search
Back to results

DiRectional AthErectomy + Drug CoAted BaLloon to Treat Long, CalcifIed FemoropopliTeal ArterY Lesions (REALITY)

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Medtronic HawkOne® or TurboHawk™
Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB
Medtronic Spider™ Distal Protection Device (DPD)
Volcano Visions® PV .014" IVUS catheter
Nitinol Stent Placement
Sponsored by
VIVA Physicians
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Vascular Disease focused on measuring Atherectomy, Drug-Coated Balloon

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

General Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willing and able to provide informed consent;
  2. Age ≥ 18 years of age;
  3. Clinical evaluation determines Rutherford Category 2-4;
  4. Willing to comply with all study requirements;
  5. All lab work is within acceptable limits to undergo a percutaneous interventional procedure.
  6. Life expectancy, in the investigator's opinion, of at least 24 months.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:

  1. RVD ≥ 4mm and ≤ 7mm;
  2. Evidence of a ≥70% de novo or restenotic lesion or occlusion in the target lesion defined as in the superficial femoral artery and/or popliteal artery, located in the arterial segment starting at least 1 cm beyond the Common Femoral Artery (CFA) bifurcation between the superficial and profunda femoris arteries (proximal anatomical landmark) to the distal P2 segment of the popliteal artery;
  3. Total lesion/occlusion length:

    a. ≥ 8 cm and ≤ 18 cm

  4. Total occlusion length

    a. ≥ 6 cm and ≤10 cm

  5. Stenosis or occlusion begins 1cm below the profunda-SFA bifurcation;
  6. Femoral or popliteal stenosis or occlusion that does not extend beyond the P2 popliteal segment;
  7. Minimum 1 patent infrapopliteal vessel to the foot with ≤ 50% diameter stenosis;
  8. Grade 3 or 4 intimal, medial and/or mixed calcification per the PACSS as judged by the operator at the time of the procedure;
  9. Index lesion fits within guidelines below:

    9.1 If two lesions are ≤ 3 cm apart, treatment would be allowed as a single lesion providing they contain a segment of moderate or severe calcification and the total lesion length is ≥ 8 cm and ≤18 cm.

    9.2 If more than one lesion is within the target vessel, and they are separated by > 3 cm of normal vessel, one lesion must be designated by the investigator as the target lesion as long as the lesion meets all angiographic eligibility criteria. Only one index lesion is permitted for analysis, but study will allow a second lesion to be treated as a non-target lesion.

  10. Infrapopliteal lesion, if diagnosed, can be staged and treated > 30 days after index procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with GFR ≤30 ml/min or MDRD GFR ≤30 ml/min per 1.73m2 (and serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dL within 30 days of index procedure);
  2. Physician does not believe subject is an appropriate candidate for study;
  3. Previous infra-inguinal intervention in the index limb within 30 days of the planned femoropopliteal intervention

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to cross lesion/occlusion with a guidewire or re-entry device;
  2. Inability for the guidewire to re-enter and/or remain in the true lumen prior to enrollment;
  3. In-stent restenosis of the target lesion, or recognition of any stent (patent or re-stenotic within the femoropopliteal segment of the index limb;
  4. Aneurysm located in the target vessel or aneurysmal vessel;
  5. Acute thrombus in the index limb prior to enrollment.

Sites / Locations

  • Iowa Methodist Medical Center
  • St. Elizabeth's
  • University of Mississippi
  • Mount Sinai
  • Rex
  • Austin Heart
  • Longview Cardiac and Vascular Consultants

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Non-randomized

Arm Description

Directional Atherectomy + Drug Coated Balloon: DA followed by DCB will be performed in all enrolled subjects. DA includes the use of Intervention 'Medtronic HawkOne® or TurboHawk™. Medtronic Spider™ Distal Protection Device (DPD) is recommended for use according to IFU. Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB will be used after DA. Volcano Visions® PV .014" IVUS catheter required to assess lesion in each procedure. Nitinol Stent Placement: Only FDA approved nitinol stents can be used if provisional stenting is required.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Patency
One-year primary patency (PSVR ≤2.4) and freedom from CD-TLR in subjects with long, moderate and severely calcified symptomatic femoropopliteal arterial stenoses and occlusions after treatment with DA+DCB.
Freedom from MAE
Freedom from (MAEs) defined as freedom from flow-limiting dissections (D-F), vessel perforations, unplanned amputation, intra-procedure distal athero-embolization and clinically-driven TVR in subjects with long, moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions and occlusions through 30 day follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Device Success
Device Success: ≤ 30% residual stenosis after completion of directional atherectomy procedure (stand-alone) as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
Procedural Success
Procedural Success: ≤30% residual stenosis after completion of the directional atherectomy procedure and DCB as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
IVUS
Core lab assessed correlation between IVUS metrics of luminal diameter, change in plaque area and luminal gain pre- and post-atherectomy, and angiographic core lab assessment of pre- and post-percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and the extent of vascular calcification will be determined
PACCS scoring and related procedural complications
The association of moderate and severe calcification as defined by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and the change in %DS, procedure related complications (residual stenosis ≥50%, vessel recoil and/or high-grade dissections requiring use of adjunct technologies) visual quantification of embolic material in the distal protection device and MAEs through 30-days will be assessed
Directional Atherectomy
Directional Atherectomy device specific metrics of total directional atherectomy time as a function of lesion length, lesion morphology, and total procedure time.
Major Adverse Events thru 24 months
Major adverse events through 24-months defined as composite clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TVR) defined as any re-intervention within the target vessel due to symptoms associated with a drop from post-intervention ABI/TBI >20% or >0.15, major unplanned amputation of the treated limb, and all-cause mortality post 30 day follow up through 2 year follow up.
Post procedure TVR
TVR within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
CD-TLR post procedure
TLR within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time to CD-TLR thru 24 months post procedure
Time to first clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) through 24 months post-index procedure
Major target limb amputation post procedure
Major target limb amputation within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Thrombosis- target lesion post procedure
Thrombosis at the target lesion site within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Primary sustained clinical improvement
Primary sustained clinical improvement: An improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of at least one class in amputation- and TVR-free surviving subjects at 6, 12, 24 months post procedure
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
Secondary sustained clinical improvement: An improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of at least one class including the need for clinically-driven TVR in amputation-free surviving subjects at 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure

Full Information

First Posted
July 26, 2016
Last Updated
October 15, 2020
Sponsor
VIVA Physicians
Collaborators
Medtronic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02850107
Brief Title
DiRectional AthErectomy + Drug CoAted BaLloon to Treat Long, CalcifIed FemoropopliTeal ArterY Lesions
Acronym
REALITY
Official Title
The REALITY Study: DiRectional AthErectomy + Drug-CoAted BaLloon to Treat Long, CalcifIed FemoropopliTeal ArterY Lesions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 16, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 16, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VIVA Physicians
Collaborators
Medtronic

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed to collect information during a procedure that is routine care for treating a blockage in a blood vessel in the upper part of the participant's leg. This study is for data collection reasons to help doctors gain better understanding of the treatment of disease in the blood vessels of the legs. You will be treated with two devices that are routine, or standard of care, for your doctor to treat blockages in the blood vessel of the leg. The treatment is for a blockage or narrowing caused by plaque build-up in the blood vessel. Data will be collected to assess what length of time the blood vessel will be prevented from re-narrowing through twenty-four (24) months after the procedure.
Detailed Description
This prospective study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two FDA 510(k) cleared DA products (Medtronic HawkOne® and TurboHawkM)19-21 and FDA approved drug-coated balloon (Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral®)22 used in combination to debulk moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal artery atherosclerotic lesions as defined by the published Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) followed by treatment with the Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB for the prevention of restenosis as assessed at 12-month follow-up. The data will be independently adjudicated by an angiographic and DUS core labs. An independent IVUS core lab to determine change in maximal luminal plaque area, pre- and post-atherectomy and post-adjunctive DCB therapy will adjudicate the assessment of debulking effectiveness. The operator will be blinded to all IVUS images and procedural success will be based on usual and customary angiographic visual assessments. The post-atherectomy plaque debulking effectiveness (change in plaque area) and vascular calcium severity as assessed by IVUS will be correlated with the angiographic metrics of RVD, pre- and post-treatment MLD, calcium grade (using PACSS), lesion length, sub-intimal wire passage, CTO length, and angiographic patterns of restenosis in all patients who sustain a CD-TLR through 12-months. All atherectomy specimens will be collected and provided to an independent histology laboratory for analysis of calcium content and vessel wall elements. The amount of embolic debris captured in the Spider® Distal Protection Device will be visually assessed. The study will validate PACSS definitions of moderate and severe calcium and its location (intimal, medial or mixed) as they relate to intra-procedural and Major Adverse Events (MAEs) through 30-day clinical follow-up (e.g., grade D-F dissections requiring provisional stenting, vessel perforation requiring an additional intervention or surgery, vessel thrombosis requiring adjunctive technologies and/or lytic agents, unplanned amputation, intra-procedure distal embolization, and CD-TLR).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Keywords
Atherectomy, Drug-Coated Balloon

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
102 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Non-randomized
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Directional Atherectomy + Drug Coated Balloon: DA followed by DCB will be performed in all enrolled subjects. DA includes the use of Intervention 'Medtronic HawkOne® or TurboHawk™. Medtronic Spider™ Distal Protection Device (DPD) is recommended for use according to IFU. Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB will be used after DA. Volcano Visions® PV .014" IVUS catheter required to assess lesion in each procedure. Nitinol Stent Placement: Only FDA approved nitinol stents can be used if provisional stenting is required.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic HawkOne® or TurboHawk™
Intervention Description
Use of FDA Cleared Directional Atherectomy (DA) Devices. Medtronic HawkOne® Directional Atherectomy System or TurboHawk™ Plaque Excision System. DA followed by DCB will be performed in all enrolled subjects.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB
Intervention Description
FDA Approved Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Technology. Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB will be used after DA.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic Spider™ Distal Protection Device (DPD)
Intervention Description
It is recommended that the Medtronic Spider™ Distal protection device (DPD) be paired with DA when used in complex, calcified lesions (TurboHawk™ IFU).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Volcano Visions® PV .014" IVUS catheter
Intervention Description
Lesion IVUS assessment using the Volcano Visions® PV .014" IVUS catheter will be required in all cases.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Nitinol Stent Placement
Intervention Description
Only FDA approved nitinol stents can be used if provisional stenting is required.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Patency
Description
One-year primary patency (PSVR ≤2.4) and freedom from CD-TLR in subjects with long, moderate and severely calcified symptomatic femoropopliteal arterial stenoses and occlusions after treatment with DA+DCB.
Time Frame
One year
Title
Freedom from MAE
Description
Freedom from (MAEs) defined as freedom from flow-limiting dissections (D-F), vessel perforations, unplanned amputation, intra-procedure distal athero-embolization and clinically-driven TVR in subjects with long, moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions and occlusions through 30 day follow up.
Time Frame
One month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Device Success
Description
Device Success: ≤ 30% residual stenosis after completion of directional atherectomy procedure (stand-alone) as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
Time Frame
Post Index Procedure
Title
Procedural Success
Description
Procedural Success: ≤30% residual stenosis after completion of the directional atherectomy procedure and DCB as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
Time Frame
Post Index Procedure
Title
IVUS
Description
Core lab assessed correlation between IVUS metrics of luminal diameter, change in plaque area and luminal gain pre- and post-atherectomy, and angiographic core lab assessment of pre- and post-percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and the extent of vascular calcification will be determined
Time Frame
Post Index Procedure
Title
PACCS scoring and related procedural complications
Description
The association of moderate and severe calcification as defined by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and the change in %DS, procedure related complications (residual stenosis ≥50%, vessel recoil and/or high-grade dissections requiring use of adjunct technologies) visual quantification of embolic material in the distal protection device and MAEs through 30-days will be assessed
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Directional Atherectomy
Description
Directional Atherectomy device specific metrics of total directional atherectomy time as a function of lesion length, lesion morphology, and total procedure time.
Time Frame
Post Index Procedure
Title
Major Adverse Events thru 24 months
Description
Major adverse events through 24-months defined as composite clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TVR) defined as any re-intervention within the target vessel due to symptoms associated with a drop from post-intervention ABI/TBI >20% or >0.15, major unplanned amputation of the treated limb, and all-cause mortality post 30 day follow up through 2 year follow up.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Post procedure TVR
Description
TVR within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time Frame
6, 12, 24 months
Title
CD-TLR post procedure
Description
TLR within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time Frame
6, 12, 24 months
Title
Time to CD-TLR thru 24 months post procedure
Description
Time to first clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) through 24 months post-index procedure
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Major target limb amputation post procedure
Description
Major target limb amputation within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time Frame
6, 12, 24 months
Title
Thrombosis- target lesion post procedure
Description
Thrombosis at the target lesion site within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time Frame
6, 12, 24 months
Title
Primary sustained clinical improvement
Description
Primary sustained clinical improvement: An improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of at least one class in amputation- and TVR-free surviving subjects at 6, 12, 24 months post procedure
Time Frame
6, 12, 24 months
Title
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
Description
Secondary sustained clinical improvement: An improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of at least one class including the need for clinically-driven TVR in amputation-free surviving subjects at 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time Frame
6, 12, 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: General Inclusion Criteria: Willing and able to provide informed consent; Age ≥ 18 years of age; Clinical evaluation determines Rutherford Category 2-4; Willing to comply with all study requirements; All lab work is within acceptable limits to undergo a percutaneous interventional procedure. Life expectancy, in the investigator's opinion, of at least 24 months. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: RVD ≥ 4mm and ≤ 7mm; Evidence of a ≥70% de novo or restenotic lesion or occlusion in the target lesion defined as in the superficial femoral artery and/or popliteal artery, located in the arterial segment starting at least 1 cm beyond the Common Femoral Artery (CFA) bifurcation between the superficial and profunda femoris arteries (proximal anatomical landmark) to the distal P2 segment of the popliteal artery; Total lesion/occlusion length: a. ≥ 8 cm and ≤ 18 cm Total occlusion length a. ≥ 6 cm and ≤10 cm Stenosis or occlusion begins 1cm below the profunda-SFA bifurcation; Femoral or popliteal stenosis or occlusion that does not extend beyond the P2 popliteal segment; Minimum 1 patent infrapopliteal vessel to the foot with ≤ 50% diameter stenosis; Grade 3 or 4 intimal, medial and/or mixed calcification per the PACSS as judged by the operator at the time of the procedure; Index lesion fits within guidelines below: 9.1 If two lesions are ≤ 3 cm apart, treatment would be allowed as a single lesion providing they contain a segment of moderate or severe calcification and the total lesion length is ≥ 8 cm and ≤18 cm. 9.2 If more than one lesion is within the target vessel, and they are separated by > 3 cm of normal vessel, one lesion must be designated by the investigator as the target lesion as long as the lesion meets all angiographic eligibility criteria. Only one index lesion is permitted for analysis, but study will allow a second lesion to be treated as a non-target lesion. Infrapopliteal lesion, if diagnosed, can be staged and treated > 30 days after index procedure. Exclusion Criteria: General Exclusion Criteria: Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with GFR ≤30 ml/min or MDRD GFR ≤30 ml/min per 1.73m2 (and serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dL within 30 days of index procedure); Physician does not believe subject is an appropriate candidate for study; Previous infra-inguinal intervention in the index limb within 30 days of the planned femoropopliteal intervention Angiographic Exclusion Criteria: Inability to cross lesion/occlusion with a guidewire or re-entry device; Inability for the guidewire to re-enter and/or remain in the true lumen prior to enrollment; In-stent restenosis of the target lesion, or recognition of any stent (patent or re-stenotic within the femoropopliteal segment of the index limb; Aneurysm located in the target vessel or aneurysmal vessel; Acute thrombus in the index limb prior to enrollment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Krishna Singh, MD
Organizational Affiliation
VIVA Physicians, Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Iowa Methodist Medical Center
City
Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50309
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Elizabeth's
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
2135
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Mississippi
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rex
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Austin Heart
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Longview Cardiac and Vascular Consultants
City
Longview
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75605
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16908785
Citation
Golomb BA, Dang TT, Criqui MH. Peripheral arterial disease: morbidity and mortality implications. Circulation. 2006 Aug 15;114(7):688-99. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.593442. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17489079
Citation
Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG, Rutherford RB; TASC II Working Group. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease. Int Angiol. 2007 Jun;26(2):81-157. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22147886
Citation
Goodney PP, Travis LL, Nallamothu BK, Holman K, Suckow B, Henke PK, Lucas FL, Goodman DC, Birkmeyer JD, Fisher ES. Variation in the use of lower extremity vascular procedures for critical limb ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):94-102. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.962233. Epub 2011 Dec 6. Erratum In: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):e27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25147039
Citation
McKinsey JF, Zeller T, Rocha-Singh KJ, Jaff MR, Garcia LA; DEFINITIVE LE Investigators. Lower extremity revascularization using directional atherectomy: 12-month prospective results of the DEFINITIVE LE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):923-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.006.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24402764
Citation
Roberts D, Niazi K, Miller W, Krishnan P, Gammon R, Schreiber T, Shammas NW, Clair D; DEFINITIVE Ca(+)(+) Investigators. Effective endovascular treatment of calcified femoropopliteal disease with directional atherectomy and distal embolic protection: final results of the DEFINITIVE Ca(+)(+) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug 1;84(2):236-44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25384. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23703778
Citation
Yazdani SK, Pacheco E, Nakano M, Otsuka F, Naisbitt S, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Rousselle S, Virmani R. Vascular, downstream, and pharmacokinetic responses to treatment with a low dose drug-coated balloon in a swine femoral artery model. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):132-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24995. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26106946
Citation
Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, Rocha-Singh K, Mena-Hurtado C, Metzger DC, Brodmann M, Pilger E, Zeller T, Krishnan P, Gammon R, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Nehler MR, Benenati JF, Scheinert D; LEVANT 2 Investigators. Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406235. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25472980
Citation
Tepe G, Laird J, Schneider P, Brodmann M, Krishnan P, Micari A, Metzger C, Scheinert D, Zeller T, Cohen DJ, Snead DB, Alexander B, Landini M, Jaff MR; IN.PACT SFA Trial Investigators. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circulation. 2015 Feb 3;131(5):495-502. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011004. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26476467
Citation
Laird JR, Schneider PA, Tepe G, Brodmann M, Zeller T, Metzger C, Krishnan P, Scheinert D, Micari A, Cohen DJ, Wang H, Hasenbank MS, Jaff MR; IN.PACT SFA Trial Investigators. Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2329-2338. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.063. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18272892
Citation
Tepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T, Heller S, Schwarzwalder U, Beregi JP, Claussen CD, Oldenburg A, Scheller B, Speck U. Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):689-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706356.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18779447
Citation
Werk M, Langner S, Reinkensmeier B, Boettcher HF, Tepe G, Dietz U, Hosten N, Hamm B, Speck U, Ricke J. Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial. Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1358-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735985. Epub 2008 Sep 8. Erratum In: Circulation. 2008 Oct 14;118(16):e670.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23192918
Citation
Werk M, Albrecht T, Meyer DR, Ahmed MN, Behne A, Dietz U, Eschenbach G, Hartmann H, Lange C, Schnorr B, Stiepani H, Zoccai GB, Hanninen EL. Paclitaxel-coated balloons reduce restenosis after femoro-popliteal angioplasty: evidence from the randomized PACIFIER trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec;5(6):831-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971630. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24456716
Citation
Scheinert D, Duda S, Zeller T, Krankenberg H, Ricke J, Bosiers M, Tepe G, Naisbitt S, Rosenfield K. The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.022.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24806955
Citation
Fanelli F, Cannavale A, Gazzetti M, Lucatelli P, Wlderk A, Cirelli C, d'Adamo A, Salvatori FM. Calcium burden assessment and impact on drug-eluting balloons in peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Aug;37(4):898-907. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0904-3. Epub 2014 May 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24402839
Citation
Rocha-Singh KJ, Zeller T, Jaff MR. Peripheral arterial calcification: prevalence, mechanism, detection, and clinical implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 1;83(6):E212-20. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25387. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26250747
Citation
Tepe G, Beschorner U, Ruether C, Fischer I, Pfaffinger P, Noory E, Zeller T. Drug-Eluting Balloon Therapy for Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease: Predictors of Outcome With a Special Emphasis on Calcium. J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):727-33. doi: 10.1177/1526602815600156. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22632996
Citation
Cioppa A, Stabile E, Popusoi G, Salemme L, Cota L, Pucciarelli A, Ambrosini V, Sorropago G, Tesorio T, Agresta A, Biamino G, Rubino P. Combined treatment of heavy calcified femoro-popliteal lesions using directional atherectomy and a paclitaxel coated balloon: One-year single centre clinical results. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;13(4):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34080792
Citation
Rocha-Singh KJ, Sachar R, DeRubertis BG, Nolte-Ernsting CCA, Winscott JG, Krishnan P, Scott EC, Garcia LA, Baeriswyl JL, Ansel G, Rosenfield K, Zeller T; REALITY Investigators. Directional atherectomy before paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty in complex femoropopliteal disease: The VIVA REALITY study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep;98(3):549-558. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29777. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K141801
Description
HawkOne 510(k) clearance.
URL
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm
Description
Turbo Hawk 3 510(k) clearances.

Learn more about this trial

DiRectional AthErectomy + Drug CoAted BaLloon to Treat Long, CalcifIed FemoropopliTeal ArterY Lesions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs