search
Back to results

Development of an Optimal Approach to Return of Results for Next-generation Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis

Primary Purpose

Major Fetal Anomaly

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Whole Genome Sequencing
Amniocentesis
Psychosocial assessment
Sponsored by
University of California, San Diego
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Major Fetal Anomaly

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject(s) 18 years or older (both mom and father of baby (FOB)
  • Subject is undergoing prenatal testing for a major fetal anomaly

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mothers or fathers of the affected fetus are under the age of 18 years

Sites / Locations

  • UCSD Health Sciences, Fetal Care and Genetics

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Control Group

Intervention Group

Arm Description

Amniocentesis will be performed, Whole Genome Sequencing will not be performed, and psychosocial assessment will be performed.

Amniocentesis will be performed, Whole Genome Sequencing will be performed if the karyotype is normal, and psychosocial assessment will be performed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in maternal mood (focused on assessment of depression)
Compare mood measured by EPDS between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy
Change in paternal mood (focused on assessment of depression)
Compare mood measured by EPDS between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in maternal mood (focused on assessment of anxiety)
Compare anxiety measured by STAI between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy
Change in paternal mood (focused on assessment of anxiety)
Compare anxiety measured by STAI between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy

Full Information

First Posted
September 24, 2014
Last Updated
June 4, 2019
Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02255825
Brief Title
Development of an Optimal Approach to Return of Results for Next-generation Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis
Official Title
Development of an Optimal Approach to Return of Results for Families Undergoing Next-generation Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Awaiting verification of assay
Study Start Date
October 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 4, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 4, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Diego

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To gain knowledge about how patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis for a fetal abnormality understand and react to Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) testing, so that the investigators can develop more ethical and responsible approach to patient education, counseling, and return of results for patients.
Detailed Description
Although whole exome sequencing (WES) was first used for identification of the genetic cause of a disease only in 2009 and whole genome sequencing (WGS) in 2010, and questions remain about their performance as clinical tests, they are already being offered to patients and doctors as a clinical test by several laboratories certified by the US government (14 labs for WES and 5 labs for WGS). The results from WES and WGS can be complex and confusing, even for doctors and scientists who work with this technology on a daily basis; for patients, the process of deciding whether to have WES or WGS testing, undergoing the testing, receiving the results, and trying to use the results for further decision-making could be quite stressful. Currently, this process occurs in an unstandardized fashion, with some patients receiving extensive education and counseling, and others receiving almost none. There is a critical need to identify patient needs and desires in this area, and to develop strategies to satisfy them. The primary goal of this project is to gain knowledge about how patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis for a fetal abnormality understand and react to WGS testing, so that we can develop a more ethical and responsible approach to patient education, counseling, and return of results for patients . In order to do this, we need to evaluate parents' understanding of the utility and limitations of the technology, parents' preferences regarding the types of results they want to receive, and the psychological impact of receiving results from this technology. We will enroll 30 families consisting of a woman carrying a fetus with a major abnormality identified by ultrasound, and the father of the fetus, who have opted for amniocentesis for standard prenatal diagnostic testing (karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or microarray testing). Half of the families will serve as controls, who will only have standard prenatal diagnostic testing. For the other half of the families, WGS will be performed in addition to standard diagnostic testing. For all 30 cases, we will perform psychosocial evaluations (including assessments of the subjects' mood, understanding of the technology and preferences for return of results) at the time of enrollment, at the time of return of CLIA-certified genetic testing results (karyotype, FISH, microarray, and/or WGS), and after completion of the pregnancy. In this way, we will learn whether participants are receiving adequate education about next-generation sequencing to make informed choices, what the range of preferences are for return of results in a prenatal population (and whether this changes when new methods for prenatal diagnosis are employed), and whether the use of WGS imposes additional psychological stress compared to standard prenatal diagnostic tests. This study will be carried out in a stepwise and carefully monitored environment, with progress overseen by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee in order to maximize the knowledge gained while minimizing potential harms.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Major Fetal Anomaly

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Amniocentesis will be performed, Whole Genome Sequencing will not be performed, and psychosocial assessment will be performed.
Arm Title
Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Amniocentesis will be performed, Whole Genome Sequencing will be performed if the karyotype is normal, and psychosocial assessment will be performed.
Intervention Type
Genetic
Intervention Name(s)
Whole Genome Sequencing
Intervention Description
Whole genome sequencing in a CLIA lab and return of results.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Amniocentesis
Intervention Description
Note: this is being performed on all subjects as a clinical (not research) procedure
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Psychosocial assessment
Intervention Description
Use of EPDS and STAI for assessment of maternal and paternal mood
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in maternal mood (focused on assessment of depression)
Description
Compare mood measured by EPDS between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy
Time Frame
At enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy (expected to be 8 months after enrollment)
Title
Change in paternal mood (focused on assessment of depression)
Description
Compare mood measured by EPDS between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy
Time Frame
At enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy (expected to be 8 months after enrollment)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in maternal mood (focused on assessment of anxiety)
Description
Compare anxiety measured by STAI between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy
Time Frame
At enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy (expected to be 8 months after enrollment)
Title
Change in paternal mood (focused on assessment of anxiety)
Description
Compare anxiety measured by STAI between enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy
Time Frame
At enrollment and 3 months after completion of pregnancy (expected to be 8 months after enrollment)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject(s) 18 years or older (both mom and father of baby (FOB) Subject is undergoing prenatal testing for a major fetal anomaly Exclusion Criteria: Mothers or fathers of the affected fetus are under the age of 18 years
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCSD Health Sciences, Fetal Care and Genetics
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92121
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Development of an Optimal Approach to Return of Results for Next-generation Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs