Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Primary Purpose
Rectal Neoplasms
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radiotherapy
Tom-OX
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Neoplasms focused on measuring rectal cancer, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, Raltitrexed, Oxaliplatin
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically proven locally advanced (T4N0-2) or locally recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Eastern Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Metastatic patients
- unfit surgery patients,
- pregnant or breast feeding females
- patients with clinically detectable ascites
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Radiotherapy plus Tom-Ox
Arm Description
Patients received concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Tom-Ox chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of patients defined as good responders (G1 or G2) according to the Mandard regression grading system.
Pathologic responses of the primary tumours were defined according to the Mandard regression grading system: grade 1 was recorded when no tumour cells remained in the primary tumour and lymph nodes (pCR); grade 2 was characterized by the presence of rare residual cancer cells scattered through the fibrosis; grade 3 was characterized by an increase in the number of residual cancer cells, but fibrosis still predominated; grade 4 showed residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis; and grade 5 was characterized by an absence of regressive changes. Good responders were defined those patients with a pathologic response with Mandard G1 or G2 and poor responder patients with Mandard G3, G4 or G5.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of patients in which a surgical resection was feasible
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0
CTCAE v 3.0 was used to score acute and late radiation toxicity.
The number of patients without disease (i.e. rectal cancer) during the follow-up.
The disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis to the documented local or distant recurrence or last follow-up.
The number of patients still alive at the end of follow-up
The overall-survival (OS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis until death for any cause or the last follow-up.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02723253
First Posted
March 19, 2016
Last Updated
March 29, 2016
Sponsor
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02723253
Brief Title
Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Official Title
Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a positive impact on locoregional control and survival.However, patients with T4 rectal cancer show high risk of local recurrence after conventional treatment. Therefore investigators designed a prospective Phase II study on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or locally recurrences, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pathological response and resectability of concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin (Tom-Ox) chemotherapy.
Detailed Description
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a positive impact on locoregional control and survival. However, patients with T4 rectal cancer show high risk of local recurrence (LR) after conventional treatment. This was a prospective Phase II study on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or locally recurrences, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pathological response and resectability of concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin (Tom-Ox) chemotherapy. The primary aim was to assess the pathological complete response rate. Key secondary aim was the resectability. Secondary aims were evaluation of treatment-related acute and late toxicity, local control, disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). The follow-up period of each subjects started after the radiochemotherapy treatment and ended after a maximum of 36 months of observation or until death.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Neoplasms
Keywords
rectal cancer, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, Raltitrexed, Oxaliplatin
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
18 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Radiotherapy plus Tom-Ox
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients received concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Tom-Ox chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Radiotherapy
Intervention Description
Radiotherapy was applied as conformal 3-D technique and was delivered with photon energies of 10 - 15 MV. The beams were delivered by an Elekta Precise Linac equipped with standard multi leaf collimators (MLC). A daily online check of isocenter position was performed using portal imaging, with set-up correction in case of displacement > 0.5 cm in any direction. Radiation dose delivered to PTV2 was 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) with a concomitant boost dose to the PTV1 of 10 Gy with accelerated fractionation at 2.2 Gy/fraction, five consecutive days for week.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tom-OX
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tomudex ®, Eloxatin ®
Intervention Description
The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients defined as good responders (G1 or G2) according to the Mandard regression grading system.
Description
Pathologic responses of the primary tumours were defined according to the Mandard regression grading system: grade 1 was recorded when no tumour cells remained in the primary tumour and lymph nodes (pCR); grade 2 was characterized by the presence of rare residual cancer cells scattered through the fibrosis; grade 3 was characterized by an increase in the number of residual cancer cells, but fibrosis still predominated; grade 4 showed residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis; and grade 5 was characterized by an absence of regressive changes. Good responders were defined those patients with a pathologic response with Mandard G1 or G2 and poor responder patients with Mandard G3, G4 or G5.
Time Frame
8 weeks after chemo-radiotherapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients in which a surgical resection was feasible
Time Frame
8 weeks after chemo-radiotherapy
Title
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0
Description
CTCAE v 3.0 was used to score acute and late radiation toxicity.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months. In details, follow-up examinations were performed 4 weeks after surgery and every 6 months until the established length of follow-up or death.
Title
The number of patients without disease (i.e. rectal cancer) during the follow-up.
Description
The disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis to the documented local or distant recurrence or last follow-up.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months.
Title
The number of patients still alive at the end of follow-up
Description
The overall-survival (OS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis until death for any cause or the last follow-up.
Time Frame
Up to 36 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologically proven locally advanced (T4N0-2) or locally recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma;
Age ≥ 18 years;
Eastern Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
Exclusion Criteria:
Metastatic patients
unfit surgery patients,
pregnant or breast feeding females
patients with clinically detectable ascites
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alessio G Morganti, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Radiation Oncology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs