Compression Device Versus 4-layer Compression System
Leg Ulcers
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Leg Ulcers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects over 18 years, willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Subjects able to wear the compression device and the comparative regime and follow the requirements of the clinical investigation plan
- Subjects who had an ankle to brachial pressure index (ABPI) of 0.8 or greater
- Subjects who had a chronic venous leg ulcer (i.e. CEAP classification of C6 1) 2 cm2 in size or greater, who required graduated compression
- Subjects who were outpatients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with a history of skin sensitivity to any of the components of the study product, comparator product or standard dressings
- *Subjects with more than one ulcer on the test leg
- Subjects who had previously been entered into the study or a previous Amadeus study (U327, U332 or U337) or had participated in a previous clinical study within the past 3 months
- Subjects with any condition that prevented application and removal of the device without external assistance
- Subjects who had an active Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or a recent DVT within the last 3 months
- Subjects who exhibited any other medical condition which, according to the Investigator, justified the subject's exclusion from the study
Subjects who had leg sizes outside the following range:
- Ankle - 12cm to 44cm
- Calf - 22cm to 60cm
- Below knee - 22cm to 68cm
- Subjects who had an index venous leg ulcer greater in size than 10cm in any one dimension
- Diabetic subjects with advanced small vessel disease
- Denotes the exclusion criterion was amended and approved by the Ethics Committees as follows:
Amendment #1 dated 27th March 2007:
*Diabetic subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, were not in reasonable metabolic control or had a history of hospitalisation within the last six months for the management of blood sugar and/or diabetic subjects with advanced small vessel disease
Amendment #2 dated 2nd August 2007:
*Subjects who had an index venous leg ulcer greater in size than 15cm in any one dimension
Amendment #3 dated 5th October 2007:
- Deletion of exclusion criterion 'Subjects with more than one ulcer on the test leg' to permit inclusion of subjects with multiple ulcers on the test leg
Sites / Locations
- Private Practice
- Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Joseph
- Hautarzt Phlebologe Allergologe
- Private Practice
- Private Practice
- The Adelaide & Meath Hospital
- Mid-Western Regional Hospital
- Cork University Hospital
- Dermatology Day Unit; Monklands Hospital
- The Wilson Practice, Alton Health Centre
- Wound Healing Research Unit; Cardiff University
- Tissue Viability Consultancy
- Institute of Wound Care, The University of Hull
- Diving Diseases Research Centre, Hyperbaric Medical Centre
- University Dept of Vascular
- Medical Physics & Bioengineering, Southampton University Hospital
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Good Hope Hospital
- Trowbridge Community Hospital
- Arrowe Park Hospital
- Short Health Clinic
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Experimental
Active Comparator
Compression device
Profore, 4-layer bandage
The electrical compression device is operated from battery or a main adaptor. It is based upon the use of inflatable pneumatic cuffs that apply controlled compression to the foot, ankle and calf.
A high compression 4-layer bandage (Profore, Trademark of Smith and Nephew). This is a four-layer system that can be purchased either separately or as a package: a wound contact layer (Knitted viscose), a sub-compression wadding bandage, two layers of elastane bandage plus a top cohesive layer.