Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation and the Trans-spinal Stimulation in the Algoneurodystrophy. (ALGOSTIM)
Primary Purpose
Algoneurodystrophy
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rTMS
tDCS
tsDCS
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Algoneurodystrophy focused on measuring rTMS, tDCS, tsDCS, pain, algoneurodystrophy , neurostimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient's written consent
- Patient suffering from an algoneurodystrophy for more than a year.
- Diagnosis of algoneurodystrophy confirmed by an osseous scintigraphy
- Stable treatment for at least 1 month
- Patient non-responsive to pharmacological treatments
- VNS > 3 at the time of screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- Drug addiction
- History of epilepsy, head trauma, Psychiatric pathology likely to hamper the progress of the study.
- Intracranial ferromagnetic material or an implanted stimulator
- MRI contraindication
- Algoneurodystrophy due to a nervous lesion
- Pregnant women, parturient women, breast-feeding mother. Lack of effective contraception
Sites / Locations
- Service de Physiologie - Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Henri Mondor
- Centre de la douleur, CHU Grenoble Alpes
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation)
tDCS (transcranial direct-current stimulation)
tsDCS (transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation)
Arm Description
rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation)
tDCS (transcranial direct-current stimulation)
tsDCS (transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Visual numeric scale of pain between the three groups
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) between the three groups
The SF12 quality of life questionnaire between the three groups
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) between the three groups
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scale (NPSI) between the three groups
Evolution of the conductance of feet and hands by using Sudoscan
The body conductance will be used to assess the evolution of the Impact of the neurostimulation on the sympathetic nervous system and on the small fiber neuropathy.
Modifications of the sensori-motor cortical cards by using a MRI
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02817880
First Posted
June 27, 2016
Last Updated
May 17, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02817880
Brief Title
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation and the Trans-spinal Stimulation in the Algoneurodystrophy.
Acronym
ALGOSTIM
Official Title
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation (tDCS and rTMS) and the Trans-spinal Stimulation (tsDCS ) in the Algoneurodystrophy of Members. A Randomised Clinical Trial. tDCS : Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation rTMS : Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation tsDCS : Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 25, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 11, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 22, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic effectiveness of two motor cortex neurostimulations (tDCS and rTMS) and the trans-spinal neurostimulation (tsDCS ) in the algoneurodystrophy.
Detailed Description
Entry into the study : After informed consent, patients will be randomised into three groups : tDCS, rTMS, tsDCS. The physician responsible for conducting neurostimulation sessions will make the randomization via an interactive web response system (IWRS).
Baseline : Participants, will record on a book, a daily Visual Numeric Scale(VNS) of Pain Intensity for 1 month.
The beginning of the treatment : after the baseline, sessions of neurostimulation will begin. Sessions of neurostimulation will have a decreasing rhythm. Five sessions per week during the two first weeks, two sessions per week during the third week, one session during the fourth week and then two sessions per month for four months.
After the end of neurostimulation sessions, patients will be followed for 1month.
Throughout their participation in the study, patients will complete their VNS report book (1month of baseline before the treatment, 3 months during neurostimulation, 1 month after neurostimulation).
Patients will have 5 evaluation examinations:
The first, one just before the beginning of the neurostimulation,
The second, 1 month after the beginning of neurostimulation
The third, 3 months after the beginning of neurostimulation
And the last one, 1 month after the end of neurostimulation.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Algoneurodystrophy
Keywords
rTMS, tDCS, tsDCS, pain, algoneurodystrophy , neurostimulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation)
Arm Title
tDCS (transcranial direct-current stimulation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
tDCS (transcranial direct-current stimulation)
Arm Title
tsDCS (transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
tsDCS (transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
rTMS
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
tDCS
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
tsDCS
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Visual numeric scale of pain between the three groups
Time Frame
Baseline to 1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) between the three groups
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
Title
The SF12 quality of life questionnaire between the three groups
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
Title
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) between the three groups
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
Title
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scale (NPSI) between the three groups
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
Title
Evolution of the conductance of feet and hands by using Sudoscan
Description
The body conductance will be used to assess the evolution of the Impact of the neurostimulation on the sympathetic nervous system and on the small fiber neuropathy.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
Title
Modifications of the sensori-motor cortical cards by using a MRI
Time Frame
Baseline, and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient's written consent
Patient suffering from an algoneurodystrophy for more than a year.
Diagnosis of algoneurodystrophy confirmed by an osseous scintigraphy
Stable treatment for at least 1 month
Patient non-responsive to pharmacological treatments
VNS > 3 at the time of screening
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug addiction
History of epilepsy, head trauma, Psychiatric pathology likely to hamper the progress of the study.
Intracranial ferromagnetic material or an implanted stimulator
MRI contraindication
Algoneurodystrophy due to a nervous lesion
Pregnant women, parturient women, breast-feeding mother. Lack of effective contraception
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Service de Physiologie - Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Henri Mondor
City
Créteil
State/Province
Ile De France
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre de la douleur, CHU Grenoble Alpes
City
Grenoble
State/Province
Isere
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17101886
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in chronic neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1568-74. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242731.10074.3c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21146300
Citation
de Andrade DC, Mhalla A, Adam F, Texeira MJ, Bouhassira D. Neuropharmacological basis of rTMS-induced analgesia: the role of endogenous opioids. Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22153574
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Poulet E, Devanne H, Haffen E, Londero A, Cretin B, Leroi AM, Radtchenko A, Saba G, Thai-Van H, Litre CF, Vercueil L, Bouhassira D, Ayache SS, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Mylius V, Nicolier M, Garcia-Larrea L. [French guidelines on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): safety and therapeutic indications]. Neurophysiol Clin. 2011 Dec;41(5-6):221-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.10.062. Epub 2011 Nov 10. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21807565
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Goujon C, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Predictive value of rTMS in the identification of responders to epidural motor cortex stimulation therapy for pain. J Pain. 2011 Oct;12(10):1102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Lefaucheur, J. P. (2007).
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15897507
Citation
Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, Ahmed MA, Sadek R, Rothwell JC. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):833-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.055806.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17872930
Citation
Passard A, Attal N, Benadhira R, Brasseur L, Saba G, Sichere P, Perrot S, Januel D, Bouhassira D. Effects of unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex on chronic widespread pain in fibromyalgia. Brain. 2007 Oct;130(Pt 10):2661-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm189. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25034472
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19464959
Citation
Leung A, Donohue M, Xu R, Lee R, Lefaucheur JP, Khedr EM, Saitoh Y, Andre-Obadia N, Rollnik J, Wallace M, Chen R. rTMS for suppressing neuropathic pain: a meta-analysis. J Pain. 2009 Dec;10(12):1205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18457536
Citation
Lefaucheur JP. Use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in pain relief. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):799-808. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.799.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14580622
Citation
Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2222-3. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11723286
Citation
Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23293607
Citation
Medeiros LF, de Souza IC, Vidor LP, de Souza A, Deitos A, Volz MS, Fregni F, Caumo W, Torres IL. Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 28;3:110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00110. eCollection 2012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22959705
Citation
Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Gosseries O, Laureys S, Bruno MA. [Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new tool for neurostimulation]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Feb;169(2):108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Sep 7. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17133529
Citation
Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, Ferreira MJ, Rocha RR, Natalle L, Bravo R, Rigonatti SP, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3988-98. doi: 10.1002/art.22195.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21398419
Citation
Antal A, Kriener N, Lang N, Boros K, Paulus W. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the visual cortex in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011 May;31(7):820-8. doi: 10.1177/0333102411399349. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16564618
Citation
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20018567
Citation
Mori F, Codeca C, Kusayanagi H, Monteleone F, Buttari F, Fiore S, Bernardi G, Koch G, Centonze D. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Pain. 2010 May;11(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20471549
Citation
Antal A, Terney D, Kuhnl S, Paulus W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):890-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.023.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21494222
Citation
O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. A report of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):309-26. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22124038
Citation
Zaghi S, Thiele B, Pimentel D, Pimentel T, Fregni F. Assessment and treatment of pain with non-invasive cortical stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):439-51. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0615.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22569218
Citation
Luedtke K, Rushton A, Wright C, Geiss B, Juergens TP, May A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the reduction of clinical and experimentally induced pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):452-61. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31823853e3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24729198
Citation
O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 11;(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18786856
Citation
Cogiamanian F, Vergari M, Pulecchi F, Marceglia S, Priori A. Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2636-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.249. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21576030
Citation
Truini A, Vergari M, Biasiotta A, La Cesa S, Gabriele M, Di Stefano G, Cambieri C, Cruccu G, Inghilleri M, Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation inhibits nociceptive spinal pathway conduction and increases pain tolerance in humans. Eur J Pain. 2011 Nov;15(10):1023-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24775922
Citation
Toshev PK, Guleyupoglu B, Bikson M. Informing dose design by modeling transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2147-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24907311
Citation
Priori A, Ciocca M, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Ferrucci R. Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists. J Physiol. 2014 Aug 15;592(16):3345-69. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.270280. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22783208
Citation
Cogiamanian F, Ardolino G, Vergari M, Ferrucci R, Ciocca M, Scelzo E, Barbieri S, Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 4;3:63. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00063. eCollection 2012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22484179
Citation
Plow EB, Pascual-Leone A, Machado A. Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain. J Pain. 2012 May;13(5):411-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Apr 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20633392
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ahdab R, Ciampi de Andrade D, Fregni F, Khedr EM, Nitsche M, Paulus W. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to relieve pain. Brain Stimul. 2008 Oct;1(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17239806
Citation
Fregni F, Freedman S, Pascual-Leone A. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70032-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22846200
Citation
Nizard J, Lefaucheur JP, Helbert M, de Chauvigny E, Nguyen JP. Non-invasive stimulation therapies for the treatment of refractory pain. Discov Med. 2012 Jul;14(74):21-31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21397400
Citation
Mhalla A, Baudic S, de Andrade DC, Gautron M, Perrot S, Teixeira MJ, Attal N, Bouhassira D. Long-term maintenance of the analgesic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in fibromyalgia. Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1478-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19713068
Citation
Zaghi S, DaSilva AF, Acar M, Lopes M, Fregni F. One-year rTMS treatment for refractory trigeminal neuralgia. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Oct;38(4):e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.020. Epub 2009 Aug 26. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):e9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15130555
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Nguyen JP. Neuropathic pain controlled for more than a year by monthly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Neurophysiol Clin. 2004 Apr;34(2):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2004.02.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25979838
Citation
Hodaj H, Alibeu JP, Payen JF, Lefaucheur JP. Treatment of Chronic Facial Pain Including Cluster Headache by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex With Maintenance Sessions: A Naturalistic Study. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):801-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.416. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24466511
Citation
Kim YJ, Ku J, Kim HJ, Im DJ, Lee HS, Han KA, Kang YJ. Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Dec;37(6):766-76. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20633386
Citation
Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19833552
Citation
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20430702
Citation
Picarelli H, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade DC, Myczkowski ML, Luvisotto TB, Yeng LT, Fonoff ET, Pridmore S, Marcolin MA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is efficacious as an add-on to pharmacological therapy in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
Results Reference
background
Citation
M. Sorel, J.-P. Lefaucheur, J.-C. Beatrix, A.M. Domec, M.L. Giboutet, E. Houy, J. Robert, P. Cesaro (2012); Complex regional pain syndrome: interest in coupling the vascular phase of technetium 99 bone scintigraphy with the effectiveness of ketamine. Lett. Méd. Phys. Réadapt., OI 10.1007/s11659-012-0296-1
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation and the Trans-spinal Stimulation in the Algoneurodystrophy.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs