Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of Liberal vs Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anaemia. (REALITY)

Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of Liberal vs Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anaemia.

Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of Liberal vs Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anaemia. The REALITY (REstrictive And LIberal Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute mYocardial Infarction) Randomized Trial.

Anemia in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is a relatively frequent issue, resulting in poorer outcome. There is equipoise regarding which transfusion strategy is best, and there is an international consensus on the urgent need for a randomized trial. The investigators hypothesize that a "restrictive" transfusion strategy is at least non-inferior to a "liberal" transfusion strategy on 30-day outcomes of MI patients with anemia. Given the costs and risks of transfusion, a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis becomes key to determining the role of each strategy.

Anemia is frequent in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). The antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents used for MI treatment increase the risk of bleeding, which in turn increases the risk of ischemia and mortality. Anemia is an independent predictor of cardiac events in this setting. In the "FAST-MI 2010" nationwide registry, the prevalence of anemia (defined as Hb <10g/dL) at admission was 3% and impacted mortality. Whether this risk can be overcome by transfusion is debated. In theory, transfusion should increase oxygen delivery to the myocardium. However, recent data suggest that oxygen delivery is not increased in patients receiving transfusion, that red blood cells are rapidly depleted of nitric oxide during storage and that, conversely, transfusion may increase platelet activation and aggregation and these consequences appear potentially even more deleterious in patients with cardiovascular disease. In the general population without cardiovascular disease of medical and surgical patients, the role of liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategies has been explored by a series of randomized trials, which have led to a consensus to withhold blood transfusions until a threshold of 7 to 8 g/dl hemoglobin is reached. Among patients with myocardial infarction, however, both the deleterious consequences of anemia and the risks of transfusion may be greater, which leads to lingering uncertainty regarding the role of liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategies in this setting. The clinical data are observational and contradictory. Conversely, a large meta-analysis (>200 000 patients) reported a higher risk of mortality and recurrent MI in MI patients who received transfusion. More recently, a careful observational study has shown that the majority of patients undergoing blood transfusion cannot be matched with non-transfused patients due to their markedly different clinical profiles, indicating that observational studies cannot reliable establish the benefits or risks of transfusion because they are hopelessly influenced by selection bias. These results strongly highlight the need for randomized trials to establish the role of transfusion during acute MI, a call for a randomized trial that has been echoed by several thought leaders in the field in recent years. Two small randomized trials (respectively 45 and 110 patients) comparing liberal vs. restrictive transfusion strategies in MI showed no clear difference in clinical outcomes but were both underpowered. The only guideline regarding management of anemia in this setting is from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on non-ST segment elevation - acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), which advise blood transfusion only if the hemodynamic status is compromised or the hemoglobin level is <7g/dL. As a result, there is wide variation in clinical practice. There is therefore equipoise regarding which transfusion strategy is best. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that a "restrictive" transfusion strategy (triggered by Hb <= 8 g/ dL) will be clinically non-inferior to a "liberal" transfusion strategy (triggered by Hb <= 10g/ dL) but will be less costly. Main objective: The main objective of the study is to compare cost-effectiveness of restrictive (triggered by Hb <= 8 g/ dL) vs liberal (triggered by Hb <= 10g/ dL) red blood transfusion strategies for patients with acute MI and anemia (7g /dL < Hb <= 10g / dL). Secondary objective(s): The key secondary objective is to perform cost-utility analyses at 30-days and 1 year. The main clinical objective will be to determine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy is clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal recurrent MI, and emergency revascularization prompted by ischemia. 2. A tertiary objective will be to compare major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year, since the impact of transfusion strategies on MACE may be delayed, or conversely, an initial benefit of either strategy may become lost over the first year.

The primary endpoint is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 30-days, using the composite endpoint (30-day composite of all-cause death, non fatal stroke, nonfatal recurrent MI, and emergency revascularization prompted by ischemia) as the effectiveness criterion

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 1 year, using the composite endpoint (1-year composite of all-cause death, non fatal stroke, nonfatal recurrent MI, and emergency revascularization prompted by ischemia) as the effectiveness criterion

The main clinical endpoint is Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30-days defined as the 30-day composite of all-cause death, non-fatal recurrent MI, non-fatal stroke and emergency revascularization prompted by ischemia, (all of the components of this composite clinical outcome will be analyzed separately as secondary endpoints of their own)

The main clinical endpoint is Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30-days defined as the 30-day composite of all-cause death, non-fatal recurrent MI, non-fatal stroke and emergency revascularization prompted by ischemia, (all of the components of this composite clinical outcome will be analyzed separately as secondary endpoints of their own)

Inclusion Criteria: Aged ≥ 18 years Recent acute myocardial infarction, with or without ST- segment elevation, with a combination of ischemic symptoms occurring in the past 48 hours,before the MI related admission, and elevation of biomarkers of myocardial injury (troponin) Anemia Hb ≤ 10g / dL but > 7 g/dL on Hb, measured at any time during the index hospital admission for MI. Written informed consent Coverage for medical insurance. Exclusion Criteria: Shock (SBP < 90 mmHg with clinical signs of low output or patients requiring inotropic agents) MI occurring post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (i.e. type IV or V Acute MI according to the 2012 Universal Definition of MI Life-threatening or massive ongoing bleeding (as judged by the investigator) Any blood transfusion in the previous 30-days any known malignant hematologic disease Note: Sickle cell disease, thalassemia and anemia due to chronic renal failure (even under EPO) are not an exclusion criteria

Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, Burton PB, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Gibson CM, Braunwald E. Association of hemoglobin levels with clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2005 Apr 26;111(16):2042-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000162477.70955.5F. Epub 2005 Apr 11.

Hanssen M, Cottin Y, Khalife K, Hammer L, Goldstein P, Puymirat E, Mulak G, Drouet E, Pace B, Schultz E, Bataille V, Ferrieres J, Simon T, Danchin N; FAST-MI 2010 Investigators. French Registry on Acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction 2010. FAST-MI 2010. Heart. 2012 May;98(9):699-705. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301700.

Silvain J, Pena A, Cayla G, Brieger D, Bellemain-Appaix A, Chastre T, Vignalou JB, Beygui F, Barthelemy O, Collet JP, Montalescot G. Impact of red blood cell transfusion on platelet activation and aggregation in healthy volunteers: results of the TRANSFUSION study. Eur Heart J. 2010 Nov;31(22):2816-21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq209. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

Silvain J, Abtan J, Kerneis M, Martin R, Finzi J, Vignalou JB, Barthelemy O, O'Connor SA, Luyt CE, Brechot N, Mercadier A, Brugier D, Galier S, Collet JP, Chastre J, Montalescot G. Impact of red blood cell transfusion on platelet aggregation and inflammatory response in anemic coronary and noncoronary patients: the TRANSFUSION-2 study (impact of transfusion of red blood cell on platelet activation and aggregation studied with flow cytometry use and light transmission aggregometry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 8;63(13):1289-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.029. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Yeh RW, Wimmer NJ. Blood transfusion in myocardial infarction: opening old wounds for comparative-effectiveness research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 26;64(8):820-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.041. No abstract available.

Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, Tinmouth AT, Marques MB, Fung MK, Holcomb JB, Illoh O, Kaplan LJ, Katz LM, Rao SV, Roback JD, Shander A, Tobian AA, Weinstein R, Swinton McLaughlin LG, Djulbegovic B; Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee of the AABB. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):49-58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201206190-00429.

Carson JL, Carless PA, Hebert PC. Outcomes using lower vs higher hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion. JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):83-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.50429.

Wu WC, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 25;345(17):1230-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010615.

Chatterjee S, Wetterslev J, Sharma A, Lichstein E, Mukherjee D. Association of blood transfusion with increased mortality in myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted study sequential analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):132-9. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1001.

Salisbury AC, Reid KJ, Marso SP, Amin AP, Alexander KP, Wang TY, Spertus JA, Kosiborod M. Blood transfusion during acute myocardial infarction: association with mortality and variability across hospitals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 26;64(8):811-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.040.

Rao SV, Sherwood MW. Isn't it about time we learned how to use blood transfusion in patients with ischemic heart disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 8;63(13):1297-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.028. Epub 2013 Dec 18. No abstract available.

Cooper HA, Rao SV, Greenberg MD, Rumsey MP, McKenzie M, Alcorn KW, Panza JA. Conservative versus liberal red cell transfusion in acute myocardial infarction (the CRIT Randomized Pilot Study). Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Jul 24.

Carson JL, Brooks MM, Abbott JD, Chaitman B, Kelsey SF, Triulzi DJ, Srinivas V, Menegus MA, Marroquin OC, Rao SV, Noveck H, Passano E, Hardison RM, Smitherman T, Vagaonescu T, Wimmer NJ, Williams DO. Liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2013 Jun;165(6):964-971.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, Caso P, Dudek D, Gielen S, Huber K, Ohman M, Petrie MC, Sonntag F, Uva MS, Storey RF, Wijns W, Zahger D; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(23):2999-3054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236. Epub 2011 Aug 26. No abstract available.

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.

Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, Tweeddale M, Schweitzer I, Yetisir E. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):409-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400601. Erratum In: N Engl J Med 1999 Apr 1;340(13):1056.

Hebert PC, Yetisir E, Martin C, Blajchman MA, Wells G, Marshall J, Tweeddale M, Pagliarello G, Schweitzer I; Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Is a low transfusion threshold safe in critically ill patients with cardiovascular diseases? Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):227-34. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00001.

Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A, Concepcion M, Hernandez-Gea V, Aracil C, Graupera I, Poca M, Alvarez-Urturi C, Gordillo J, Guarner-Argente C, Santalo M, Muniz E, Guarner C. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211801. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 13;368(24):2341.

Sherwood MW, Rao SV. Acute coronary syndromes: Blood transfusion in patients with acute MI and anaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;10(4):186-7. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.14. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Perkins HA, Busch MP. Transfusion-associated infections: 50 years of relentless challenges and remarkable progress. Transfusion. 2010 Oct;50(10):2080-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02851.x. No abstract available.

Williamson LM, Devine DV. Challenges in the management of the blood supply. Lancet. 2013 May 25;381(9880):1866-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60631-5.

Bernard AC, Davenport DL, Chang PK, Vaughan TB, Zwischenberger JB. Intraoperative transfusion of 1 U to 2 U packed red blood cells is associated with increased 30-day mortality, surgical-site infection, pneumonia, and sepsis in general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 May;208(5):931-7, 937.e1-2; discussion 938-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Mar 26.

Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, Gattinoni L, Thijs L, Webb A, Meier-Hellmann A, Nollet G, Peres-Bota D; ABC (Anemia and Blood Transfusion in Critical Care) Investigators. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002 Sep 25;288(12):1499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.12.1499.

Frank SM, Abazyan B, Ono M, Hogue CW, Cohen DB, Berkowitz DE, Ness PM, Barodka VM. Decreased erythrocyte deformability after transfusion and the effects of erythrocyte storage duration. Anesth Analg. 2013 May;116(5):975-981. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828843e6. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion-related mortality: the ongoing risks of allogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for their prevention. Blood. 2009 Apr 9;113(15):3406-17. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-167643. Epub 2009 Feb 2.

Murray CJ, Richards MA, Newton JN, Fenton KA, Anderson HR, Atkinson C, Bennett D, Bernabe E, Blencowe H, Bourne R, Braithwaite T, Brayne C, Bruce NG, Brugha TS, Burney P, Dherani M, Dolk H, Edmond K, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, Fleming TD, Freedman G, Gunnell D, Hay RJ, Hutchings SJ, Ohno SL, Lozano R, Lyons RA, Marcenes W, Naghavi M, Newton CR, Pearce N, Pope D, Rushton L, Salomon JA, Shibuya K, Vos T, Wang H, Williams HC, Woolf AD, Lopez AD, Davis A. UK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013 Mar 23;381(9871):997-1020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60355-4. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E; CHEERS Task Force. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ. 2013 Mar 25;346:f1049. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1049.

Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ. 2001 Mar;10(2):179-84. doi: 10.1002/hec.584.

Kaiser C, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, Bonetti PO, Osswald S, Linka A, Bernheim A, Zutter A, Zellweger M, Grize L, Pfisterer ME; BASKET Investigators. Incremental cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared with a third-generation bare-metal stent in a real-world setting: randomised Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitats Trial (BASKET). Lancet. 2005 Sep 10-16;366(9489):921-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67221-2. Erratum In: Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2086.

Caruba T, Katsahian S, Schramm C, Charles Nelson A, Durieux P, Begue D, Juilliere Y, Dubourg O, Danchin N, Sabatier B. Treatment for stable coronary artery disease: a network meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e98371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098371. eCollection 2014.

Greiner W, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, Oppe S, Badia X, Busschbach J, Buxton M, Dolan P, Kind P, Krabbe P, Ohinmaa A, Parkin D, Roset M, Sintonen H, Tsuchiya A, de Charro F. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study. Eur J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;4(3):222-31. doi: 10.1007/s10198-003-0182-5.

Fearon WF, Shilane D, Pijls NH, Boothroyd DB, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Juni P, De Bruyne B, Hlatky MA; Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) Investigators. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease and abnormal fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 2013 Sep 17;128(12):1335-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003059. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

Wijeysundera HC, Tomlinson G, Ko DT, Dzavik V, Krahn MD. Medical therapy v. PCI in stable coronary artery disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 2013 Oct;33(7):891-905. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13497262. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Magnuson EA, Farkouh ME, Fuster V, Wang K, Vilain K, Li H, Appelwick J, Muratov V, Sleeper LA, Boineau R, Abdallah M, Cohen DJ; FREEDOM Trial Investigators. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the FREEDOM trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 19;127(7):820-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.147488. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

Raikou M, Briggs A, Gray A, McGuire A. Centre-specific or average unit costs in multi-centre studies? Some theory and simulation. Health Econ. 2000 Apr;9(3):191-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(200004)9:33.0.co;2-1.

Hollingworth W, McKell-Redwood D, Hampson L, Metcalfe C. Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside randomized controlled trials: are economic end points considered in sample size calculations and does it matter? Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):43-53. doi: 10.1177/1740774512465358. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, Caro J, Mullins CD, Nuijten M, Orlewska E, Watkins J, Trueman P. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis. Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x.

Robinson SD, Janssen C, Fretz EB, Berry B, Chase AJ, Siega AD, Carere RG, Fung A, Simkus G, Klinke WP, Hilton JD. Red blood cell storage duration and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2010 May;159(5):876-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.018.

Ducrocq G, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Puymirat E, Lemesle G, Cachanado M, Durand-Zaleski I, Arnaiz JA, Martinez-Selles M, Silvain J, Ariza-Sole A, Ferrari E, Calvo G, Danchin N, Avendano-Sola C, Frenkiel J, Rousseau A, Vicaut E, Simon T, Steg PG; REALITY Investigators. Effect of a Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Major Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: The REALITY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):552-560. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0135.

Ducrocq G, Calvo G, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Durand-Zaleski I, Avendano-Sola C, Puymirat E, Lemesle G, Arnaiz JA, Martinez-Selles M, Rousseau A, Cachanado M, Vicaut E, Silvain J, Karam C, Danchin N, Simon T, Steg PG; REALITY investigators. Restrictive vs liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: Rationale and design of the REALITY trial. Clin Cardiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/clc.23453. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Durand-Zaleski I, Ducrocq G, Mimouni M, Frenkiel J, Avendano-Sola C, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Ferrari E, Lemesle G, Puymirat E, Berard L, Cachanado M, Arnaiz JA, Martinez-Selles M, Silvain J, Ariza-Sole A, Calvo G, Danchin N, Paco S, Drouet E, Abergel H, Rousseau A, Simon T, Steg PG. Economic evaluation of restrictive vs. liberal transfusion strategy following acute myocardial infarction (REALITY): trial-based cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Feb 28;9(2):194-202. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac029.

Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.