search
Back to results

Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cell Saver
No Cell Saver
Sponsored by
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care focused on measuring lumbar fusion, transfusion, cell-saver, cost-effectiveness

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age at time of enrollment
  • Signed informed consent
  • Requires fusion of 2 to 3 levels from L1-S1 for degenerative lumbar disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal trauma/fracture/malignancy
  • Infection as an indication for surgery
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Prisoners
  • Institutionalized in a non-voluntary and/or dependent residence (including hospitals, group homes, etc.), who may not be competent to give informed consent.
  • Inability to speak or understand English

Sites / Locations

  • Norton Leatherman Spine Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Cell Saver

No Cell saver

Arm Description

Patients will have the use of a cell-saver during surgery

Patient will not have cell saver available during surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Volume of blood transfused
The total volume of blood and blood products transfused during surgery an during hospitalization will be determined

Secondary Outcome Measures

Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level

Full Information

First Posted
October 10, 2011
Last Updated
October 14, 2011
Sponsor
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01453309
Brief Title
Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions
Official Title
Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2013 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Norton Leatherman Spine Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.
Detailed Description
INTRODUCTION: Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient. Although the theoretical benefits of using a cell saver are attractive, the literature seems to be controversial with respect to efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The benefits are clear in patients undergoing fusions for scoliosis that involve more than 5 levels where blood loss is considered substantial. It is less clear in patients who undergo a more limited two to three level lumbar fusion. The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions. METHODS Patients seen at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center scheduled to have decompression and fusion over 2 to 3 lumbar spine segments will be screened for the study. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be randomized to have a cell saver used intraoperatively (Cell Saver group) or no cell saver (Non-Cell Saver group). Data to be collected will include age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin) medications used to decrease intraoperative bleeding (Aprotinin, Tranexamic Acid); the use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time, complications, length of stay, discharge information, whether or not patient pre-donated blood, hemoglobin, hematocrit and maximum body temperature prior to surgery and during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively and the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion. The costs associated with the use of the cell-saver and/or blood transfusions, including supplies and personnel time, will be determined. Randomization Randomization will be through stratified block randomization to allow for stratification of the number of levels fused. Randomization will use sealed envelopes. Sample Size To detect a medium effect size of 0.3 with an α error of 0.05, a total of 220 subjects need to be included in the analysis. To account for subject withdrawal, a total of 240 subjects will be enrolled Procedures Patients receiving care at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center will be screened as potential subjects for the study. Only the existing information obtained per standard routine medical procedures will be used. Patients who fail pre-screening will not be recorded on any log or form. Patients considered potential candidates for the study based on screening will sign an Institutional Review Board -approved Informed Consent Document and HIPAA Authorization form prior to participating in any study activity. Subjects will be randomized to receive or not receive cell saver during surgery. The following data will be collected during the clinic visit: age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin). The following pre-operative data will be collected: hemoglobin, hematocrit, body temperature and whether or not patient pre-donated blood, the predonated blood volume and date of donation. Surgery will be performed per the standard of care of the treating surgeon. The choice of surgical approach, instrumentation and bone grafts/bone graft substitutes will be at the discretion of the surgeon. The following intraoperative data will be collected: use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time products transfused intraoperatively. In the subjects randomized to the Cell Saver group, the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion will be determined and collected. In-hospital post-operative data to be collected include: complications, length of stay, discharge information, hematocrit, hemoglobin and maximum body temperature during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused postoperatively. Subjects will be transfused at a set transfusion threshold of hemoglobin of 7.0g/dL or below and corresponding hematocrit of 21 or below. Subjects with Hb 7.0g/dL and are symptomatic as evidenced by tachycardia, hypotension, orthostatic hypotension or have pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease will also be transfused. The risks that occur in this study are associated with the general risks of spine surgery. Risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion include allergic reactions, hemolytic reactions, isoimmunization, graft versus host reactions, increased infection rates, and transmission of bloodborne pathogens, including human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Risks associated with the use of a cell saver include a paradoxical increase in blood loss, electrolyte depletion, metabolic acidosis, and hematuria Endpoints The primary endpoint is the volume of blood transfusion required. Secondary endpoints include Immediate post-op Hematocrit level Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level Volume of blood products used post-operatively Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics, including frequency counts for discrete variables and measures of central tendency (means, medians) and dispersion (standard deviation, range) for continuous variables will be calculated. Comparisons between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be done with independent t test for continuous variables and χ2 tests for discrete variables. To determine the effects of potentially confounding variables, analysis of covariance to compare the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be used. This will help identify variables that may be statistically different between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups that could potentially influence the total units of blood transfused. Those variables that were significantly related (i.e., correlated) with the number of units of blood transfused will be entered as covariates into the statistical model to determine if they affect the statistical conclusions between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups. All analyses will performed an a priori alpha level of 0.05 using IBM SPSS version 19.0. Funding This study will be unfunded.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care
Keywords
lumbar fusion, transfusion, cell-saver, cost-effectiveness

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cell Saver
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will have the use of a cell-saver during surgery
Arm Title
No Cell saver
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patient will not have cell saver available during surgery.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Cell Saver
Intervention Description
Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
No Cell Saver
Intervention Description
Cell Saver will not be available during surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Volume of blood transfused
Description
The total volume of blood and blood products transfused during surgery an during hospitalization will be determined
Time Frame
Hospitalization, range of 3 to 14 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Description
Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Time Frame
Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days
Title
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
Description
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
Time Frame
Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: At least 18 years of age at time of enrollment Signed informed consent Requires fusion of 2 to 3 levels from L1-S1 for degenerative lumbar disorders Exclusion Criteria: Spinal trauma/fracture/malignancy Infection as an indication for surgery Pregnant or nursing women Prisoners Institutionalized in a non-voluntary and/or dependent residence (including hospitals, group homes, etc.), who may not be competent to give informed consent. Inability to speak or understand English
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Leah Y Carreon, MD, MSc
Phone
502 992 0488
Ext
139
Email
leah.carreon@nortonhealthcare.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kelly R Bratcher, RN
Phone
502 992 0488
Ext
131
Email
kelly.bratcher2@nortonhealthcare.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mladen Djurasovic, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
Phone
502-744-0468
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mladen Djurasovic, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Steven D Glassman, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John R Dimar, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rolando M Puno, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mitchell J Campbell, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charles H Crawford III, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Kirk Owens, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leah Y Carreon, MD. MSc

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs