search
Back to results

Diaphragmatic Resection And Gynecological Ovarian Neoplasm (DRAGON)

Primary Purpose

Ovarian Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
thoracic Drain Tube 24 Fr.
Sponsored by
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ovarian Cancer focused on measuring Ovarian Cancer, Diaphragm, Chest Drain, Diaphragmatic Resection, Pleural Effusion

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 < 80 years
  • Patient's informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
  • No actual pregnancies or pelvic inflammatory disease (P.I.D.)
  • BMI < 40
  • Macroscopic diaphragmatic disease infiltration (mono lateral)
  • Grade IIIA-IV diaphragmatic resection score
  • Advanced stage ovarian cancer (stage III-IV)
  • Primary diagnosis, interval debulking surgery, recurrent disease
  • All histotype included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Actual pregnancies or P.I.D
  • BMI > 40
  • Pulmonary or thoracic preoperatory disease
  • Preoperative pleural effusion
  • Residual thoracic disease after surgery
  • Residual diaphragmatic disease after surgery

Sites / Locations

  • Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Sham Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Arm A: Chest tube positioning YES

Arm B: Chest tube positioning NO

Arm Description

Patients enrolled for chest tube positioning

Patients enrolled for diaphragm closure without chest tube positioning

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Measurement of incidence of pleural effusion after diaphragmatic resection and useful of chest drain to prevent pleural effusion and consequent respiratory symptoms as dyspnea.
The diaphragmatic surgery is often related to post-operative complication. The most common complication is pleural effusion. This condition contribute to decrease the clinical outcomes causing increase of hospitalization and necessity medical or surgical treatment. The main outcome is to asses a correct management of intra-operatory thoracic drain position after diaphragmatic surgery. The outcomes measured are: - Incidence of post-operatory pleural effusion detected by chest RX measuring pleural fluid collection (cm)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
March 21, 2018
Last Updated
May 22, 2020
Sponsor
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03543462
Brief Title
Diaphragmatic Resection And Gynecological Ovarian Neoplasm
Acronym
DRAGON
Official Title
Diaphragmatic Resection And Gynecological Ovarian Neoplasm
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 20, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 11, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 11, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Prospective randomized phase IV study aimed to value the impact of diaphragmatic surgery and the useful of intra-operatory thoracic drain in advanced ovarian cancer. Considering the fact that the diaphragmatic surgery could contribute with the incidence of post-operatory morbidity. The study is aimed to value the role of thoracic drain in post-operative outcomes as hospital stay, time to chemotherapy, drugs use and eventual interventions.
Detailed Description
Ovarian cancer represents the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies. The majority of patients present with advanced-stage disease (III/IV) often involving the upper abdomen. Spread by either direct extension or via peritoneal implantation can result in metastases to the diaphragm, as seen in up to 40% of patients with advanced disease. Standard treatment of advanced-stage disease includes primary cytoreductive surgery followed by combination platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Optimal cytoreduction to ≤1 cm disease has repeatedly been shown to be associated with improved survival. Diaphragm involvement was considered one of the most frequent obstacles to achieving optimal cytoreduction. The right diaphragm is more frequently and extensively involved than the left diaphragm; however, bilateral involvement is not uncommon. Various studies have advocated and reported the feasibility of diaphragmatic surgery in achieving optimal cytoreduction. Sometimes, depending on extent of the disease, the diaphragm involvement could be massive and often the resection of the muscle with access to pleural cavity is necessary. Allegedly, entering the pleural cavity increases the morbidity of the procedure. Extensive upper abdominal surgery involving diaphragmatic peritonectomy/resection and liver mobilization may both contribute to the development of symptomatic pleural effusions. The aim of the study is to value the impact of diaphragmatic surgery in post-operative complications using a specific score (DRS). The other aim is to asses a correct management of intra-operatory thoracic drain position after diaphragmatic surgery. All parameter that could influence the post-operative outcomes as (EBL,BMI, OT, SCS) are recorded. The study was approved by Ethical Committee of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli Hospital (prot n. 9078/18). The study is a superiority randomized clinical trial to investigate the role of intra-operative chest tube in the large (> 5 cm) diaphragmatic peritonectomy/resection in the ovarian cancer debulking. Calculation of sample size for the analysis of the primary end-point (major pleural effusion) was based on literature results reporting a rate of moderate/severe early peri-operative pleural effusion between 54% and 23% when a large (> 5 cm) diaphragmatic resection is performed. A sample size of 88 patients was required in order to provide 80% power of detecting a reduction of 60% of moderate/severe pleural effusion in PDS with large diaphragmatic resection when intra-operative chest tube was inserted (overall rate 22%) (two-tailed α =0.05, drop-out 5%). Sample size is composed by 44 Patients affected by advanced stage ovarian cancer, meeting inclusion criteria, undergo diaphragmatic surgery followed by intra-operatory thoracic drain position and 44 patients with same characteristics undergo to diaphragmatic surgery without intra-operatory thoracic drain position. Both groups are compared in terms of incidence of post-operative complications (especially pleural effusion, pneumothorax, respiratory disease). Secondary endpoints are the evaluation of surgical outcomes and clinical outcomes in terms hospital stay, procedures and radiologic examinations required. All patients are adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient are prospectively recorded. Surgical procedures consist of surgical standard cytoreduction, performed for all cases of advanced stage ovarian cancer disease. The procedures performed depending on disease spread. The diaphragmatic procedures, depending on the disease infiltration can consists of superficial peritonectomy, deep peritonectomy (until muscular layer) or diaphragmatic resection. Considering the randomization, if required, a thoracic drain tube 24 Fr. is positioned. A post-operative chest X-Ray is performed on all cases. At the end of the procedure, a schedule is compiled with intraoperative data. Post-operative examinations are follows: Chest X-Ray (2 h post-op) Chest X-Ray (day 1) Chest X-Ray (if required, depending of clinical indications) Thoracic US scan evaluation before discharge Thoracic US scan evaluation 10 days after discharge Radiological examinations (if required, depending of clinical indications) All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using an electronic database.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ovarian Cancer
Keywords
Ovarian Cancer, Diaphragm, Chest Drain, Diaphragmatic Resection, Pleural Effusion

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients affected by advanced stage ovarian cancer with diaphragmatic involvement. When diaphragmatic resection is performed the patients are randomized to proceed with chest drain positioning or not
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
The investigator check the random list only when the patients is enrolled.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
88 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A: Chest tube positioning YES
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Patients enrolled for chest tube positioning
Arm Title
Arm B: Chest tube positioning NO
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients enrolled for diaphragm closure without chest tube positioning
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
thoracic Drain Tube 24 Fr.
Intervention Description
Positioning of Thoracic Drain after diaphragmatic resection and consequently diaphragmatic repair
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Measurement of incidence of pleural effusion after diaphragmatic resection and useful of chest drain to prevent pleural effusion and consequent respiratory symptoms as dyspnea.
Description
The diaphragmatic surgery is often related to post-operative complication. The most common complication is pleural effusion. This condition contribute to decrease the clinical outcomes causing increase of hospitalization and necessity medical or surgical treatment. The main outcome is to asses a correct management of intra-operatory thoracic drain position after diaphragmatic surgery. The outcomes measured are: - Incidence of post-operatory pleural effusion detected by chest RX measuring pleural fluid collection (cm)
Time Frame
30 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Time to start chemotherapy
Description
The time to start chemotherapy is fundamental from oncological point of view. The ideal time to start chemotherapy treatment should exceed 40 days after surgery. The data measured are - time between surgery and first chemotherapy cycle
Time Frame
40 Days
Title
Estimated blood loss
Description
The intra operative blood loss is often related to the complexity of procedure and consequently to post-operative complications The data measured are: - EBL (ml)
Time Frame
1 Day
Title
Operative time
Description
The Operative time is often related to the complexity of procedure and consequently to post-operative complications The data measured are: - Operative time (minutes)
Time Frame
1 Day

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age > 18 < 80 years Patient's informed consent American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV No actual pregnancies or pelvic inflammatory disease (P.I.D.) BMI < 40 Macroscopic diaphragmatic disease infiltration (mono lateral) Grade IIIA-IV diaphragmatic resection score Advanced stage ovarian cancer (stage III-IV) Primary diagnosis, interval debulking surgery, recurrent disease All histotype included Exclusion Criteria: Actual pregnancies or P.I.D BMI > 40 Pulmonary or thoracic preoperatory disease Preoperative pleural effusion Residual thoracic disease after surgery Residual diaphragmatic disease after surgery
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefano Cianci, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
City
Roma
State/Province
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00191
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23335087
Citation
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11520145
Citation
Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. What are the current surgical objectives, strategies, and technical capabilities of gynecologic oncologists treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Sep;82(3):489-97. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6312.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11870167
Citation
Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1248-59. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17704411
Citation
Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, Markman M, Armstrong DK, Muggia F, McGuire WP; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3621-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16182350
Citation
Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Surgical treatment of diaphragm disease correlates with improved survival in optimally debulked advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Feb;100(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.027. Epub 2005 Sep 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20686373
Citation
Tsolakidis D, Amant F, Van Gorp T, Leunen K, Neven P, Vergote I. The role of diaphragmatic surgery during interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis of 74 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):542-51. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d4de23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22080893
Citation
Zapardiel I, Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Biffi R, Bocciolone L, Landoni F, Aletti G, Colombo N, Maggioni A. Diaphragmatic surgery during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: peritoneal stripping versus diaphragmatic resection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Dec;21(9):1698-703. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31822f65c3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20004958
Citation
Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gallotta V, Ercoli A, Pacelli F, Costantini B, Vizzielli G, Margariti PA, Garganese G, Scambia G. Upper abdominal surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: role of diaphragmatic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.11.023. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19459863
Citation
Chereau E, Ballester M, Selle F, Cortez A, Pomel C, Darai E, Rouzier R. Pulmonary morbidity of diaphragmatic surgery for stage III/IV ovarian cancer. BJOG. 2009 Jul;116(8):1062-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02214.x. Epub 2009 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18334014
Citation
Devolder K, Amant F, Neven P, van Gorp T, Leunen K, Vergote I. Role of diaphragmatic surgery in 69 patients with ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):363-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01006.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16815536
Citation
Eisenhauer EL, D'Angelica MI, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, Jarnagin WR, Barakat RR, Chi DS. Incidence and management of pleural effusions after diaphragm peritonectomy or resection for advanced mullerian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):871-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.023. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15273542
Citation
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15350355
Citation
Cliby W, Dowdy S, Feitoza SS, Gostout BS, Podratz KC. Diaphragm resection for ovarian cancer: technique and short-term complications. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Sep;94(3):655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.032.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Diaphragmatic Resection And Gynecological Ovarian Neoplasm

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs