Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis
Primary Purpose
To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cyclophosphamide
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients focused on measuring Lupus Nephritis, cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate mofetil
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Newly diagnosed LN with ISN/RPS histopathology classes III to V
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with biopsy had proven ISN / RPS classes I, II and VI LN
- Patients with previous history of treatment and relapse of lupus nephritis
- Patients who were receiving continuous dialysis for more than two weeks prior to randomization.
- Patients of less than 12 years of age
- Patients who had concurrent infection or illness at the time of enrollment
- Patients who were taking concurrent medications which are supposed to have interactions with MMF or CYC
- Female patients who were pregnant and breastfeeding.
- Patients who did not give consent for participation
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Cyclophosphamide
mycophenolate mofetil
Arm Description
Participants in this arm received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area.
Patients in this arm received mycophenolate mofetil in the tablet form.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
partial remission
reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day
Secondary Outcome Measures
Complete remission
normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03200002
Brief Title
Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis
Official Title
Effect of Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis in Nepalese Population
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chitwan Medical College
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This was a prospective open label randomized control trial, which was conducted for a period of one and half year from January 2014 to June 2015. Out of 52 patients screened, 49 patients meeting the international society of nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) criteria were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) groups respectively. Forty two patients (21 in each group) could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included in final analysis. Baseline clinical evaluation and investigations were done and recorded. CYC was given intravenously as a monthly pulse in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 body surface area. MMF was administered in the tablet form with the starting dose of 500 mg twice daily, which was increased to 750 mg twice daily after a month. Patients were assessed and monitored monthly and the details were recorded. Efficacy of treatment was measured as primary end point for those who achieved partial remission (reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day) and secondary end point for those who achieved complete remission (normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein). Adverse events experienced by the patients were also recorded during monthly visit.
Detailed Description
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with multiple organ involvement, among which kidney involvement, also known as lupus nephritis (LN), is quite common in SLE. LN is associated with a more than four-fold increase in mortality in patients with SLE. The management of SLE and LN comprises timely and coordinated management consisting of initial or induction phase of aggressive immunosuppression to bring the active disease under control followed by maintenance phase. The initial phase usually lasting for six months consists of treatment with steroid and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil. So far there is no study published regarding the efficacy and adverse events of such treatments in Nepal. So, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety profile of mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in induction therapy of LN in Nepalese population.
A total of 52 patients with international society of Nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) class III to V lupus nephritis were screened, 3 of which did not meet entry criteria and 49 patients were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the MMF and CYC group respectively. Twenty one patients in each groups could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included for analysis.
Patients in the CYC group received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the total leucocyte count (TLC) exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.Patients were monitored monthly and the details were recorded. During follow ups, any adverse events in between were noted and detailed physical evaluation was done and all baseline investigations (except USG abdomen, chest X-ray, serum anti nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti double strain deoxy-ribonuccleic acid (anti dsDNA), complement factor 3 (C3) and complement facotr 4 (C4) level) was repeated. Fasting lipid profile was repeated at the end of third and sixth month of treatment.
During the course of treatment, if a patient had interruption of medication for less than a 10 days' period due to any reason, s/he was considered as a regularly included subject. If the interruption extended beyond 10 days, the patient was withdrawn from the study.
Patients in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.
All patients, irrespective of randomized group, received concomitant corticosteroid therapy with oral prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine. Angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ACEi)/ angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) were given to all patients if the blood pressure remained above or equal to 120 mmHg of systolic blood pressure and 80 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure. If the blood pressure remained persistently high despite the use of ACEi/ARBs, other antihypertensives were added as required to achieve target blood pressure <130/80 mmHg. Oral prednisolone was given at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 60 mg/day. The starting dose of prednisolone was continued for initial one month. Then, the dose of oral prednisolone was tapered at the rate of 10 mg/day every 2 weeks and was maintained at the baseline dose of 5 to 7.5 mg per day then after. Additional intravenous methylprednisolone was given at the beginning of treatment for patients who presented as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) and who had activity index of more than 8 out of 24 on kidney biopsy irrespective of the randomized group (MMF or CYC) of the patient. The dose of methylprednisolone was 1 gram, which was given after mixing with 100 ml of normal saline and was infused intravenously over 1 hour for 3 days.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients
Keywords
Lupus Nephritis, cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate mofetil
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
49 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cyclophosphamide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this arm received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area.
Arm Title
mycophenolate mofetil
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients in this arm received mycophenolate mofetil in the tablet form.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cyclophosphamide
Intervention Description
Cyclophosphamide injection was administered in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the TLC exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Intervention Description
Participants in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
partial remission
Description
reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete remission
Description
normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
68 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Newly diagnosed LN with ISN/RPS histopathology classes III to V
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with biopsy had proven ISN / RPS classes I, II and VI LN
Patients with previous history of treatment and relapse of lupus nephritis
Patients who were receiving continuous dialysis for more than two weeks prior to randomization.
Patients of less than 12 years of age
Patients who had concurrent infection or illness at the time of enrollment
Patients who were taking concurrent medications which are supposed to have interactions with MMF or CYC
Female patients who were pregnant and breastfeeding.
Patients who did not give consent for participation
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29996800
Citation
Sedhain A, Hada R, Agrawal RK, Bhattarai GR, Baral A. Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs