search
Back to results

Dolutegravir Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir , Each in Combination With Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) in ART-naive Subjects (FLAMINGO)

Primary Purpose

Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
dolutegravir 50 mg OAD
darunavir 800mg OAD
ritonavir 100mg OAD
Sponsored by
ViiV Healthcare
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus focused on measuring ritonavir, HIV, HAART, darunavir, antiretroviral, dolutegravir, GSK1349572

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-1 infected adults greater than or equal to 18 years of age. Females are eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is (1) non-childbearing potential, (2) child bearing potential with negative pregnancy test at screening and Day 1 and agrees to use protocol-specified methods of birth control while on study.
  • HIV-1 infection with a screening plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 1000copies/mL
  • Antiretroviral-naïve (less than or equal to 10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection)
  • Signed and dated written informed consent is obtained from the subject or the subject's legal representative prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Any evidence of an active Centers for Disease and Prevention Control (CDC) Category C disease [CDC, 1993], except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy
  • Subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Class B or C) as determined by Child-Pugh classification
  • Anticipated need for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the study
  • History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class
  • History of malignancy within the past 5 years or ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; other localized malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the Study medical monitor for inclusion of the subject
  • Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening
  • Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening: radiation therapy; cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; any immunomodulators
  • Treatment with any agent, except recognized ART as allowed above, with documented activity against HIV-1 in vitro within 28 days of first dose of investigational product
  • Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half-lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of investigational product
  • Any evidence of primary viral resistance based on the presence of any major resistance-associated mutation [IAS-USA, 2010] in the Screening result or, if known, any historical resistance test result
  • Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the subject's participation in the study of an investigational compound is exclusionary
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal
  • ALT greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal and bilirubin greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (with greater than 35% direct bilirubin)
  • Subject has creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min via Cockroft-Gault method
  • Recent history (less than or equal to 3 months) of any upper or lower gastrointestinal bleed, with the exception of anal or rectal bleeding

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

dolutegravir 50mg once daily (OAD)

darunavir 800mg OAD in combination with ritonavir 100mg OAD

Arm Description

in combination with either abacavir/lamivudine fixed dose combination tablet OAD or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabline fixed dose combination tablet OAD

in combination with either abacavir/lamivudine fixed dose combination tablet OAD or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabline fixed dose combination tablet OAD

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 48
Assessment was done using Missing, Switch or Discontinuation = Failure (MSDF), as codified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "snapshot" algorithm.This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks). Modified Intent-To-Treat Exposed (mITT-E) Population:all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to Virologic Suppression (<50 Copies/mL) Through Week 48
The time to viral suppression (i.e. first viral load value <50 copies/mL) through Week 48 was derived and summarized using Kaplan-Meier plots. Participants who withdrew for any reason without having suppressed prior to the analysis were censored. Confidence intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 48
The percentage of participants with Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 48 was assessed MSDF, as codified by the FDA "snapshot" algorithm. This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks).
Change From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Change from Baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 . Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.
Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts
Change from Baseline in CD4+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48. Change from Baseline in CD8+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits and parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Associated Disease Progression With the Indicated Shift to CDC Class C, or New CDC Class C or Death at Week 48
The number of participants with HIV-1 disease progression (AIDS or death) was assessed per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. The CDC classifies HIV infection as Category A (participants with asymptomatic HIV infection, acute HIV infection with accompanying illness, or persistent generalized lymphadenopathy), Category B (participants with symptomatic non-AIDS condition, i.e., conditions that are attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection), and Category C (includes AIDS indicator conditions as defined by diagnostic or presumptive measures).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Through Week 48
Fasting LDL cholesterol change from Baseline was analyzed. Values represented are for adjusted means. Estimates are calculated from a repeated measures model including the following covariates: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, background dual NRTI therapy, Baseline LDL cholesterol, treatment*visit interaction and Baseline LDL cholesterol*visit interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Through Week 48
Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for which an increase in fasting LDL cholesterol to Grade 2 or higher occurred. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Toxicities
Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to Grade 3 or Grade 4 occurred.
Number of Participants (Par.) With Detectable Virus That Has Genotypic or Phenotypic Evidence of Treatment-emergent Resistance to DTG, DRV+RTV and Other On-study ART at Time of Protocol Defined Virology Failure (PDVF)
An assessment was made of every change across all amino acids within the integrase (IN), reverse transcriptase (RT), and Protease (PRO) encoding region at Baseline and at time of suspected PDVF. PDVF is defined as the confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA >200 c/mL >=Week 24. PDVF Genotypic Population included all participants in the mITT-E population with available on-treatment genotypic resistance data, at time of PDVF. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
SDM is a 20-item self-reported measure that addresses the presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 where 0 (complete absence of symptom) and 4 (very bothersome symptom). Overall score calculated as the sum of the scores for each of the 20 items of the questionnaire and ranged from 0 (best health) and 80 (worst health). Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and baseline symptom bother score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicates a decline in a participant's quality of life over that period.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48
The EQ-5D is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome. Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D utility score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48
The European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. Thermometer score is based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state).Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, Baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D thermometer score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The treatment satisfaction score (range: 0-60) was the sum of the individual items. HIVTSQ mITT-E Population=Only participants from USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain for whom valid translations were available from the mITT-E Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The lifestyle/ease score is the sum of items 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (range: 0-30). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The convenience score is the score for item 5 (range: 0-6). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.

Full Information

First Posted
October 6, 2011
Last Updated
December 14, 2017
Sponsor
ViiV Healthcare
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01449929
Brief Title
Dolutegravir Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir , Each in Combination With Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) in ART-naive Subjects
Acronym
FLAMINGO
Official Title
A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Open-label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of GSK1349572 (Dolutegravir, DTG) 50 mg Once Daily Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800 mg/100 mg Once Daily Each Administered With Fixed-dose Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Therapy Over 96 Weeks in HIV-1 Infected Antiretroviral naïve Adult Subjects
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 31, 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 22, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 26, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
ViiV Healthcare
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will be conducted in approximately 468 HIV-1 infected antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve subjects. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive dolutegravir (DTG) 50 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects) or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800 mg/100 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects), each in combination with fixed-dose dual nucleoside reverse transriptase inhibitor (NRTI) therapy (either abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). Subjects will be stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA and background NRTI selection. The primary analysis will take place after the last subject completes 48 weeks on therapy; an additional analysis will be conducted after the last subject completes Week 96 on study.
Detailed Description
ING114915 is a Phase IIIb randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel group, fully-powered non-inferiority study. The study will be conducted in approximately 468 HIV-1 infected ART-naïve subjects. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive DTG 50 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects) or DRV/r 800 mg/100 mg once daily (approximately 234 subjects), each in combination with fixed-dose dual NRTI therapy (either ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC). The primary analysis will take place after the last subject completes 48 weeks on therapy; an additional analysis will be conducted after the last subject completes Week 96 on study. Subjects who fulfil eligibility requirements will be randomized 1:1 to receive DTG 50 mg once daily or DRV/r 800 mg/100 mg once daily. In order to achieve balance across the two treatment groups of the study, randomization will be stratified by: screening plasma HIV-1 RNA >/ 100,000 copies/mL (c/mL) or > 100,000 c/mL and background dual NRTI (ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC) The DTG and DRV/r doses will be administered in an open-label fashion throughout the study. Subjects randomized to receive DTG and who successfully complete 96 weeks of treatment will continue to have access to DTG until either it is locally approved and commercially available, the patient no longer derives clinical benefit, the patient meets a protocol-defined reason for discontinuation or until development of DTG is terminated. Subjects randomized to the DRV/r arm will receive DRV/r through their Week 96 visit, after which they will be discontinued from the study and will need to make alternative arrangements to access antiretroviral medication. All subjects will receive background dual-NRTI therapy through their Week 96 visit.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Keywords
ritonavir, HIV, HAART, darunavir, antiretroviral, dolutegravir, GSK1349572

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
488 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
dolutegravir 50mg once daily (OAD)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
in combination with either abacavir/lamivudine fixed dose combination tablet OAD or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabline fixed dose combination tablet OAD
Arm Title
darunavir 800mg OAD in combination with ritonavir 100mg OAD
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
in combination with either abacavir/lamivudine fixed dose combination tablet OAD or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabline fixed dose combination tablet OAD
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
dolutegravir 50 mg OAD
Intervention Description
1 x 50 mg tablet OAD
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
darunavir 800mg OAD
Intervention Description
2 x 400mg tablets OAD
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ritonavir 100mg OAD
Intervention Description
1 x 100mg tablet OAD
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 48
Description
Assessment was done using Missing, Switch or Discontinuation = Failure (MSDF), as codified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "snapshot" algorithm.This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks). Modified Intent-To-Treat Exposed (mITT-E) Population:all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product
Time Frame
Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Virologic Suppression (<50 Copies/mL) Through Week 48
Description
The time to viral suppression (i.e. first viral load value <50 copies/mL) through Week 48 was derived and summarized using Kaplan-Meier plots. Participants who withdrew for any reason without having suppressed prior to the analysis were censored. Confidence intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Time Frame
From Baseline through Week 48
Title
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 48
Description
The percentage of participants with Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/mL at Week 48 was assessed MSDF, as codified by the FDA "snapshot" algorithm. This algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 as nonresponders, as well as participants who switched their concomitant ART prior to Week 48 as follows: background ART substitutions non-permitted per protocol (one background ART substitution was permitted for safety or tolerability); background ART substitutions permitted per protocol unless the decision to switch was documented as being before or at the first on-treatment visit where HIV-1 RNA was assessed. Otherwise, virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment in the snapshot window (Week 48 +/- 6 weeks).
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Description
Change from Baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA (log10 c/mL) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 . Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts
Description
Change from Baseline in CD4+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48. Change from Baseline in CD8+ cell counts was assessed at Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits and parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the mITT-E Population.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48 for CD4+ and Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48 for CD8+
Title
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Associated Disease Progression With the Indicated Shift to CDC Class C, or New CDC Class C or Death at Week 48
Description
The number of participants with HIV-1 disease progression (AIDS or death) was assessed per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. The CDC classifies HIV infection as Category A (participants with asymptomatic HIV infection, acute HIV infection with accompanying illness, or persistent generalized lymphadenopathy), Category B (participants with symptomatic non-AIDS condition, i.e., conditions that are attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection), and Category C (includes AIDS indicator conditions as defined by diagnostic or presumptive measures).
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Through Week 48
Description
Fasting LDL cholesterol change from Baseline was analyzed. Values represented are for adjusted means. Estimates are calculated from a repeated measures model including the following covariates: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, background dual NRTI therapy, Baseline LDL cholesterol, treatment*visit interaction and Baseline LDL cholesterol*visit interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Time Frame
From Baseline through Week 48
Title
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol Through Week 48
Description
Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for which an increase in fasting LDL cholesterol to Grade 2 or higher occurred. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Time Frame
From Baseline through Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Toxicities
Description
Hematology and clinical chemistry data were summarized according to the division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the Severity of adverse events, version 1.0. Grade 1, Mild; Grade 2, Moderate; Grade 3 (G3), Severe; Grade 4 (G4), Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to Grade 3 or Grade 4 occurred.
Time Frame
From Baseline through Week 48
Title
Number of Participants (Par.) With Detectable Virus That Has Genotypic or Phenotypic Evidence of Treatment-emergent Resistance to DTG, DRV+RTV and Other On-study ART at Time of Protocol Defined Virology Failure (PDVF)
Description
An assessment was made of every change across all amino acids within the integrase (IN), reverse transcriptase (RT), and Protease (PRO) encoding region at Baseline and at time of suspected PDVF. PDVF is defined as the confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA >200 c/mL >=Week 24. PDVF Genotypic Population included all participants in the mITT-E population with available on-treatment genotypic resistance data, at time of PDVF. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Time Frame
Baseline until PDVF up to Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Symptom Distress Module (SDM) Bother Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Description
SDM is a 20-item self-reported measure that addresses the presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 where 0 (complete absence of symptom) and 4 (very bothersome symptom). Overall score calculated as the sum of the scores for each of the 20 items of the questionnaire and ranged from 0 (best health) and 80 (worst health). Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and baseline symptom bother score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicates a decline in a participant's quality of life over that period.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Week 24 and Week 48
Description
The EQ-5D is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome. Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D utility score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Thermometer Scores at Week 24 and Week 48
Description
The European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a 5-question quality of life instrument that provides a utility score and visual analogue scale score that describes the participants' health status. The primary reason for including the EQ-5D is to elicit utility values for potential cost-effectiveness analysis for submission to health technology assessment agencies. Thermometer score is based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state).Values represented are for adjusted mean. Estimates are calculated from an ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, race, Baseline viral load, background dual NRTI therapy and Baseline EQ-5D thermometer score. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Title
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Total Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Description
Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The treatment satisfaction score (range: 0-60) was the sum of the individual items. HIVTSQ mITT-E Population=Only participants from USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain for whom valid translations were available from the mITT-E Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Time Frame
Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Title
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Lifestyle/Ease Sub Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Description
Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The lifestyle/ease score is the sum of items 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (range: 0-30). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Time Frame
Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Title
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) Convenience Score at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48
Description
Participant treatment satisfaction was measured using the self-reported scale (HIVTSQ), which consists of 10 items (1-satisfaction, 2-HIV control, 3-adverse effects, 4-level of demand, 5-convenience, 6-flexibility, 7-knowledge, 8-life habits, 9-recommendability, and 10-willingness to continue). Items are scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied), other than item 4, which has an inverted score from 6 (very demanding) to 0 (very undemanding). The convenience score is the score for item 5 (range: 0-6). Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different visits, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the HIVTSQ mITT-E population.
Time Frame
Week 4, Week 24, and Week 48

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: HIV-1 infected adults greater than or equal to 18 years of age. Females are eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is (1) non-childbearing potential, (2) child bearing potential with negative pregnancy test at screening and Day 1 and agrees to use protocol-specified methods of birth control while on study. HIV-1 infection with a screening plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 1000copies/mL Antiretroviral-naïve (less than or equal to 10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection) Signed and dated written informed consent is obtained from the subject or the subject's legal representative prior to screening Exclusion Criteria: Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding Any evidence of an active Centers for Disease and Prevention Control (CDC) Category C disease [CDC, 1993], except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy Subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Class B or C) as determined by Child-Pugh classification Anticipated need for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the study History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class History of malignancy within the past 5 years or ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; other localized malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the Study medical monitor for inclusion of the subject Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening: radiation therapy; cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; any immunomodulators Treatment with any agent, except recognized ART as allowed above, with documented activity against HIV-1 in vitro within 28 days of first dose of investigational product Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half-lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of investigational product Any evidence of primary viral resistance based on the presence of any major resistance-associated mutation [IAS-USA, 2010] in the Screening result or, if known, any historical resistance test result Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the subject's participation in the study of an investigational compound is exclusionary Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal ALT greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal and bilirubin greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (with greater than 35% direct bilirubin) Subject has creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min via Cockroft-Gault method Recent history (less than or equal to 3 months) of any upper or lower gastrointestinal bleed, with the exception of anal or rectal bleeding
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
ViiV Healthcare
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90027
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90069
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80209
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Norwalk
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06851
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20009
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20037
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32117
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32803
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vero Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32690
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30912
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30033
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31401
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Springfield
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01105
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55415
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64111
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27514
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28209
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157-1042
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45267
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75204
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75219
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Longview
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75605
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montpellier Cedex 5
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Paris Cedex 10
ZIP/Postal Code
75475
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Paris Cedex 20
ZIP/Postal Code
75970
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75018
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Denis Cedex 01
ZIP/Postal Code
93205
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Freiburg
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Frankfurt
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Modena
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
41150
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00149
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20127
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20142
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Torino
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10149
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ponce
ZIP/Postal Code
00717
Country
Puerto Rico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
00909
Country
Puerto Rico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Juan
Country
Puerto Rico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
021105
Country
Romania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
030303
Country
Romania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Constanta
ZIP/Postal Code
900708
Country
Romania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Krasnodar
ZIP/Postal Code
350015
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
105275
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saratov
ZIP/Postal Code
410009
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
196645
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Volgograd
ZIP/Postal Code
400040
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Badalona
ZIP/Postal Code
08916
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bern
ZIP/Postal Code
3010
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zurich
ZIP/Postal Code
CH-8091
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26424673
Citation
Molina JM, Clotet B, van Lunzen J, Lazzarin A, Cavassini M, Henry K, Kulagin V, Givens N, de Oliveira CF, Brennan C; FLAMINGO study team. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 96 week results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study. Lancet HIV. 2015 Apr;2(4):e127-36. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00027-2. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Erratum In: Lancet HIV. 2015 Apr;2(4):e126.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24698485
Citation
Clotet B, Feinberg J, van Lunzen J, Khuong-Josses MA, Antinori A, Dumitru I, Pokrovskiy V, Fehr J, Ortiz R, Saag M, Harris J, Brennan C, Fujiwara T, Min S; ING114915 Study Team. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 48 week results from the randomised open-label phase 3b study. Lancet. 2014 Jun 28;383(9936):2222-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60084-2. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Erratum In: Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2576.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Dolutegravir Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir , Each in Combination With Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) in ART-naive Subjects

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs