search
Back to results

Comparison Between the Vibringe and the Conventional Needle

Primary Purpose

Endodontic Inflammation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vibringe
Sponsored by
Cairo University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Endodontic Inflammation

Eligibility Criteria

25 Years - 45 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 25-45 years old.
  • Males or Females.
  • Single rooted teeth with:
  • Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis .
  • Normal periapical radiographic appearance or slight widening in lamina dura.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on medication for chronic pain.
  • Patients having significant systemic disorders.
  • Teeth that have :
  • Vital pulp tissues.
  • Swelling or fistulous tract
  • Acute or chronic peri-apical abscess
  • Greater than grade I mobility
  • Pocket depth greater than 5mm
  • No possible restorability
  • Previous endodontic treatment.

Sites / Locations

  • Cairo university

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Irrigant delivered by the Vibringe

Irrigation by Conventional needle

Arm Description

Experimental group: The irrigant will be delivered and sonically activated with the Vibringe system.

Control group: Irrigation procedures will br performed with a conventional method using conventional gauge 24 needle.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

pain intensity ( post operative pain )
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
May 29, 2018
Last Updated
August 1, 2019
Sponsor
Cairo University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03551587
Brief Title
Comparison Between the Vibringe and the Conventional Needle
Official Title
Comparative Evaluation Of Postoperative Pain After Using Sonic Vibringe Irrigation System Versus Conventional Irrigation In Single Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis : A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 28, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 27, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Cairo University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Vibringe is the first endodontic sonic irrigation system that enables delivery and activation of the irrigation solution in the root canal, in only one step. The activation of the disinfectant by acoustic streaming, enriches and completes the irrigation procedure and improves the success rate of endodontic treatments. It has been shown that this system significantly improves debridement. It also improves the disruption of the smear layer and biofilm by activating irrigation solutions. As there are no previous studies comparing the Vibringe system with other irrigation techniques under clinical settings, in this regard, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether irrigation with Vibringe provides more or less benefit in terms of postoperative pain when compared with the conventional needle technique.
Detailed Description
Postoperative pain is defined as the sensation of discomfort after endodontic intervention and is reported by 25%-40% of patients irrespective of pulp and peri-radicular status. According to the 2011 systematic review of Pak and White , the prevalence of pain in the first 24 hours is 40%, falling to 11% after 7 days. Dentinal debris, pulp tissue, microorganisms and irrigants can be conveyed to the peri-radicular tissues during root canal preparation and such extrusion of debris can lead to postoperative complications, such as flare-ups. Mechanical instrumentation and irrigation are used to remove vital and necrotic remnants of pulp tissue, debris, microbiota and their by-products from a root canal system. However, several studies using microcomputed tomography scanning imagery have shown that most of the areas of the main root canal wall remain untouched by the instruments. This emphasizes the importance of other means of cleaning and disinfecting all areas of the root canal. To enhance the effectiveness of cleaning and disinfecting all areas of the root canal, several irrigants are commonly used as initial and final rinses to overcome the shortcomings of using a single irrigant, such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid or chlorhexidine. In addition to these various irrigants, numerous irrigation devices and needle tips have been developed with the aim of improving the delivery of irrigant throughout the root canal using sonic or ultrasonic energy and negative apical pressure. However, as well as the success of the irrigation devices in removing debris from the root canal, a safe irrigation delivery system is desirable to prevent periapical tissue damage and decrease post-endodontic pain. The available data on extrusion of irrigant when using these devices appears to be limited to laboratory studies. Rationale : The Vibringe is the first endodontic sonic irrigation system that enables delivery and activation of the irrigation solution in the root canal, in only one step. The activation of the disinfectant by acoustic streaming, enriches and completes the irrigation procedure and improves the success rate of endodontic treatments. It has been shown that this system significantly improves debridement. It also improves the disruption of the smear layer and biofilm by activating irrigation solutions. Vasconcelos et al at in vitro study at 2017 proved that groups using ultrasonic agitation presented a greater antibacterial effect than the other ones, even using saline solution as irrigant. Middha et al studied the effect of continuous ultrasonic irrigation on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps concluded that a significant difference was observed between CUI and syringe irrigation on the first postoperative day following chemo-mechanical preparation. However, the benefit observed was not clinically relevant. It has been shown that the Vibringe results in an equal performance in canal and isthmus debridement efficacy when compared with needle irrigation in the apical region (9). In addition, it did not significantly alter sealer penetration compared with conventional needles. Furthermore, another recent study concluded that the Vibringe extruded more debris than conventional needle irrigation . Postoperative pain associated with root canal treatment is a poor indicator of long-term success; however, the occurrence and the control of pain are of clinical interest. So , this study will focus on evaluating postoperative discomfort due to the fact that Vibringe is an actively vibrating system, which may lead to postoperative discomfort. Objective of the study : As there are no previous studies comparing the Vibringe system with other irrigation techniques under clinical settings, in this regard, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether irrigation with Vibringe provides more or less benefit in terms of postoperative pain when compared with the conventional needle technique.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Endodontic Inflammation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
18 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Irrigant delivered by the Vibringe
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental group: The irrigant will be delivered and sonically activated with the Vibringe system.
Arm Title
Irrigation by Conventional needle
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control group: Irrigation procedures will br performed with a conventional method using conventional gauge 24 needle.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Vibringe
Intervention Description
The Vibringe is the first endodontic sonic irrigation system that enables delivery and activation of the irrigation solution in the root canal, in only one step.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
Description
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
Time Frame
6 hours post- obturation.
Title
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
Description
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
Time Frame
12 hours post- obturation.
Title
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
Description
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
Time Frame
24 hours post- obturation.
Title
pain intensity ( post operative pain )
Description
post operative pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) where; 0; No pain. 1-3; Mild Pain 4-6; Moderate Pain 7-10; Severe pain: "severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain".
Time Frame
48 hours post- obturation.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age between 25-45 years old. Males or Females. Single rooted teeth with: Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis . Normal periapical radiographic appearance or slight widening in lamina dura. Exclusion Criteria: Patients on medication for chronic pain. Patients having significant systemic disorders. Teeth that have : Vital pulp tissues. Swelling or fistulous tract Acute or chronic peri-apical abscess Greater than grade I mobility Pocket depth greater than 5mm No possible restorability Previous endodontic treatment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Professor Heba El Far
Organizational Affiliation
Cairo University
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Faculty of Dentistry
Organizational Affiliation
Cairo University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cairo university
City
Cairo
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Between the Vibringe and the Conventional Needle

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs