search
Back to results

Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Primary Purpose

Infertility

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Protective catheter group
Conventional catheter group
Sponsored by
The University of Hong Kong
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, transfer catheter

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - 42 Years (Child, Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

(i) ET in the fresh cycle (ii) Age <43 year (iii) Normal uterine cavity shown on ultrasound scanning

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) Three previous IVF cycles (ii) Natural IVF or IVM cycles (iii) Presence of hydrosalpinx on pelvic scanning (iv) Transfer of grade 5 embryos (v) Blastocyst transfer (vi) Use of donor oocytes (vii) Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and (viii) Previously joined in the same study

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Protective catheter group

Conventional catheter group

Arm Description

Protective catheter group uses Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter from Cook.

Conventional catheter group uses Sydney IVF catheter from Cook.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

ongoing pregnancy rate
Pelvic ultrasound showed intrauterine pregnancy with fetal pulsation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical pregnancy rate
Pelvic ultrasound should an intrauterine sac with crown rump length corresponding to 6 weeks

Full Information

First Posted
December 27, 2013
Last Updated
April 27, 2021
Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02024880
Brief Title
Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
Official Title
A Randomized Single-blind Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
The ET catheters were outdated.
Study Start Date
January 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment. The ET catheter has to pass through the endocervical canal to go into the uterine cavity through the internal os. The endocervical canal may be filled up with mucus or blood. Embryos trapped in the mucus or blood after the passage of the endocervical canal may not be able to implant into the endometrium. Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter is designed to allow the safe passage of embryos through cervical mucus and blood as its outer sheath protects the embryo through entry and then opens in petals to further advance the inner catheter and gently place the embryo. The hypothesis of this study is that the pregnancy rate is significantly higher after ET using protective ET catheters.
Detailed Description
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). Despite recent advances in ovarian stimulation, the method of assisted fertilization and improved culture conditions, the implantation potential of embryos remains around 20-25% for a long time. ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment and pregnancy rates after ET may be affected by various factors. In a Cochrane meta-analysis (Derks et al., 2009), no evidence of a benefit was found for performing ET with a full bladder, the removal of cervical mucus, and flushing the endocervical canal or the endometrial cavity. No data were found on changing the woman's position, the use of a tenaculum, the performance of a dummy transfer, and embryo afterloading. Other meta-analyses demonstrate that the use of soft ET catheters (Buckett, 2008) and transabdominal ultrasound guidance (Brown et al., 2010) lead to a higher chance of clinical pregnancy when compared with the use of stiff catheters and clinical touch respectively. The ET catheter has to pass through the endocervical canal to go into the uterine cavity through the internal os. The endocervical canal may be filled up with mucus or blood. Embryos trapped in the mucus or blood after the passage of the endocervical canal may not be able to implant into the endometrium. Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter is designed to allow the safe passage of embryos through cervical mucus and blood as its outer sheath protects the embryo through entry and then opens in petals to further advance the inner catheter and gently place the embryo. There is still no study comparing conventional and protective ET catheters in terms of the pregnancy rate of IVF treatment. The hypothesis of this study is that the pregnancy rate is significantly higher after ET using protective ET catheters. Research plan Patients attending the Department for IVF-ET will be recruited if they fulfill the inclusion criteria and do not have the exclusion criteria. The FET treatment will be arranged as indicated. On the day of ET, patients will be randomized according to a computer-generated randomization list in sealed envelopes into two groups: conventional and protective ET catheter groups. Conventional ET catheters will be used in the conventional ET catheter group while protective ET catheters will be used in the protective ET catheter group. Patients would be blinded to the group assigned although the clinical, nursing and laboratory staff will be aware of the type of catheters used. A maximum of two good quality embryos are to be replaced. Patients are asked to keep a mildly full bladder so that the uterus can be visualized by abdominal sonogram during the procedure. A bivalve speculum is inserted into the vagina and the cervix is cleaned with warm saline and culture medium. The axis, degree of flexion and the configuration of the uterine cavity are determined by transabdominal ultrasound examination before the transfer. Under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, the outer catheter is inserted into the cervical canal 4 cm from the external os, with the tip just beyond the internal os. A malleable obturator is used if difficulty is encountered. The inner transfer catheter with the loaded embryo(s) is then inserted into the uterine cavity via the outer cannula. The aim is to put the tip of the inner catheter inside the uterine cavity 6 cm from the external os and care was taken not to advance the tip beyond 1 cm from the uterine fundus. The transfer volume is gently expelled by the technician. The catheters will be held in place for 30 seconds. Both the inner and outer catheters will be checked by the technician under the microscope to make sure that the embryos have been replaced. The luteal phase support will be used if needed and antenatal management is as usual, if pregnant. Sample size estimation The ongoing pregnancy rate of IVF-ET in 2010 was about 30.0%. Assuming a 10% increase following use of protective ET catheters as significant, 356 patients in each arm was required at a power of 80% and a significance level of 5% (Sigmastat, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA). A total of 720 patients will be recruited into the study. Interim analysis will be performed after recruitment of every 100 subjects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infertility
Keywords
in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, transfer catheter

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
600 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Protective catheter group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Protective catheter group uses Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter from Cook.
Arm Title
Conventional catheter group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conventional catheter group uses Sydney IVF catheter from Cook.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Protective catheter group
Other Intervention Name(s)
Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter
Intervention Description
The tip of this catheter is protected on insertion of the catheter.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional catheter group
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sydney IVF catheters
Intervention Description
A standard embryo catheter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ongoing pregnancy rate
Description
Pelvic ultrasound showed intrauterine pregnancy with fetal pulsation
Time Frame
10 weeks of gestation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical pregnancy rate
Description
Pelvic ultrasound should an intrauterine sac with crown rump length corresponding to 6 weeks
Time Frame
6 weeks of gestation

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
42 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: (i) ET in the fresh cycle (ii) Age <43 year (iii) Normal uterine cavity shown on ultrasound scanning Exclusion Criteria: (i) Three previous IVF cycles (ii) Natural IVF or IVM cycles (iii) Presence of hydrosalpinx on pelvic scanning (iv) Transfer of grade 5 embryos (v) Blastocyst transfer (vi) Use of donor oocytes (vii) Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and (viii) Previously joined in the same study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ernest HY Ng, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
City
Hong Kong
State/Province
Hong Kong
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs