Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Partial Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction?
Primary Purpose
Epilepsy
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Memantine
Sugar Pill
Memantine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Epilepsy focused on measuring epilepsy, memory, memantine, localization related epilepsy, focal epilepsy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-65 years of age
- Normal IQ as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR)
- Able to give consent
- Able to live independently and complete activities of daily living
- Stable frequency of seizures. There is no minimum/maximum criteria for the frequency of partial seizures. Those with infrequent secondary generalized seizures may participate, with infrequent seizures defined as two or fewer per year.
- The subject's treating physician does not believe a change in anticonvulsant regimen to be warranted. The anticonvulsant drugs must remain unchanged during the 26 week trial.
- Partial-onset seizures. Seizure type will be determined by clinical history, MRI, SPECT and/or PET imaging, and interictal and/or ictal EEG.
- Either symptomatic or idiopathic seizures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-epileptic seizures
- Prior surgical resection for treatment of seizures
- Progressive neurologic illness (i.e. tumor evident on MRI)
- Current alcohol or drug abuse, as this may affect memory by other mechanisms. This information may be obtained by self-report, from the referring physician or by medical record.
- Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, nutritional deficiency, infection or metabolic/electrolyte disorder causing memory loss.
- Non-native English speaking and/or multilingual.
- Seizure(s) must not have occurred within 3 days of testing.
- Subjects who are pregnant will not be eligible to take part in the study, as memantine is classified as a Pregnancy Category B drug and may pose risk to the fetus.
- Women who are breastfeeding may not participate in this study.
- Those with renal tubular acidosis or infections of the urinary tract will not be eligible for participation, as memantine is renally cleared and conditions that alkalinize the urine may reduce clearance of the drug.
- Subjects with severe renal impairment, defined as a creatinine clearance of ≤29 mL/min, will be excluded as such patients may not tolerate the proposed dosing schedule.
Sites / Locations
- Emory University
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Memantine
Sugar Pill
Arm Description
Subjects will randomly assigned to take either a placebo or memantine for 13 weeks. The assignment will be double-blind, neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo.
Subjects will be randomly assigned to take either memantine or a placebo. The study is double-blind, and neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Change Scores in Memory Measures From Baseline to Post-treatment/Placebo Will be Compared Between the Memantine Treatment and Placebo Groups.
Change scores from pre- to post-treatment/placebo were calculated for the primary outcome measures, the Selective Reminding Test Continuous Long-Term Retrieval (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory) and 7-24 Spatial Recall Test Total Learning (range 0-35; total correct across 5 learning trials are summed, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores. These measures are scores on a scale, rather than representing standard units.
Secondary Outcome Measures
To Test the Hypothesis That Improvement Will be Selective for Verbal Memory, Change Scores on the Non-verbal Tasks Will be Compared Between the Placebo and Memantine Treatment Groups.
To Test the Hypothesis That Treatment With Memantine Will Result in Subjective Improvement of Memory Function, the Change Scores From the QOLIE-89 Will be Evaluated.
A Secondary Analysis Will Examine the Possible Sustained Benefit of Continued Memantine Use.
SRT-CLTR (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory), and 7-24 Spatial Memory Test (range 0-35; scores are summed across the 5 learning trials, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores will be assessed across the first (baseline) and third (post-open label memantine) testing sessions. These measures are considered to be scores on a scale, rather than standard units. The hypothesis was that subjects randomized to memantine would demonstrate sustained improvement from baseline, while the placebo group would demonstrate improvements after taking open label memantine (compared to baseline).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01054599
First Posted
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 11, 2017
Sponsor
American Academy of Neurology
Collaborators
Forest Laboratories
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01054599
Brief Title
Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Partial Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction?
Official Title
Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Localization-related Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction? A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
American Academy of Neurology
Collaborators
Forest Laboratories
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Many patients with epilepsy have memory deficits in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Unfortunately, the treatment options for memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy are limited. The investigators are conducting a study to evaluate the effects of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with localization-related seizures. The study involves randomization to memantine therapy or placebo, with cognitive testing and EEG pre- and post-treatment, as well as after an open-label memantine treatment phase.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy. The investigators expect that verbal memory task performance will improve in those taking memantine, but not in those taking a placebo.
The investigators propose that the expected benefit of memantine is specific to verbal memory in subjects with left temporal lobe seizures, rather than representing an overall improvement in cognitive function. The investigators expect no improvement on other cognitive tasks in either the memantine or placebo groups.
The investigators will evaluate whether subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy and memory difficulties have self-reported improvement in memory while taking memantine. The investigators expect improvement of self-rated memory function on the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Patient Inventory (QOLIE-89) in the memantine group, but no change on this scale in the placebo group.
Detailed Description
Patients with epilepsy frequently demonstrate subtle cognitive difficulties in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Those with left temporal lobe seizures often have particular deficits in verbal memory (Blum 2001). These memory difficulties may be the most distressing aspect of epilepsy for the patients.
Unfortunately, treatment options for memory dysfunction are limited. Cognitive therapy, for example, may help patients to cope, but does not treat the memory loss or address the underlying pathologic process. Two studies examined the pharmacologic management of memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy using donepezil (Aricept), but with inconsistent results and questionable benefit. A pilot study by Fisher et al. (2001) showed some promise for use of the drug. The study found improved immediate recall and consistent long-term retrieval scores on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test after three months of open-label treatment when compared to a pre-treatment baseline. A more recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of donepezil, however, showed no effect on memory as measured by delayed recall on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Hamberger et al. 2007).
Use of donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, may pose a risk of seizure exacerbation in this population. Fisher et al. (2001) reported a significant increase in the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures during donepezil treatment. Cholinergic agents have been shown to cause seizures in animal models as well (Turski et al. 1989). Given isolated case reports of seizures associated with donepezil use, the manufacturer issued an advisory note warning of a possible relationship, although data have been insufficient to establish causality. While an increase in seizures was not noted in the Hamberger et al. (2007) study, seizure exacerbation remains a concern regarding the use of this drug in patients with epilepsy.
The mechanism for the postulated effect of donepezil is unclear. Cholinergic transmission has not traditionally been viewed as a contributor to hippocampal pathology. It is believed that excitotoxicity, mediated by glutamate acting on NMDA receptors in the hippocampus, causes hippocampal sclerosis. This process leads to further seizures and memory dysfunction. Alteration of this excitotoxic pathway would be a novel, and potentially safer and more effective, approach to the treatment of memory loss.
The possible effect of intervention at the level of excitotoxicity is supported by animal data. Such studies demonstrate that induced seizures in a rat model of epilepsy will lead to decrements in performance of a spatial memory task, the Morris water maze. This memory dysfunction, however, can be mitigated by NMDA antagonists, such as MK-801, administered prior to seizure induction. The underlying concept is that NMDA receptor antagonists would block the pathway of excitotoxicity that leads to hippocampal injury and memory loss (Kelsey et al. 2000).
An NMDA antagonist, memantine (Namenda), is prescribed in humans for treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (Tariot et al. 2004, Reisberg et al. 2003, 2006). Patients with Alzheimer's disease have attained significant cognitive improvements with use of the drug, as measured by the Severe Impairment Battery. The time-course of benefit is less clear, with some studies demonstrating sustained improvement (Tariot et al. 2004) and others showing more transient benefits over the first several weeks of treatment (Reisberg et al. 2003).
It is unknown, however, if an NMDA antagonist such as memantine would be of benefit in humans with memory dysfunction and seizures. The proposed study tests the hypothesis that treatment with memantine would improve verbal memory test performance in patients with localization-related epilepsy. If beneficial, this would provide a much-needed treatment option.
The study will examine the primary specific aim:
Aim 1: Improvement in memory test performance. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy. We expect that verbal memory task performance, as measured by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT), will improve in those taking memantine, but not while taking a placebo. Such a finding would support the use of memantine for treatment of memory loss in this population, as well as more generally support the hypothesis that NMDA receptor hyperactivity is an appropriate target for intervention.
The study will examine two secondary specific aims:
Aim 2: Selectivity of response. We propose that the postulated benefit of memantine is specific to verbal memory in subjects with left temporal lobe seizures, and visuospatial memory in subjects with right temporal lobe seizures, rather than representing an overall improvement in cognitive function. We expect no improvement on other cognitive tasks in either the memantine or placebo groups, with measures including the Digit Span (for sustained attention, immediate span), Spatial Span (for visuospatial working memory and span), Block Design (for visuospatial construction), Verbal Fluency, Design Fluency, and Stroop Color Word Interference (for executive function) tests. This would lend support to the hypothesis that blockade of NMDA receptor hyperactivity in the hippocampus would lead to improved performance on cognitive tasks that depend specifically on the integrity of that hippocampus, as opposed to a general benefit in overall cognition.
Aim 3: Improvement in self-reported memory function. We will evaluate whether subjects with localization-related epilepsy and memory difficulties have subjective improvement in memory with the administration of memantine. We expect improvement of self-rated memory function on the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Patient Inventory (QOLIE-89) with memantine, but no change on this scale with placebo. This measure serves to evaluate the hypothesis that memantine treatment leads to clinically meaningful improvement.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Epilepsy
Keywords
epilepsy, memory, memantine, localization related epilepsy, focal epilepsy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
29 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Memantine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will randomly assigned to take either a placebo or memantine for 13 weeks. The assignment will be double-blind, neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo.
Arm Title
Sugar Pill
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomly assigned to take either memantine or a placebo. The study is double-blind, and neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Memantine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Namenda
Intervention Description
All subjects in the treatment group will be placed on memantine. The dosage of memantine will begin at 5mg once per day (qday), and increase by 5mg every week. The titration will continue over a period of 3 weeks until a goal of 10mg bid is reached. The dosing will increase slowly, to minimize the risk of side effects. The subject will then remain on memantine at 10mg bid for 10 weeks, until the conclusion of the first phase of the study. At the conclusion of the first 13 weeks, subjects will discontinue the treatment (memantine or placebo) and enter the open label phase.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sugar Pill
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
In the control arm of the study, subjects will take one placebo sugar pill per day for one week, then increase to one tablet twice per day for the following 12 weeks. At the end of this phase of the study, subjects will enter the open-label phase (unblinded treatment with memantine).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Memantine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Namenda
Intervention Description
Open label: When the blinded phase is complete (Weeks 1-13), all subjects will receive open-label treatment with memantine (Weeks 14-26). The dosage of memantine will begin at 5mg once per day (qday), and increase by 5mg every week. The titration will continue over a period of 3 weeks until a goal of 10mg bid is reached. The dosing will increase slowly, to minimize the risk of side effects. The subject will then remain on memantine at 10mg bid for 10 weeks, until the conclusion of the study. At the conclusion of the study, subjects will discontinue the treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Change Scores in Memory Measures From Baseline to Post-treatment/Placebo Will be Compared Between the Memantine Treatment and Placebo Groups.
Description
Change scores from pre- to post-treatment/placebo were calculated for the primary outcome measures, the Selective Reminding Test Continuous Long-Term Retrieval (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory) and 7-24 Spatial Recall Test Total Learning (range 0-35; total correct across 5 learning trials are summed, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores. These measures are scores on a scale, rather than representing standard units.
Time Frame
13 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To Test the Hypothesis That Improvement Will be Selective for Verbal Memory, Change Scores on the Non-verbal Tasks Will be Compared Between the Placebo and Memantine Treatment Groups.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
To Test the Hypothesis That Treatment With Memantine Will Result in Subjective Improvement of Memory Function, the Change Scores From the QOLIE-89 Will be Evaluated.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
A Secondary Analysis Will Examine the Possible Sustained Benefit of Continued Memantine Use.
Description
SRT-CLTR (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory), and 7-24 Spatial Memory Test (range 0-35; scores are summed across the 5 learning trials, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores will be assessed across the first (baseline) and third (post-open label memantine) testing sessions. These measures are considered to be scores on a scale, rather than standard units. The hypothesis was that subjects randomized to memantine would demonstrate sustained improvement from baseline, while the placebo group would demonstrate improvements after taking open label memantine (compared to baseline).
Time Frame
26 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18-65 years of age
Normal IQ as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR)
Able to give consent
Able to live independently and complete activities of daily living
Stable frequency of seizures. There is no minimum/maximum criteria for the frequency of partial seizures. Those with infrequent secondary generalized seizures may participate, with infrequent seizures defined as two or fewer per year.
The subject's treating physician does not believe a change in anticonvulsant regimen to be warranted. The anticonvulsant drugs must remain unchanged during the 26 week trial.
Partial-onset seizures. Seizure type will be determined by clinical history, MRI, SPECT and/or PET imaging, and interictal and/or ictal EEG.
Either symptomatic or idiopathic seizures.
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-epileptic seizures
Prior surgical resection for treatment of seizures
Progressive neurologic illness (i.e. tumor evident on MRI)
Current alcohol or drug abuse, as this may affect memory by other mechanisms. This information may be obtained by self-report, from the referring physician or by medical record.
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, nutritional deficiency, infection or metabolic/electrolyte disorder causing memory loss.
Non-native English speaking and/or multilingual.
Seizure(s) must not have occurred within 3 days of testing.
Subjects who are pregnant will not be eligible to take part in the study, as memantine is classified as a Pregnancy Category B drug and may pose risk to the fetus.
Women who are breastfeeding may not participate in this study.
Those with renal tubular acidosis or infections of the urinary tract will not be eligible for participation, as memantine is renally cleared and conditions that alkalinize the urine may reduce clearance of the drug.
Subjects with severe renal impairment, defined as a creatinine clearance of ≤29 mL/min, will be excluded as such patients may not tolerate the proposed dosing schedule.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauren Moo, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Newton-Wellesley Hospital
City
Newton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02462
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12609282
Citation
Blum D. Decline in Verbal Memory Associated with Duration of Epilepsy: An Intracarotid Amobarbital Study. Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Oct;2(5):448-453. doi: 10.1006/ebeh.2001.0239.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16302857
Citation
Busch RM, Frazier TW, Haggerty KA, Kubu CS. Utility of the Boston naming test in predicting ultimate side of surgery in patients with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2005 Nov;46(11):1773-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00300.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17050270
Citation
Diaz-Asper CM, Dopkins S, Potolicchio SJ Jr, Caputy A. Spatial memory following temporal lobe resection. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Nov;28(8):1462-81. doi: 10.1080/13803390500434359.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17521340
Citation
Dodrill CB, Ojemann GA. Do recent seizures and recent changes in antiepileptic drugs impact performances on neuropsychological tests in subtle ways that might easily be missed? Epilepsia. 2007 Oct;48(10):1833-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01140.x. Epub 2007 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12609209
Citation
Fisher RS, Bortz JJ, Blum DE, Duncan B, Burke H. A pilot study of donepezil for memory problems in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Aug;2(4):330-4. doi: 10.1006/ebeh.2001.0221.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16723214
Citation
Halsband U. Bilingual and multilingual language processing. J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 May 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17484756
Citation
Hamberger MJ, Palmese CA, Scarmeas N, Weintraub D, Choi H, Hirsch LJ. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil to improve memory in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007 Jul;48(7):1283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01114.x. Epub 2007 May 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7925154
Citation
Helmstaedter C, Elger CE, Lendt M. Postictal courses of cognitive deficits in focal epilepsies. Epilepsia. 1994 Sep-Oct;35(5):1073-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02557.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8822692
Citation
Hermann BP, Seidenberg M, Schoenfeld J, Peterson J, Leveroni C, Wyler AR. Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 1996 Oct;37(10):942-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00531.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10628730
Citation
Kelsey JE, Sanderson KL, Frye CA. Perforant path stimulation in rats produces seizures, loss of hippocampal neurons, and a deficit in spatial mapping which are reduced by prior MK-801. Behav Brain Res. 2000 Jan;107(1-2):59-69. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00107-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9217156
Citation
Kim KH, Relkin NR, Lee KM, Hirsch J. Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature. 1997 Jul 10;388(6638):171-4. doi: 10.1038/40623.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12614389
Citation
Lee S, Sziklas V, Andermann F, Farnham S, Risse G, Gustafson M, Gates J, Penovich P, Al-Asmi A, Dubeau F, Jones-Gotman M. The effects of adjunctive topiramate on cognitive function in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2003 Mar;44(3):339-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.27402.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15352603
Citation
Lucas TH 2nd, McKhann GM 2nd, Ojemann GA. Functional separation of languages in the bilingual brain: a comparison of electrical stimulation language mapping in 25 bilingual patients and 117 monolingual control patients. J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):449-57. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0449.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16266826
Citation
Lutz MT, Helmstaedter C. EpiTrack: tracking cognitive side effects of medication on attention and executive functions in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Dec;7(4):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.08.015. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1733053
Citation
McLean MJ, Gupta RC, Dettbarn WD, Wamil AW. Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of memantine against seizures produced by soman in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992 Jan;112(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90284-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15985582
Citation
Meador KJ, Loring DW, Vahle VJ, Ray PG, Werz MA, Fessler AJ, Ogrocki P, Schoenberg MR, Miller JM, Kustra RP. Cognitive and behavioral effects of lamotrigine and topiramate in healthy volunteers. Neurology. 2005 Jun 28;64(12):2108-14. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000165994.46777.BE.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12672860
Citation
Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, Schmitt F, Ferris S, Mobius HJ; Memantine Study Group. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1333-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013128.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16401736
Citation
Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, Schmitt F, Ferris S, Mobius HJ. A 24-week open-label extension study of memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2006 Jan;63(1):49-54. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.1.49.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11879343
Citation
Sabsevitz DS, Swanson SJ, Morris GL, Mueller WM, Seidenberg M. Memory outcome after left anterior temporal lobectomy in patients with expected and reversed Wada memory asymmetry scores. Epilepsia. 2001 Nov;42(11):1408-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.38500.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12697141
Citation
Schefft BK, Testa SM, Dulay MF, Privitera MD, Yeh HS. Preoperative assessment of confrontation naming ability and interictal paraphasia production in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2003 Apr;4(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/s1525-5050(03)00026-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12707428
Citation
Stroup E, Langfitt J, Berg M, McDermott M, Pilcher W, Como P. Predicting verbal memory decline following anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). Neurology. 2003 Apr 22;60(8):1266-73. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000058765.33878.0d.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14734594
Citation
Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, Graham SM, McDonald S, Gergel I; Memantine Study Group. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Jan 21;291(3):317-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.3.317.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2648633
Citation
Turski L, Ikonomidou C, Turski WA, Bortolotto ZA, Cavalheiro EA. Review: cholinergic mechanisms and epileptogenesis. The seizures induced by pilocarpine: a novel experimental model of intractable epilepsy. Synapse. 1989;3(2):154-71. doi: 10.1002/syn.890030207.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14590558
Citation
Zipf-Williams EM, Shear PK, Strongin D, Winegarden BJ, Morrell MJ. Qualitative block design performance in epilepsy patients. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb;15(2):149-57.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30449328
Citation
Leeman-Markowski BA, Meador KJ, Moo LR, Cole AJ, Hoch DB, Garcia E, Schachter SC. Does memantine improve memory in subjects with focal-onset epilepsy and memory dysfunction? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88:315-324. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.047. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Partial Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction?
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs