Comparison of Motor and Sensory Response With Interstim Stimulation
Primary Purpose
Overactive Bladder, Urgency-Frequency
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Interstim implant for SNS
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Overactive Bladder focused on measuring urinary leakage associated with urinary urgency, unable to fully empty bladder, Comparison: Motor&Sensory Response to Interstim Stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
You are eligible to participate in this study if:
- you are at least 18 years of age or older
- you have the capacity to give informed consent
- you are currently implanted with a functioning Interstim device for the treatment of urge urinary leakage or overactive bladder
Exclusion Criteria:
You are not eligible to participate in this study if:
- you do not meet the inclusion criteria and/or are not able to fully empty your bladder
- you have a history of an underlying neurologic disorder
- you are currently pregnant, or have an active urinary tract or vaginal infection
Sites / Locations
- UCI Women's Healthcare
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Interstim stimulation
Arm Description
Patients who receive the interstim implant in order to evaluate effectiveness of treatment
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percent of Symptoms With Improvement of Leaks Reported
Percent change in improvement of symptoms after reprogramming in terms of number of leaks reported. Nocturia refers to leaks that happened while asleep. Incontinence refers to both stress and urge leaks. Urgency refers to only urge leaks. Positive values represent more improvement of symptoms and therefore less leaks. Negative values represent less improvement and therefore more leaks.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00943904
First Posted
July 20, 2009
Last Updated
September 7, 2021
Sponsor
University of California, Irvine
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00943904
Brief Title
Comparison of Motor and Sensory Response With Interstim Stimulation
Official Title
Comparison of Motor and Sensory Response With Interstim Stimulation for Overactive Bladder and Urgency-Frequency Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Irvine
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) implantation is a minimally invasive procedure which has current FDA approval for urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency syndrome and non-obstructive urinary retention, and has been available in the United States since 1997. The SNS delivers non-painful, mild electrical pulses to the sacral nerves to modulate the reflexes that influence the bladder, sphincter, and pelvic floor to improve or restore normal voiding function. While SNS has been shown to have efficacy for the aforementioned conditions, the exact mechanism of action is unknown, but it is believed to work primarily through the somatic afferent system in promoting inhibitory reflex pathways to facilitate urine storage. The degree of stimulation is thought to be at a level that only evokes a sensory and not a motor response; however this has not been tested.
Detailed Description
SNS involves a two-stage procedure. The initial phase is considered the test stimulation period where the patient is allowed to evaluate whether or not the therapy is effective in controlling her symptoms. There are two techniques that exist in performing the test stimulation. The first is an office-based procedure termed the percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE). This involves placing a temporary electrode wire through the S3 sacral foramen under local anesthesia. The wire is secured with tape and connected to an external generator the patient wears for a trial period of 3-7 days. If patients have at least 50% improvement in their symptoms during the test phase, they are candidates for chronic implant of the lead and implantable pulse generator (IPG). The advantage of the PNE is that it is an incision free procedure performed in the office utilizing local anesthesia, and does not require hospitalization. The disadvantage comes from the fact that the wire is not securely anchored in place, and has the propensity to migrate away from the nerve with physical activity. The second alternative is known as a staged implant. This is typically performed as an outpatient procedure using local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and intra-operative fluoroscopy. This procedure involves placement of the chronic quadripolar lead wire adjacent to a sacral nerve root (typically S3). The lead is self-anchoring and therefore reduces the potential for migration. The patient goes through a test phase that can last from 7-21 days. The advantage of this technique is that it allows for a longer trial period with minimal risk of lead migration. The chronic wire also has 4 electrodes that can each be trialed as the active electrode to achieve optimal improvement in patients' symptoms. In addition, during the 2nd stage, or final implant the previously placed tined-lead remains in place and is simply connected to the IPG. This eliminates the chance of variable lead placement from the test and implantation phases. The disadvantage of the staged implant is that it requires two visits to the operating room and may be more costly to the health care system. However, in a prospective study comparing the PNE to the staged implant, there was a significantly higher rate of conversion to implant with the staged procedure vs. the PNE (88% vs.46%). In addition, infection rates are not higher with the staged implant when compared to the PNE.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Overactive Bladder, Urgency-Frequency
Keywords
urinary leakage associated with urinary urgency, unable to fully empty bladder, Comparison: Motor&Sensory Response to Interstim Stimulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
31 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Interstim stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who receive the interstim implant in order to evaluate effectiveness of treatment
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Interstim implant for SNS
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sacral nerve Stimulation
Intervention Description
stimulates third sacral nerve root
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Symptoms With Improvement of Leaks Reported
Description
Percent change in improvement of symptoms after reprogramming in terms of number of leaks reported. Nocturia refers to leaks that happened while asleep. Incontinence refers to both stress and urge leaks. Urgency refers to only urge leaks. Positive values represent more improvement of symptoms and therefore less leaks. Negative values represent less improvement and therefore more leaks.
Time Frame
6 months following enrollment
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
You are eligible to participate in this study if:
you are at least 18 years of age or older
you have the capacity to give informed consent
you are currently implanted with a functioning Interstim device for the treatment of urge urinary leakage or overactive bladder
Exclusion Criteria:
You are not eligible to participate in this study if:
you do not meet the inclusion criteria and/or are not able to fully empty your bladder
you have a history of an underlying neurologic disorder
you are currently pregnant, or have an active urinary tract or vaginal infection
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen Noblett, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, Irvine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCI Women's Healthcare
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of Motor and Sensory Response With Interstim Stimulation
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs