search
Back to results

Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery (SUPERB)

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System
Sponsored by
Abbott Medical Devices
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Vascular Disease focused on measuring Superficial Femoral Artery or SFA

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age greater than or equal to 18 years and of age of legal consent.
  2. Women of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the index procedure.
  3. Subject has lifestyle limiting claudication or rest pain (Rutherford-Becker scale 2-4) with a resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) less than or equal to 0.9. TBI (toe-brachial index) is performed only unable to assess ABI. TBI must be less than or equal to 0.7.
  4. A single superficial femoral artery lesion with greater than 60% stenosis or total occlusion.
  5. Stenotic lesion(s) or occluded length within the same vessel (one long or multiple serial lesions) greater than or equal to 40 mm to less than or equal to 140 mm. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) greater than or equal to 4.0 mm and less than or equal to 6.0 mm by visual assessment.
  6. All lesions are to be located with the distal point at least 3 cm above the knee joint, defined as the distal end of the femur at the knee joint, and proximal point at least 2 cm below the origin of the profunda artery.
  7. Patent infrapopliteal and popliteal artery, i.e., single vessel runoff or better with at least one of three vessels patent (less than 50% stenosis) to the ankle or foot.
  8. The target lesion(s) can be successfully crossed with a guide wire and dilated.
  9. Poor aortoiliac or common femoral "inflow" (i.e., angiographically defined greater than 50% stenosis of the iliac or common femoral artery) that would be deemed inadequate to support a femoropopliteal bypass graft must be successfully treated prior to treatment of the target lesion. This can be done just prior to treatment of the target lesion. Successful treatment is defined as less than 30% stenosis after either PTA or stenting of the inflow lesion. After treatment of the inflow lesion, the pressure gradient across the target lesion will be obtained and if the pressure gradient is greater than or equal to 20 mmHg, then the subject will be included in the study.
  10. A subject with bilateral obstructive SFA disease is eligible for enrollment into the study. If a subject with bilateral disease is enrolled, the target limb will be selected at the Investigator's discretion, who may use the criteria of lesion length, percent stenosis, and/or calcification content. The contra-lateral procedure should not be done until at least 30 days after the index procedure (staged); however, if contralateral treatment is performed prior to treatment of the target lesion, the waiting period will be at least 14 days prior to the index procedure.
  11. The subject is eligible for standard surgical repair, if necessary.
  12. A subject who requires a coronary intervention should have it performed at least 7 days prior to the treatment of the target lesion.
  13. Subject must provide written informed consent.
  14. Subject must be willing to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Thrombophlebitis or deep venous thrombus, within the previous 30 days.
  2. Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy within the previous 30 days.
  3. Thrombolysis of the target vessel within 72 hours prior to the index procedure, where complete resolution of the thrombus was not achieved.
  4. Stroke within the previous 90 days.
  5. Ipsilateral femoral aneurysm or aneurysm in the SFA or popliteal artery.
  6. Required stent placement via a popliteal approach.
  7. Required stent placement across or within 0.5 cm of the SFA/PFA bifurcation.
  8. Procedures which are pre-determined to require stent-in-stent placement to obtain patency, such as in-stent restenosis.
  9. Significant vessel tortuosity or other parameters prohibiting access to the lesion or 90° tortuosity which would prevent delivery of the stent device.
  10. Required stent placement within 1 cm of a previously deployed stent.
  11. Subject required a coronary intervention, and the coronary intervention was done less than 7 days prior to or planned within 30 days after the treatment of the target lesion.
  12. Known allergies to any of the following: aspirin and all three of the following: clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®), ticlopidine (Ticlid®), and prasugrel (Effient®); heparin, nitinol (nickel titanium), or contrast agent, that cannot be medically managed.
  13. Presence of thrombus prior to crossing the lesion.
  14. Known or suspected active infection at the time of the procedure.
  15. Presence of an ipsilateral arterial artificial graft.
  16. Use of cryoplasty, laser, or atherectomy devices at the time of index procedure.
  17. Restenotic lesion that had previously been treated by atherectomy, laser or cryoplasty within 3 months of the index procedure.
  18. Subject has tissue loss, defined as Rutherford-Becker classification category 5 or 6.
  19. History of neutropenia, coagulopathy, or thrombocytopenia that was unexplained or is considered to be at risk for reoccurrence.
  20. Known bleeding or hypercoagulability disorder or significant anemia (Hb < 8.0) that cannot be corrected.
  21. Subject has the following laboratory values:

    1. platelet count less than 80,000/μL,
    2. international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 1.5,
    3. serum creatinine level greater than 2.0 mg/dL.
  22. Subject requires general anesthesia for the procedure.
  23. Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study.
  24. Subject has a co-morbid illness that may result in a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  25. Subject is participating in an investigational study of a new drug, biologic or device at the time of study screening. NOTE: Subjects who are participating in the long term follow-up phase of a previously investigational and now FDA-approved product are not excluded by this criterion.

Sites / Locations

  • Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.
  • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • Tucson Medical Center
  • Arkansas Heart Hospital
  • ACT / CVRI & Cedar Sinai Medical Center
  • Hartford Hospital
  • Yale University
  • Bradenton Cardiology Center
  • First Coast Cardiovascular Institute
  • Mount Sinai Medical Cente
  • Clarian North / Heart Partners
  • Cardiovascular Research of Northwest Indiana, LLC
  • Hutchinson Hospital Corporation dba Promise Regional Medical Center
  • Willis Knighton Bossier Medical Center
  • Terrebonne General Hospital
  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South
  • Opelousas General Health System
  • Louisiana Heart Center
  • Maine Medical Center
  • Montgomery General Hospital
  • Massachussetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Caritas-St. Elizabeth Medical Center
  • Metro Health Hospital
  • Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A.
  • Deborah Heart
  • Hunterdon Medical Center
  • Robert Wood Johnson UMDNJ-RWJMS
  • SJH Cardiology Associates
  • NYU Medical Center
  • Lenox Hill Hospital
  • The Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • Ohio Health Research Institute / Riverside Methodist Hospital
  • Heritage Valley Health System
  • Cardiology Consultants or Mainline Health System
  • Moffitt Heart & Vascular Group
  • The Miriam Hospital
  • Greenville Hospital Systems
  • Forsyth Medical Center - Cardiovascular Research
  • Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
  • Vanderbilt Medical Center
  • Alice Heart Center
  • Austin Heart, P.A
  • Cardiovascular Specialist of Texas & North Austin Medical Center
  • Cardiovascular Research Institute of Dallas
  • Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth
  • North Cascade Cardiology, PLLC
  • Columbia - St. Mary's

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System

Arm Description

Implantation of SUPERA nitinol stent using the SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Technical (Lesion) Success
Technical (lesion) success, defined as the attainment of <50% residual stenosis by Quantitative Angiography (QA) by any percutaneous method as determined by the Angiographic core laboratory.
Procedural Success
Defined as device success with < 50% residual stenosis immediately after stent placement, mean trans-stenotic pressure gradient less than 5 mmHg, and without the occurrence of death, amputation or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.
Device Success
Device success, defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of <50% (by QA), using the assigned treatment only.
Secondary Safety Composite Endpoint
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 12 months (± 30 Days) (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 36 months (± 30 Days)(comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
Stent Fracture Rate
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V. Stent fracture classification Type I - a single strut fracture only. Type II - multiple single nitinol stent fractures that can occur at different sites. Type III - multiple nitinol stent fractures resulting in complete transverse linear fracture but without stent displacement. Type IV - a complete transverse linear type III fracture with stent displacement. Type V - a spiral dissection of a stent.
Stent Fracture Rate
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.
Stent Fracture Rate
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio ≥ 2.0
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Target Vessel Revascularization
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 6 months post-procedure.
Target Vessel Revascularization
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 12 months post-procedure.
Target Vessel Revascularization
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 24 months post-procedure.
Target Vessel Revascularization
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 36 months post-procedure.
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Index Limb Amputations
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Index Limb Amputations
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Index Limb Amputations
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Index Limb Amputations
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Quality of Life Assessed (QoL) by SF-12 Questionnaire
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL. SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
The PAQ assesses Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.

Full Information

First Posted
July 2, 2009
Last Updated
April 25, 2017
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Collaborators
Baim Institute for Clinical Research
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00933270
Brief Title
Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery
Acronym
SUPERB
Official Title
Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System to a Performance Goal Derived From Balloon Angioplasty Clinical Trials in the Superficial Femoral Artery
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Collaborators
Baim Institute for Clinical Research

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, pivotal trial. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the IDev SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System in treating subjects with obstructive superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. The primary endpoint will be the primary patency of the SFA evaluated at 12 months. The outcome will be compared to a performance goal based on clinical trials of percutaneous transvenous angioplasty (PTA) alone.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Keywords
Superficial Femoral Artery or SFA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
325 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Implantation of SUPERA nitinol stent using the SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
SUPERA® Nitinol Stent System
Intervention Description
Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Superior Femoral Artery with placement of a SUPERA® Stent at time of PTA
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom From Death, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), or Any Amputation of the Index Limb to 30 (±7) Days.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: SFA Patency at 12 Months (± 30 Days), Defined as Freedom From Restenosis (PSVR ≥ 2.0) and TLR.
Description
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical (Lesion) Success
Description
Technical (lesion) success, defined as the attainment of <50% residual stenosis by Quantitative Angiography (QA) by any percutaneous method as determined by the Angiographic core laboratory.
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Procedural Success
Description
Defined as device success with < 50% residual stenosis immediately after stent placement, mean trans-stenotic pressure gradient less than 5 mmHg, and without the occurrence of death, amputation or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Device Success
Description
Device success, defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of <50% (by QA), using the assigned treatment only.
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Secondary Safety Composite Endpoint
Description
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 12 months (± 30 Days) (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Description
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes (comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Time Frame
24 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Description
Secondary safety endpoint was a combined rate of death at 30 (± 7) days, or TLR, index limb amputation, and an increase in Rutherford-Becker Classification by 2 classes at 36 months (± 30 Days)(comparing pre- to post-procedural assessments).
Time Frame
36 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
Time Frame
24 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Long-Term Safety Endpoint (Clinically Driven TLR, Index Limb Amputation)
Time Frame
36 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Stent Fracture Rate
Description
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V. Stent fracture classification Type I - a single strut fracture only. Type II - multiple single nitinol stent fractures that can occur at different sites. Type III - multiple nitinol stent fractures resulting in complete transverse linear fracture but without stent displacement. Type IV - a complete transverse linear type III fracture with stent displacement. Type V - a spiral dissection of a stent.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Stent Fracture Rate
Description
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.
Time Frame
24 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Stent Fracture Rate
Description
Stent fractures were analyzed by X-ray evaluation by a designated core laboratory and defined as type I, II, III, IV or V.
Time Frame
36 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
Description
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) Measurements on Target Limb
Description
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 Days)
Title
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
Description
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Time Frame
6 Months (± 14 Days)
Title
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) on Target Limb
Description
A ratio of the highest ankle systolic blood pressure in one leg, usually measured with a 10 cm cuff at the ankle and using a continuous wave Doppler to detect return of blood flow in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries, to the highest of either arm systolic blood pressure. Performed at rest with subject in supine position.
Time Frame
12 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Time Frame
24 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention with or without evidence of stenosis ≥ 50%, to improve blood flow inside or within 5 mm proximally and/or distally of the treated target lesion.
Time Frame
36 months (± 30 Days)
Title
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio ≥ 2.0
Description
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Time Frame
6 Months (± 14 days)
Title
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
Description
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Time Frame
6 Months (± 14 days)
Title
SFA Patency: PSV Ratio > 2.4
Description
Patency of the target lesion was defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on a centrally-read Color Flow Doppler ultrasound in the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). Occlusion and restenosis were defined as no color flow or an increase in peak systolic velocity of > 2.0 when compared to the proximal normal segment.
Time Frame
12 Months (±30 days)
Title
Target Vessel Revascularization
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 6 months post-procedure.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 days)
Title
Target Vessel Revascularization
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 12 months post-procedure.
Time Frame
12 months (±30 days)
Title
Target Vessel Revascularization
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 24 months post-procedure.
Time Frame
24 months (±30 days)
Title
Target Vessel Revascularization
Description
Defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery performed in the target vessel at 36 months post-procedure.
Time Frame
36 months (±30 days)
Title
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 days)
Title
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Time Frame
12 Months (±30 days)
Title
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Time Frame
24 Months (±30 days)
Title
Limb Ischemia Improvement: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Defined as an improvement in the Rutherford-Becker Clinical Improvement Scale of greater than or equal to one. Grade +3 = Markedly improved. Symptoms are gone or markedly improved. ABI increased to >0.90. Grade +2 = Moderately improved. Still symptomatic but with improvement in lesion category. ABI increased by 0.10 but not normalized. Grade +1 = Minimally improved. Categorical improvement in symptoms without significant ABI increase (0.10 or less) or vice versa (but not both). Grade 0 = No change. No categorical shift and less than 0.10 change in ABI. Grade -1 = Mildly worse. Either worsening of symptoms or decrease in ABI of 0.10. Grade -2 = Moderate worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by one category or unexpected minor amputation. Grade -3 = Marked worsening. Deterioration of the subject's condition by more than one category or major amputation.
Time Frame
36 Months (±30 days)
Title
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Description
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Time Frame
30 days (±7 days)
Title
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Description
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Time Frame
6 Months (±14 days)
Title
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Description
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Time Frame
12 months (±30 days)
Title
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Description
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Time Frame
24 months (±30 days)
Title
Major Adverse Events (MAVE)
Description
Defined as a composite rate of stent thrombosis, clinically apparent distal embolization (defined as causing end-organ damage, e.g. lower extremity ulceration, tissue necrosis, or gangrene), procedure-related arterial rupture, acute limb ischemia, target limb amputation, procedure related bleeding event requiring transfusion.
Time Frame
36 months (±30 days)
Title
Index Limb Amputations
Description
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Time Frame
6 months (±14 days)
Title
Index Limb Amputations
Description
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Time Frame
12 months (±30 days)
Title
Index Limb Amputations
Description
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Time Frame
24 months (±30 days)
Title
Index Limb Amputations
Description
Amputation was defined as the surgical removal of tissue anywhere from the toe to hip in the ipsilateral limb of the target site.
Time Frame
36 months (±30 days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed (QoL) by SF-12 Questionnaire
Description
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL. SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Description
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Time Frame
6 Months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12 Questionnaire
Description
The Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short form survey (SF-12) was used to assess generic QoL.SF-12 Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. Physical and mental summary scores from the SF-12 are scaled to a U.S. population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores are better). Multiple groups have suggested minimum clinically important changes in SF-12 summary scores to be greater than 2-2.5 points, and moderate changes to be greater than 5 points.
Time Frame
12 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
Description
The PAQ assesses Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Physical Limitation
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptoms
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Symptom Stability
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Social Limitation
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Treatment Satisfaction
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Quality of Life
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
6 months (± 14 Days)
Title
Quality of Life Assessed by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ): Summary Score
Description
The PAQ assesses PAD-related physical limitation, symptoms, quality of life, social function and treatment satisfaction on 0-100 scales; higher scores are better. A threshold of 8 points has been proposed as a minimum clinically important difference for the PAQ summary scale.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Description
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Description
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Time Frame
1 Month (± 7 Days)
Title
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Description
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Time Frame
12 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Description
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Time Frame
24 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Clinical Category: Rutherford Becker
Description
Category and Clinical Description 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. Claudication is defined as a pain, cramps, fatigue, or equivalent in leg muscles occurring during walking that results from inadequate blood supply, usually due to atherosclerotic arterial obstruction.
Time Frame
36 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 Days)
Title
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Time Frame
12 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Time Frame
24 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline: Rutherford Becker Scale
Description
Clinical Improvement Compared With Baseline Grade +3 = Markedly Improved, Grade +2 = Moderately Improved, Grade +1 = Minimally Improved, Grade 0 = No Change, Grade -1 = Mildly Worse, Grade -2 = Moderately Worsening, Grade -3 = Markedly Worsening
Time Frame
36 Months (± 30 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Distance
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Claudication Pain Time (CPT)
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Distance
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
1 month (± 7 Days)
Title
Exercise Tolerance Test: Maximal Walking Time
Description
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) for this study was determined by the point of termination or maximum distance walked on the treadmill due to claudication.
Time Frame
12 months (± 30 Days)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age greater than or equal to 18 years and of age of legal consent. Women of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the index procedure. Subject has lifestyle limiting claudication or rest pain (Rutherford-Becker scale 2-4) with a resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) less than or equal to 0.9. TBI (toe-brachial index) is performed only unable to assess ABI. TBI must be less than or equal to 0.7. A single superficial femoral artery lesion with greater than 60% stenosis or total occlusion. Stenotic lesion(s) or occluded length within the same vessel (one long or multiple serial lesions) greater than or equal to 40 mm to less than or equal to 140 mm. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) greater than or equal to 4.0 mm and less than or equal to 6.0 mm by visual assessment. All lesions are to be located with the distal point at least 3 cm above the knee joint, defined as the distal end of the femur at the knee joint, and proximal point at least 2 cm below the origin of the profunda artery. Patent infrapopliteal and popliteal artery, i.e., single vessel runoff or better with at least one of three vessels patent (less than 50% stenosis) to the ankle or foot. The target lesion(s) can be successfully crossed with a guide wire and dilated. Poor aortoiliac or common femoral "inflow" (i.e., angiographically defined greater than 50% stenosis of the iliac or common femoral artery) that would be deemed inadequate to support a femoropopliteal bypass graft must be successfully treated prior to treatment of the target lesion. This can be done just prior to treatment of the target lesion. Successful treatment is defined as less than 30% stenosis after either PTA or stenting of the inflow lesion. After treatment of the inflow lesion, the pressure gradient across the target lesion will be obtained and if the pressure gradient is greater than or equal to 20 mmHg, then the subject will be included in the study. A subject with bilateral obstructive SFA disease is eligible for enrollment into the study. If a subject with bilateral disease is enrolled, the target limb will be selected at the Investigator's discretion, who may use the criteria of lesion length, percent stenosis, and/or calcification content. The contra-lateral procedure should not be done until at least 30 days after the index procedure (staged); however, if contralateral treatment is performed prior to treatment of the target lesion, the waiting period will be at least 14 days prior to the index procedure. The subject is eligible for standard surgical repair, if necessary. A subject who requires a coronary intervention should have it performed at least 7 days prior to the treatment of the target lesion. Subject must provide written informed consent. Subject must be willing to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation schedule. Exclusion Criteria: Thrombophlebitis or deep venous thrombus, within the previous 30 days. Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy within the previous 30 days. Thrombolysis of the target vessel within 72 hours prior to the index procedure, where complete resolution of the thrombus was not achieved. Stroke within the previous 90 days. Ipsilateral femoral aneurysm or aneurysm in the SFA or popliteal artery. Required stent placement via a popliteal approach. Required stent placement across or within 0.5 cm of the SFA/PFA bifurcation. Procedures which are pre-determined to require stent-in-stent placement to obtain patency, such as in-stent restenosis. Significant vessel tortuosity or other parameters prohibiting access to the lesion or 90° tortuosity which would prevent delivery of the stent device. Required stent placement within 1 cm of a previously deployed stent. Subject required a coronary intervention, and the coronary intervention was done less than 7 days prior to or planned within 30 days after the treatment of the target lesion. Known allergies to any of the following: aspirin and all three of the following: clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®), ticlopidine (Ticlid®), and prasugrel (Effient®); heparin, nitinol (nickel titanium), or contrast agent, that cannot be medically managed. Presence of thrombus prior to crossing the lesion. Known or suspected active infection at the time of the procedure. Presence of an ipsilateral arterial artificial graft. Use of cryoplasty, laser, or atherectomy devices at the time of index procedure. Restenotic lesion that had previously been treated by atherectomy, laser or cryoplasty within 3 months of the index procedure. Subject has tissue loss, defined as Rutherford-Becker classification category 5 or 6. History of neutropenia, coagulopathy, or thrombocytopenia that was unexplained or is considered to be at risk for reoccurrence. Known bleeding or hypercoagulability disorder or significant anemia (Hb < 8.0) that cannot be corrected. Subject has the following laboratory values: platelet count less than 80,000/μL, international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 1.5, serum creatinine level greater than 2.0 mg/dL. Subject requires general anesthesia for the procedure. Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study. Subject has a co-morbid illness that may result in a life expectancy of less than 1 year. Subject is participating in an investigational study of a new drug, biologic or device at the time of study screening. NOTE: Subjects who are participating in the long term follow-up phase of a previously investigational and now FDA-approved product are not excluded by this criterion.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carol Base, RN,MS
Organizational Affiliation
Abbott Medical Devices
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Rosenfield, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lawrence Garcia, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center of Boston, Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.
City
Fairhope
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36532
Country
United States
Facility Name
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tucson Medical Center
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arkansas Heart Hospital
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72211
Country
United States
Facility Name
ACT / CVRI & Cedar Sinai Medical Center
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hartford Hospital
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale University
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bradenton Cardiology Center
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
First Coast Cardiovascular Institute
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Medical Cente
City
Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33140
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clarian North / Heart Partners
City
Fishers
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46038
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Research of Northwest Indiana, LLC
City
Munster
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46321
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hutchinson Hospital Corporation dba Promise Regional Medical Center
City
Hutchinson
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Willis Knighton Bossier Medical Center
City
Bossier City
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Terrebonne General Hospital
City
Houma
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
City
Lafayette
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Opelousas General Health System
City
Opelousas
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70570
Country
United States
Facility Name
Louisiana Heart Center
City
Slidell
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70458
Country
United States
Facility Name
Maine Medical Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montgomery General Hospital
City
Olney
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20832
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachussetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Caritas-St. Elizabeth Medical Center
City
Brighton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metro Health Hospital
City
Wyoming
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49519
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A.
City
Hattiesburg
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Deborah Heart
City
Browns Mills
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hunterdon Medical Center
City
Flemington
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08822
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert Wood Johnson UMDNJ-RWJMS
City
New Brunswick
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08903
Country
United States
Facility Name
SJH Cardiology Associates
City
Liverpool
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13088
Country
United States
Facility Name
NYU Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lenox Hill Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10075
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio Health Research Institute / Riverside Methodist Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heritage Valley Health System
City
Beaver
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15009
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Consultants or Mainline Health System
City
Bryn Mawr
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Moffitt Heart & Vascular Group
City
Wormleysburg
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17043
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Miriam Hospital
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Hospital Systems
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Forsyth Medical Center - Cardiovascular Research
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alice Heart Center
City
Alice
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78332
Country
United States
Facility Name
Austin Heart, P.A
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Specialist of Texas & North Austin Medical Center
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78758
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Research Institute of Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Cascade Cardiology, PLLC
City
Bellingham
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98225
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia - St. Mary's
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53211
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25969545
Citation
Garcia L, Jaff MR, Metzger C, Sedillo G, Pershad A, Zidar F, Patlola R, Wilkins RG, Espinoza A, Iskander A, Khammar GS, Khatib Y, Beasley R, Makam S, Kovach R, Kamat S, Leon LR Jr, Eaves WB, Popma JJ, Mauri L, Donohoe D, Base CC, Rosenfield K; SUPERB Trial Investigators. Wire-Interwoven Nitinol Stent Outcome in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: Twelve-Month Results of the SUPERB Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5):e000937. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000937. Erratum In: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6). pii: e000014. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000014.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of the SUpera® PERipheral System in the Superficial Femoral Artery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs