search
Back to results

Discussing Death and Dying: An End of Life Curriculum to Empower Residents

Primary Purpose

Education, Medical, Education, Medical, Graduate, Care, Palliative

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Facilitated Group Session
CELA Session
Sponsored by
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Education, Medical

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Post Graduate Year (PGY) 2 or PGY-3 resident participating in the already-required Advocacy rotation at Monroe Carrell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
  • Availability to participate in self reflection essays and simulated patient case
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students, PGY-1, PGY-4 or PGY-5 residents, fellows or learners not participating in the already-required Advocacy rotation
  • Inability to participate in self reflection essays and simulated patient case
  • Non-English speaking

Sites / Locations

  • Monroe Carell Junior Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Control Group

Facilitated Group Session

CELA Session

Arm Description

Those in the control group (CG) will write a pre and post-study reflection essay discussing their experiences with end of life discussions.

Participants in Facilitated Group Session (previously called Intervention Group 1) will watch a pre-recorded video describing the SPIKES model and then take part of a facilitated guided group session reviewing the model and group interview of standardized/simulated patient encounter.

Participants in the CELA Session (previously called Intervention Group 2) will watch a pre-recorded video describing the SPIKES model and then participate in an individualized standardized/simulated patient scenario that will be filmed at the Center for Experiential Learning and Assessment (CELA).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Self-reported resident competency
Residents will complete validated pre- and post-surveys to evaluate their competency in having end of life discussions. The scale is 1-4, where 1 indicates very comfortable and 4 indicates very uncomfortable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 12, 2017
Last Updated
April 15, 2019
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03186274
Brief Title
Discussing Death and Dying: An End of Life Curriculum to Empower Residents
Official Title
Discussing Death and Dying: An End of Life Curriculum to Empower Residents
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 26, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate how the educational intervention utilized affects pediatric resident comfort level with EOL discussions.
Detailed Description
One of the most challenging roles a physician can serve is delivering life altering and/or bad news to patients and their families, and yet this skill is not widely taught to physicians. A survey from 2003 of pediatric residents found that not only was there minimal education and training in this area, but that they felt there was no natural improvement in their skills from the first to third year of training. It has also been shown that the art of eliciting a patient or family's concerns about death and responding to them is felt to be poorly taught. Worse, residents have indicated that a hidden curriculum in medicine seems to indicate that there is no value to these conversations at all. Residents are not the only stakeholders involved who have expressed concern with this reality. Parents of pediatric patients have repeatedly reported wanting increased sensitivity and clarity during sharing of life-altering information. Up to 75% of parents have reported a negative experience involving end of life (EOL) discussions, and cited inexperience, lack of comfort in communication, and a lack of knowledge as contributing factors to their negative experiences. Less than 18% of students and residents report receiving formal education in EOL discussions, despite the fact that 90% or more of residents have identified caring for those dying as part of a physician's responsibilities. Of residents who do get experience with EOL discussions, less than 2/3 receive feedback. Some residencies, such as internal medicine, have recognized the need for formal instruction on how to have EOL discussions is needed and have implemented formal programs to answer it, and it has even become a standard expectation for many fellowships. Formal education regarding EOL has also become a standard expectation for many fellowships, including pediatric neonatology, intensive care, and hematology/oncology. Despite the evidence that there is need for formal intervention and education regarding EOL care, there has been little advancement towards implementing a formal curriculum in pediatric residency programs. Review of the literature demonstrates that only one study has developed a formal curriculum involving a method called SPIKES (Setting, Perception, Involvement, Knowledge, Empathy, and Summary) that targets pediatric residents. The initial data from this study is promising and indicates increased comfort level in residents. However, to date no study has evaluated if the method of instruction affects the resident education, an important consideration as some interventions (ex. standardized patients) are more costly and time consuming than others (ex. facilitator guided small group sessions).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Education, Medical, Education, Medical, Graduate, Care, Palliative, Medicine, Palliative

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
37 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Those in the control group (CG) will write a pre and post-study reflection essay discussing their experiences with end of life discussions.
Arm Title
Facilitated Group Session
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in Facilitated Group Session (previously called Intervention Group 1) will watch a pre-recorded video describing the SPIKES model and then take part of a facilitated guided group session reviewing the model and group interview of standardized/simulated patient encounter.
Arm Title
CELA Session
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the CELA Session (previously called Intervention Group 2) will watch a pre-recorded video describing the SPIKES model and then participate in an individualized standardized/simulated patient scenario that will be filmed at the Center for Experiential Learning and Assessment (CELA).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Facilitated Group Session
Intervention Description
Participants will review the SPIKES model with a facilitator and then participate in a guided and supported simulated patient encounter utilizing aspects of the SPIKES model, with feedback at the end of the session.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
CELA Session
Intervention Description
Participants will review the SPIKES model on their own and then participate in a simulated patient encounter utilizing the SPIKES model. They will receive feedback following the encounter.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self-reported resident competency
Description
Residents will complete validated pre- and post-surveys to evaluate their competency in having end of life discussions. The scale is 1-4, where 1 indicates very comfortable and 4 indicates very uncomfortable.
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Post Graduate Year (PGY) 2 or PGY-3 resident participating in the already-required Advocacy rotation at Monroe Carrell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt Availability to participate in self reflection essays and simulated patient case English speaking Exclusion Criteria: Medical students, PGY-1, PGY-4 or PGY-5 residents, fellows or learners not participating in the already-required Advocacy rotation Inability to participate in self reflection essays and simulated patient case Non-English speaking
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Travis Crook, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Pediatric Hospital Medicine
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Monroe Carell Junior Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37210
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23053870
Citation
Tait GR, Hodges BD. Residents learning from a narrative experience with dying patients: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Oct;18(4):727-43. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9411-y. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31139729
Citation
Wolfe AD, Denniston SF, Baker J, Catrine K, Hoover-Regan M. Bad News Deserves Better Communication: A Customizable Curriculum for Teaching Learners to Share Life-Altering Information in Pediatrics. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Aug 12;12:10438. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10438.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12950476
Citation
Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Block SD. The status of medical education in end-of-life care: a national report. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep;18(9):685-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21215.x.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Keefer P, Pituch K, Murphy T, et al. A child's last hours - multidisciplinary training in end-of-life care for professionals working in children's hospitals: newborn with lethal congenital anomalies. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10108. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10108
Results Reference
background
Citation
Rock L, Gadmer N, Arnold R, et al. Critical care communication skills training for internal medicine residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10212. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10212
Results Reference
background
Citation
Brock K, Cohen H, Sourkes B, et al. Teaching pediatric fellows palliative care through simulation and video intervention: a practical guide to implementation. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10284. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10284
Results Reference
background
Citation
Brown C, Gephardt G, Lloyd C, Swearingen C, Boateng B. Teaching palliative care skills using simulated family encounters. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2011;7:8507. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.8507
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18929686
Citation
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Jackson J, Albertini L. Caring for children with chronic health care needs: an introductory curriculum for pediatric residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2012;8:9172. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9172
Results Reference
background
Citation
Mintzer M, Chen A, Conway Copper T, et al. Breaking bad news using role playing: a multimedia instructional activity for teaching medical trainees. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2014;10:9798. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9798
Results Reference
background
Citation
Reichert J, Parmelee D, Bognar S, Durgans K, Godoy M. A LION IN THE HOUSE module for health care education: pediatric end-of-life case studies. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2012;8:8362. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.8362
Results Reference
background
Citation
Williams D, Fisicaro T, Hargraves R, Berg D. End-of-life communication education program for internal medicine residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2009;5:7945. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7945
Results Reference
background
Citation
Anspacher M, Shah N. Palliative care for the medically complex child. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2013;9:9538. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9538
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Discussing Death and Dying: An End of Life Curriculum to Empower Residents

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs