Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation
Primary Purpose
Failed Moderate Sedation During Procedure, Minimally Conscious State
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexmedetomidine
Midazolam
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Failed Moderate Sedation During Procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- The presence of any Bradyarrhythmia;
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classes III and IV Heart Failure and/or Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction under 30%;
- Respiratory Failure, Glasgow Coma Scale score 8 or under, and Liver Failure - due to the increased risk of sedation in patients with these conditions (d) refusal to participate in the study or withdrawal of consent at any moment.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
DEX
MDZ
Arm Description
Patients undergoing surgical procedures under regional anesthesia sedated with a loading dose of 1 µg/Kg of Dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes followed by continuous infusion at 0.2 to 0.8 µg/Kg/h, along with 0.5µg/Kg bolus breakthrough doses of Fentanyl as necessary to achieve a RASS score between -3 and -1.
Patients undergoing surgical procedures under regional anesthesia sedated with a 0.05mg/Kg bolus dose of Midazolam, along with 0.02 mg/Kg bolus doses of Midazolam plus 0.5µg/Kg bolus doses of Fentanyl as necessary to achieve a RASS score between -3 and -1
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Depth of Sedation
Number of breakthrough doses necessary to achieve RASS score between -3 and -1
Respiratory depression
Use of supplemental oxygen flow greater than 2L/min or endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation
Bradycardia
Heart Rate < 50 heartbeats per minute
Hypotension
Mean Arterial Pressure < 55mmHg
Secondary Outcome Measures
Residual Sedation
RASS score < -1 in Post Anesthesia Care Unit
Shivering
Self-described by the patient
Pain
Pain, described by the patient, according to the Analog Scale. Necessity of breakthrough doses of analgesics.
Quality of Sleep
Self-described.
Delirium
Incidence of Delirium according to CAM-ICU algorithm
Length of Hospital Stay
Length of time between surgery and discharge from Hospital, in days
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02878837
First Posted
August 10, 2016
Last Updated
August 17, 2017
Sponsor
Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02878837
Brief Title
Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation
Official Title
Dex vs Dazzle: Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized, open clinical trial sought to compare the use of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine during surgery in patients under regional anesthesia.
The primary objective was to determine the superiority of either drug during the intraoperative period regarding: 1- Depth of sedation and 2- incidence of complications.
Secondary objectives included the determination of superiority regarding the postoperative period.
For that, patients were randomized into two groups and sedated with either Midazolam or Dexmedetomidine.
Detailed Description
This study was a randomized, open clinical trial.
Patients undergoing surgery under regional (neuraxial or brachial plexus block) anesthesia were randomly assigned into one of two groups.
Patients in one of the groups (called MDZ) were initially sedated with a 0.05mg/Kg bolus dose of Midazolam.
The ones in the other group (called DEX) were initially sedated with a loading dose of 1 µg/Kg of Dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes, followed by continuous infusion at 0.2 to 0.8 µg/Kg/h.
In order to achieve a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and -1, the following breakthrough doses were used as necessary:
MDZ: 0.02 mg/Kg bolus dose of Midazolam plus 0.5µg/Kg bolus dose of Fentanyl DEX: 0.5µg/Kg bolus dose of Fentanyl
Depth of sedation and incidence of complications were recorded during surgery, in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and in the Ward for two days following surgery,
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Failed Moderate Sedation During Procedure, Minimally Conscious State
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
DEX
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergoing surgical procedures under regional anesthesia sedated with a loading dose of 1 µg/Kg of Dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes followed by continuous infusion at 0.2 to 0.8 µg/Kg/h, along with 0.5µg/Kg bolus breakthrough doses of Fentanyl as necessary to achieve a RASS score between -3 and -1.
Arm Title
MDZ
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergoing surgical procedures under regional anesthesia sedated with a 0.05mg/Kg bolus dose of Midazolam, along with 0.02 mg/Kg bolus doses of Midazolam plus 0.5µg/Kg bolus doses of Fentanyl as necessary to achieve a RASS score between -3 and -1
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexmedetomidine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Midazolam
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Depth of Sedation
Description
Number of breakthrough doses necessary to achieve RASS score between -3 and -1
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Respiratory depression
Description
Use of supplemental oxygen flow greater than 2L/min or endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Bradycardia
Description
Heart Rate < 50 heartbeats per minute
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Hypotension
Description
Mean Arterial Pressure < 55mmHg
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Residual Sedation
Description
RASS score < -1 in Post Anesthesia Care Unit
Time Frame
Up to 2 hours after surgery
Title
Shivering
Description
Self-described by the patient
Time Frame
Up to 2 hours after end of surgery
Title
Pain
Description
Pain, described by the patient, according to the Analog Scale. Necessity of breakthrough doses of analgesics.
Time Frame
2 days
Title
Quality of Sleep
Description
Self-described.
Time Frame
2 days
Title
Delirium
Description
Incidence of Delirium according to CAM-ICU algorithm
Time Frame
2 days
Title
Length of Hospital Stay
Description
Length of time between surgery and discharge from Hospital, in days
Time Frame
Until Discharge, up to 30 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
The presence of any Bradyarrhythmia;
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classes III and IV Heart Failure and/or Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction under 30%;
Respiratory Failure, Glasgow Coma Scale score 8 or under, and Liver Failure - due to the increased risk of sedation in patients with these conditions (d) refusal to participate in the study or withdrawal of consent at any moment.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
Sao Paulo SP
ZIP/Postal Code
04039-901
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10732935
Citation
Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, Sibbald WJ. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.11.1451.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2122773
Citation
Bailey PL, Pace NL, Ashburn MA, Moll JW, East KA, Stanley TH. Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Anesthesiology. 1990 Nov;73(5):826-30. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199011000-00005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11964611
Citation
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):1004-17. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00031. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19713256
Citation
Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY; MAC Study Group. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):47-56. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10702460
Citation
Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):699-705. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00035.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10910487
Citation
Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):382-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11056756
Citation
Venn RM, Hell J, Grounds RM. Respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in the surgical patient requiring intensive care. Crit Care. 2000;4(5):302-8. doi: 10.1186/cc712. Epub 2000 Jul 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12145072
Citation
Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):461-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00042.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11878517
Citation
Venn RM, Grounds RM. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: patient and clinician perceptions. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Nov;87(5):684-90. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.5.684.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15959548
Citation
Elbaradie S, El Mahalawy FH, Solyman AH. Dexmedetomidine vs. propofol for short-term sedation of postoperative mechanically ventilated patients. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2004 Sep;16(3):153-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16421680
Citation
Abdalla MI, Al Mansouri F, Bener A. Dexmedetomidine during local anesthesia. J Anesth. 2006;20(1):54-6. doi: 10.1007/s00540-005-0351-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18176230
Citation
Taghinia AH, Shapiro FE, Slavin SA. Dexmedetomidine in aesthetic facial surgery: improving anesthetic safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jan;121(1):269-276. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000293867.05857.90.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21876972
Citation
Usta B, Gozdemir M, Demircioglu RI, Muslu B, Sert H, Yaldiz A. Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(7):1187-91. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000700011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22345953
Citation
Bajwa SJ, Gupta S, Kaur J, Singh A, Parmar S. Reduction in the incidence of shivering with perioperative dexmedetomidine: A randomized prospective study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;28(1):86-91. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.92452.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1361310
Citation
Belleville JP, Ward DS, Bloor BC, Maze M. Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in humans. I. Sedation, ventilation, and metabolic rate. Anesthesiology. 1992 Dec;77(6):1125-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199212000-00013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12503262
Citation
Takrouri MS, Seraj MA, Channa AB, el-Dawlatly AA, Thallage A, Riad W, Khalaf M. Dexmedetomidine in intensive care unit: a study of hemodynamic changes. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Oct;16(6):587-95.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16369581
Citation
Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN. Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001 Jan;14(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19947809
Citation
Gerlach AT, Murphy CV. Dexmedetomidine-associated bradycardia progressing to pulseless electrical activity: case report and review of the literature. Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Dec;29(12):1492. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.12.1492.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19188334
Citation
Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20376429
Citation
Tan JA, Ho KM. Use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic agent in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):926-39. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1877-6. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18484919
Citation
Chrysostomou C, Schmitt CG. Dexmedetomidine: sedation, analgesia and beyond. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2008 May;4(5):619-27. doi: 10.1517/17425255.4.5.619.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21283652
Citation
Grosu I, Lavand'homme P. Use of dexmedetomidine for pain control. F1000 Med Rep. 2010 Dec 17;2:90. doi: 10.3410/M2-90.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22156274
Citation
Kettner SC, Willschke H, Marhofer P. Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome? Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107 Suppl 1:i90-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer340.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8291729
Citation
Shir Y, Raja SN, Frank SM. The effect of epidural versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Anesthesiology. 1994 Jan;80(1):49-56. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199401000-00011.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18005372
Citation
Huupponen E, Maksimow A, Lapinlampi P, Sarkela M, Saastamoinen A, Snapir A, Scheinin H, Scheinin M, Merilainen P, Himanen SL, Jaaskelainen S. Electroencephalogram spindle activity during dexmedetomidine sedation and physiological sleep. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Feb;52(2):289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01537.x. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24988068
Citation
Alexopoulou C, Kondili E, Diamantaki E, Psarologakis C, Kokkini S, Bolaki M, Georgopoulos D. Effects of dexmedetomidine on sleep quality in critically ill patients: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2014 Oct;121(4):801-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000361.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30777901
Citation
Silva-Jr JM, Katayama HT, Nogueira FAM, Moura TB, Alves TL, de Oliveira BW. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and benzodiazepine for intraoperative sedation in elderly patients: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):319-324. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100120. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs