search
Back to results

Decision Support Workshop for Breast Reconstruction (DSW)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Decision Support Workshop
Sponsored by
University Health Network, Toronto
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring breast cancer, breast reconstruction, shared decision making, decision support intervention

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 79 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age: 18 - 79 years at the time of consultation
  • In situ or invasive biopsy confirmed breast adenocarcinoma
  • Considered for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
  • First consultation for breast reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chest wall or atypical breast malignancy (ex: angiosarcoma) or inflammatory adenocarcinoma of the breast
  • Completion any phase of reconstruction, or for revision reconstruction
  • Patient cannot read or write in English.
  • Cognitive impairment or uncontrolled psychiatric diagnosis

Sites / Locations

  • Toronto General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Decision Support Workshop

Standard Care

Arm Description

The decision support workshop will be 2 hours in duration on the morning of the consultation and will be facilitated by a dedicated social worker from psycho-oncology.

Routine pre-consultation education

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Decision Self-efficacy Scale
Decision self-efficacy (DSE) scale is a prospectively designed instrument to evaluate patient self-confidence in decision-making, including shared decision-making. It has been validated among women facing treatment decisions for osteoporosis and used in cancer patients. Psychometric evaluation has shown high levels of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.90). Decision self-efficacy is correlated with decision conflict subscales of feeling informed (r = 0.47) and supported (r = 0.45). This instrument has never been tested in the breast cancer or breast reconstruction population. The total score is calculated by summing the 11 items, dividing by 11 and multiplying by 25. Scores range from 0 (extremely low self-efficacy) to 100 (extremely high self-efficacy). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated at baseline and after the initial consultation. Change in score was defined as the difference in total score between baseline and after consultation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Decision Conflict Scale
Decision conflict scale measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options and has been demonstrated to be valid and responsive to change. The decisional conflict scale is a 16-item 5-response instrument that reports a score from 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating more conflict (items are summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25).
Decision Preference and Decision Choice
Decision Preference and Decision Choice has been used as a primary and secondary outcome in studies of decision support interventions in cancer patients. It demonstrates good test-retest reliability (test-retest coefficient > 0.90) and is sensitive to change when measured before and after an intervention.
Patient Involvement in Care Scale (PICS)
PICS is a measure of patient perception of involvement with her care, and has seven 5-point Likert scale items that assess the extent to which the patient asked questions, offered opinions, and expressed concerns when meeting with the surgeon.
Satisfaction With Information (Sub-scale of BREAST-Q)
The BREAST-Q is a procedure-specific and validated PRO that measures Hr-QOL and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. The "Satisfaction with Information" Subscale specifically measures patient satisfaction with the preoperative information and care provided by the plastic surgeon and other members of the medical team. There are 15 items that use a four-level Likert scale response format, the score is transformed on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Qualitative Interview Assessment
A subgroup of participants allocated to both the experimental and usual care groups will be asked to participate in a brief qualitative telephone interview. Purposeful sampling will be used to recruit 5 patients from each group to achieve data saturation and variability. Telephone interviews will be conducted by a social worker trained in qualitative methods. All participants randomized to the workshop will additionally be asked to complete a written survey for evaluation of the intervention immediately after participation in the workshop.
Uptake Rate of Breast Reconstruction-Service Outcome
The uptake rate of breast reconstruction (if patients chose breast reconstruction or no reconstruction)
Length of Consultation-service Outcome
The length of the initial consultation with the plastic surgeon, measured in minutes. Consultations are expected to be between 20-60 mins.
Number of Consultations-service Outcomes
The number of consultations with the plastic surgeon until the patient has made a reconstruction choice (defined as signing a surgical consent form) will be recorded. Patients can spend months considering their choices, so it is appropriate to follow them for a period of at least six months after their initial consultation.
Breast Reconstruction Knowledge Test
This breast reconstruction knowledge test is a 12-item 3-response questionnaire that records the score on a continuous integer scale, and measured patient's knowledge regarding breast reconstruction.
Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey
Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey has a series of 18 questions that measure 4 domains of social support (emotional, tangible, affectionate, and social interactions). Responses range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all the time). The items in each domain were summed and then transformed to yield scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more support.

Full Information

First Posted
May 6, 2013
Last Updated
June 16, 2015
Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Collaborators
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01857882
Brief Title
Decision Support Workshop for Breast Reconstruction
Acronym
DSW
Official Title
Breast Reconstruction Decision Workshop Pilot RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Collaborators
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a pre-consultation decision support workshop for breast reconstruction after breast cancer, in facilitating the decision-making process, compared to routine pre-surgical education.
Detailed Description
Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly utilized in breast cancer patients to provide surgical restoration of the breast mounds. The breast reconstruction discussions can be highly complex, as there are many different techniques, timing, and complications that are unique to each procedure. However ¼ of women report being dissatisfied with some component of their cancer or reconstructive care. Failure of the physician to provide adequate information about treatment options is the most frequent source of cancer patient dissatisfaction and breast reconstruction patients have expressed a need for further information regarding the complex decision to pursue breast reconstruction. In such scenarios of complex medical decision-making, decision support techniques may be an effective solution to information provision and shared decision-making. As a result, the investigators developed a pre-consultation educational group intervention delivered in a group setting for women considering breast reconstruction, with the aims to fill an existing information-gap, promote high-quality decision-making and enhance decision self-efficacy and other decision measures. This pilot study will be the first step in the evaluation of the educational group intervention and the results will be used to determine the feasibility and inform the optimal design for a definitive randomized controlled trial. This study will first examine the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention through implementation in a pilot, mixed-methods, 1:1 allocation parallel-arm randomized controlled trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
breast cancer, breast reconstruction, shared decision making, decision support intervention

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
41 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Decision Support Workshop
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The decision support workshop will be 2 hours in duration on the morning of the consultation and will be facilitated by a dedicated social worker from psycho-oncology.
Arm Title
Standard Care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Routine pre-consultation education
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Decision Support Workshop
Intervention Description
Incorporates the key components of shared decision-making and decision support with the philosophy of delivering supportive care to cancer patients. Surgeon (30 mins): treatment options for breast reconstruction with indications/ contraindications, advantages / disadvantages, expected post-operative course, aesthetic result and complications with probabilities Registered nurse (30 mins): preparing for surgery, postoperative recovery and how to navigate the health care system Social worker (30 mins): values clarification exercise Breast reconstruction patient volunteer (30 mins) questions and answers about her personal experience
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decision Self-efficacy Scale
Description
Decision self-efficacy (DSE) scale is a prospectively designed instrument to evaluate patient self-confidence in decision-making, including shared decision-making. It has been validated among women facing treatment decisions for osteoporosis and used in cancer patients. Psychometric evaluation has shown high levels of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.90). Decision self-efficacy is correlated with decision conflict subscales of feeling informed (r = 0.47) and supported (r = 0.45). This instrument has never been tested in the breast cancer or breast reconstruction population. The total score is calculated by summing the 11 items, dividing by 11 and multiplying by 25. Scores range from 0 (extremely low self-efficacy) to 100 (extremely high self-efficacy). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated at baseline and after the initial consultation. Change in score was defined as the difference in total score between baseline and after consultation.
Time Frame
Change from baseline decision self-efficacy at 1 week after surgical consultation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decision Conflict Scale
Description
Decision conflict scale measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options and has been demonstrated to be valid and responsive to change. The decisional conflict scale is a 16-item 5-response instrument that reports a score from 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating more conflict (items are summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25).
Time Frame
Change from baseline decision conflict at 1 week after surgical consultation
Title
Decision Preference and Decision Choice
Description
Decision Preference and Decision Choice has been used as a primary and secondary outcome in studies of decision support interventions in cancer patients. It demonstrates good test-retest reliability (test-retest coefficient > 0.90) and is sensitive to change when measured before and after an intervention.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Patient Involvement in Care Scale (PICS)
Description
PICS is a measure of patient perception of involvement with her care, and has seven 5-point Likert scale items that assess the extent to which the patient asked questions, offered opinions, and expressed concerns when meeting with the surgeon.
Time Frame
T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
Title
Satisfaction With Information (Sub-scale of BREAST-Q)
Description
The BREAST-Q is a procedure-specific and validated PRO that measures Hr-QOL and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. The "Satisfaction with Information" Subscale specifically measures patient satisfaction with the preoperative information and care provided by the plastic surgeon and other members of the medical team. There are 15 items that use a four-level Likert scale response format, the score is transformed on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Time Frame
T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
Title
Qualitative Interview Assessment
Description
A subgroup of participants allocated to both the experimental and usual care groups will be asked to participate in a brief qualitative telephone interview. Purposeful sampling will be used to recruit 5 patients from each group to achieve data saturation and variability. Telephone interviews will be conducted by a social worker trained in qualitative methods. All participants randomized to the workshop will additionally be asked to complete a written survey for evaluation of the intervention immediately after participation in the workshop.
Time Frame
Within three months after initial consultation
Title
Uptake Rate of Breast Reconstruction-Service Outcome
Description
The uptake rate of breast reconstruction (if patients chose breast reconstruction or no reconstruction)
Time Frame
Six months after initial consultation
Title
Length of Consultation-service Outcome
Description
The length of the initial consultation with the plastic surgeon, measured in minutes. Consultations are expected to be between 20-60 mins.
Time Frame
Duration of initial consultation
Title
Number of Consultations-service Outcomes
Description
The number of consultations with the plastic surgeon until the patient has made a reconstruction choice (defined as signing a surgical consent form) will be recorded. Patients can spend months considering their choices, so it is appropriate to follow them for a period of at least six months after their initial consultation.
Time Frame
Six months after initial consultation
Title
Breast Reconstruction Knowledge Test
Description
This breast reconstruction knowledge test is a 12-item 3-response questionnaire that records the score on a continuous integer scale, and measured patient's knowledge regarding breast reconstruction.
Time Frame
Change in baseline breast reconstruction knowledge at 1 week after initial consultation
Title
Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey
Description
Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey has a series of 18 questions that measure 4 domains of social support (emotional, tangible, affectionate, and social interactions). Responses range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all the time). The items in each domain were summed and then transformed to yield scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more support.
Time Frame
baseline
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Recruitment Rate-feasibility Outcome
Description
As this is a pilot study, the feasibility of conducting the study is highly important. The recruitment rate of participants will be measured, during the recruiting period which is expected to be on average two months.
Time Frame
Duration of recruiting, expected on average two months
Title
Retention After Randomized Treatment Assignment (Workshop and Consultation Attendance)-Feasibility Outcome
Description
The number of participants who completed their assigned treatment (workshop and consultation vs. consultation alone) will be recorded. This will be recorded directly after each day the treatment is delivered.
Time Frame
Duration of treatment-8 hours on day of treatment
Title
Completion of Primary Outcome Measure-feasibility Outcome
Description
Patients are to complete the primary outcome one week after initial consultation. However, it is expected that some patients may take longer to complete this intervention (on average 1 month after consultation), and will require reminder telephone calls.
Time Frame
1 week after initial consultation

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
79 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient age: 18 - 79 years at the time of consultation In situ or invasive biopsy confirmed breast adenocarcinoma Considered for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction First consultation for breast reconstruction Exclusion Criteria: Chest wall or atypical breast malignancy (ex: angiosarcoma) or inflammatory adenocarcinoma of the breast Completion any phase of reconstruction, or for revision reconstruction Patient cannot read or write in English. Cognitive impairment or uncontrolled psychiatric diagnosis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Toni Zhong, MD, MHS
Organizational Affiliation
University Health Network, Toronto
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Toronto General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2C4
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25351455
Citation
Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, Bagher S, Jones JM, Metcalfe KA, Hofer SO, O'Neill AC, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1365-75. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23829442
Citation
Platt J, Baxter N, Jones J, Metcalfe K, Causarano N, Hofer SO, O'Neill A, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 6;14:199. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-199.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00520-014-2479-6
Description
E-publication link

Learn more about this trial

Decision Support Workshop for Breast Reconstruction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs