search
Back to results

Does Self-efficacy Predict Outcomes Among U.S. Military Academy Cadets During Initial Entry Training?

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Injury

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Deadlift Form Education
Sponsored by
Keller Army Community Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring Nocebo, Self-Efficacy

Eligibility Criteria

17 Years - 26 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All incoming US Military Academy cadets, attending cadet basic training in summer 2022.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to communicate in English; unable to participate in deadlift event.

Sites / Locations

  • Keller Army Community Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Cautionary

Reassuring

Control

Arm Description

The group will receive a message regarding potential risk for spine injury before the tested task.

This group will receive a message regarding spine resiliency before the tested task.

This group will not receive education before the tested task.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Maximum Deadlift weight lifted
Amount of weight lifted for three repetitions
Perceived spine vulnerability questionnaire
Ease of which participants believe the back can be injured. Questions based on Back Pain Attitude Questionnaire
Perceived spine vulnerability questionnaire
Ease of which participants believe the back can be injured. Questions based on Back Pain Attitude Questionnaire

Secondary Outcome Measures

Deadlift Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Confidence in ability to deadlift

Full Information

First Posted
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 29, 2022
Sponsor
Keller Army Community Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05453110
Brief Title
Does Self-efficacy Predict Outcomes Among U.S. Military Academy Cadets During Initial Entry Training?
Official Title
Does Self-efficacy Predict Outcomes Among U.S. Military Academy Cadets During Initial Entry Training?
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 4, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 8, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 8, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Keller Army Community Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: Lower back injuries are a common occurrence in athletes, sports programs, and in the military (Bengtsson, 2018; Lovalekar, 2021). The Army's new fitness test includes a three-repetition maximum deadlift, and this inclusion has raised concern amongst servicemembers and healthcare workers due to the association between deadlifts and lower back injuries. There is debate amongst researchers about the role of deadlift form in lower back injury prevention, specifically related to flexion of the spine (Sjoberg, 2020). Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of low back pain education (either cautionary regarding injury risk or reassuring regarding spine resiliency) on deadlift performance (weight lifted), and if this education has an effect on self-efficacy and perceived spine vulnerability. Participants: Participants will be incoming new cadets at the United States Military Academy (USMA). Inclusion criteria are cadets age 17-26 (cadets under the age of 18 are legally emancipated therefore able to consent), those participating in the ACFT, and speak and understand English. Study Design: This study will be a randomized controlled trial with parallel design and 1:1 allocation ratio. The investigators plan to use cluster randomization. There will be three groups- control, cautionary, reassuring (Jackson, 2005). The investigators are also planning a prospective cohort study to assess self-efficacy, injury, and performance over time. Procedures: Data will be collected at the United States Military Academy during the summer of 2022 during cadet basic training. Shortly after new cadets arrive at USMA, the investigators will gather demographic and initial self-efficacy information. The randomized control element of this study will occur before and during the maximum deadlift (MDL) of the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT). At the start of cadet basic training, investigators will randomly allocate each company of cadets into one of three groups (three companies per group.) The investigator will administer the education (cautionary, reassuring, or control) shortly prior to cadets taking the MDL, and will collect results after the ACFT. The cautionary education is similar to standard information provided to many servicemembers before the start of an ACFT or a maximum deadlift.
Detailed Description
Background: Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are the leading cause of nondeployability, lost duty days (LDD), medical encounters, military discharge, and disability in the United States Military. (Lovalekar, 2021). Ironically, the leading causes of MSKIs are same activities that leaders deliberately conduct to develop physical resilience: running, foot marching, other physical fitness training activities (besides running) and work-related tasks (Lovalekar, 2021). Purpose: The purpose of this study is to learn about relationships between self-efficacy, injury and physical/tactical performance. The investigators also plan to assess the effect of low back pain education (either cautionary regarding injury risk or reassuring regarding spine resiliency) on deadlift performance (weight lifted), and if this education has an effect on self-efficacy and perceived spine vulnerability. Participants: Participants will be incoming new cadets at the United States Military Academy (USMA). Inclusion criteria are cadets age 17-26 (cadets under the age of 18 are legally emancipated therefore able to consent), those participating in the ACFT, and speak and understand English. Study Design: This study will be a randomized controlled trial with parallel design and 1:1 allocation ratio. The investigators plan to use cluster randomization. There will be three groups- control, cautionary, reassuring (Jackson, 2005). The investigators are also planning a prospective cohort study to assess self-efficacy, injury, and performance over time. Procedures: Data will be collected at the United States Military Academy during the summer of 2022 during cadet basic training. Shortly after new cadets arrive at USMA, the investigators will gather demographic and initial self-efficacy information. The randomized control element of this study will occur before and during the maximum deadlift (MDL) of the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT). At the start of cadet basic training, researchers will randomly allocate each company of cadets into one of three groups (three companies per group.) The researchers will administer the education (cautionary, reassuring, or control) shortly prior to cadets taking the MDL, and will collect results after the ACFT. The cautionary education is similar to standard information provided to many servicemembers before the start of an ACFT or a maximum deadlift.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Injury
Keywords
Nocebo, Self-Efficacy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Mixed Design with Time Repeated and Group Between-Factor, Randomized Controlled Trial
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cautionary
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The group will receive a message regarding potential risk for spine injury before the tested task.
Arm Title
Reassuring
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group will receive a message regarding spine resiliency before the tested task.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
This group will not receive education before the tested task.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Deadlift Form Education
Intervention Description
The education will include information about the lumbar spine as it relates to a deadlift. The researchers will administer this education shortly prior to participants taking a strength test.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximum Deadlift weight lifted
Description
Amount of weight lifted for three repetitions
Time Frame
Day 1/Post-intervention
Title
Perceived spine vulnerability questionnaire
Description
Ease of which participants believe the back can be injured. Questions based on Back Pain Attitude Questionnaire
Time Frame
Day 1/Pre-Test
Title
Perceived spine vulnerability questionnaire
Description
Ease of which participants believe the back can be injured. Questions based on Back Pain Attitude Questionnaire
Time Frame
Day1/Post-Test
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Deadlift Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Description
Confidence in ability to deadlift
Time Frame
Day 1/Post-Test

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
26 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All incoming US Military Academy cadets, attending cadet basic training in summer 2022. Exclusion Criteria: Unable to communicate in English; unable to participate in deadlift event.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Keller Army Community Hospital
City
West Point
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10996
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16238858
Citation
Jackson T, Pope L, Nagasaka T, Fritch A, Iezzi T, Chen H. The impact of threatening information about pain on coping and pain tolerance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(Pt 3):441-51. doi: 10.1348/135910705X27587.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30057777
Citation
Bengtsson V, Berglund L, Aasa U. Narrative review of injuries in powerlifting with special reference to their association to the squat, bench press and deadlift. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Jul 17;4(1):e000382. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000382. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33824080
Citation
Lovalekar M, Hauret K, Roy T, Taylor K, Blacker SD, Newman P, Yanovich R, Fleischmann C, Nindl BC, Jones B, Canham-Chervak M. Musculoskeletal injuries in military personnel-Descriptive epidemiology, risk factor identification, and prevention. J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Oct;24(10):963-969. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.03.016. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30199449
Citation
Sjoberg H, Aasa U, Rosengren M, Berglund L. Content Validity Index and Reliability of a New Protocol for Evaluation of Lifting Technique in the Powerlifting Squat and Deadlift. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Sep;34(9):2528-2536. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002791.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Does Self-efficacy Predict Outcomes Among U.S. Military Academy Cadets During Initial Entry Training?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs