search
Back to results

Determining the Impact of Enhanced Case Finding on Tuberculosis Notification in The Gambia (ECF)

Primary Purpose

Tuberculosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Gambia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Behavioral: community sensitization
Sponsored by
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Tuberculosis focused on measuring Tuberculosis case finding

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any newly diagnosed case initiating TB therapy at any of the Gambia Government TB diagnostic and treatment centres in the Greater Banjul Area.
  • All TB patients are eligible regardless of age, residency, HIV status, or type of TB
  • All settlements randomised to the intervention arm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand the implications of study participation, whether through cognitive impairment or insurmountable language barrier.
  • Communities that refuse to accept intervention through decision conveyed by the alkalo and other recognised community leaders

Sites / Locations

  • Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

No Intervention

Arm Label

Behavioral: community sensitization

control

Arm Description

Behavioral, enhanced case finding (ECF) by community sensitization via audiovisual presentation in local languages, a session for questions and answers and opportunity to provide sputum specimens for detection of TB

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The total number of successive TB cases notified in the intervention area compared to the total number of successive TB cases notified in the control areas

Secondary Outcome Measures

The total cost of making diagnosis and receiving treatment will be compared between ECF and passive case finding
Residual burden of TB after intervention Proportion of TB detected through ECF vs. passive case finding in intervention areas. Evaluation of diagnostic delay and treatment outcome in cases detected through ECF versus passive case finding

Full Information

First Posted
July 26, 2012
Last Updated
March 20, 2018
Sponsor
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01660646
Brief Title
Determining the Impact of Enhanced Case Finding on Tuberculosis Notification in The Gambia
Acronym
ECF
Official Title
A Cluster Randomised Trial to Assess the Impact of an Enhanced Case Finding Strategy on Tuberculosis Notification in The Gambia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a cluster Tuberculosis (TB) randomized trial in which enhanced case finding (ECF) strategy will be compared to passive TB case reporting in The Gambia. And that the impact of ECF on community and household transmission of TB will also be assessed. The hypothesis is a cluster randomized trial of an enhanced case finding (ECF) strategy will increase TB case notifications in The Gambia and reduce TB burden in the study area in a cost effective manner. The impact of ECF on community and household transmission of TB will also be assessed. The investigators hope this trial will contribute to this evidence base. The timing alongside a nationwide TB prevalence survey is particularly of benefit as that would provide a baseline for disease burden against which the investigators may be able to compare case notification or case detection in selected clusters
Detailed Description
TB is a chronic, transmissible disease, albeit with effective and curative combination therapeutic regimens available. However insufficient case detection, delayed diagnosis of TB , which prolong the duration of potential transmission, and co prevalent HIV/AIDS are the major factors responsible for increasing TB incidence. The DOTs strategy, which relies on a process of passive TB case finding, has helped to control TB in many parts of the world. Currently, the World Health Organisation's Stop TB DOTS policy is being questioned as countries that have reached and maintained targets of 70% case detection and 85% cure rates are unable to demonstrate a decline in number of cases notified. Studies in Southern Africa suggest that if the investigators want to prevent TB in HIV-infected and uninfected people a major focus should be on decreasing transmission from people who are HIV-negative that may transmit TB for a long time on account of delayed diagnosis 5, 6. Data from studies in Ethiopia, Peru, Brazil, and Zimbabwe show different strategies of intensified or active case finding (ICF or ACF) yield significantly more TB cases than the standard of care-passive case finding.7-10 In the Zimbabwe study, point prevalence of TB declined significantly over 2 time points and was attributed to the ICF intervention. Since effective treatment for TB renders patients non-infectious within 2-4 weeks, it is likely that earlier diagnosis and initiation of treatment will ultimately reduce the incidence of TB by interrupting TB transmission. However the quantitative effect of enhanced case finding (ECF) on TB case notification rates, TB transmission, prevalence and incidence remains largely unproven. Although there is now data from Zimbabwe regarding the impact of untargeted active case finding strategies, it is unclear how each case finding strategy compares to the standard passive case finding and the investigators are currently unable to address the cost effectiveness or otherwise of active case finding strategies in high TB burden settings with low HIV prevalence which is the scenario in most West African countries including The Gambia. Consequently, there is insufficient data to support a policy change and an urgent need for evidence to drive the necessary review of policy. The hypothesis is a cluster randomized trial of an enhanced case finding (ECF) strategy will increase TB case notifications in The Gambia and reduce TB burden in the study area in a cost effective manner. The impact of ECF on community and household transmission of TB will also be assessed. The investigators hope this trial will contribute to this evidence base. The timing alongside a nationwide TB prevalence survey is particularly of benefit as that would provide a baseline for disease burden against which the investigators may be able to compare case notification or case detection in selected clusters.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tuberculosis
Keywords
Tuberculosis case finding

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
650000 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Behavioral: community sensitization
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Behavioral, enhanced case finding (ECF) by community sensitization via audiovisual presentation in local languages, a session for questions and answers and opportunity to provide sputum specimens for detection of TB
Arm Title
control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Behavioral: community sensitization
Intervention Description
Behavioral, enhanced case finding (ECF) by community sensitization via audiovisual presentation in local languages, a session for questions and answers and opportunity to provide sputum specimens for detection of TB
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The total number of successive TB cases notified in the intervention area compared to the total number of successive TB cases notified in the control areas
Time Frame
30 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The total cost of making diagnosis and receiving treatment will be compared between ECF and passive case finding
Description
Residual burden of TB after intervention Proportion of TB detected through ECF vs. passive case finding in intervention areas. Evaluation of diagnostic delay and treatment outcome in cases detected through ECF versus passive case finding
Time Frame
30 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Any newly diagnosed case initiating TB therapy at any of the Gambia Government TB diagnostic and treatment centres in the Greater Banjul Area. All TB patients are eligible regardless of age, residency, HIV status, or type of TB All settlements randomised to the intervention arm Exclusion Criteria: Inability to understand the implications of study participation, whether through cognitive impairment or insurmountable language barrier. Communities that refuse to accept intervention through decision conveyed by the alkalo and other recognised community leaders
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ifedayo Adetifa, FWACP, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia
City
Fajara,
State/Province
Near Banjul
Country
Gambia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Determining the Impact of Enhanced Case Finding on Tuberculosis Notification in The Gambia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs