search
Back to results

DermaVeil Versus Sculptra for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds Wrinkles

Primary Purpose

Face; Atrophy

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DermaVeil right with left side Sculptra left side
DermaVeil left with left side Sculptra right side
Sponsored by
DermAvance
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Face; Atrophy focused on measuring Nasolabial Folds

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Outpatient, male or female subjects of any race 21 years or older. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at the Baseline Visit (test must have a sensitivity of at least 50U/mL for human chorionic gonadotropin) and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.

    1. A female is considered of childbearing potential unless she is

      • postmenopausal for at least 12 months prior to study drug administration;
      • without a uterus and/or both ovaries; or
      • has been surgically sterile for at least 6 months prior to study drug administration.
    2. Reliable methods of contraception are:

      • hormonal methods or intrauterine device in use >30 days prior to study drug administration; or
      • barrier methods plus spermicide in use at least 14 days prior to study drug administration
      • vasectomized partner at least 3 months post operative or a zero sperm count post operatively 2. Demonstrate clinical evidence of moderate to severe bilateral aging in the nasolabial area, with wrinkles classified as a grade 3 or grade 4 on a 5-grade WSRS.

        3. Committed to abstain from procedures interfering with the treatment outcome (exclusion criteria) throughout the study.

        4. Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent and Photography Release forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test), are planning to become pregnant during the study period, have an infant they are breast-feeding, or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control.
  2. Subjects planning a facial cosmetic procedure during the study period or with prior cosmetic procedures (i.e., surgery) or visible scars that may affect the evaluation of response and/or quality of photography.
  3. Facial asymmetry, ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, thick sebaceous skin, or an inability to substantially lessen upper facial rhytids even by physically spreading them apart.
  4. Active skin disease within the treatment area within 6 months prior to study entry.
  5. History of malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer within the past 5 years.
  6. Profound atrophy/excessive weakness of muscles in target areas of injection.
  7. History of facial nerve palsy.
  8. Facial wrinkles therapy, such a permanent or enduring dermal fillers in the previous 2 years or bioresorbable during the previous 12 months.
  9. Allergy or sensitivity to any component of the study medication (Section 8.1), or a known sensitivity to local anesthetics.
  10. Previous botulinum toxin therapy within six (6) months of the Baseline Visit.
  11. Use of systemic prednisone, penicillamine, anti metabolites or other bioequivalent collagen production inhibitors within 3 months of the Baseline Visit.
  12. Has received (or is planning to receive) anti-coagulation, anti-platelet, or thrombolytic medications (e.g., warfarin), anti-inflammatory drugs (oral/injectable corticosteroids or non-steroidal anti inflammatory, eg.,aspirin, ibuprofen), or other substances known to increase coagulation time (e.g., Vitamin E, garlic, gingko). To clarify, no non-steroidal anti inflammatory e.g. asprin or ibuprofen within 10 days prior to injections or 3 days post injection.
  13. Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse.
  14. Medical and/or psychiatric problems that, in the Investigator's opinion, is severe enough to interfere with the study results.
  15. History of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability.
  16. Participation in an investigational drug or investigational device study within 3 months of the Baseline Visit.
  17. A history of connective tissue disease (rheumatoid Arthritis, arthritis, lupus).
  18. A history of multiple severe allergies or a history of anaphylactic shock.
  19. Patients with a known history of or susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring.

Sites / Locations

  • Bay Area Dermatology
  • Miami Skin Institute
  • Laser & Skin Surgery Center of Indiana
  • PCR

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Right Side DermaVeil, Left Side Sculptra

Left Side DermaVeil, Right Side Sculptra

Arm Description

DermaVeil right with left side Sculptra left side

DermaVeil left with left side Sculptra right side

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy of treatment vs Comparator (using a 5-grade WSRS (wrinkle severity rating scale) score and a rating by an independent evaluator)
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment versus the comparator in a non-inferiority statistical model using a 5-grade WSRS (wrinkle severity rating scale) score and a rating by an independent evaluator

Secondary Outcome Measures

To evaluate the Global aesthetic improvement as assessed by investigators and subjects
• To evaluate the Global aesthetic improvement (GAI) as assessed by investigators and subjects
To evaluate subjects satisfaction using a six point subject satisfaction questionnaire.
To evaluate subjects satisfaction using a six point subject satisfaction questionnaire.

Full Information

First Posted
December 3, 2014
Last Updated
February 5, 2019
Sponsor
DermAvance
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02310490
Brief Title
DermaVeil Versus Sculptra for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds Wrinkles
Official Title
A Controlled, Randomized, Within-subject, Multi-center Prospective Clinical Trial of DermaVeil (Injectable Poly-L-lactic Acid) Versus SCULPTRA® Aesthetic (Injectable Poly-L-lactic Acid) in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
DermAvance

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Study DA-13-007 is a randomized, evaluator-blinded, within subject (split face) multicenter clinical study of DermaVeil (Injectable poly-l-lactic acid) compared to SCULPTRA in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles. Qualifying subjects will be randomized to receive DermaVeil and SCULPTRA on either the right or left side of the face.
Detailed Description
A randomized, evaluator-blinded, within subject (split face) multicenter clinical study of DermaVeil (Injectable poly-l-lactic acid) compared to SCULPTRA in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles. Qualifying subjects will be randomized to receive DermaVeil and SCULPTRA on either the right or left side of the face. The treatment phase will consist of one to three visits at 3 week intervals during which eligible subjects will receive bilateral injections of study material in the left and right nasolabial fold wrinkles, including visits at weeks 3 and 6 for touch ups if needed. The follow-up phase will consist of assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the last treatment, and safety and efficacy evaluations for an additional 12 months. Standardized photographs will be taken at screening and at all treatment phase and follow-up visits. Efficacy evaluations will be made by an on-site blinded evaluator, and of the photographs using a validated, standardized photo-numeric scale. The primary efficacy comparison between study treatments will be made on the mean change from baseline in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale of the nasolabial folds (as determined by the on-site blinded evaluator) and at the 12 month time point. Study participants will continue to be followed for safety and efficacy at months 18 and 24 after their last injection session.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Face; Atrophy
Keywords
Nasolabial Folds

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
161 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Right Side DermaVeil, Left Side Sculptra
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
DermaVeil right with left side Sculptra left side
Arm Title
Left Side DermaVeil, Right Side Sculptra
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
DermaVeil left with left side Sculptra right side
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
DermaVeil right with left side Sculptra left side
Intervention Description
The treatment phase will consist of one to three visits at 3 week intervals during which eligible subjects will receive bilateral injections of study material in the left and right nasolabial fold wrinkles, including visits at weeks 3 and 6 for touch ups if needed
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
DermaVeil left with left side Sculptra right side
Intervention Description
The treatment phase will consist of one to three visits at 3 week intervals during which eligible subjects will receive bilateral injections of study material in the left and right nasolabial fold wrinkles, including visits at weeks 3 and 6 for touch ups if needed
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy of treatment vs Comparator (using a 5-grade WSRS (wrinkle severity rating scale) score and a rating by an independent evaluator)
Description
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment versus the comparator in a non-inferiority statistical model using a 5-grade WSRS (wrinkle severity rating scale) score and a rating by an independent evaluator
Time Frame
One Year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To evaluate the Global aesthetic improvement as assessed by investigators and subjects
Description
• To evaluate the Global aesthetic improvement (GAI) as assessed by investigators and subjects
Time Frame
Two Year
Title
To evaluate subjects satisfaction using a six point subject satisfaction questionnaire.
Description
To evaluate subjects satisfaction using a six point subject satisfaction questionnaire.
Time Frame
Two Year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Outpatient, male or female subjects of any race 21 years or older. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at the Baseline Visit (test must have a sensitivity of at least 50U/mL for human chorionic gonadotropin) and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study. A female is considered of childbearing potential unless she is postmenopausal for at least 12 months prior to study drug administration; without a uterus and/or both ovaries; or has been surgically sterile for at least 6 months prior to study drug administration. Reliable methods of contraception are: hormonal methods or intrauterine device in use >30 days prior to study drug administration; or barrier methods plus spermicide in use at least 14 days prior to study drug administration vasectomized partner at least 3 months post operative or a zero sperm count post operatively 2. Demonstrate clinical evidence of moderate to severe bilateral aging in the nasolabial area, with wrinkles classified as a grade 3 or grade 4 on a 5-grade WSRS. 3. Committed to abstain from procedures interfering with the treatment outcome (exclusion criteria) throughout the study. 4. Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent and Photography Release forms. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test), are planning to become pregnant during the study period, have an infant they are breast-feeding, or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control. Subjects planning a facial cosmetic procedure during the study period or with prior cosmetic procedures (i.e., surgery) or visible scars that may affect the evaluation of response and/or quality of photography. Facial asymmetry, ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, thick sebaceous skin, or an inability to substantially lessen upper facial rhytids even by physically spreading them apart. Active skin disease within the treatment area within 6 months prior to study entry. History of malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer within the past 5 years. Profound atrophy/excessive weakness of muscles in target areas of injection. History of facial nerve palsy. Facial wrinkles therapy, such a permanent or enduring dermal fillers in the previous 2 years or bioresorbable during the previous 12 months. Allergy or sensitivity to any component of the study medication (Section 8.1), or a known sensitivity to local anesthetics. Previous botulinum toxin therapy within six (6) months of the Baseline Visit. Use of systemic prednisone, penicillamine, anti metabolites or other bioequivalent collagen production inhibitors within 3 months of the Baseline Visit. Has received (or is planning to receive) anti-coagulation, anti-platelet, or thrombolytic medications (e.g., warfarin), anti-inflammatory drugs (oral/injectable corticosteroids or non-steroidal anti inflammatory, eg.,aspirin, ibuprofen), or other substances known to increase coagulation time (e.g., Vitamin E, garlic, gingko). To clarify, no non-steroidal anti inflammatory e.g. asprin or ibuprofen within 10 days prior to injections or 3 days post injection. Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse. Medical and/or psychiatric problems that, in the Investigator's opinion, is severe enough to interfere with the study results. History of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability. Participation in an investigational drug or investigational device study within 3 months of the Baseline Visit. A history of connective tissue disease (rheumatoid Arthritis, arthritis, lupus). A history of multiple severe allergies or a history of anaphylactic shock. Patients with a known history of or susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William Werschler, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Premier Clinical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bay Area Dermatology
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Miami Skin Institute
City
Coral Gables
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33146
Country
United States
Facility Name
Laser & Skin Surgery Center of Indiana
City
Carmel
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46032
Country
United States
Facility Name
PCR
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99202
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

DermaVeil Versus Sculptra for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds Wrinkles

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs