search
Back to results

Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps

Primary Purpose

Colon Polyps

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Polp removal and identification
colon polyp removal
ETMI colonoscope (ETMI scope is a FDA approved device)
Sponsored by
Mayo Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Colon Polyps focused on measuring colon polyps, colon adenomas

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older.
  2. Informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of inflammatory bowel disease.
  2. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding colonoscopy.
  3. Presence of conditions not allowing for polypectomy or biopsy (e.g. coagulation disorder).
  4. Known familial polyposis syndrome (FAP, HNPCC, Juvenile polyposis, etc)
  5. Sub-optimal preparation for the procedure, which will be determined by patient history or based on the initial colonoscopy.
  6. Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

2

1

Arm Description

HDNBI colonoscopy followed by standard white light colonoscopy

standard white light colonoscopy followed by HDNBI colonoscopy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Compare the miss rate of standard white light imaging compared to NBI for detection of colon polyps with NBI

Secondary Outcome Measures

2. Estimate the accuracy of standard white light, HDWL and HDNBI imaging modes for the classification of adenomatous (premalignant) versus non-adenomatous (hyperplastic, inflammatory, normal) polyps.

Full Information

First Posted
December 26, 2007
Last Updated
January 20, 2009
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00825292
Brief Title
Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps
Official Title
Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps: A Comparison of High Definition White Light and Narrow Band Imaging (Endoscopic Trimodal Imaging; ETMI)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Colon cancer is the third most common cancer in western society. To prevent colon cancer it is recommended for people to undergo a screening colonoscopy at the age of fifty. The purpose of the colonoscopy is to remove polyps, since some of these lesions are precancerous. Precancerous polyps are called adenomas. This method of prevention is effective, but the standard colonoscopy currently used does not detect all polyps. Studies have reported a polyp miss rate of about 24%. Furthermore, we are unable to distinguish precancerous polyps from benign polyps, also known as hyperplastic polyps, with standard colonoscopy. This results in all polyps being removed at time of colonoscopy, even the benign polyps. To help improve the detection of colon polyps new endoscopic technologies have been developed. These technologies include high definition white light (HDWL)and high definition narrow band imaging (HDNBI). HDWL improves the overall resolution of the images seen during colonoscopy. HDNBI can help us better classify polyps by enhancing their tissue appearance as well as seeing small blood vessels and capillaries. The goal of this study to determine if HDNBI imaging shows an increased polyp detection rate when compared to the current standard colonoscopy. In addition to develop a classification system to help better differentiate between precancerous polyps and their benign counterparts using HDWL and HDNBI.
Detailed Description
II. Hypothesis: The use of NBI colonoscopy will reduce the miss rate for colon polyps compared to standard white light imaging. HDWl and HDNBI are more accurate than standard colonoscopy for the classification of adenomatous polyps in comparison to other non-premalignant polyps. III. Specific Aims: Compare the miss rate of standard white light imaging compared to NBI for detection of colon polyps with NBI Estimate the accuracy of standard white light, HDWL and HDNBI imaging modes for the classification of adenomatous (premalignant) versus non-adenomatous (hyperplastic, inflammatory, normal) polyps. Examine the inter-observer agreement for classification of adenomatous versus non-adenomatous polyps based on standard, NBI and HDWL imaging. IV. Research Design and Methods: 4.1 Study Design: A prospective phase II cross-over trial. Patients will undergo both procedures (standard, NBI) back to back under conscious sedation. The order of the procedure will be randomized. 4.2 Setting: The study will take place at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Division of Gastroenterology, an expert center in the diagnosis and treatment of colon polyps. 4.3 Study Subjects All patients scheduled for colonoscopy at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville will be screened for eligibility using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients that are deemed eligible will be offered participation in the study. Informed consent will be obtained and the participant will be registered in our database. Prior to consent the participant will be made aware of the investigative nature of the study, alternatives, risks, and benefits. 4.4 Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years or older. Informed written consent. Exclusion Criteria: History of inflammatory bowel disease. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding colonoscopy. Presence of conditions not allowing for polypectomy or biopsy (e.g. coagulation disorder). Known familial polyposis syndrome (FAP, HNPCC, Juvenile polyposis, etc) Sub-optimal preparation for the procedure, which will be determined by patient history or based on the initial colonoscopy. Pregnancy 4.5 Procedure and Data Collections A. Pre-procedure: All patients will be prepared for colonoscopy with the standard preparation and will be scheduled to have the procedure at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville. The principal investigator (PI) will screen eligible patients based on medical history, physical exam and laboratory data on day of procedure. Patients typically arrive at the registration area at least 60 minutes before start of scheduled procedure. A GI endoscopy nurse will prepare patients in the standard manner and intravenous access will be placed. Eligible patients will be offered informed consent by the study PI or designee. Patients who agree to participate in the study will sign informed consent and will be registered in the database. A log with only non-identifiable (e.g. patients # 1) will also be maintained of eligible patients who decline to participate. The GI endoscopy nurse will monitor patient's vitals before, during and after procedure as per standard protocol. B. Procedure: The exams will be performed back to back with a standard colonoscope and an ETMI colonoscope provided by Olympus. The order of the first and second procedure will be randomized according to a list prepared by the statistician using randomly permuted blocks to ensure equal numbers of patients are randomized to the two groups. All patients will be sedated with meperidine or fentanyl and midazolam to achieve conscious sedation. Each procedure will be preformed by a different endoscopist. The endoscopist will be either the P.I. supervised by a GI staff physician or solely by one of the five GI staff physicians. During the initial colonoscopy all visualized polyps will be noted, photographed, and removed. When the ETMI colonoscope is used, all polyps will be photographed using these modes (HDWL, HDNBI). The NBI portion of the exam will be performed using the MB-046 cap to further enhance stabilization of the focal length of the colonoscope. The second procedure will be done with the same level of careful inspection as the first although we not specifically regiment the time of withdrawal beyond what the endoscopist feels is necessary for a careful examination. During the second colonoscopy all visualized polyps will be noted, photographed and removed. During the first procedure, the time will be evaluated with a stopwatch. The stopwatch will start when the endoscopist begins pull-back at the cecum and end when the scope is removed from the anal verge. The clock will be stopped during washing of the bowel, polypectomy, biopsy or any other therapeutic maneuver. At the end of the first procedure, the endoscopist will be informed of the withdrawal and inspection time and every effort will be made to match this to the second procedure. Time will be recorded similarly for the second procedure. Polyps will be classified as pedunculated, raised-sessile (rounded) or flat. Flat polyps will be further classified according to the Paris endoscopic classification 14. C. Post-procedure: After the procedure all patients will be brought to the recovery and monitored as per standard protocol. Participants will be given discharge instructions as per protocol and also be provided with information to contact the P.I. if any problems should occur. Any post procedure complication will be reviewed on weekly intervals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colon Polyps
Keywords
colon polyps, colon adenomas

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
HDNBI colonoscopy followed by standard white light colonoscopy
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
standard white light colonoscopy followed by HDNBI colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Polp removal and identification
Other Intervention Name(s)
Colonoscopy with polypectomy
Intervention Description
Identify polyp during colonoscopy then remove polyp
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
colon polyp removal
Other Intervention Name(s)
Colonoscopy with polypectomy
Intervention Description
identify and remove polyp
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
ETMI colonoscope (ETMI scope is a FDA approved device)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Detecting and removing colon polyps
Intervention Description
ETMI colonoscope used to identify colon polyps as compared to HD white light colonoscope identifying colon polyps.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
1. Compare the miss rate of standard white light imaging compared to NBI for detection of colon polyps with NBI
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
2. Estimate the accuracy of standard white light, HDWL and HDNBI imaging modes for the classification of adenomatous (premalignant) versus non-adenomatous (hyperplastic, inflammatory, normal) polyps.
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years or older. Informed written consent Exclusion Criteria: History of inflammatory bowel disease. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding colonoscopy. Presence of conditions not allowing for polypectomy or biopsy (e.g. coagulation disorder). Known familial polyposis syndrome (FAP, HNPCC, Juvenile polyposis, etc) Sub-optimal preparation for the procedure, which will be determined by patient history or based on the initial colonoscopy. Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Seth A. Gross, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael B. Wallace, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14974761
Citation
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ; American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Jan-Feb;54(1):8-29. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.1.8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5681027
Citation
Morson BC. Precancerous and early malignant lesions of the large intestine. Br J Surg. 1968 Oct;55(10):725-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800551003. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4853754
Citation
Morson B. President's address. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med. 1974 Jun;67(6 Pt 1):451-7. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2752850
Citation
Cappell MS, Forde KA. Spatial clustering of multiple hyperplastic, adenomatous, and malignant colonic polyps in individual patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Aug;32(8):641-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02555767.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14499778
Citation
Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):2000-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07662.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16012987
Citation
Muto M, Katada C, Sano Y, Yoshida S. Narrow band imaging: a new diagnostic approach to visualize angiogenesis in superficial neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jul;3(7 Suppl 1):S16-20. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00262-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16189764
Citation
Kara MA, Peters FP, Rosmolen WD, Krishnadath KK, ten Kate FJ, Fockens P, Bergman JJ. High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2005 Oct;37(10):929-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870433.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21971929
Citation
Gross SA, Buchner AM, Crook JE, Cangemi JR, Picco MF, Wolfsen HC, DeVault KR, Loeb DS, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Wallace MB. A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection. Endoscopy. 2011 Dec;43(12):1045-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256894. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://clinicaltrials.mayo.edu
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Learn more about this trial

Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs