search
Back to results

Contingency Management for Hoarding Disorder (HCM)

Primary Purpose

Hoarding Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Contingency Management
Sponsored by
Hartford Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hoarding Disorder focused on measuring Hoarding Disorder, Contingency Management, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Group Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with Primary Hoarding Disorder,
  • currently participating in the Hoarding Disorder treatment group at the HH Anxiety Disorders Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not clinically appropriate for a group treatment format (i.e., active suicidality or aggressive behavior, psychosis, current physiological substance dependence, or personality issues that would be expected to substantially interfere with the group milieu; cognitively intact).
  • Participants will also be excluded if they have previously completed CBT for HD.
  • In addition, participants in the CM portion of the treatment will be required to live within one hour travel time of the treatment facility to allow for home visits with the independent rater.

Sites / Locations

  • Anxiety Disorders Center, Institute of Lilving

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Contingency Management

Arm Description

Receives contingency payments each month based on decluttering scores

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Hoarding Rating Scale (HRS)
A brief 5-item interview to rate clutter, difficulty discarding, acquisition, distress, and impairment. Each item is rated on a likert scale from 1 to 8, with higher scores reflective of higher symptom severity.
Clutter Image Rating Scale
A pictorial measure of clutter severity containing nine photographs depicting increasing levels of clutter. CIR Scores can range from 1 to 9, with picture 1 indicating an absence of clutter and 9 indicative of the highest level of clutter. Each available room will be rated.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Readiness Ruler
The Readiness Ruler is a brief measure of motivation, which prompts patients with a 10-point likert scale on which they rate readiness, with a score of 0 reflecting "not ready," and a score of 10 reflecting "ready." The Readiness Ruler used in the current study will have patients rate both readiness for treatment and readiness for change.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)
Was developed by the World Health Organization and field-tested in 18 countries (including the United States) and contains 26 self-report questions, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. These four scales can be summed to calculate a total quality of life (QOL) score, ranging from 0 (least favorable health status)to 100 (most favorable health status).

Full Information

First Posted
November 12, 2013
Last Updated
May 17, 2021
Sponsor
Hartford Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04894851
Brief Title
Contingency Management for Hoarding Disorder
Acronym
HCM
Official Title
A Pilot Study of Contingency Management for Hoarding Disorder
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hartford Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aim 1: To test the efficacy of contingency management for patients with hoarding disorder (HD). Hypothesis 1. Participants completing CM will show significant pre- to post-treatment decreases in severity of hoarding symptoms and clinician-rated impairment, and significant increases in quality of life. Exploratory analyses will examine whether effect sizes compare with those of prior trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for HD conducted within our clinic, whether problem severity at follow-up is predicted by hoarding severity measured immediately after treatment completion, and whether readiness for change improves with treatment.
Detailed Description
The primary aim of the current study is a preliminary investigation of the efficacy of contingency management (CM) in the treatment of hoarding disorder (HD). CM is a highly efficacious treatment that has been used to treat issues such as substance use disorders, medication/ medical regimen nonadherence, and schizophrenia. While the current best-practice treatment for HD (cognitive behavioral therapy; CBT) is efficacious in that it results in significant symptom reduction, many patients continue to have high levels of functional impairment and distressing symptoms after treatment completion. We strongly feel that CM is able to address many of the issues that arise in the context of CBT for hoarding and we feel that the addition of CM to as CBT will result in significant pre- to post-treatment decreases in severity of hoarding symptoms and impairment, and significant increases in quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hoarding Disorder
Keywords
Hoarding Disorder, Contingency Management, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Group Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
13 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Contingency Management
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receives contingency payments each month based on decluttering scores
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Contingency Management
Intervention Description
Participants in the current study will receive contingencies for improvement in clutter, as measured by a trained, independent in-home rater. Ratings will be completed by after study consent, and once every month thereafter, being conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 of treatment. Participants will be reimbursed for each new 1-point reduction in CIR score, a set dollar amount per month for each CIR point reduction they maintain from baseline. Therefore, a perfectly performing patient would earn reimbursement (A CIR reduction of 8 points made in the first month and maintained throughout treatment. If a CIR score is higher than the prior month, the reinforcement schedule will reset to zero.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hoarding Rating Scale (HRS)
Description
A brief 5-item interview to rate clutter, difficulty discarding, acquisition, distress, and impairment. Each item is rated on a likert scale from 1 to 8, with higher scores reflective of higher symptom severity.
Time Frame
Change from week 1 (pre) to week 16 (post)
Title
Clutter Image Rating Scale
Description
A pictorial measure of clutter severity containing nine photographs depicting increasing levels of clutter. CIR Scores can range from 1 to 9, with picture 1 indicating an absence of clutter and 9 indicative of the highest level of clutter. Each available room will be rated.
Time Frame
Change from week 1 (pre) to week 16 (post)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Readiness Ruler
Description
The Readiness Ruler is a brief measure of motivation, which prompts patients with a 10-point likert scale on which they rate readiness, with a score of 0 reflecting "not ready," and a score of 10 reflecting "ready." The Readiness Ruler used in the current study will have patients rate both readiness for treatment and readiness for change.
Time Frame
Change from week 1 (pre) to week 16 (post)
Title
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)
Description
Was developed by the World Health Organization and field-tested in 18 countries (including the United States) and contains 26 self-report questions, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. These four scales can be summed to calculate a total quality of life (QOL) score, ranging from 0 (least favorable health status)to 100 (most favorable health status).
Time Frame
Change from week 1 (pre) to week 16 (post)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosed with Primary Hoarding Disorder, currently participating in the Hoarding Disorder treatment group at the HH Anxiety Disorders Center Exclusion Criteria: Not clinically appropriate for a group treatment format (i.e., active suicidality or aggressive behavior, psychosis, current physiological substance dependence, or personality issues that would be expected to substantially interfere with the group milieu; cognitively intact). Participants will also be excluded if they have previously completed CBT for HD. In addition, participants in the CM portion of the treatment will be required to live within one hour travel time of the treatment facility to allow for home visits with the independent rater.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Blaise L Worden, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Hartford Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Anxiety Disorders Center, Institute of Lilving
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06106
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Contingency Management for Hoarding Disorder

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs