Computer-based Tutorial as Supportive Means to Enhance the Informed Consent Process for Cataract Surgery
Primary Purpose
Cataract
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CatInfo tool
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Cataract focused on measuring Cataract surgery, informed consent process, patient education
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cataract
- Age 18 and older
- First eye to be operated
- No previous ophthalmic surgery
- written informed consent to participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Visual acuity of less than 0.1 Snellen in the worse eye
- Severe hearing loss
- Inability to use touch screen device (e.g. severe tremor, etc.)
Sites / Locations
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
CatInfo tool + Face-to-face discussion with physician
Face-to-face discussion with physician only
Arm Description
audio-visual presentation (CatInfo tool) before face-to-face informed-consent discussion with the physician
face-to-face informed-consent discussion with the physician only
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Decisional conflict scale score
To assess the decisional confidence after the face-to-face informed consent discussion patients are asked to complete the decisional conflict scale questionnaire. In this study it is calculated as decisional confidence, where 0 represents the lowest decisional confidence and 100 the highest.
Decision regret scale score
One month after surgery the patients' satisfaction with their decision is evaluated with the decision regret scale (DRS) questionnaire via telephone interview. A score of 0 means no regret, a score of 100 high regret.
Number of correctly answered questions assessing knowledge
To assess the knowledge concerning cataract surgery patients are asked to complete a multiple-choice questionnaire concerning cataract surgery. The number of correctly answered questions are summed up. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 19 points. The more points the better the patient's knowledge about cataract and cataract surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04975126
First Posted
July 14, 2021
Last Updated
July 14, 2021
Sponsor
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04975126
Brief Title
Computer-based Tutorial as Supportive Means to Enhance the Informed Consent Process for Cataract Surgery
Official Title
Computer-based Tutorial as Supportive Means to Enhance Quality and Efficiency of the Informed Consent Process for Cataract Surgery: an Exploratory Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 9, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 27, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 27, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To assess whether a computer-based tutorial as supportive means enhances quality and efficiency of the informed consent process for cataract surgery focussing on the patients' attitude before and after surgery.
Detailed Description
Informing the patient and obtaining informed consent is one of the major duties physicians perform before starting a medical treatment. The requirements concerning the informed consent process are high. The amount of information needed to be explained to the patient is growing, as procedures get more complex and the number of treatment options increase.
The CatInfo tool is a computer-based tutorial about cataract and cataract surgery run on a handheld device with headphones and presented in an audio-visual fashion. The patient gives feedback after each chapter using a traffic light system to ensure that the content has been understood (green - content understood, ready to continue; yellow - questions that require discussion with the physician and red - repetition of the module required). A printout that summarizes what the patient has selected after each chapter immediately tells the physician which topics have been poorly understood or were unclear.
It has been shown in a randomized triple-masked study that patients using the CatInfo tool were significantly better informed than patients only having a face-to-face interview. Satisfaction with the tool was high. This present study has the goal to assess the patients' attitude before and after surgery using validated questionnaires (decisional conflict scale, decision regret scale) as well as knowledge. Patients scheduled for their first eye cataract surgery are randomly allocated to two groups, receiving standard face-to-face informed consent (control group) or additionally using the interactive CatInfo tool (study group). Scores between the groups are compared.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cataract
Keywords
Cataract surgery, informed consent process, patient education
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
CatInfo tool + Face-to-face discussion with physician
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
audio-visual presentation (CatInfo tool) before face-to-face informed-consent discussion with the physician
Arm Title
Face-to-face discussion with physician only
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
face-to-face informed-consent discussion with the physician only
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
CatInfo tool
Intervention Description
Presentation about cataract surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decisional conflict scale score
Description
To assess the decisional confidence after the face-to-face informed consent discussion patients are asked to complete the decisional conflict scale questionnaire. In this study it is calculated as decisional confidence, where 0 represents the lowest decisional confidence and 100 the highest.
Time Frame
Day of pre-assessment visit (1 week before surgery)
Title
Decision regret scale score
Description
One month after surgery the patients' satisfaction with their decision is evaluated with the decision regret scale (DRS) questionnaire via telephone interview. A score of 0 means no regret, a score of 100 high regret.
Time Frame
1 month after surgery
Title
Number of correctly answered questions assessing knowledge
Description
To assess the knowledge concerning cataract surgery patients are asked to complete a multiple-choice questionnaire concerning cataract surgery. The number of correctly answered questions are summed up. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 19 points. The more points the better the patient's knowledge about cataract and cataract surgery.
Time Frame
Day of pre-assessment visit (1 week before surgery)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Cataract
Age 18 and older
First eye to be operated
No previous ophthalmic surgery
written informed consent to participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Visual acuity of less than 0.1 Snellen in the worse eye
Severe hearing loss
Inability to use touch screen device (e.g. severe tremor, etc.)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oliver Findl, MD, MBA
Organizational Affiliation
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular surgery (VIROS), Vienna, Austria
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1140
Country
Austria
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36368980
Citation
Ullrich M, Findl O, Kefer K, Doller B, Varsits R, Hienert J, Hirnschall N. An evaluation of the efficacy of a supplemental computer-based tutorial to enhance the informed consent process for cataract surgery: an exploratory randomized clinical study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02652-z.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Computer-based Tutorial as Supportive Means to Enhance the Informed Consent Process for Cataract Surgery
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs