search
Back to results

Comparison of MRI Fusion Biopsy Techniques in Men With Elevated PSA and Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MRI UroNav fusion biopsy
Sponsored by
Kaiser Permanente
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring prostate cancer, prostate biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging guidance, detection rates, performance

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 79 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PSA > 2.5 ng/ml (ages 30-50) or PSA > 4.0 ages (50-79)
  • Patients with prior negative prostate biopsy
  • Written informed consent
  • Age > 30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Age> 79
  • No contraindication to MRI or prostate biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, severe medical comorbidity prohibiting halting of anticoagulation therapies, anatomical contraindications)
  • Active urinary tract infection or indwelling catheter
  • Prior pelvic irradiation
  • Prior androgen deprivation hormonal therapy
  • Prostate surgery (e.g. prostate biopsy, transurethral prostate procedure) within 8 weeks prior to mpMRI.
  • Contraindication to MRI (extreme claustrophobia, metallic implants incompatible with MRI)

Sites / Locations

  • Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles (Sunset)
  • Kaiser Permanente Riverside

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

MRI guided cognitive fusion biopsy

UroNav fusion biopsy

Arm Description

Men in this arm will undergo MRI followed by systematic biopsy and then additional cognitive (freehand) biopsies of MRI suspicious targets

Men in this arm will undergo MRI followed by systematic biopsy and then additional UroNav fusion biopsy of MRI suspicious targets

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Prostate cancer detection rate
Prostate cancer detection rate between MRI guided free hand biopsy and UroNav targeted biopsy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate
Detection rate between techiques of Gleason 4 or higher prostate cancer

Full Information

First Posted
May 13, 2014
Last Updated
May 14, 2014
Sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02138760
Brief Title
Comparison of MRI Fusion Biopsy Techniques in Men With Elevated PSA and Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy
Official Title
Comparison of MRI Fusion Biopsy Techniques in Men With Elevated PSA and Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2015 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2015 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kaiser Permanente

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Men with elevated prostate specific antigen bloodtest and prior negative prostate biopsy have a 30-60% of harboring occult prostate cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an imaging test that may improve prostate cancer detection rates in this population of men. In this prospective randomized trial multicenter trial the investigators will assess the detection rates of prostate cancer diagnosis of systematic biopsy compared with the addition of either a computer targeted system (UroNav - InVivo corp) to sample suspicious areas identified on mpMRI versus the detection rate mpMRI guided freehand biopsy (cognitive fusion biopsy). The hypothesis being tested is that computerized fusion guided biopsy (UroNav) will increase detection prostate cancer compared to cognitive biopsy of these areas and systematic biopsy alone.
Detailed Description
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men in the United States, affecting approximately 250,000 men per year. With the advent of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test, PC has undergone downward stage migration resulting in earlier cancer detection. In the pre-PSA era, tumors presented with advanced stage which were often visible on transrectal ultrasound. In the modern era, tumors more often are microscopic and not apparent on ultrasound imaging which creates a diagnostic challenge in which biopsy is essentially blind. As a result, many tumors are missed resulting in subsequent biopsies, tumor progression, and decreased cancer-specific survival due to delayed diagnosis. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has now become the preferred imaging modality to visualize prostate tumors radiographically. mpMRI has become increasing utilized for targeting tumor suspicious areas in the prostate in men with prior negative conventional systematic biopsy. Numerous studies have shown MRI targeted biopsy results in detection of cancer in this subset of men in approximately 30-60% of patients (refs). In addition, MRI detects a higher number of aggressive prostate cancers which would require treatment. Several methods of incorporating MRI into biopsy targeting have been tested: 1) in gantry/in bore MRI biopsy 2) Robotic biopsy (Artemis) 3) UroNav ultrasound-MR fusion biopsy. The first two techniques are cumbersome and difficult to use in clinical practice. The latter technology is the most widely utilized, user and patient friendly technique. UroNav utilizes a work-station which imports the MRI and then co-registers (fuses) it with real time ultrasound; the ultrasound transducer communicates with an electromagnetic received above the patient to allow the work-station/computer to target suspicious MRI lesions to guide the users needle to the appropriate 3-dimensional location. Data has shown this to be more effective than either systematic biopsy or free-MRI guided biopsy. The goal of the present study is to compare head-to-head systematic biopsy + freehand MRI targeted biopsy vs systematic biopsy + UroNav targeted in men with elevated PSA and prior negative systematic biopsy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
prostate cancer, prostate biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging guidance, detection rates, performance

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MRI guided cognitive fusion biopsy
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Men in this arm will undergo MRI followed by systematic biopsy and then additional cognitive (freehand) biopsies of MRI suspicious targets
Arm Title
UroNav fusion biopsy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Men in this arm will undergo MRI followed by systematic biopsy and then additional UroNav fusion biopsy of MRI suspicious targets
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
MRI UroNav fusion biopsy
Other Intervention Name(s)
UroNav (InVivo corp)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prostate cancer detection rate
Description
Prostate cancer detection rate between MRI guided free hand biopsy and UroNav targeted biopsy
Time Frame
1 week after biopsy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate
Description
Detection rate between techiques of Gleason 4 or higher prostate cancer
Time Frame
1 week after biopsy
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Tumor volume
Description
% core involvement of cancer between techniques
Time Frame
1 week after biopsy

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
79 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: PSA > 2.5 ng/ml (ages 30-50) or PSA > 4.0 ages (50-79) Patients with prior negative prostate biopsy Written informed consent Age > 30 Exclusion Criteria: Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer Age> 79 No contraindication to MRI or prostate biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, severe medical comorbidity prohibiting halting of anticoagulation therapies, anatomical contraindications) Active urinary tract infection or indwelling catheter Prior pelvic irradiation Prior androgen deprivation hormonal therapy Prostate surgery (e.g. prostate biopsy, transurethral prostate procedure) within 8 weeks prior to mpMRI. Contraindication to MRI (extreme claustrophobia, metallic implants incompatible with MRI)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
David S Finley, MD
Phone
3237835500
Email
David.S.Finley@kp.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David S Finley, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Kaiser Permanente
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles (Sunset)
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90027
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente Riverside
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92505
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen G Williams, MD
Email
Stephen.G.Williams@kp.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen G Williams, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of MRI Fusion Biopsy Techniques in Men With Elevated PSA and Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs