search
Back to results

Dose Finding Study in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)(174007/P05805/MK-8777-003)

Primary Purpose

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MK-8777
Placebo
Sponsored by
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder focused on measuring randomized, double blind, placebo controlled

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • are between 18-50 years, inclusive;
  • are male; or female who are non-pregnant, non-lactating and using an acceptable method of birth control (intrauterine device, double-barrier method, hormonal contraceptives); or female of non-childbearing potential if they are a) surgically sterile (tubal ligation, hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy) and provide documentation of the procedure by operative report or ultrasound scan, or b) post-menopausal for greater than one year with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level greater than or equal to 40 mIU/mL at screening. All females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening;
  • are outpatients;
  • provide written informed consent
  • are fluent in the language of the investigator,
  • are able to discontinue the use of any psychotropic medications for the treatment of ADHD symptoms at screening;
  • meet strict operational criteria for adult ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM)
  • have a Clinical Global Impression ADHD score of 4 or higher at screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have any clinically significant concurrent medical condition (endocrine, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, hematological, immunological, cerebrovascular, neurological, anorexia, obesity or malignancy) that has become unstable and may interfere with the interpretation of safety and efficacy evaluations.
  • have any clinically significant abnormal laboratory, vital sign, physical examination, or electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the interpretation of safety or efficacy evaluations.
  • have any history of liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis, hepatitis), or liver injury;(history of hepatitis A greater than one year prior to screening is acceptable); any abnormal clinically significant findings at screening on liver laboratory parameters (serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase [SGPT], serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT], gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], bilirubin, albumin, protein, alkaline phosphatase);
  • have a seizure disorder beyond childhood or are taking any anticonvulsants to prevent seizures;
  • have known serological evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody;
  • have a positive test result at screening on hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis A immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies or hepatitis C total antibodies;
  • are pregnant as confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test at screening;
  • have QTc values >450 msec at screening using Fridericia's QTc formula;
  • have a confirmed positive result in the alcohol/drug screen test for alcohol, illegal or non-prescribed drugs at screening (except marijuana/ tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]);
  • have a confirmed positive result in the alcohol/drug screen re-test for marijuana/THC;
  • have current or lifetime history of bipolar and psychotic disorders;
  • have a current major depression disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder and eating disorder (also if treated but not currently symptomatic);
  • have a current comorbid dysthymia or social anxiety disorder that is currently treated with psychotropic medication;
  • have a current untreated social anxiety disorder that may interfere with the assessment of ADHD in the investigator's opinion;
  • present an imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others;
  • have any history of a significant suicide attempt, or possess a current risk of attempting suicide, in the investigator's opinion, based on clinical interview and responses provided on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS);
  • have a history of jailing or imprisonment in the past 6 months due to worsening of symptoms of ADHD;

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm 4

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    MK-8777 FD→PBO

    PBO→MK-8777 FD

    MK-8777 RD→PBO

    PBO→MK-8777 RD

    Arm Description

    Participants receive a fixed dose (FD) of MK-8777 100 mg twice each day (BID) for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive a fixed dose of placebo (PBO) BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).

    Participants receive a fixed dose of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive a fixed dose of MK-8777 100 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).

    Participants receive rising doses (RD) of MK-8777 100-300 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive rising doses of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).

    Participants receive rising doses of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive rising doses of MK-8777 100-300 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Score
    The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. For the statistical analyses, the average score from Day 14 and Day 21 was used.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Percentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score
    The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.
    Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score
    The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.
    Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE
    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.
    Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category Scores
    The CGI-S is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global severity of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill, with a higher score indicating more severe illness. Categorization was as follows: 1=Normal, not at all ill and Borderline mentally ill; 2=Mildly ill; 3=Moderately ill and 4=Markedly ill, Severely ill and Among the most extremely ill patients, with a higher category indicating more severe illness. Analysis of CGI-S was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-S assessments were condensed to one assessment of severity per treatment period by taking the most severe score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.
    Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
    The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global improvement of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Very much improved to 4=No change to 7=Very much worse, with a lower score indicating the most improvement. Analysis of CGI-I was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-I assessments were condensed to one assessment of improvement per treatment period by taking the worst improvement score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.
    Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score
    The ESS is an 8-item scale used to assess sleepiness. The test consists of a list of 8 situations in which participants rate their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0=Would never doze to 3=High chance of dozing. The scores for each of the 8 situations are added to create a total score on a scale with a range from of 0 to 24. A higher score indicates a greater degree of sleepiness. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
    The PSQI is a participant-rated scale to assess the quality of sleep. The PSQI consists of 7 component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component score can range from 0=better (i.e., 0 times per month) to 3=worse (i.e., 3 or more times per week). The sum of these 7 component scores yields one total score with a range of 0 (better) to 21 (worse). A total PSQI score <=5 is associated with good sleep quality; a total score >5 is associated with poor sleep quality. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) Score
    The QIDS-C is a clinician-administered rating scale to measure the severity of depressive symptoms within the 9 DSM-IV major depression disorder symptom (MDD) domains: depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, concentration/decision making, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep, weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes. There is one score (0=none to 3=severe) for each of the of the 9 domains. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each of the 9 symptom domains. QIDS-C total scores can range from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depression. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Change From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) Score
    The TASS is a participant-administered scale to assess study drug effects in the evening. Participants respond to 18 questions about ADHD symptoms, with scores from 0=Not at all to 3=Severe. Total scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating more severe ADHD symtoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive Flexibility
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing (©CNS Vital Signs, Chapel Hill, NC) battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of cognitive flexibility (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Complex Attention
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of complex attention (score range: 0 to 250), with a lower score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Composite Memory
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of composite memory (score range: -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Executive Functioning
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of executive functioning (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of Processing
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of speed of processing (score range: -1000 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction Time
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reaction time (lowest time possible is 0 msec), with a lower reaction time indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reasoning
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reasoning (score range: -15 to 15), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained Attention
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of sustained attention (score range -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal Memory
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of verbal memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Visual Memory
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of visual memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Working Memory
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of working memory (score range: -48 to 48), with a higher score indicating better cognition.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 28, 2008
    Last Updated
    September 24, 2018
    Sponsor
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00610441
    Brief Title
    Dose Finding Study in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)(174007/P05805/MK-8777-003)
    Official Title
    A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Two Period 4-Arm Trial to Investigate the Dose-Related Efficacy and Safety of Org 26576 in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    April 1, 2008 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 2, 2009 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    March 9, 2009 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of MK-8777 (Org 26576, SCH 900777) in adult subjects with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). MK-8777 or placebo will be administered in a crossover fashion for two 3-week treatment periods. The two 3-week treatment periods will be separated by a 2-week placebo washout period. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of various doses of MK-8777 to that of placebo in the treatment of ADHD symptoms in adults.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Keywords
    randomized, double blind, placebo controlled

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigator
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    67 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    MK-8777 FD→PBO
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Participants receive a fixed dose (FD) of MK-8777 100 mg twice each day (BID) for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive a fixed dose of placebo (PBO) BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
    Arm Title
    PBO→MK-8777 FD
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Participants receive a fixed dose of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive a fixed dose of MK-8777 100 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
    Arm Title
    MK-8777 RD→PBO
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Participants receive rising doses (RD) of MK-8777 100-300 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive rising doses of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
    Arm Title
    PBO→MK-8777 RD
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Participants receive rising doses of placebo BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a 2-week placebo washout period, participants receive rising doses of MK-8777 100-300 mg BID for 3 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    MK-8777
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Placebo
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Score
    Description
    The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. For the statistical analyses, the average score from Day 14 and Day 21 was used.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (BL) and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With at Least a 30% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score
    Description
    The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.
    Time Frame
    Baseline and Day 21
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Score
    Description
    The AISRS is an 18-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the 18 core symptoms of ADHD corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adults. Based on the clinician's rating for each of the symptoms using a 4-point scale (0=None to 3=Severe), the AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms. Scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating a more severe ADHD symptoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2. Reduction was defined as the relative change from the baseline score within a treatment period to post-baseline score within that treatment period.
    Time Frame
    Baseline and Day 21
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
    Description
    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.
    Time Frame
    Up to 7 days after last dose of study drug (Up to 63 days)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE
    Description
    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not related to the investigational product. AEs are reported by study drug taken at time of event and not by randomly assigned sequence.
    Time Frame
    Up to last dose of study drug (Up to 56 days)
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) Category Scores
    Description
    The CGI-S is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global severity of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill, with a higher score indicating more severe illness. Categorization was as follows: 1=Normal, not at all ill and Borderline mentally ill; 2=Mildly ill; 3=Moderately ill and 4=Markedly ill, Severely ill and Among the most extremely ill patients, with a higher category indicating more severe illness. Analysis of CGI-S was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-S assessments were condensed to one assessment of severity per treatment period by taking the most severe score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.
    Time Frame
    Days 14-21
    Title
    Percentage of Participants With Clinician Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
    Description
    The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global improvement of ADHD. Scores could range from 1=Very much improved to 4=No change to 7=Very much worse, with a lower score indicating the most improvement. Analysis of CGI-I was performed using a proportional odds model. For statistical analyses, CGI-I assessments were condensed to one assessment of improvement per treatment period by taking the worst improvement score at the second and third visits within a treatment period.
    Time Frame
    Days 14-21
    Title
    Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score
    Description
    The ESS is an 8-item scale used to assess sleepiness. The test consists of a list of 8 situations in which participants rate their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0=Would never doze to 3=High chance of dozing. The scores for each of the 8 situations are added to create a total score on a scale with a range from of 0 to 24. A higher score indicates a greater degree of sleepiness. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Time Frame
    Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21
    Title
    Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
    Description
    The PSQI is a participant-rated scale to assess the quality of sleep. The PSQI consists of 7 component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component score can range from 0=better (i.e., 0 times per month) to 3=worse (i.e., 3 or more times per week). The sum of these 7 component scores yields one total score with a range of 0 (better) to 21 (worse). A total PSQI score <=5 is associated with good sleep quality; a total score >5 is associated with poor sleep quality. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Time Frame
    Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21
    Title
    Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology - Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) Score
    Description
    The QIDS-C is a clinician-administered rating scale to measure the severity of depressive symptoms within the 9 DSM-IV major depression disorder symptom (MDD) domains: depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, concentration/decision making, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep, weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes. There is one score (0=none to 3=severe) for each of the of the 9 domains. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each of the 9 symptom domains. QIDS-C total scores can range from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depression. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Time Frame
    Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21
    Title
    Change From Baseline in Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) Score
    Description
    The TASS is a participant-administered scale to assess study drug effects in the evening. Participants respond to 18 questions about ADHD symptoms, with scores from 0=Not at all to 3=Severe. Total scores can range from 0 to 54, with a higher score indicating more severe ADHD symtoms. Baseline was defined as the score at the baseline visit prior to starting dosing for Period 1 and as the last score in the 2-week placebo wash-out period for Period 2.
    Time Frame
    Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Cognitive Flexibility
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing (©CNS Vital Signs, Chapel Hill, NC) battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of cognitive flexibility (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Complex Attention
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of complex attention (score range: 0 to 250), with a lower score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Composite Memory
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of composite memory (score range: -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Executive Functioning
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of executive functioning (score range: -200 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Speed of Processing
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of speed of processing (score range: -1000 to 200), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reaction Time
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reaction time (lowest time possible is 0 msec), with a lower reaction time indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Reasoning
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of reasoning (score range: -15 to 15), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Sustained Attention
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of sustained attention (score range -120 to 120), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Verbal Memory
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of verbal memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Visual Memory
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of visual memory (score range: -60 to 60), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21
    Title
    Computerized Cognition Assessment: Working Memory
    Description
    Cognition was assessed by a computerized cognitive testing battery consisting of neuropsychological tests that measure the cognitive domain of working memory (score range: -48 to 48), with a higher score indicating better cognition.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Day 21

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    50 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: are between 18-50 years, inclusive; are male; or female who are non-pregnant, non-lactating and using an acceptable method of birth control (intrauterine device, double-barrier method, hormonal contraceptives); or female of non-childbearing potential if they are a) surgically sterile (tubal ligation, hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy) and provide documentation of the procedure by operative report or ultrasound scan, or b) post-menopausal for greater than one year with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level greater than or equal to 40 mIU/mL at screening. All females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening; are outpatients; provide written informed consent are fluent in the language of the investigator, are able to discontinue the use of any psychotropic medications for the treatment of ADHD symptoms at screening; meet strict operational criteria for adult ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM) have a Clinical Global Impression ADHD score of 4 or higher at screening Exclusion Criteria: have any clinically significant concurrent medical condition (endocrine, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, hematological, immunological, cerebrovascular, neurological, anorexia, obesity or malignancy) that has become unstable and may interfere with the interpretation of safety and efficacy evaluations. have any clinically significant abnormal laboratory, vital sign, physical examination, or electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the interpretation of safety or efficacy evaluations. have any history of liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis, hepatitis), or liver injury;(history of hepatitis A greater than one year prior to screening is acceptable); any abnormal clinically significant findings at screening on liver laboratory parameters (serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase [SGPT], serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT], gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], bilirubin, albumin, protein, alkaline phosphatase); have a seizure disorder beyond childhood or are taking any anticonvulsants to prevent seizures; have known serological evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody; have a positive test result at screening on hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis A immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies or hepatitis C total antibodies; are pregnant as confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test at screening; have QTc values >450 msec at screening using Fridericia's QTc formula; have a confirmed positive result in the alcohol/drug screen test for alcohol, illegal or non-prescribed drugs at screening (except marijuana/ tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]); have a confirmed positive result in the alcohol/drug screen re-test for marijuana/THC; have current or lifetime history of bipolar and psychotic disorders; have a current major depression disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder and eating disorder (also if treated but not currently symptomatic); have a current comorbid dysthymia or social anxiety disorder that is currently treated with psychotropic medication; have a current untreated social anxiety disorder that may interfere with the assessment of ADHD in the investigator's opinion; present an imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others; have any history of a significant suicide attempt, or possess a current risk of attempting suicide, in the investigator's opinion, based on clinical interview and responses provided on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS); have a history of jailing or imprisonment in the past 6 months due to worsening of symptoms of ADHD;
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Medical Director
    Organizational Affiliation
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
    IPD Sharing URL
    http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php

    Learn more about this trial

    Dose Finding Study in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)(174007/P05805/MK-8777-003)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs