search
Back to results

Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain (Lumbar CvS)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Low-back Pain

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cooled Radiofrequency
Conventional Radiofrequency
Sponsored by
Avanos Medical
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Low-back Pain focused on measuring Pain Management, Lumbar facet syndrome, Radiofrequency Ablation, Low Back, Medial Branch Nerves

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 21 years
  2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures.
  3. Subjects who have chronic axial (non-radicular) low back pain (at least 3 months) attributed to bilateral L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar facet joint arthropathy based on clinical evaluation (paraspinal tenderness in the absence of signs and symptoms suggestive of focal neurological deficits) despite conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]).
  4. Positive response to dual diagnostic medial branch blocks (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 80% for a min of 3 hours for bupivacaine and minimum of 2 hours for lidocaine) using 0.5mL or less of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine, on respective encounters on separate days, at each of the appropriate medial branches.
  5. Usual/Average Pain ≥ 6 on an 11-point NRS scale.
  6. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the study without approval of the investigator.
  7. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for back pain during the study period.
  8. Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method for duration of participation.
  9. Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic condition (example; gout, fibromyalgia, MS, Lupus, etc.) that could cause pain.
  2. Focal neurologic signs or symptoms.
  3. Spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spina bifida occulta, grade II or higher spondylolisthesis at an affected joint or adjacent level, or significant lumbar scoliosis (sagittal vertical axis angle >5 degrees or Cobb Angle >10 degrees).
  4. Suspected mechanical instability based on flexion/extension and/or films at the proposed treatment levels
  5. History of prior lumbar fusion or previous lumbar back surgery at the intended treatment levels.
  6. Progressive motor deficit, and/or clinical signs of cauda equina or polyradiculopathy.
  7. Radiologic evidence of a symptomatic herniated disc or nerve root impingement.
  8. Symptomatic moderate or severe foramina or central canal stenosis demonstrating radicular symptoms or neurogenic claudication.
  9. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the lower back.
  10. Intra-articular steroid injection at target levels within 90 days from randomization.
  11. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells at target levels within 180 days from randomization.
  12. Prior lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy of the L3/L4, L4/L5 medial branches and/or L5/S1dorsal ramus.
  13. Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2
  14. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns.
  15. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved).
  16. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (e.g. disability, worker's compensation, auto injury in litigation or pending litigation).
  17. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period
  18. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction.
  19. Poorly controlled severe psychiatric illness or ongoing psychological barriers to recovery, as determined by the investigator.
  20. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures
  21. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable.
  22. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol.
  23. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse.
  24. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 50 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose.
  25. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.).
  26. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator.
  27. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation which included therapeutic treatment within 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
  28. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule, protocol requirements or procedures.

Sites / Locations

  • International Spine & Pain Performance Center
  • Millennium Pain Center
  • Ochsner Baptist Medical Center
  • Premier Pain Centers
  • The Center for Clinical Research
  • University Orthopedics Center
  • Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
  • University Orthopedics Center
  • University of Utah
  • The Spine and Nerve Centers of St. Francis Hosptial

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cooled Radiofrequency

Conventional Radiofrequency

Arm Description

Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain

Conventional radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The proportion of subjects whose back pain is reduced by ≥ 50 percent based on the NRS scale at 6 Months
The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

The mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) score from baseline to the 6-month visit
Short Form 36-PF - score range = 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to "greatest disability" and "100" indicates "no disability". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group
The mean change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to the 6-month visit
ODI - score range = 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to "no disability" and "100" indicates the "maximum disability possible". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group
The measured Global Perceived Effect scale at the 6-month visit
The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales.
The mean change in EQ-5D-5L score from baseline to the 6-month visit
This outcome instrument is composed two components. The first component consists of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. The second component, EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), has a score range of 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to the "worst imaginable health state" and "100" indicates the "best imaginable health state". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group.
The proportion of subjects requiring additional intervention for their back pain during the 6-month period

Full Information

First Posted
March 12, 2021
Last Updated
June 28, 2022
Sponsor
Avanos Medical
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04803149
Brief Title
Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Acronym
Lumbar CvS
Official Title
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial Comparing COOLIEF* Cooled Radiofrequency to Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation of the Medial Branch Nerves in the Management of Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 23, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Avanos Medical

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is being conducted to assess the relative effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy in subjects with chronic axial low back pain originating in the lumbar facet joints using the COOLIEF* Cooled Radiofrequency Probe as compared to the same procedure conducted using a Standard Radiofrequency Probe.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with chronic axial low back pain that originates in the lumbar facet joints undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion in the medial branch nerves with either Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) or Conventional (Standard) Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA). Approximately 188 participants from approximately 15 sites will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or SRFA in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 12 months post-treatment, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Low-back Pain
Keywords
Pain Management, Lumbar facet syndrome, Radiofrequency Ablation, Low Back, Medial Branch Nerves

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The study is a participant-blinded trial and deliberate action, utilizing a physical barrier, will be taken to ensure the blind remains intact.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
79 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cooled Radiofrequency
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain
Arm Title
Conventional Radiofrequency
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conventional radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cooled Radiofrequency
Other Intervention Name(s)
Coolief
Intervention Description
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional Radiofrequency
Other Intervention Name(s)
Standard Radiofrequency
Intervention Description
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via standard or conventional radiofrequency probe
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The proportion of subjects whose back pain is reduced by ≥ 50 percent based on the NRS scale at 6 Months
Description
The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through 6-months
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) score from baseline to the 6-month visit
Description
Short Form 36-PF - score range = 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to "greatest disability" and "100" indicates "no disability". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group
Time Frame
6 months
Title
The mean change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to the 6-month visit
Description
ODI - score range = 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to "no disability" and "100" indicates the "maximum disability possible". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group
Time Frame
6 months
Title
The measured Global Perceived Effect scale at the 6-month visit
Description
The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
The mean change in EQ-5D-5L score from baseline to the 6-month visit
Description
This outcome instrument is composed two components. The first component consists of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. The second component, EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), has a score range of 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to the "worst imaginable health state" and "100" indicates the "best imaginable health state". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
The proportion of subjects requiring additional intervention for their back pain during the 6-month period
Time Frame
6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
The proportion of subjects whose back pain is reduced by ≥ 50 percent based on the NRS scale at 12 Months
Description
The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through 12 months
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) score from baseline to the 12-month visit
Description
Short Form 36-PF - score range = 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to "greatest disability" and "100" indicates "no disability". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The mean change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to the 12-month visit
Description
ODI - score range = 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to "no disability" and "100" indicates the "maximum disability possible". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The measured Global Perceived Effect scale at the 12-month visit
Description
The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The mean change in EQ-5D-5L score from baseline to the 12-month visit
Description
This outcome instrument is composed two components. The first component consists of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. The second component, EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), has a score range of 0 - 100. "0" corresponds to the "worst imaginable health state" and "100" indicates the "best imaginable health state". The means of these scores and their respective standard deviations are reported for each study group.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The proportion of subjects requiring additional intervention for their back pain during the 12-month period
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 21 years Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures. Subjects who have chronic axial (non-radicular) low back pain (at least 3 months) attributed to bilateral L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar facet joint arthropathy based on clinical evaluation (paraspinal tenderness in the absence of signs and symptoms suggestive of focal neurological deficits) despite conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]). Positive response to dual diagnostic medial branch blocks (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 80% for a min of 3 hours for bupivacaine and minimum of 2 hours for lidocaine) using 0.5mL or less of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine, on respective encounters on separate days, at each of the appropriate medial branches. Usual/Average Pain ≥ 6 on an 11-point NRS scale. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the study without approval of the investigator. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for back pain during the study period. Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method for duration of participation. Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study. Exclusion Criteria: Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic condition (example; gout, fibromyalgia, MS, Lupus, etc.) that could cause pain. Focal neurologic signs or symptoms. Spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spina bifida occulta, grade II or higher spondylolisthesis at an affected joint or adjacent level, or significant lumbar scoliosis (sagittal vertical axis angle >5 degrees or Cobb Angle >10 degrees). Suspected mechanical instability based on flexion/extension and/or films at the proposed treatment levels History of prior lumbar fusion or previous lumbar back surgery at the intended treatment levels. Progressive motor deficit, and/or clinical signs of cauda equina or polyradiculopathy. Radiologic evidence of a symptomatic herniated disc or nerve root impingement. Symptomatic moderate or severe foramina or central canal stenosis demonstrating radicular symptoms or neurogenic claudication. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the lower back. Intra-articular steroid injection at target levels within 90 days from randomization. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells at target levels within 180 days from randomization. Prior lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy of the L3/L4, L4/L5 medial branches and/or L5/S1dorsal ramus. Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2 Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved). Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (e.g. disability, worker's compensation, auto injury in litigation or pending litigation). Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction. Poorly controlled severe psychiatric illness or ongoing psychological barriers to recovery, as determined by the investigator. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 50 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.). Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation which included therapeutic treatment within 30 days prior to signing informed consent. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule, protocol requirements or procedures.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Provenzano
Organizational Affiliation
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
International Spine & Pain Performance Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Pain Center
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Baptist Medical Center
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Premier Pain Centers
City
Shrewsbury
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07702
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Clinical Research
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Orthopedics Center
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16602
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
City
Sewickley
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15143
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Orthopedics Center
City
State College
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16801
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84108
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Spine and Nerve Centers of St. Francis Hosptial
City
Charleston
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
25301
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs