search
Back to results

CRRT Versus Plasmapheresis in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning (AlP)

Primary Purpose

Aluminium Phosphide Poisoning

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Routine management
CRRT
PPH
Sponsored by
Assiut University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aluminium Phosphide Poisoning focused on measuring CRRT, Plasmapheresis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients exposed to AlP poisoning of either sex.
  • Critically ill with severe symptomatic acute AlP poisoning; SBP<90mmHg, PH<7.32 and HR<60 bpm.
  • Age >18 year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to consent participating research.
  • Age <18 years.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Placebo Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Control group

    CRRT group

    PPH group

    Arm Description

    Patients will receive routine management only.

    Patients will receive CRRT and routine management.

    Patients will receive plasmapheresis and routine management.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Mortality rate
    Evaluation of the effect of CRRT versus PPH on mortality rate in acute AlP poisoning, (30 days mortality).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    ICU
    ICU stay.
    Morbidity
    Thirty days morbidity: organ dysfunction secondary to poisoning (e.g. renal failure, pancreatitis, DM).
    Sessions
    Frequency of CRRT and PPH sessions that will be required for each patient.
    Vasopressors
    Requirement of vasopressors and or inotropic support.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 11, 2022
    Last Updated
    April 12, 2022
    Sponsor
    Assiut University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05334667
    Brief Title
    CRRT Versus Plasmapheresis in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning
    Acronym
    AlP
    Official Title
    Comparison Between the Effect of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Versus Plasmapheresis on Mortality Rate in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning; Randomized Controlled Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    June 2022 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 2025 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    November 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Assiut University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Aluminum phosphide (AlP) is a solid fumigant pesticide sold as tablets in use since the 1940s. It is considered to be an ideal pesticide because of its cheapness, efficiency, and easy availability in the market and is widely used as a grain preservative worldwide.The mortality in cases of aluminum phosphide poisoning varies between 60% and 90%, even in experienced and well-equipped hospitals. Patients mostly die due to cardiovascular collapse, refractory shock, severe acidemia, fulminant hepatic failure, and or adult respiratory distress syndrome. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a slow and smooth continuous extracorporeal blood purification, which is designed to replicate depurative function of the kidney. It is usually implemented over 24 h to several days with an aim of gentle correction of fluid overload and removal of excess uremic toxins. Furthermore, many observational studies considered CRRT as the predominant form of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU) for critically ill patients with AKI and/or multiorgan failure, along with acute brain injury or other causes of increased intracranial pressure or generalized brain edema. The effectiveness of CRRT is mainly due to its accurate volume control, steady acid-base and electrolyte correction, and achievement of hemodynamic stability in adults and pediatrics. Plasmapheresis (PPH) can rapidly and effectively remove toxic substances and their potentially toxic metabolites from the blood compartment, especially those with high protein-binding. As the potential benefit of therapeutic plasma exchange is increasingly recognized, its use is becoming more widespread, and case reports have confirmed its value in the treatment of drug overdose. The application of plasmapheresis dramatically reversed the severe biochemical and clinical manifestations and was able to prevent serious co-occurrence.
    Detailed Description
    Seventy five (75) patients will be included in this study. They will be randomly allocated into three groups (25 patients | each) Control Group (C Group): routine management. CRRT Group: routine management + CRRT. PPH Group: routine management + PPH. Immediately after ICU admission: All Patients will receive the routine management including: Care for airway, breathing and circulation. Intravenous fluids guided by central venous pressure measurement and vasopressors (Norepinephrine) IV infusion will be used to treat hypotension and refractory shock, intubation and mechanical ventilation in the following conditions: apnea, respiratory failure, hypoxia, inadequate ventilation, disruption of airway reflexes, disturbed conscious level (GCS <8). Phosphine excretion can be increased by maintaining adequate hydration and renal perfusion with intravenous fluids and low dose dopamine (4-6 μg/kg/min). Diuretics like furosemide can be given if systolic blood pressure is >90 mm Hg to enhance excretion as the main route of elimination of phosphine is renal. Correction of metabolic acidosis by intravenous sodium bicarbonate will also be considered in a dose of 50-100 mEq intravenously every 8 hour till the bicarbonate level rises to 18-20 mEq/L. Additionally, magnesium sulfate: 1g IV infusion every 1hr for the first 3 hrs, followed by 1-1.5 g every 6 hrs for 24 hrs was administered. Decontamination will be done by gastric lavage using normal saline mixed with sodium bicarbonate solution (2 ampoules sodium bicarbonate 25% added to each 500cc saline) in all Patients presented within 2 hrs of toxic ingestion. Then, a single (50 gm) dose of activated charcoal will be administered. Then patients will receive either CRRT or PPH after confirmation of exposure to aluminum phosphide. Peri-interventional evaluation: - Time elapsed between exposure and start of management. Standard vital signs (ABP, HR, Spo2, ETCO2). ECG and GCS are continuously monitored and documented. Laboratory studies: Phosphine gas level in blood by gas chromatography: on admission and another sample after CRRT or PPH Tropnin levels immediately on admission and at the end of CRRT or PPH. ABG to assess acid base status and lactate levels. Basic sample on admission and serial samples every 2 hours after the start of CRRT or PPH for follow up, evaluation and assessment. Prisma-flex (Gambro-Swedan) machine will be used to carry out both CRRT and PPH sessions. Each CRRT session continue for 72 hours, while PPH session continue for 4 hours. The need for another session will be evaluated by the SBP< 90 mmHg, lactate level >1mmol, acid base status; PH<7.35 and renal function; S. creatinine>2. All participating patients will be observed until discharge from the hospital or death. Continuous monitoring and documentation of their vital signs, oxygen saturation, and conscious level will be done. Parameters to be evaluated regularly Laboratory studies CBC, Coagulation profile (PT, PC, INR) if within normal, reassessment after 48 hours. Liver function tests LFTs if within normal, reassessment after 48 hours. Urea and creatinine will be assessed daily. Troponin T and I if within normal, reassessment after 48 hours. Blood glucose/ 4 hours for the first 48 hours then every 8 hours. K, Mg, Ca will be assessed daily. Standard monitoring: ABP, HR, Spo2, ETCO2 and ECG continuously. 24 hours total urine output (UOP).

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Aluminium Phosphide Poisoning
    Keywords
    CRRT, Plasmapheresis

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Comparison between using CRRT versus plasmapheresis in the management of aluminum phosphide poisoning and effect on mortality rate.
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigator) nor the patients will be aware of the group allocation.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    75 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients will receive routine management only.
    Arm Title
    CRRT group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients will receive CRRT and routine management.
    Arm Title
    PPH group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients will receive plasmapheresis and routine management.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Routine management
    Intervention Description
    Routine management
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    CRRT
    Intervention Description
    Prisma-flex (Gambro-Swedan) machine will be used to carry out both CRRT and PPH sessions. Each CRRT session continue for 72 hours, while PPH session continue for 4 hours.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    PPH
    Intervention Description
    Prisma-flex (Gambro-Swedan) machine will be used to carry out both CRRT and PPH sessions. Each CRRT session continue for 72 hours, while PPH session continue for 4 hours.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Mortality rate
    Description
    Evaluation of the effect of CRRT versus PPH on mortality rate in acute AlP poisoning, (30 days mortality).
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    ICU
    Description
    ICU stay.
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    Morbidity
    Description
    Thirty days morbidity: organ dysfunction secondary to poisoning (e.g. renal failure, pancreatitis, DM).
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    Sessions
    Description
    Frequency of CRRT and PPH sessions that will be required for each patient.
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    Vasopressors
    Description
    Requirement of vasopressors and or inotropic support.
    Time Frame
    30 days

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients exposed to AlP poisoning of either sex. Critically ill with severe symptomatic acute AlP poisoning; SBP<90mmHg, PH<7.32 and HR<60 bpm. Age >18 year. Exclusion Criteria: Refusal to consent participating research. Age <18 years.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    6314042
    Citation
    Chan LT, Crowley RJ, Delliou D, Geyer R. Phosphine analysis in post mortem specimens following ingestion of aluminium phosphide. J Anal Toxicol. 1983 Jul-Aug;7(4):165-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/7.4.165.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29378027
    Citation
    Yan H, Chen H, Li Z, Shen M, Zhuo X, Wu H, Xiang P. Phosphine Analysis in Postmortem Specimens Following Inhalation of Phosphine: Fatal Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning in Children. J Anal Toxicol. 2018 Jun 1;42(5):330-336. doi: 10.1093/jat/bky005.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29807406
    Citation
    Navabi SM, Navabi J, Aghaei A, Shaahmadi Z, Heydari R. Mortality from aluminum phosphide poisoning in Kermanshah Province, Iran: characteristics and predictive factors. Epidemiol Health. 2018 May 27;40:e2018022. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018022. eCollection 2018.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Bellomo R, Ronco C. Nomenclature for continuous renal replacement therapies. Critical Care Nephrology: Springer; 1998. p. 1169-76.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18791697
    Citation
    Ronco C, Ricci Z. Renal replacement therapies: physiological review. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1258-6. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27241853
    Citation
    Macedo E, Mehta RL. Continuous Dialysis Therapies: Core Curriculum 2016. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Oct;68(4):645-657. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.427. Epub 2016 May 28. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22353434
    Citation
    Schutt RC, Ronco C, Rosner MH. The role of therapeutic plasma exchange in poisonings and intoxications. Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):201-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01033.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    CRRT Versus Plasmapheresis in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs