregnant or lactating women and fertile women who will not be using contraception during the trial; Allergy to any drugs; Participation in another intervention clinical trial with interference to the chemotherapeutic or chemoradiotherapeutic intervention during this study or during the last 30 days prior to informed consent; Expected lack of compliance with the protocol.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lijie Tan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200032
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22668811
Citation
Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19139439
Citation
Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Langer P, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Bitzer M, Konigsrainer A, Budach W, Wilke H. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):851-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0506. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23993028
Citation
Shen Y, Zhong M, Wu W, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The impact of tidal volume on pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1267-73; discussion 1273-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Aug 28. Erratum In: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):544.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22421259
Citation
Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H, Tan L, Zhang Y, Khan MA, Wang Q. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position? J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May;214(5):838-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.047. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22258878
Citation
Shen Y, Zhang Y, Tan L, Feng M, Wang H, Khan MA, Liang M, Wang Q. Extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy: optimal results from a single center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr;16(4):715-21. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1824-7. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19930404
Citation
Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Jul;23(5):408-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01025.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26808342
Citation
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21296855
Citation
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Erratum In: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):134.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21444866
Citation
Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouche O, Lebreton G, Ducourtieux M, Bedenne L, Fabre JM, Saint-Aubert B, Geneve J, Lasser P, Rougier P. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1715-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0597. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26254683
Citation
Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, van Laarhoven HWM, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Hospers GAP, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJB, Busch ORC, Ten Kate FJW, Creemers GM, Punt CJA, Plukker JTM, Verheul HMW, Bilgen EJS, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJC, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AHM, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A; CROSS study group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21684205
Citation
Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, Gebski V; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):681-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19770374
Citation
Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Langley RE. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 20;27(30):5062-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2083. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25691613
Citation
Jang R, Darling G, Wong RK. Multimodality approaches for the curative treatment of esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Feb;13(2):229-38. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0029.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24982463
Citation
Mariette C, Dahan L, Mornex F, Maillard E, Thomas PA, Meunier B, Boige V, Pezet D, Robb WB, Le Brun-Ly V, Bosset JF, Mabrut JY, Triboulet JP, Bedenne L, Seitz JF. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;32(23):2416-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6532. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24493117
Citation
Kumagai K, Rouvelas I, Tsai JA, Mariosa D, Klevebro F, Lindblad M, Ye W, Lundell L, Nilsson M. Meta-analysis of postoperative morbidity and perioperative mortality in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers. Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):321-38. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9418. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22552194
Citation
Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
14530720
Citation
Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):486-94; discussion 494-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18320278
Citation
Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9799-x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25180663
Citation
Bakhos C, Oyasiji T, Elmadhun N, Kent M, Gangadharan S, Critchlow J, Fabian T. Feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Oct;24(10):688-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0118. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24266955
Citation
Warner S, Chang YH, Paripati H, Ross H, Ashman J, Harold K, Day R, Stucky CC, Rule W, Jaroszewski D. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21084184
Citation
Burmeister BH, Thomas JM, Burmeister EA, Walpole ET, Harvey JA, Thomson DB, Barbour AP, Gotley DC, Smithers BM. Is concurrent radiation therapy required in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A randomised phase II trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Feb;47(3):354-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.009.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25249141
Citation
Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, Feng M, Wang H, Xi Y, Wang Q. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):925-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3753-x. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25038015
Citation
Shen Y, Feng M, Tan L, Wang H, Li J, Xi Y, Wang Q. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone versus decubitus position: ergonomic evaluation from a randomized and controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):1072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.107. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24876941
Citation
Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, Feng M, Wang H, Xi Y, Leng Y, Wang Q. Cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis: technique and initial experience. J Thorac Dis. 2014 May;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S350-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.02.06.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24847029
Citation
Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The effect of narrowed gastric conduits on anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;19(2):263-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu151. Epub 2014 May 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24211053
Citation
Shen Y, Feng M, Khan MA, Wang H, Tan L, Wang Q. A simple method minimizes chylothorax after minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20857337
Citation
Wang H, Tan L, Feng M, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Qual Life Res. 2011 Mar;20(2):179-89. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9742-1. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
36400384
Citation
Tang H, Wang H, Fang Y, Zhu JY, Yin J, Shen YX, Zeng ZC, Jiang DX, Hou YY, Du M, Lian CH, Zhao Q, Jiang HJ, Gong L, Li ZG, Liu J, Xie DY, Li WF, Chen C, Zheng B, Chen KN, Dai L, Liao YD, Li K, Li HC, Zhao NQ, Tan LJ. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2023 Feb;34(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.508. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33729467
Citation
Wang H, Tang H, Fang Y, Tan L, Yin J, Shen Y, Zeng Z, Zhu J, Hou Y, Du M, Jiao J, Jiang H, Gong L, Li Z, Liu J, Xie D, Li W, Lian C, Zhao Q, Chen C, Zheng B, Liao Y, Li K, Li H, Wu H, Dai L, Chen KN. Morbidity and Mortality of Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2021 May 1;156(5):444-451. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0133.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28659128
Citation
Tang H, Tan L, Shen Y, Wang H, Lin M, Feng M, Xu S, Guo W, Qian C, Liu T, Zeng Z, Hou Y, Yu Z, Jiang H, Li Z, Chen C, Lian C, Du M, Li H, Xie D, Yin J, Zhao N, Wang Q. CMISG1701: a multicenter prospective randomized phase III clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (cT3-4aN0-1M0) (NCT03001596). BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3446-7.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.jnccn.org/content/13/2/229.long
Description
NCCN
URL
http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.23.1b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
Description
Wolters kluwer
URL
http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2003&issue=10000&article=00004&type=abstract
Description
Wolters kluwer
URL
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-008-9799-x
Description
Springer
URL
http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/lap.2014.0118
Description
Atypon
URL
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-014-3753-x
Description
Springer
URL
http://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/2243/3085
Description
AME
URL
http://icvts.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/2/263.long
Description
Oxford University Press
URL
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11605-012-1824-7
Description
Springer
URL
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11136-010-9742-1
Description
Springer

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Between NCRT and NCT Followed by MIE for Treatment of Locally Advanced Resectable ESCC

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs