Comparison Between Two Methods of Pancreatic Transection in Distal Pancreatectomy (TRUDY)
Primary Purpose
Pancreatic Fistula, Distal Pancreatectomy
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Stapler
ultrasonic shears
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pancreatic Fistula
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Scheduled for elective DP via a minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) or open technique, either preserving the spleen or with splenectomy, depending on the diagnosis/nature of the tumor
- ASA score < 4
- Ability of the subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pancreas thickness >17mm measured at the intraoperative ultrasound at the pancreatic transection level
- Metastatic disease
- Kidney or adrenal gland resection
- Arterial resection (celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, hepatic artery)
- Intestinal resections and anastomoses or stoma
- Acute necrotizing and chronic pancreatitis
- Immune suppressed patients
- Pregnant women
- Patients with contraindications for distal pancreatectomy
- Impaired mental state or language problems
Sites / Locations
- Ospedale Policlinico GB RossiRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Stapler
ultrasonic shears
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of Pancreatic fistula
pancreatic fistula according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) 2017 definition
Secondary Outcome Measures
Operative time
Rate of postoperative overall and specific complications
abdominal collections, delayed gastric emptying, hemorrhage, sepsis, wound infections
Rate of re-operations or percutaneous drainage
re-operations rate or percutaneous drainage rate
Cost-analysis
intra and post-operative costs
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03880773
First Posted
February 25, 2019
Last Updated
March 18, 2019
Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03880773
Brief Title
Comparison Between Two Methods of Pancreatic Transection in Distal Pancreatectomy
Acronym
TRUDY
Official Title
Tri Stapler vs. Ultrasonic Scalpel in Distal Pancreatectomy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
July 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Several systematic reviews have investigated the management of the pancreatic stump in order to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate after distal pancreatectomy (DP). The appropriate closure technique of the pancreatic stump is still debated. There is no published experience about the comparison of the Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology (TS) versus Harmonic Focus (US) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) regarding the reduction of POPF.
The investigators want to compare the incidence of clinically-relevant POPF (CR-POPF) after DP, depending upon the transection technique (TS versus US).
This is a randomized controlled, multicenter, patient-blinded, superiority trial. This protocol was designed according to the SPIRIT guidelines.
Two groups of 76 patients (152 in total) with an indication for elective minimally invasive or open DP for a lesion of the body-tail of the pancreas. The two techniques analyzed are Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology (TS) and Harmonic Focus (US) as control.
The primary endpoint is to evaluate the incidence of CR-POPF rate after DP. Secondary endpoints are intraoperative outcomes (blood loss, operative time and conversion of the minimally invasive procedure), postoperative outcomes (complications rate; hospitalization parameters to 90 days; mortality) and treatment costs.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Fistula, Distal Pancreatectomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
152 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Stapler
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
ultrasonic shears
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Stapler
Intervention Description
for transection of the pancreas and pancreatic stump treatment
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ultrasonic shears
Intervention Description
for transection of the pancreas and pancreatic stump treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of Pancreatic fistula
Description
pancreatic fistula according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) 2017 definition
Time Frame
90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Operative time
Time Frame
intra-operatively
Title
Rate of postoperative overall and specific complications
Description
abdominal collections, delayed gastric emptying, hemorrhage, sepsis, wound infections
Time Frame
30 days, 90 days
Title
Rate of re-operations or percutaneous drainage
Description
re-operations rate or percutaneous drainage rate
Time Frame
30 days, 90 days
Title
Cost-analysis
Description
intra and post-operative costs
Time Frame
90 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Scheduled for elective DP via a minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) or open technique, either preserving the spleen or with splenectomy, depending on the diagnosis/nature of the tumor
ASA score < 4
Ability of the subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Pancreas thickness >17mm measured at the intraoperative ultrasound at the pancreatic transection level
Metastatic disease
Kidney or adrenal gland resection
Arterial resection (celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, hepatic artery)
Intestinal resections and anastomoses or stoma
Acute necrotizing and chronic pancreatitis
Immune suppressed patients
Pregnant women
Patients with contraindications for distal pancreatectomy
Impaired mental state or language problems
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Erica Secchettin
Phone
0458126254
Email
erica.secchettin@aovr.veneto.it
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ospedale Policlinico GB Rossi
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37134
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luca Landoni, MD
Phone
0458126254
Ext
0039
Email
luca.landoni@aovr.veneto.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudio Bassi, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luca Landoni, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22526040
Citation
Ban D, Shimada K, Konishi M, Saiura A, Hashimoto M, Uesaka K. Stapler and nonstapler closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: multicenter retrospective analysis of 388 patients. World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1866-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1595-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10361178
Citation
Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Hori Y, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, Tominaga M, Ku Y, Yamamoto YM, Kuroda Y. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):608-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01120.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17414606
Citation
Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z'graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J, Zehetner J, Muller MW, Friess H, Buchler MW. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):573-82. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251438.43135.fb.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15852419
Citation
Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):539-46. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5000.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21529927
Citation
Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Buchler MW. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25388952
Citation
Zhang H, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi CJ, Wang X, Jiang JX, Hu J, Wang M, Qin RY. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):4-15. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9653. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27583852
Citation
Kim H, Jang JY, Son D, Lee S, Han Y, Shin YC, Kim JR, Kwon W, Kim SW. Optimal stapler cartridge selection according to the thickness of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4441. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004441.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28298641
Citation
Peng YP, Zhu XL, Yin LD, Zhu Y, Wei JS, Wu JL, Miao Y. Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 15;7(1):185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00311-8.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Comparison Between Two Methods of Pancreatic Transection in Distal Pancreatectomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs