search
Back to results

Dose-Tolerability Titration Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Perampanel (E2007) In Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Primary Purpose

Neuralgia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
E2007 (perampanel)
Placebo
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuralgia focused on measuring Post-Herpetic Neuralgia, PHN)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

To be included, patients must meet the following:

  1. Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures.
  2. Male and female patients ≥18 years of age. Females should be either of nonchildbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception. Acceptable contraception includes: abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device [IUD]. Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD). Contraceptive use must start at least 1 month before Visit 1, be practiced throughout the entire study period, and continue for 1 month after the end of the study. They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) at Visit 1, and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline Visit 2.
  3. PHN of at least 6 months duration; the onset of PHN is defined as the time from healing of herpes zoster skin lesions.
  4. Pain over the past 6 months, and not in a clinically identifiable improving or worsening trend, based on medical history.
  5. Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Visit 1 and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization).
  6. Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Visit 2 (Baseline).
  7. Average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert scale during the 7 days prior to randomization [from the diaries].
  8. Reliable and willing and able to cooperate with all study procedures, including the following examples:

    • Accurately entering the diary on a daily basis
    • Returning for study visits on the required dates
    • Accurately and reliably reporting symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms)
    • Taking study drug as required by protocol
  9. Be on stable analgesic treatment (same medication(s)) or stable nonpharmacological pain treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and remain on this stable treatment throughout the study. Nonpharmacologic pain treatment includes the following:

    • relaxation/hypnosis
    • physical or occupational therapy
    • mental-health counseling
    • acupuncture
    • injections
    • blocks, etc.
    • Episodic or periodic pharmacologic treatments such as monthly injections for treatment of pain (eg, local anesthetics) will not be permitted.
    • Up to 4 g of acetaminophen/day is permitted as rescue medication, as needed, during the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with any of the following are to be excluded:

  1. Any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the trial or confound efficacy evaluations including the following examples: pain or neuropathy from another cause (including painful diabetic neuropathy), such as central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc.
  2. Motivation by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined from the medical history and is at the discretion of the investigator.
  3. Inability to cooperate with protocol, for any reason.
  4. Clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine, or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories:

    1. Systemic infections (eg, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis, tuberculosis [TB], syphilis); lack of appropriate medical history of these conditions is acceptable,
    2. History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria,
    3. History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months,
    4. Active cancer within the previous 5 years (the exception is fully treated, non-melanoma skin cancer such as basal cell carcinoma),
    5. Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years,
    6. History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years,
    7. History of major systemic allergy such as anaphylactoid reactions or Stevens-Johnson syndrome (however, patients with limited allergies such as contact dermatitis or minor allergy to penicillin are acceptable).
  5. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Visit 1:

    1. Clinically significant ECG abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTcB > 450 msec),
    2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN),
    3. Clinically significant abnormal white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil, or platelet count values,
    4. Any other clinically significant laboratory value.
  6. Exposure to an investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Visit 1 or exposure ever to perampanel.
  7. Females who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  8. Use of any medication known to be a strong inducer of CYP3A4 activity within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1; use of CYP3A4 inducers is prohibited for the entire study duration.

Sites / Locations

  • Pain and Rehabilitation Clinic of Chicago

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo Cohort 1

Perampanel Cohort 1, 3-week Titration

Placebo Cohort 2

Perampanel Cohort 2, 1-week Titration

Perampanel Cohort 2, 2- Week Titration

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Average Pain Scores to Week 15/ End of Treatment (EOT) (Including Modified BOCF Data)
Average pain scores are based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Responder Rate: Subjects With at Least 30 Percent Reduction in Pain
A responder was a participant with at least 30 percent reduction in average pain scores, using modified BOCF, based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Responder Rate: Subjects With at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Pain
A responder was a participant with at least 50 percent reduction in average pain scores, using modified BOCF, based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Scores by Week
Change from baseline in average pain scores by week based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain scores were calculated as the average of available scores in each week, and were reported by treatment group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Average Sleep Interference Scores
The average of the last 7 available sleep scores prior to the visit, based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for sleep interference (where 0=pain did not interfere with sleep, to 10=pain completely interfered with sleep [unable to sleep]), and they were reported by treatment group.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT
Changes were calculated using the modified BOCF method
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 15/EOT
Changes were calculated using the modified BOCF method
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in HADS Anxiety Subscale Scores (Modified BOCF)
The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) is a widely used, self-reported, 14-item instrument that measures the presence and severity of anxiety and depression. It consists of 2 subscales; a 7-item anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and a 7-item depression subscale (HADS-D). HADS-A consists of a 7-item scale, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse anxiety. Range of possible HADS anxiety subscale scores is 0 to 21, and normal=(0-7), mild=(8-10), moderate=(11-14), and severe=(15-21).
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in HADS Depression Subscale Scores (Modified BOCF)
The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) is a widely used, self-reported, 14-item instrument that measures the presence and severity of anxiety and depression. It consists of 2 subscales; a 7-item anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and a 7-item depression subscale (HADS-D). HADS-D consists of a 7-item scale, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse depression. Range of possible HADS depression subscale scores is 0 to 21, and normal=(0-7), mild=(8-10), moderate=(11-14), and severe=(15-21).
Analysis of Allodynia (Present/Not Present) at Week 15/EOT- by Treatment Groups ITT Population (Modified BOCF)
Allodynia is defined as a painful reaction to a non-painful stimulus.

Full Information

First Posted
January 3, 2008
Last Updated
February 7, 2013
Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00592774
Brief Title
Dose-Tolerability Titration Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Perampanel (E2007) In Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Tolerability Titration Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Perampanel (E2007) In Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Inc.

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Perampanel (E2007) in patients with Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuralgia
Keywords
Post-Herpetic Neuralgia, PHN)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
146 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo Cohort 1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
Perampanel Cohort 1, 3-week Titration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo Cohort 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Perampanel Cohort 2, 1-week Titration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Perampanel Cohort 2, 2- Week Titration
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
E2007 (perampanel)
Other Intervention Name(s)
perampanel
Intervention Description
2 mg titrated up to 8 mg maximum; taken once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
2 mg titrated up to 8 mg maximum; taken once daily.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Scores to Week 15/ End of Treatment (EOT) (Including Modified BOCF Data)
Description
Average pain scores are based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Responder Rate: Subjects With at Least 30 Percent Reduction in Pain
Description
A responder was a participant with at least 30 percent reduction in average pain scores, using modified BOCF, based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Responder Rate: Subjects With at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Pain
Description
A responder was a participant with at least 50 percent reduction in average pain scores, using modified BOCF, based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Scores by Week
Description
Change from baseline in average pain scores by week based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain scores were calculated as the average of available scores in each week, and were reported by treatment group.
Time Frame
Week 1 through Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Average Sleep Interference Scores
Description
The average of the last 7 available sleep scores prior to the visit, based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for sleep interference (where 0=pain did not interfere with sleep, to 10=pain completely interfered with sleep [unable to sleep]), and they were reported by treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT
Description
Changes were calculated using the modified BOCF method
Time Frame
Week 15
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 15/EOT
Description
Changes were calculated using the modified BOCF method
Time Frame
Week 15
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in HADS Anxiety Subscale Scores (Modified BOCF)
Description
The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) is a widely used, self-reported, 14-item instrument that measures the presence and severity of anxiety and depression. It consists of 2 subscales; a 7-item anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and a 7-item depression subscale (HADS-D). HADS-A consists of a 7-item scale, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse anxiety. Range of possible HADS anxiety subscale scores is 0 to 21, and normal=(0-7), mild=(8-10), moderate=(11-14), and severe=(15-21).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in HADS Depression Subscale Scores (Modified BOCF)
Description
The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) is a widely used, self-reported, 14-item instrument that measures the presence and severity of anxiety and depression. It consists of 2 subscales; a 7-item anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and a 7-item depression subscale (HADS-D). HADS-D consists of a 7-item scale, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse depression. Range of possible HADS depression subscale scores is 0 to 21, and normal=(0-7), mild=(8-10), moderate=(11-14), and severe=(15-21).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Analysis of Allodynia (Present/Not Present) at Week 15/EOT- by Treatment Groups ITT Population (Modified BOCF)
Description
Allodynia is defined as a painful reaction to a non-painful stimulus.
Time Frame
Week 15

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: To be included, patients must meet the following: Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures. Male and female patients ≥18 years of age. Females should be either of nonchildbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception. Acceptable contraception includes: abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device [IUD]. Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD). Contraceptive use must start at least 1 month before Visit 1, be practiced throughout the entire study period, and continue for 1 month after the end of the study. They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) at Visit 1, and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline Visit 2. PHN of at least 6 months duration; the onset of PHN is defined as the time from healing of herpes zoster skin lesions. Pain over the past 6 months, and not in a clinically identifiable improving or worsening trend, based on medical history. Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Visit 1 and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization). Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Visit 2 (Baseline). Average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert scale during the 7 days prior to randomization [from the diaries]. Reliable and willing and able to cooperate with all study procedures, including the following examples: Accurately entering the diary on a daily basis Returning for study visits on the required dates Accurately and reliably reporting symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms) Taking study drug as required by protocol Be on stable analgesic treatment (same medication(s)) or stable nonpharmacological pain treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and remain on this stable treatment throughout the study. Nonpharmacologic pain treatment includes the following: relaxation/hypnosis physical or occupational therapy mental-health counseling acupuncture injections blocks, etc. Episodic or periodic pharmacologic treatments such as monthly injections for treatment of pain (eg, local anesthetics) will not be permitted. Up to 4 g of acetaminophen/day is permitted as rescue medication, as needed, during the trial. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with any of the following are to be excluded: Any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the trial or confound efficacy evaluations including the following examples: pain or neuropathy from another cause (including painful diabetic neuropathy), such as central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc. Motivation by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined from the medical history and is at the discretion of the investigator. Inability to cooperate with protocol, for any reason. Clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine, or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories: Systemic infections (eg, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis, tuberculosis [TB], syphilis); lack of appropriate medical history of these conditions is acceptable, History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria, History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months, Active cancer within the previous 5 years (the exception is fully treated, non-melanoma skin cancer such as basal cell carcinoma), Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years, History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years, History of major systemic allergy such as anaphylactoid reactions or Stevens-Johnson syndrome (however, patients with limited allergies such as contact dermatitis or minor allergy to penicillin are acceptable). Any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Visit 1: Clinically significant ECG abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTcB > 450 msec), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), Clinically significant abnormal white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil, or platelet count values, Any other clinically significant laboratory value. Exposure to an investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Visit 1 or exposure ever to perampanel. Females who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study. Use of any medication known to be a strong inducer of CYP3A4 activity within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1; use of CYP3A4 inducers is prohibited for the entire study duration.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allison Mann, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Eisai Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Peoria
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Milford
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Ft. Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Kissimmee
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Largo
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Palm Beach Gardens
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Sunrise
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pain and Rehabilitation Clinic of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60610
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Towson
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
West Yarmouth
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Southfield
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
Country
United States
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
High Point
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Winston Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Kettering
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Bensalem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Norristown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Warwick
State/Province
Rhode Island
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
City
Sarnia
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Pointe Claire
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Dose-Tolerability Titration Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Perampanel (E2007) In Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs