Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
robotic assisted total knee replacement
traditional total knee replacement
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee focused on measuring robotic-arm assisted, total knee replacement, kinematic alignment
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- age between 18 years and 85 years
- primary total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- obvious bone defect
- infection
- BMI>>35kg/m2
- severe osteoporosis
- mental disease
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
robotic-arm assisted modified kinematic alignment total knee replacement
traditional manual total knee replacement
Arm Description
The patients in this group receive robotic-arm assisted total knee replacement. And these patients achieve modified kinematic alignment.
The patients in this group receive traditional manual total knee replacement. And these patients achieve traditional alignment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
KSS score
Keen Society Score
Secondary Outcome Measures
HKA angle
hip-knee-ankle angle
mLDFA
mechanical lateral distal femoral angle
mMPTA
mechanical medial proximal tibial angle
SFCA
sagittal femoral component angle
knee ROM
knee range of motion
blood loss
the intraoperative blood loss
surgical duration
the duration of the operation
complication
complications after the surgery
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05391152
First Posted
May 22, 2022
Last Updated
May 24, 2022
Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05391152
Brief Title
Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
Official Title
Comparison Between Robotic-Arm Assisted Modified Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Replacement And Traditional Manual Alignment Total Knee Replacement:A Prospective Multicenter, Double-Blind Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
September 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, prospective, and case-control study. Five joint centers and 100 participants will be included. The study group used robotic-assisted modified kinematic alignment total knee replacement, and the control study used traditional alignment manual total knee replacement. The knee society score (KSS), Hip-knee-ankle(HKA) angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle(mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle(mMPTA), sagittal femoral component angle(SFCA), range of motion(ROM), WOMAC score, SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale(VAS score), surgical time, blood loss, and complications are evaluated and compared.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Keywords
robotic-arm assisted, total knee replacement, kinematic alignment
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
robotic-arm assisted modified kinematic alignment total knee replacement
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The patients in this group receive robotic-arm assisted total knee replacement. And these patients achieve modified kinematic alignment.
Arm Title
traditional manual total knee replacement
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The patients in this group receive traditional manual total knee replacement. And these patients achieve traditional alignment.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
robotic assisted total knee replacement
Intervention Description
the study group used robotic-arm assisted total knee replacement.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
traditional total knee replacement
Intervention Description
the control group used traditional total knee replacement
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
KSS score
Description
Keen Society Score
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
HKA angle
Description
hip-knee-ankle angle
Time Frame
3 months
Title
mLDFA
Description
mechanical lateral distal femoral angle
Time Frame
3 months
Title
mMPTA
Description
mechanical medial proximal tibial angle
Time Frame
3 months
Title
SFCA
Description
sagittal femoral component angle
Time Frame
3 months
Title
knee ROM
Description
knee range of motion
Time Frame
3 months
Title
blood loss
Description
the intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
surgical duration
Description
the duration of the operation
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
complication
Description
complications after the surgery
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
age between 18 years and 85 years
primary total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
obvious bone defect
infection
BMI>>35kg/m2
severe osteoporosis
mental disease
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs