search
Back to results

Comparison of the Effects of TENS and CTM on Primary Dysmenorrhea

Primary Purpose

Primary Dysmenorrhea

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Connective Tissue Manipulation
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Sponsored by
Izmir Bakircay University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Dysmenorrhea focused on measuring Primary dysmenorrhea, Connective tissue manipulation (CTM), Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 30 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being between the ages of 18-30
  • having a diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having used an oral contraceptive in the last 3 months,
  • having an active sexual life,
  • pregnancy,
  • having gone through childbirth,
  • having a neurological deficit,
  • any kind of systemic condition,
  • a diagnosed gynecological condition (pelvic inflammatory diseases, endometriosis, uterus cancers, ovarian cysts, etc.),
  • taking psychotherapeutic drugs.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Connective Tissue Manipulation

    Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

    Arm Description

    The participants were administered CTM by a physiotherapist with 11 years of experience in the application from the point at which their menstrual cycles had ended to the beginning of the next cycle. Another assessment was made immediately after the treatment and this was repeated at the second, third and fourth menstrual cycles. The CTM took an average of 20-30 minutes to complete.

    Following the assessment made in the participants' first menstrual cycle, on the most painful day of their second cycle (1st or 2nd day of the cycle), high-frequency TENS was applied at a frequency of 120 Hertz, at intervals of 100 µsn for 20 minutes. The intensity of the current was increased until the participant felt it.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Assessment of Pain Severity
    To determine the localization of pain, the participants were asked to point out and mark the place(s) they felt the most pain on a body diagram. The severity of the pain of dysmenorrhea was assessed on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Assessment of Sleep Disorders and Fatigue
    A 10cm VAS was used to assess the severity of sleep disorder and fatigue in the cases of dysmenorrhea.
    Assessment of Depressive Symptoms
    The Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used in order to identify the risk participants faced in terms of depression and the level of their depressive symptoms. The inventory contains 21 categories, each having 4 choices to mark. The items score between 0-3. The total possible score is 0-63. A score of 0-9 is defined as relating to depressive symptoms at a minimal level, a score of 10-16 to slight depressive symptoms, 17-29 to moderate depressive symptoms, 30-63 to severe depressive symptoms.
    Assessment of Anxiety
    The Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was used to assess anxiety. This inventory consists of 21 categories, each item being scored on a scale of 0-3. The total possible score on the inventory is 0-63. A score of 0-17 is defined as indicating low, 18-24 as indicating moderate, and a score of 25 and over as indicating a high level of anxiety
    Assessment of General Health Status
    The "General Health Questionnaire" (GHA-28) was used in order to learn the general health status of the participants during their menstrual cycles. The 28-item questionnaire we used in the study assesses the psychological symptoms experienced in the last week. The questionnaire contains four sub-divisions of seven items each. The minimum score on the scale is 0; maximum is 84. Higher scores indicate a state of poor health.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 13, 2020
    Last Updated
    January 16, 2020
    Sponsor
    Izmir Bakircay University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04235595
    Brief Title
    Comparison of the Effects of TENS and CTM on Primary Dysmenorrhea
    Official Title
    Comparison of the Effects of High-frequency TENS and Connective Tissue Manipulation on the Primary Dysmenorrhea
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    September 1, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 15, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    August 30, 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Izmir Bakircay University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    this study was to compare the early and short-term effects of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus connective tissue manipulation (CTM) in participants with primary dysmenorrhea. Half of the participants received CTM, while the other half received TENS.
    Detailed Description
    CTM and TENS each relieve dysmenorrhea pain, but they do so by different. The electrotherapy modality that is most commonly used in the treatment of dysmenorrhea is TENS. It has been reported in studies that high-frequency TENS is more effective in reducing pain than either low-frequency TENS or placebo TENS. A scan of the literature reveals that although there are differing opinions and applications related to the number and duration of CTM, it has been shown that women with primary dysmenorrhea experience reduced pain after CTM,

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Primary Dysmenorrhea
    Keywords
    Primary dysmenorrhea, Connective tissue manipulation (CTM), Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Pain

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    40 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Connective Tissue Manipulation
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    The participants were administered CTM by a physiotherapist with 11 years of experience in the application from the point at which their menstrual cycles had ended to the beginning of the next cycle. Another assessment was made immediately after the treatment and this was repeated at the second, third and fourth menstrual cycles. The CTM took an average of 20-30 minutes to complete.
    Arm Title
    Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Following the assessment made in the participants' first menstrual cycle, on the most painful day of their second cycle (1st or 2nd day of the cycle), high-frequency TENS was applied at a frequency of 120 Hertz, at intervals of 100 µsn for 20 minutes. The intensity of the current was increased until the participant felt it.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Connective Tissue Manipulation
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    CTM
    Intervention Description
    The application was delivered with the participant in a sitting position, with the entire back and sacral regions left exposed. The treatment was administered to the sacral, lower thoracic and pelvic regions.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    TENS
    Intervention Description
    TENS was administered with the participant lying face down with a flat cushion underneath the abdomen. TENS was administered via 2 channels of electrodes placed with the sacral region in the middle. The intensity of the current was increased until the participant felt it.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Assessment of Pain Severity
    Description
    To determine the localization of pain, the participants were asked to point out and mark the place(s) they felt the most pain on a body diagram. The severity of the pain of dysmenorrhea was assessed on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
    Time Frame
    Change from Pain severity at 3 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Assessment of Sleep Disorders and Fatigue
    Description
    A 10cm VAS was used to assess the severity of sleep disorder and fatigue in the cases of dysmenorrhea.
    Time Frame
    Change from Sleep Disorders and Fatigue severity at 3 months
    Title
    Assessment of Depressive Symptoms
    Description
    The Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used in order to identify the risk participants faced in terms of depression and the level of their depressive symptoms. The inventory contains 21 categories, each having 4 choices to mark. The items score between 0-3. The total possible score is 0-63. A score of 0-9 is defined as relating to depressive symptoms at a minimal level, a score of 10-16 to slight depressive symptoms, 17-29 to moderate depressive symptoms, 30-63 to severe depressive symptoms.
    Time Frame
    Change from Beck Depression Inventory score at 3 months
    Title
    Assessment of Anxiety
    Description
    The Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was used to assess anxiety. This inventory consists of 21 categories, each item being scored on a scale of 0-3. The total possible score on the inventory is 0-63. A score of 0-17 is defined as indicating low, 18-24 as indicating moderate, and a score of 25 and over as indicating a high level of anxiety
    Time Frame
    Change from Beck Anxiety Inventory score at 3 months
    Title
    Assessment of General Health Status
    Description
    The "General Health Questionnaire" (GHA-28) was used in order to learn the general health status of the participants during their menstrual cycles. The 28-item questionnaire we used in the study assesses the psychological symptoms experienced in the last week. The questionnaire contains four sub-divisions of seven items each. The minimum score on the scale is 0; maximum is 84. Higher scores indicate a state of poor health.
    Time Frame
    Change from General Health Questionnaire score at 3 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Gender Based
    Yes
    Gender Eligibility Description
    Menstrual cycle
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    30 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: being between the ages of 18-30 having a diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea Exclusion Criteria: having used an oral contraceptive in the last 3 months, having an active sexual life, pregnancy, having gone through childbirth, having a neurological deficit, any kind of systemic condition, a diagnosed gynecological condition (pelvic inflammatory diseases, endometriosis, uterus cancers, ovarian cysts, etc.), taking psychotherapeutic drugs.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Nesrin Yağcı
    Organizational Affiliation
    Pamukkale University
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparison of the Effects of TENS and CTM on Primary Dysmenorrhea

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs