search
Back to results

Double Cord Versus Haploidentical (BMT CTN 1101)

Primary Purpose

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Burkitt's Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant
Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant
Sponsored by
Medical College of Wisconsin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia focused on measuring Haplo identical transplant, Cord blood transplant, Reduced intensity conditioning regimen, Lymphoma, Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 to 70 years old
  • Patients must have available both: a)One or more potential related mismatched donors (biologic parent(s) or siblings (full or half) or children). At least low resolution DNA based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 for potential haploidentical sibling donors is required. b)At least two potential umbilical cord blood units identified. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x 10^7/kg. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA-A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing) and HLA-DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing). Confirmatory typing is not required for randomization.
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) that is NOT considered favorable-risk as defined by the presence of at least one of the following: Adverse cytogenetics such as t(9;22), t(1;19), t(4;11), other Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) rearrangements; White blood cell counts of greater than 30,000/mcL (B-ALL) or greater than 100,000/mcL (T-ALL)at diagnosis; Recipient age older than 30 years at diagnosis; Time to CR greater than 4 weeks
  • Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia (AML) in CR1 that is NOT considered as favorable-risk. Favorable risk is defined as having one of the following: t(8.21) without CKIT mutation, inv(16) without CKIT mutation or t(16;16), normal karyotype with mutated NPM1 and not FLT-ITD, normal karyotype with double mutated CEBPA, Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in first molecular remission at end of consolidation
  • Acute Leukemias in 2nd or subsequent CR
  • Biphenotypic/Undifferentiated/Prolymphocytic Leukemias in first or subsequent CR, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in first or subsequent CR
  • Burkitt's lymphoma: second or subsequent CR
  • Lymphoma fulfilling the following criteria: Chemotherapy-sensitive (at least stable disease lymphomas that have failed at least 1 prior regimen of multi-agent chemotherapy and are INELIGIBLE for an autologous transplant. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are not eligible regardless of disease status.
  • Performance status: Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 70%.

Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Conditioning:

  • Patients with Adequate Physical Function as Measured by: a. Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be greater than or equal to 40%, or shortening fraction less than 25%; b. Hepatic: Bilirubin less than or equal to 2.5 mg/dL, except for patients with Gilbert's syndrome or hemolysis. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline Phosphatase less than 5 x upper limit of normal; c. Renal: Serum creatinine within normal range, or if serum creatinine outside normal range, then renal function (measured or estimated creatinine clearance or GFR)greater than 40 mL/min/1.73m^; d. Pulmonary: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for hemoglobin), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 50% predicted;
  • Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Patients Assigned to Haploidentical BM Arm: Patients must be HLA typed at high resolution using DNA based typing at the following HLA-loci: HLA-A, -B, -C and DRB1 and have available a related haploidentical BM donor with 2, 3, or 4 HLA-mismatches. A unidirectional mismatch in either the graft versus host or host versus graft direction is considered a mismatch. The donor and recipient must be HLA identical for at least one antigen (using high resolution DNA based typing) at the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1. Fulfillment of this criterion shall be considered sufficient evidence that the donor and recipient share one HLA haplotype, and typing of additional family members is not required.
  • Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Patients Assigned to Double Umbilical Cord Blood Arm:

    1. Patients must have available two UCB units fulfilling the following criteria:

      1. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x10^7/kg.
      2. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA -A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing), and HLA -DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing).
      3. Additional graft selection criteria specified in section 2.5
    2. Patients must have received at least one cycle of the cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (or regimen of similar intensity) listed in Appendix D within 3 months of enrollment (measured from the start date of chemotherapy) OR have had an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment OR receive 300 cGy as part of the preparative regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with suitably matched related or unrelated donor, as defined per institutional practice.
  • Recipients of prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are ineligible if disease recurrence occurred less than 6 months from their autologous stem cell transplant.
  • Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication with evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings).
  • Prior allogeneic HCT.
  • Patients with history of primary idiopathic myelofibrosis or any severe marrow fibrosis.
  • Planned use of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) therapy.
  • Anti-donor HLA antibodies.

Additional exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Evidence of HIV infection or known HIV positive serology.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Arizona Cancer Center
  • City of Hope National Medical Center
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Stanford Hospital and Clinics
  • University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands)
  • Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
  • Emory University
  • BMT Program at Northside Hospital
  • University of Kansas Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • DFCI Massachustts General Hospital
  • DFCI Brigham & Women's Hospital
  • University of Michigan Medical Center
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT
  • Univeristy of Minnesota
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester
  • Roswell Park Cancer Center
  • Mt. Sinai Medical Center
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
  • Stony Brook University Medical Center
  • University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • Jewish Hospital BMT Program
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Ohio State / Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital
  • University of Oklahoma Medical Center
  • Penn State College of Medicine - The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
  • University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Univesity of Texas, MD Anderson CRC
  • Texas Transplant Institute
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • West Virginia University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant

Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant

Arm Description

Participants will receive haploidentical bone marrow transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.

Participants will receive a double umbilical cord blood transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)
The primary endpoint is PFS at 2 years post-randomization. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events. The time to event is defined as the time interval from randomization to relapse/progression, to death or to last follow-up, whichever comes first. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in Subgroups
Participants' primary diagnosis was categorized into two large groups: leukemia versus lymphoma. Age was dichotomized into two large groups: age <= 59 versus age > 59. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for PFS at 2 years post-randomization are provided for each subgroup.
Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery
Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery.
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery
Platelet recovery is defined by two different metrics as the first day of a sustained platelet count greater than 20,000/mm^3 or greater than 50,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. The first day of the sustained platelet count will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.
Participants With Primary Graft Failure
Primary graft failure is defined as less than 5% donor chimerism on all measurements up to and including Day 56.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
Secondary graft failure is defined as initial donor chimerism ≥ 5% declining to < 5% on subsequent measurements with time to secondary graft failure beginning at the first day of primary engraftment.
Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)
The cumulative incidences of grade II - IV and III - IV acute aGVHD will be determined.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGHVD)
The cumulative incidence of cGVHD from the time of transplant will be determined. Data were collected directly from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Conference.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival
Overall survival is defined as the time interval between date of randomization and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up. The time interval between date of transplant and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up are also analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)
The cumulative incidence of TRM will be estimated, event for this endpoint is death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression
Incidence of relapse/progression will be estimated using cumulative incidence function, treating death in remission as a competing risk. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. When in doubt, the diagnosis of recurrent or progressive lymphoma should be documented by tissue biopsy. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.
Toxicities
They are all Grade ≥ 3 toxicities based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.
Participants With Infections
All Grade 2 and 3 infections will be reported. Grade 1 CMV infections through Day 56 will also be reported.
Hospital Admission and Length of Stay
Total Time Alive and Not Hospitalized within 6 Months Post Randomization

Full Information

First Posted
May 10, 2012
Last Updated
November 2, 2021
Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01597778
Brief Title
Double Cord Versus Haploidentical (BMT CTN 1101)
Official Title
A Multi-Center, Phase III, Randomized Trial of RIC and Transplantation of (dUCB) Versus HLA-Haplo Related Bone Marrow for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.(BMT CTN #1101)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 11, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 11, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT)are one treatment option for people with leukemia or lymphoma. Family members,unrelated donors or banked umbilical cordblood units with similar tissue type can be used for HCT. This study will compare the effectiveness of two new types of bone marrow transplants in people with leukemia or lymphoma: one that uses bone marrow donated from family members with only partially matched bone marrow; and, one that uses two partially matched cord blood units.
Detailed Description
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) has allowed older and less clinically fit patients to receive potentially curative treatment with allogeneic HCT for high risk or advanced hematological malignancies. Patients lacking an HLA-matched sibling may receive a graft from a suitably HLA-matched unrelated donor. However, up to a third of patients will not have an HLA-matched sibling or a suitably matched adult unrelated donor (i.e., no more than a mismatch at a single locus). Even when a suitably matched unrelated donor is identified, data from the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) indicate that a median of four months is required to complete searches that result in transplantation; thus, some number of patients succumb to their disease while awaiting identification and evaluation of a suitably matched adult unrelated donor. Single or dual center studies have shown that partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow (haplo-BM) and unrelated double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) are valuable sources of donor cells for RIC HCT, thus extending this treatment modality to patients who lack other donors. In order to study the reproducibility, and thus, the wider applicability of these two alternative donor strategies, The Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) conducted two parallel multicenter prospective Phase II clinical trials. These two studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of related haplo-BM (BMT CTN 0603) and dUCB (BMT CTN 0604) transplantation after RIC. Both of these alternative donor approaches produced early results similar to that reported with unrelated donor, and even HLA-matched sibling, HCT. These data demonstrate not only the efficacy of both of these approaches, but also that both can be safely exported from the single center setting. Both haplo-BM and dUCB grafts can be obtained rapidly for greater than 90% of patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. This study will test the hypothesis that progression free survival at two years after RIC haplo-BM transplantation is similar to the progression free survival after RIC dUCB transplantation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Burkitt's Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Keywords
Haplo identical transplant, Cord blood transplant, Reduced intensity conditioning regimen, Lymphoma, Leukemia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
368 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive haploidentical bone marrow transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.
Arm Title
Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive a double umbilical cord blood transplant using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant
Intervention Description
The conditioning regimen consists of: Fludarabine (Flu)30 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2 Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 14.5 mg/kg IV Days -6, -5 Total body irradiation (TBI) 200cGy Day -1 The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of: Cy 50 mg/kg IV Days 3, 4 Tacrolimus (IV or PO) beginning Day 5 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day 5 until Day 35
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant
Intervention Description
The preparative regimen consists of: Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 IV Days -6, -5, -4,-3, -2 Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV Day -6 Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy Day -1 for patients who have received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment or an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment or 300 cGy Day -1 for patients who have not received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the 3 months of enrollment and who have not received an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment. The GVHD prophylaxis regimen consists of: Cyclosporine beginning Day -3 with dose adjusted to maintain a trough level of 200-400 ng/mL. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg po three times a day, maximum dose 1 g po TID beginning Day -3 until Day 35
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
The primary endpoint is PFS at 2 years post-randomization. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events. The time to event is defined as the time interval from randomization to relapse/progression, to death or to last follow-up, whichever comes first. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.
Time Frame
Year 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With PFS by Treatment Arms in Subgroups
Description
Participants' primary diagnosis was categorized into two large groups: leukemia versus lymphoma. Age was dichotomized into two large groups: age <= 59 versus age > 59. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for PFS at 2 years post-randomization are provided for each subgroup.
Time Frame
Year 2
Title
Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery
Description
Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery.
Time Frame
Day 56
Title
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery
Description
Platelet recovery is defined by two different metrics as the first day of a sustained platelet count greater than 20,000/mm^3 or greater than 50,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. The first day of the sustained platelet count will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.
Time Frame
Day 100
Title
Participants With Primary Graft Failure
Description
Primary graft failure is defined as less than 5% donor chimerism on all measurements up to and including Day 56.
Time Frame
Day 56
Title
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
Description
Secondary graft failure is defined as initial donor chimerism ≥ 5% declining to < 5% on subsequent measurements with time to secondary graft failure beginning at the first day of primary engraftment.
Time Frame
Year 2
Title
Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)
Description
The cumulative incidences of grade II - IV and III - IV acute aGVHD will be determined.
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGHVD)
Description
The cumulative incidence of cGVHD from the time of transplant will be determined. Data were collected directly from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Conference.
Time Frame
Year 2
Title
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival is defined as the time interval between date of randomization and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up. The time interval between date of transplant and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up are also analyzed.
Time Frame
Year 2
Title
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)
Description
The cumulative incidence of TRM will be estimated, event for this endpoint is death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence.
Time Frame
Day 100, Day 180, Year 1, and Year 2
Title
Percentage of Participants With Relapse/Progression
Description
Incidence of relapse/progression will be estimated using cumulative incidence function, treating death in remission as a competing risk. Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of progressive lymphoma. When in doubt, the diagnosis of recurrent or progressive lymphoma should be documented by tissue biopsy. Minimal residual disease will not be considered evidence of relapse, however, minimal residual disease that progresses will be considered as relapse and the date of relapse will be the date of detection of minimal residual disease that prompted an intervention by the treating physician. Finally, institution of any therapy to treat persistent, progressive or relapsed disease, including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI, will be considered evidence of relapse/progression regardless of whether the criteria described above are met.
Time Frame
Year 1, year 2
Title
Toxicities
Description
They are all Grade ≥ 3 toxicities based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.
Time Frame
Day 28, Day 56, Day 180, 1 year, and 2 years
Title
Participants With Infections
Description
All Grade 2 and 3 infections will be reported. Grade 1 CMV infections through Day 56 will also be reported.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Hospital Admission and Length of Stay
Description
Total Time Alive and Not Hospitalized within 6 Months Post Randomization
Time Frame
Month 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients 18 to 70 years old Patients must have available both: a)One or more potential related mismatched donors (biologic parent(s) or siblings (full or half) or children). At least low resolution DNA based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 for potential haploidentical sibling donors is required. b)At least two potential umbilical cord blood units identified. Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x 10^7/kg. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA-A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing) and HLA-DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing). Confirmatory typing is not required for randomization. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) that is NOT considered favorable-risk as defined by the presence of at least one of the following: Adverse cytogenetics such as t(9;22), t(1;19), t(4;11), other Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) rearrangements; White blood cell counts of greater than 30,000/mcL (B-ALL) or greater than 100,000/mcL (T-ALL)at diagnosis; Recipient age older than 30 years at diagnosis; Time to CR greater than 4 weeks Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia (AML) in CR1 that is NOT considered as favorable-risk. Favorable risk is defined as having one of the following: t(8.21) without CKIT mutation, inv(16) without CKIT mutation or t(16;16), normal karyotype with mutated NPM1 and not FLT-ITD, normal karyotype with double mutated CEBPA, Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in first molecular remission at end of consolidation Acute Leukemias in 2nd or subsequent CR Biphenotypic/Undifferentiated/Prolymphocytic Leukemias in first or subsequent CR, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in first or subsequent CR Burkitt's lymphoma: second or subsequent CR Lymphoma fulfilling the following criteria: Chemotherapy-sensitive (at least stable disease lymphomas that have failed at least 1 prior regimen of multi-agent chemotherapy and are INELIGIBLE for an autologous transplant. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are not eligible regardless of disease status. Performance status: Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 70%. Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Conditioning: Patients with Adequate Physical Function as Measured by: a. Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be greater than or equal to 40%, or shortening fraction less than 25%; b. Hepatic: Bilirubin less than or equal to 2.5 mg/dL, except for patients with Gilbert's syndrome or hemolysis. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline Phosphatase less than 5 x upper limit of normal; c. Renal: Serum creatinine within normal range, or if serum creatinine outside normal range, then renal function (measured or estimated creatinine clearance or GFR)greater than 40 mL/min/1.73m^; d. Pulmonary: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for hemoglobin), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 50% predicted; Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Patients Assigned to Haploidentical BM Arm: Patients must be HLA typed at high resolution using DNA based typing at the following HLA-loci: HLA-A, -B, -C and DRB1 and have available a related haploidentical BM donor with 2, 3, or 4 HLA-mismatches. A unidirectional mismatch in either the graft versus host or host versus graft direction is considered a mismatch. The donor and recipient must be HLA identical for at least one antigen (using high resolution DNA based typing) at the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1. Fulfillment of this criterion shall be considered sufficient evidence that the donor and recipient share one HLA haplotype, and typing of additional family members is not required. Additional Patient Inclusion Criteria for Patients Assigned to Double Umbilical Cord Blood Arm: Patients must have available two UCB units fulfilling the following criteria: Each unit must have a minimum of 1.5 x 10^7/kg pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose. For non-red blood cell depleted units, the minimum pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose of each unit must be at least 2.0 x10^7/kg. Units must be HLA matched at a minimum of 4/6 to the recipient at HLA -A, HLA-B (at low resolution using DNA based typing), and HLA -DRB1 (at high resolution using DNA based typing). Additional graft selection criteria specified in section 2.5 Patients must have received at least one cycle of the cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (or regimen of similar intensity) listed in Appendix D within 3 months of enrollment (measured from the start date of chemotherapy) OR have had an autologous transplant within 24 months of enrollment OR receive 300 cGy as part of the preparative regimen Exclusion Criteria: Patients with suitably matched related or unrelated donor, as defined per institutional practice. Recipients of prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are ineligible if disease recurrence occurred less than 6 months from their autologous stem cell transplant. Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication with evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings). Prior allogeneic HCT. Patients with history of primary idiopathic myelofibrosis or any severe marrow fibrosis. Planned use of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) therapy. Anti-donor HLA antibodies. Additional exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or breast-feeding. Evidence of HIV infection or known HIV positive serology.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary Horowitz, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Cancer Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85013
Country
United States
Facility Name
City of Hope National Medical Center
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010-3000
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California at Los Angeles
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands)
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610-0277
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32804
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
BMT Program at Northside Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Hospital
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21231
Country
United States
Facility Name
DFCI Massachustts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
DFCI Brigham & Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan Medical Center
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univeristy of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Roswell Park Cancer Center
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mt. Sinai Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stony Brook University Medical Center
City
Stony Brook
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11794-7122
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599-7305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jewish Hospital BMT Program
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45236
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106-5061
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State / Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Oklahoma Medical Center
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State College of Medicine - The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univesity of Texas, MD Anderson CRC
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Transplant Institute
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Commonwealth University
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23298
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109-1024
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Virginia University
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
26506-9162
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53211
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Within 6 months of official study closure at participating sites.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Available to the public
IPD Sharing URL
https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/home/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24862638
Citation
Eapen M, O'Donnell P, Brunstein CG, Wu J, Barowski K, Mendizabal A, Fuchs EJ. Mismatched related and unrelated donors for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct;20(10):1485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24645687
Citation
Roth JA, Bensink ME, O'Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ, Eapen M, Ramsey SD. Design of a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized trial of transplantation using umbilical cord blood versus HLA-haploidentical related bone marrow in advanced hematologic cancer. J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Mar;3(2):135-44. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.95.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34273598
Citation
Brunstein CG, DeFor TE, Fuchs EJ, Karanes C, McGuirk JP, Rezvani AR, Eapen M, O'Donnell PV, Weisdorf DJ; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Engraftment of Double Cord Blood Transplantation after Nonmyeloablative Conditioning with Escalated Total Body Irradiation Dosing to Facilitate Engraftment in Immunocompetent Patients. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Oct;27(10):879.e1-879.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33475736
Citation
Fuchs EJ, O'Donnell PV, Eapen M, Logan B, Antin JH, Dawson P, Devine S, Horowitz MM, Horwitz ME, Karanes C, Leifer E, Magenau JM, McGuirk JP, Morris LE, Rezvani AR, Jones RJ, Brunstein CG. Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial. Blood. 2021 Jan 21;137(3):420-428. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007535.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://bethematch.org/
Description
National Marrow Donor Program

Learn more about this trial

Double Cord Versus Haploidentical (BMT CTN 1101)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs