search
Back to results

Distribution of Topical Nasal Medication Within the Nasal Cavity and Sinuses by Radiographic Comparison

Primary Purpose

Chronic Sinusitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sinus CT Scan
Omnipaque 240 Contrast Solution
Omnipaque 240 mg I/mL
Sponsored by
University of Nebraska
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Chronic Sinusitis focused on measuring Nasal Spray, Nasal Drop, Intranasal Medication

Eligibility Criteria

19 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult able to perform activities of daily living

Exclusion Criteria:

  • signs or symptoms of acute or chronic paranasal sinus disease
  • history of sinus surgery
  • symptomatic deviated septum
  • active seasonal allergies
  • allergies to contrast
  • history of nasal polyposis
  • pregnant or breast feeding women
  • neck or back problems that would prevent a subject from kneeling on the floor and crouching over
  • currently taking metformin or amiodarone
  • students or stff under the direct supervision of the investigators
  • cognitive impairment
  • terminal illness

Sites / Locations

  • ENT Specialist PC of Omaha

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Nasal spray

Nasal drop

Arm Description

This arm of the study will contain subjects who will spray 2-4 sprays of a nasal contrast solution in their nares. Following administration of the spray, the subjects will then have a Xoran mini-CAT scan of their sinuses.

This arm will contain subjects who will place two drops of a nasal contrast solution in each nose. Following administration of the nasal contrast, the subjects will then have a Xoran miniCAT scan of their sinuses.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To Measure the Distribution of Nasal Sprays and Drops.
CT scan scored for distribution contrast delivered by nasal spray or drops within subsets in the nasal cavity. The sinonasal cavity was divided into twenty-one subsites on each side of the nasal cavity. The interpreters scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of contrast from the nasal spray or nasal drops within each subsite. Left and right sides were interpreted separately for a possible total score of 0-42 for each CT scan.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
February 20, 2008
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Sponsor
University of Nebraska
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00626366
Brief Title
Distribution of Topical Nasal Medication Within the Nasal Cavity and Sinuses by Radiographic Comparison
Official Title
Distribution of Topical Nasal Medication Within the Nasal Cavity and Sinuses by Radiographic Comparison
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 12, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 9, 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 9, 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Nebraska

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of nasal sprays and nasal drops when used.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of nasal sprays and nasal drops when used. The study hypothesizes that nasal drops will reach the frontonasal region more often than nasal sprays.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Sinusitis
Keywords
Nasal Spray, Nasal Drop, Intranasal Medication

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
18 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Nasal spray
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This arm of the study will contain subjects who will spray 2-4 sprays of a nasal contrast solution in their nares. Following administration of the spray, the subjects will then have a Xoran mini-CAT scan of their sinuses.
Arm Title
Nasal drop
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This arm will contain subjects who will place two drops of a nasal contrast solution in each nose. Following administration of the nasal contrast, the subjects will then have a Xoran miniCAT scan of their sinuses.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Sinus CT Scan
Intervention Description
Subjects will undergo a Xoran miniCAT scan of their sinuses
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Omnipaque 240 Contrast Solution
Other Intervention Name(s)
contrast enhancement
Intervention Description
Subjects will spray 2-4 drops of half-strength Omnipaque 240 mgI/mL into each nare. Each spray is approximately 0.1 ml.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Omnipaque 240 mg I/mL
Other Intervention Name(s)
contrast enhancement
Intervention Description
Subjects will place two drops of half-strength Omnipaque 240 mg I/mL intranasally to each nose. Each drop is approximately 1 ml.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To Measure the Distribution of Nasal Sprays and Drops.
Description
CT scan scored for distribution contrast delivered by nasal spray or drops within subsets in the nasal cavity. The sinonasal cavity was divided into twenty-one subsites on each side of the nasal cavity. The interpreters scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of contrast from the nasal spray or nasal drops within each subsite. Left and right sides were interpreted separately for a possible total score of 0-42 for each CT scan.
Time Frame
2 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult able to perform activities of daily living Exclusion Criteria: signs or symptoms of acute or chronic paranasal sinus disease history of sinus surgery symptomatic deviated septum active seasonal allergies allergies to contrast history of nasal polyposis pregnant or breast feeding women neck or back problems that would prevent a subject from kneeling on the floor and crouching over currently taking metformin or amiodarone students or stff under the direct supervision of the investigators cognitive impairment terminal illness
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erin K O'Brien, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Nebraska
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donald Leopold, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Nebraska
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ENT Specialist PC of Omaha
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68114
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16360518
Citation
Senocak D, Senocak M, Bozan S. Sinonasal distribution of topically applied particles: computerized tomographic detection and the effects of topical decongestion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.024.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12172251
Citation
Olson DE, Rasgon BM, Hilsinger RL Jr. Radiographic comparison of three methods for nasal saline irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2002 Aug;112(8 Pt 1):1394-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200208000-00013.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15564850
Citation
Wormald PJ, Cain T, Oates L, Hawke L, Wong I. A comparative study of three methods of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2004 Dec;114(12):2224-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149463.95950.c5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16500451
Citation
Boatsman JE, Calhoun KH, Ryan MW. Relationship between rhinosinusitis symptoms and mucociliary clearance time. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Mar;134(3):491-3. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.045.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15224630
Citation
Lund VJ, Black JH, Szabo LZ, Schrewelius C, Akerlund A. Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide aqueous nasal spray in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Rhinology. 2004 Jun;42(2):57-62.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15182211
Citation
Aukema AA, Fokkens WJ. Chronic rhinosinusitis: management for optimal outcomes. Treat Respir Med. 2004;3(2):97-105. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200403020-00004.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16274802
Citation
Cannady SB, Batra PS, Citardi MJ, Lanza DC. Comparison of delivery of topical medications to the paranasal sinuses via "vertex-to-floor" position and atomizer spray after FESS. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov;133(5):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.07.039.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Distribution of Topical Nasal Medication Within the Nasal Cavity and Sinuses by Radiographic Comparison

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs