search
Back to results

Diagnosis of Microaspiration in Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Pepsin vs 99m Technetium

Primary Purpose

Critical Illness

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Lille
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Critical Illness focused on measuring microaspiration, mechanical ventilation, enteral feeding, 99m technetium, pepsin

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > or = 18 years
  • hospitalised in ICU
  • tracheal intubation using a polyvinyl chloride tube and mechanical ventilation
  • predictable mechanical ventilation > or = 6 hours after inclusion
  • enteral nutrition by a nasogastric tube

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuse to participate to the study
  • no informed consent
  • pregnant
  • contra-indication for enteral nutrition
  • tracheotomy
  • intubation or re-intubation done in 6 hours preceding the inclusion

Sites / Locations

  • ICU, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid

Arm Description

99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

incidence of pepsin levels ≥200 ng / ml
Sensibility and sensitivity of Pepsin for the diagnosis of microaspiration will be determined with regard to 99m technetium (gold standard).

Secondary Outcome Measures

likelihood ratio of pepsin of microregurgitation
Sensibility and sensitivity of Pepsin for the diagnosis of microregurgitation will be determined with regard to 99m technetium.
likelihood ratio of pepsin of microaspiration
positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratio of pepsin for the diagnosis of microaspiration compared to the 99m technetium (gold standard)
Youden Index
Youden Index and ROC curve analysis of the Pepsin as a marker for the diagnosis of microaspiration compared to the 99m Technetium (gold standard)
ROC curve
Youden Index and ROC curve analysis of the Pepsin as a marker for the diagnosis of microaspiration compared to the 99m Technetium (gold standard)

Full Information

First Posted
June 18, 2014
Last Updated
December 3, 2015
Sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02169193
Brief Title
Diagnosis of Microaspiration in Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Pepsin vs 99m Technetium
Official Title
Diagnosis of Microaspiration in Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Pepsin vs 99m Technetium
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Study Start Date
September 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Lille

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions and gastric contents frequently occurs in intubated critically ill patients, and plays a major role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Quantitative pepsin measurement in tracheal aspirates would be useful in diagnosing microaspiration of gastric contents in intubated critically ill patients. Technetium 99m labelled enteral feeding is the gold standard for the diagnosis of microaspiration. The investigators hypothesized that tracheal pepsin measurement is a good diagnosis marker of microaspiration compared to the gold standard.
Detailed Description
Microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions and gastric contents frequently occurs in intubated critically ill patients, and plays a major role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia Quantitative pepsin measurement in tracheal aspirates would be useful in diagnosing microaspiration of gastric contents in intubated critically ill patients Technetium 99m labelled enteral feeding is the gold standard for the diagnosis of microaspiration. We hypothesized that tracheal pepsin measurement is a good diagnosis marker of microaspiration compared to the gold standard

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Illness
Keywords
microaspiration, mechanical ventilation, enteral feeding, 99m technetium, pepsin

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid
Other Intervention Name(s)
NanoCis
Intervention Description
12 MBq of NanoCis added to 500 ml of enteral feeding
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
incidence of pepsin levels ≥200 ng / ml
Description
Sensibility and sensitivity of Pepsin for the diagnosis of microaspiration will be determined with regard to 99m technetium (gold standard).
Time Frame
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
likelihood ratio of pepsin of microregurgitation
Description
Sensibility and sensitivity of Pepsin for the diagnosis of microregurgitation will be determined with regard to 99m technetium.
Time Frame
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Title
likelihood ratio of pepsin of microaspiration
Description
positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratio of pepsin for the diagnosis of microaspiration compared to the 99m technetium (gold standard)
Time Frame
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Title
Youden Index
Description
Youden Index and ROC curve analysis of the Pepsin as a marker for the diagnosis of microaspiration compared to the 99m Technetium (gold standard)
Time Frame
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Title
ROC curve
Description
Youden Index and ROC curve analysis of the Pepsin as a marker for the diagnosis of microaspiration compared to the 99m Technetium (gold standard)
Time Frame
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age > or = 18 years hospitalised in ICU tracheal intubation using a polyvinyl chloride tube and mechanical ventilation predictable mechanical ventilation > or = 6 hours after inclusion enteral nutrition by a nasogastric tube Exclusion Criteria: refuse to participate to the study no informed consent pregnant contra-indication for enteral nutrition tracheotomy intubation or re-intubation done in 6 hours preceding the inclusion
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Saad Nseir, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Univ Hosp of Lille, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ICU, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Diagnosis of Microaspiration in Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Pepsin vs 99m Technetium

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs