search
Back to results

Conventional Photodynamic Therapy Versus Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for The Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

Primary Purpose

Acne Vulgaris

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Israel
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Containing Product in Cutaneous Dose Form
Sponsored by
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acne Vulgaris focused on measuring acne vulgaris, photodynamic therapy, PDT, Daylight PDT

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 40 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris on the face
  • Acne lesions include inflammatory papules/ pustules/ nodules and cysts , and non-inflammatory open and closed comedones.
  • Acne refractory to conventional therapies
  • Patients who are unable or do not want to take oral isotretinoin
  • Patients who cannot tolerate isotretinoin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of oral retinoid use within 12 months of study entry
  • Systemic antibiotics within 6 month of study entry
  • Topical acne treatment within 1 month of study entry
  • Presence of any other skin disease that could interfere with the assessment of the acne, such as folliculitis or rosacea
  • Presence of any other systemic disease that could affect the acne severity by its presence, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome, or by any medication prescribed for the treatment of the systemic diseases (retinoids, antibiotics).
  • Pregnancy or intention to get pregnant
  • lactating woman
  • Porphyria
  • Photosensitive dermatoses
  • Allergy to any component of the photosensitizer compound
  • Personal history of melanoma or dysplastic nevi
  • A beard or other facial hair that might interfere with study assessments;

Sites / Locations

  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Right: daylight illumination

Left face: conventional illumination with red light

Arm Description

The right side of the face was treated using daylight PDT

The left side was treated with conventional PDT.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Reduction in acne lesion counts and total acne severity score on both sides of the face
Change in the number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne lesions
Difference in adverse effects between the two sides
Difference in pain scores, erythema after each treatment, erosions and pustulosis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
November 10, 2020
Last Updated
November 10, 2020
Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04631250
Brief Title
Conventional Photodynamic Therapy Versus Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for The Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Official Title
A Split-Face Clinical Trial of Conventional Photodynamic Therapy Versus Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for The Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is considered an effective treatment for acne vulgaris. The study aims to determine whether treatment with daylight as an illumination source is as effective as conventional, red light illumination. 15 patients with acne vulgaris received 4 treatment sessions at three-week intervals. First, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) was applied to the entire face. Then the face was divided into two symmetrical contralateral treatment areas: the left was covered with a light-impermeable dressing, while the right face was exposed to sunlight. After 2 hours outdoors, the right side of the face was covered, and the left half was illuminated with red light.
Detailed Description
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is considered an effective treatment for acne vulgaris .One of the most important drawbacks of PDT is the pain during illumination. It has been shown that daylight PDT is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis. In order to examine the efficacy of daylight PDT for acne vulgaris, we used a split-face design: the face was divided into two symmetrical contralateral treatment areas: the left was covered with a light-impermeable dressing, while the right face was exposed to daylight. After 2 hours outdoors, the right side of the face was covered, and the left half was illuminated with red light.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acne Vulgaris
Keywords
acne vulgaris, photodynamic therapy, PDT, Daylight PDT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
"Split Face design" is a common model used in dermatology to study the difference between two treatments on a facial condition. The face was divided into two symmetrical contralateral treatment areas: the left was covered with a light-impermeable dressing, while the right face was exposed to sunlight. After 2 hours outdoors, the right side of the face was covered, and the left half was illuminated with red light.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The photographs of the patients were evaluated by two dermatologists blinded to the study protocol.
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
15 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Right: daylight illumination
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The right side of the face was treated using daylight PDT
Arm Title
Left face: conventional illumination with red light
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The left side was treated with conventional PDT.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Containing Product in Cutaneous Dose Form
Intervention Description
5-Aminolevulinic Acid was applied to both sides of the face.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reduction in acne lesion counts and total acne severity score on both sides of the face
Description
Change in the number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne lesions
Time Frame
We measured the difference between the number of lesions in the first visit and the number of lesions in the follow up visit, 12 weeks after the last teatment
Title
Difference in adverse effects between the two sides
Description
Difference in pain scores, erythema after each treatment, erosions and pustulosis
Time Frame
After each of the 4 treatment sessions

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris on the face Acne lesions include inflammatory papules/ pustules/ nodules and cysts , and non-inflammatory open and closed comedones. Acne refractory to conventional therapies Patients who are unable or do not want to take oral isotretinoin Patients who cannot tolerate isotretinoin Exclusion Criteria: History of oral retinoid use within 12 months of study entry Systemic antibiotics within 6 month of study entry Topical acne treatment within 1 month of study entry Presence of any other skin disease that could interfere with the assessment of the acne, such as folliculitis or rosacea Presence of any other systemic disease that could affect the acne severity by its presence, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome, or by any medication prescribed for the treatment of the systemic diseases (retinoids, antibiotics). Pregnancy or intention to get pregnant lactating woman Porphyria Photosensitive dermatoses Allergy to any component of the photosensitizer compound Personal history of melanoma or dysplastic nevi A beard or other facial hair that might interfere with study assessments;
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
6423906
Country
Israel

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Conventional Photodynamic Therapy Versus Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for The Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs