search
Back to results

Comparison Between Robotic (RM) and Laparoscopic Myomectomy (LM)

Primary Purpose

Uterine Leiomyoma, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RM
LM
Sponsored by
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Uterine Leiomyoma focused on measuring Uterine Leiomyoma, robot-assisted (RM), conventional lapatoscopic myomectomy (LM)

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All women who has symptomatic benign myoma.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is unwilling the scheduled operation after randomization.

Sites / Locations

  • Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RM)

Conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (LM)

Arm Description

After randomization, participants who are assigned to the robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RM) agree to receive RM.

After randomization, participants who are assigned to the Conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) agree to receive LM.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Conversion rate
To compare the conversion rate between RM and LM

Secondary Outcome Measures

The time of surgery
The amount of blood loss and transfusion
The dosage of antipyretic
The stay length of hospitalization
Readmission rate
Myoma score
The score of myoma characteristics

Full Information

First Posted
February 7, 2020
Last Updated
February 21, 2020
Sponsor
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Collaborators
Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital, Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery (ASGRS)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04282863
Brief Title
Comparison Between Robotic (RM) and Laparoscopic Myomectomy (LM)
Official Title
Comparison Between Robotic (RM) and Laparoscopic Myomectomy (LM): a Multicenter Randomized Trial (RoLM Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Collaborators
Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital, Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery (ASGRS)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a single-blinded RCT evaluating the effect of robotic-assisted (RM) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (LM) in the management of uterine leiomyomas.
Detailed Description
Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the uterus and may be presented 20%-40% of women at reproductive age.The uterine fibroids can be asymptomatic without intervention. However, they often are the cause of abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, infertility, and even miscarriage. Myomectomy, rather than hysterectomy can be one option for symptomatic women who wish to preserve their childbearing capabilities or for reasons other than for fertilit. Nowadays, patients pursue cosmetic benefit and early recovery and prompted the search for more conservative and minimally invasive surgical methods when surgical intervention is inescapable and surgical devices are improved. The feasibility, safety and advantage of cosmetics of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has been confirmed after the improvement of techniques and instruments. However, it is very "unfriendly" for our surgeons because of many disadvantages such as keeping stand for long time, unable to relying on, or swaying visual field by first-assistant, etc. Since the approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2005, robotic surgeries using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) have been applied widely in many surgical fields including gynecology, urology, orthopedics, general surgery and cardiothoracic surgery. The three-dimensional vision system and the wrist-like structure of EndoWrist instruments (Intuitive surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) recapitulating the motion of the surgeon's hand make precise procedures easier than in conventional laparoscopy, which allows robotic surgery to overcome some of the shortcomings and limitations of traditional laparoscopy. Dr. Lai and colleagues had also successfully undergone robotic surgery in many complicated gynecologic diseases in Taiwan. However, how to choose or apply robotic-assisted (RM) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (LM) in the management of uterine leiomyomas is still an important issue for our surgeon. We still lack clear definitions about which one kind of myoma may be smoothly performed in RM or LM. The current study is aimed to compare the clinical outcome and efficacy of these 2 minimally invasive procedure in myomectomy, RM and LM, for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids, in this prospective randomised control trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Uterine Leiomyoma, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Keywords
Uterine Leiomyoma, robot-assisted (RM), conventional lapatoscopic myomectomy (LM)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
This is a single-blinded RCT evaluating the effect of RM and LM in the management of uterine leiomyomas. Participants will be stratified on hospital performing the procedure and thereafter randomly assigned to the RM or LM group with allocation ratio 1:1.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
494 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RM)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
After randomization, participants who are assigned to the robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RM) agree to receive RM.
Arm Title
Conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (LM)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
After randomization, participants who are assigned to the Conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) agree to receive LM.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
RM
Other Intervention Name(s)
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy
Intervention Description
All patients were positioned in a lithotomy position. A uterine manipulator and a Foley catheter were inserted. Four trocars were used after pneumoperitoneum was obtained. Trocar sites varied according to different procedures. Generally, umbilical site for the scope and 8-10 cm lateral to the scope at 15 degrees for the arms are the most commonly adopted sites for robotic myomectomy.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
LM
Other Intervention Name(s)
Conventional laparoscopic myomectomy
Intervention Description
All patients were positioned in a lithotomy position. A uterine manipulator and a Foley catheter were inserted. Four trocars were used after pneumoperitoneum was obtained: a 10 mm port is inserted through the umbilicus to introduce the video-laparoscopic system. Other three accessory 5 mm trocar are inserted into the abdomen to the left lower quadrant, right lower quadrant, suprapubic area, for operative instruments and the suction irrigator cannula.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Conversion rate
Description
To compare the conversion rate between RM and LM
Time Frame
The surgical 1 day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The time of surgery
Time Frame
The surgical 1 day
Title
The amount of blood loss and transfusion
Time Frame
Through hospitalization duration, an average of 1 week
Title
The dosage of antipyretic
Time Frame
Through hospitalization duration, an average of 1 week
Title
The stay length of hospitalization
Time Frame
Through hospitalization duration, an average of 1 week
Title
Readmission rate
Time Frame
Within 1 month after discharge
Title
Myoma score
Description
The score of myoma characteristics
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
The women, age more than 20 y/o, have symptomatic benign myoma.
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All women who has symptomatic benign myoma. Exclusion Criteria: Patient is unwilling the scheduled operation after randomization.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hung-Chang Lai, M.D/Ph. D.
Phone
+886-2-2249-0088
Ext
8846
Email
hclai30656@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kuo-Chang Wen, M.D/Ph. D.
Phone
+886-2-2249-0088
Email
19345@s.tmu.edu.tw
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hung-Chang Lai, M.D/Ph. D.
Organizational Affiliation
Study Principal Investigator
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
+886
Country
Taiwan
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hung-Chang Lai, M.D/Ph. D.
Phone
+886-2-2249-0088
Ext
8846
Email
hclai30656@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hung-Chang Lai, M.D./Ph. D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Between Robotic (RM) and Laparoscopic Myomectomy (LM)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs