search
Back to results

Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Primary Purpose

Rectal Neoplasms

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radiotherapy
Tom-OX
Sponsored by
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Neoplasms focused on measuring rectal cancer, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, Raltitrexed, Oxaliplatin

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven locally advanced (T4N0-2) or locally recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Eastern Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic patients
  • unfit surgery patients,
  • pregnant or breast feeding females
  • patients with clinically detectable ascites

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Radiotherapy plus Tom-Ox

    Arm Description

    Patients received concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Tom-Ox chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of patients defined as good responders (G1 or G2) according to the Mandard regression grading system.
    Pathologic responses of the primary tumours were defined according to the Mandard regression grading system: grade 1 was recorded when no tumour cells remained in the primary tumour and lymph nodes (pCR); grade 2 was characterized by the presence of rare residual cancer cells scattered through the fibrosis; grade 3 was characterized by an increase in the number of residual cancer cells, but fibrosis still predominated; grade 4 showed residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis; and grade 5 was characterized by an absence of regressive changes. Good responders were defined those patients with a pathologic response with Mandard G1 or G2 and poor responder patients with Mandard G3, G4 or G5.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Number of patients in which a surgical resection was feasible
    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0
    CTCAE v 3.0 was used to score acute and late radiation toxicity.
    The number of patients without disease (i.e. rectal cancer) during the follow-up.
    The disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis to the documented local or distant recurrence or last follow-up.
    The number of patients still alive at the end of follow-up
    The overall-survival (OS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis until death for any cause or the last follow-up.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 19, 2016
    Last Updated
    March 29, 2016
    Sponsor
    IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02723253
    Brief Title
    Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Official Title
    Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 2005 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 2008 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    February 2012 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a positive impact on locoregional control and survival.However, patients with T4 rectal cancer show high risk of local recurrence after conventional treatment. Therefore investigators designed a prospective Phase II study on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or locally recurrences, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pathological response and resectability of concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin (Tom-Ox) chemotherapy.
    Detailed Description
    Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a positive impact on locoregional control and survival. However, patients with T4 rectal cancer show high risk of local recurrence (LR) after conventional treatment. This was a prospective Phase II study on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer or locally recurrences, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pathological response and resectability of concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin (Tom-Ox) chemotherapy. The primary aim was to assess the pathological complete response rate. Key secondary aim was the resectability. Secondary aims were evaluation of treatment-related acute and late toxicity, local control, disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). The follow-up period of each subjects started after the radiochemotherapy treatment and ended after a maximum of 36 months of observation or until death.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Rectal Neoplasms
    Keywords
    rectal cancer, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, Raltitrexed, Oxaliplatin

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    18 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Radiotherapy plus Tom-Ox
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients received concomitant boost RT (55 Gy/5 weeks) with concurrent Tom-Ox chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.
    Intervention Type
    Radiation
    Intervention Name(s)
    Radiotherapy
    Intervention Description
    Radiotherapy was applied as conformal 3-D technique and was delivered with photon energies of 10 - 15 MV. The beams were delivered by an Elekta Precise Linac equipped with standard multi leaf collimators (MLC). A daily online check of isocenter position was performed using portal imaging, with set-up correction in case of displacement > 0.5 cm in any direction. Radiation dose delivered to PTV2 was 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) with a concomitant boost dose to the PTV1 of 10 Gy with accelerated fractionation at 2.2 Gy/fraction, five consecutive days for week.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Tom-OX
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Tomudex ®, Eloxatin ®
    Intervention Description
    The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 15 min intravenous infusion Raltitrexed (Tomudex ®) 3 mg/m2 and a two-hours intravenous infusion of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin ®) at 130 mg/m 2, 20 min after raltitrexed, on days 1, 17, 35.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of patients defined as good responders (G1 or G2) according to the Mandard regression grading system.
    Description
    Pathologic responses of the primary tumours were defined according to the Mandard regression grading system: grade 1 was recorded when no tumour cells remained in the primary tumour and lymph nodes (pCR); grade 2 was characterized by the presence of rare residual cancer cells scattered through the fibrosis; grade 3 was characterized by an increase in the number of residual cancer cells, but fibrosis still predominated; grade 4 showed residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis; and grade 5 was characterized by an absence of regressive changes. Good responders were defined those patients with a pathologic response with Mandard G1 or G2 and poor responder patients with Mandard G3, G4 or G5.
    Time Frame
    8 weeks after chemo-radiotherapy
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of patients in which a surgical resection was feasible
    Time Frame
    8 weeks after chemo-radiotherapy
    Title
    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0
    Description
    CTCAE v 3.0 was used to score acute and late radiation toxicity.
    Time Frame
    Up to 36 months. In details, follow-up examinations were performed 4 weeks after surgery and every 6 months until the established length of follow-up or death.
    Title
    The number of patients without disease (i.e. rectal cancer) during the follow-up.
    Description
    The disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis to the documented local or distant recurrence or last follow-up.
    Time Frame
    Up to 36 months.
    Title
    The number of patients still alive at the end of follow-up
    Description
    The overall-survival (OS) was defined as the time from the diagnosis until death for any cause or the last follow-up.
    Time Frame
    Up to 36 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Histologically proven locally advanced (T4N0-2) or locally recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma; Age ≥ 18 years; Eastern Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Exclusion Criteria: Metastatic patients unfit surgery patients, pregnant or breast feeding females patients with clinically detectable ascites
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alessio G Morganti, Prof
    Organizational Affiliation
    Division of Radiation Oncology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Concurrent Chemoradiation With Concomitant Boost In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs