search
Back to results

Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (REVELATION)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Myocardial Infarction

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Treatment according arm
Sponsored by
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Coronary artery disease, Acute myocardial infarction, Drug-coated balloon, Drug-eluting stent

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary PCI:
  • > 20 min of chest-pain and at least 1 mm ST-elevation in at least two contiguous leads, a new left bundle branch block or a true posterior myocardial infarction (confirmed by ECG or echocardiography)
  • Reperfusion is expected to be feasible within 12 hours after onset of complaints
  • Infarct related artery eligible for PPCI and:
  • De novo lesion in a native coronary artery
  • Reference-vessel diameter ≥ 2.5mm and ≤ 4mm
  • Without severe calcification
  • Without diameter stenosis of >50% (by visual assessment) after thrombus aspiration and pre-dilatation.

The protocol requires visualization, thrombus aspiration and pre-dilatation of the culprit lesion before inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years and > 75 years
  • History of myocardial infarction
  • Known contraindication/resistance for bivalirudin, fondaparinux, heparin, aspirin, prasugrel and/or ticagrelor.
  • Participation in another clinical study, interfering with this protocol
  • Uncertain neurological outcome e.g. resuscitation
  • Intubation/ventilation
  • Cardiogenic shock prior to randomization
  • Known intracranial disease (mass, aneurysm, AVM, hemorrhagic CVA, ischemic CVA/TIA < 6 months prior to inclusion or ischemic CVA with permanent neurological deficit)
  • Gastro-intestinal / urinary tract bleeding < 2 months prior to inclusion
  • Refusal to receive blood transfusion
  • Planned major surgery within 6 weeks
  • Stent implantation < 1 month prior to inclusion
  • Expected mortality from any cause within the next 12 months

Sites / Locations

  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Drug-eluting stent

Drug-coated balloon

Arm Description

Treatment of infarct related laesion with a drug-eluting stent

After treatment of the infarct related artery with a drug-coated ballon, an additional BMS is advised to be used in case of residual stenosis > 50% or coronary artery dissection type > B.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)
Fractional flow reserve is the ratio of mean coronary pressure distal of the treated lesion to mean aortic pressure during maximum hyperemia.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Major adverse cardiac event (MACE)
Cardiac death (ARC); defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Recurrent MI in the target vessel area. Ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (PCI within 5 mm of the treated segment in case of balloon, or stent area borders in case of stent, or CABG of the target vessel).
Angiographic endpoint: iFR
ST-segment resolution
ST-segment resolution post-initial procedure at 90 minutes, defined as the ST-segment deviation resolution in only the single lead showing maximum deviation.
Non-coronary artery bypass grafting major bleeding
Intracranial, intraocular, intra-articular or retroperitoneal bleeding Access site bleed requiring intervention/surgery Hematoma ≥ 5 cm Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥4 g/dL without an overt source Hgb ≥3 g/dL with an overt source Operation for bleeding Any blood transfusions
Stent thrombosis
Definite or confirmed stent thrombosis: Angiographic confirmation of vessel occlusion or thrombus formation within, or adjacent to, the stented segment or proven stent thrombosis at autopsy. Probable stent thrombosis: Unexplained death within 30 days or target vessel recurrent MI without angiographic confirmation. Possible stent thrombosis: Unexplained death after 30 days.
Angiographic endpoint: TIMI flow
Angiographic endpoint: late lumen loss
Angiographic endpoint: minimal lumen diameter
Angiographic endpoint: diameter stenosis

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2014
Last Updated
August 15, 2014
Sponsor
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Collaborators
Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Volcano Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02219802
Brief Title
Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acronym
REVELATION
Official Title
Revascularization With Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-eluting Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction - a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Collaborators
Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Volcano Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Rationale: Compared with balloon angioplasty, implantation of bare metal stents (BMS) and drug eluting stents (DES) have shown to reduce repeat target lesion revascularization in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, this did not result in a reduction of mortality or recurrent myocardial infarction. Furthermore, there are concerns of the occurrence of stent thrombosis. The PAPPA-pilot study, evaluating safety and feasibility of using a drug-coated balloon (DCB) only strategy in PPCI, showed good short- and long-term clinical results, with sustained safety and efficacy at 12 months follow-up. To date little is known about the long-term effects of this treatment modality in STEMI. Besides, angiographic follow-up is of great clinical importance by giving insight on the treated infarct lesion and to assess the functional angioplasty result. Objective: This randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial is mainly designed to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of a CE-marked paclitaxel-eluting balloon only strategy vs. third generation DES in the setting of a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Detailed Description
Rationale: Compared with balloon angioplasty, implantation of bare metal stents (BMS) and drug eluting stents (DES) have shown to reduce repeat target lesion revascularization in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, this did not result in a reduction of mortality or recurrent myocardial infarction. Furthermore, there are concerns of the occurrence of stent thrombosis. The PAPPA-pilot study, evaluating safety and feasibility of using a drug-coated balloon (DCB) only strategy in PPCI, showed good short- and long-term clinical results, with sustained safety and efficacy at 12 months follow-up. To date little is known about the long-term effects of this treatment modality in STEMI. Besides, angiographic follow-up is of great clinical importance by giving insight on the treated infarct lesion and to assess the functional angioplasty result. Objective: This randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial is mainly designed to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of a CE-marked paclitaxel-eluting balloon only strategy vs. third generation DES in the setting of a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Study design: This is a prospective, single center, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Study population: All patients presenting with STEMI and suitable for PPCI. Intervention: PPCI will be performed according to current guidelines. After thrombus aspiration and pre-dilatation, randomization between a DCB only strategy (with bail-out stenting if indicated) and DES will be done by 1:1 ratio. Concomitant medication will be administered according current standards. Control coronary angiography, including measurement of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the treated lesion(s), will be performed after 9 months. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is the fractional flow reserve at 9 months follow-up. Secondary study parameters include cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction in the target vessel area and ischemia driven target lesion revascularisation at 9 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Myocardial Infarction
Keywords
Coronary artery disease, Acute myocardial infarction, Drug-coated balloon, Drug-eluting stent

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Drug-eluting stent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Treatment of infarct related laesion with a drug-eluting stent
Arm Title
Drug-coated balloon
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
After treatment of the infarct related artery with a drug-coated ballon, an additional BMS is advised to be used in case of residual stenosis > 50% or coronary artery dissection type > B.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment according arm
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)
Description
Fractional flow reserve is the ratio of mean coronary pressure distal of the treated lesion to mean aortic pressure during maximum hyperemia.
Time Frame
At 9 months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Major adverse cardiac event (MACE)
Description
Cardiac death (ARC); defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Recurrent MI in the target vessel area. Ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (PCI within 5 mm of the treated segment in case of balloon, or stent area borders in case of stent, or CABG of the target vessel).
Time Frame
In-hospital, at 1 and 9 months follow-up and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 year follow-up.
Title
Angiographic endpoint: iFR
Time Frame
At 9 months follow-up.
Title
ST-segment resolution
Description
ST-segment resolution post-initial procedure at 90 minutes, defined as the ST-segment deviation resolution in only the single lead showing maximum deviation.
Time Frame
90 minutes after initial procedure
Title
Non-coronary artery bypass grafting major bleeding
Description
Intracranial, intraocular, intra-articular or retroperitoneal bleeding Access site bleed requiring intervention/surgery Hematoma ≥ 5 cm Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥4 g/dL without an overt source Hgb ≥3 g/dL with an overt source Operation for bleeding Any blood transfusions
Time Frame
At 1 month follow-up
Title
Stent thrombosis
Description
Definite or confirmed stent thrombosis: Angiographic confirmation of vessel occlusion or thrombus formation within, or adjacent to, the stented segment or proven stent thrombosis at autopsy. Probable stent thrombosis: Unexplained death within 30 days or target vessel recurrent MI without angiographic confirmation. Possible stent thrombosis: Unexplained death after 30 days.
Time Frame
During follow-up
Title
Angiographic endpoint: TIMI flow
Time Frame
At 9 months follow-up
Title
Angiographic endpoint: late lumen loss
Time Frame
At 9 months follow-up
Title
Angiographic endpoint: minimal lumen diameter
Time Frame
At 9 months follow-up
Title
Angiographic endpoint: diameter stenosis
Time Frame
At 9 months follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary PCI: > 20 min of chest-pain and at least 1 mm ST-elevation in at least two contiguous leads, a new left bundle branch block or a true posterior myocardial infarction (confirmed by ECG or echocardiography) Reperfusion is expected to be feasible within 12 hours after onset of complaints Infarct related artery eligible for PPCI and: De novo lesion in a native coronary artery Reference-vessel diameter ≥ 2.5mm and ≤ 4mm Without severe calcification Without diameter stenosis of >50% (by visual assessment) after thrombus aspiration and pre-dilatation. The protocol requires visualization, thrombus aspiration and pre-dilatation of the culprit lesion before inclusion. Exclusion Criteria: Age < 18 years and > 75 years History of myocardial infarction Known contraindication/resistance for bivalirudin, fondaparinux, heparin, aspirin, prasugrel and/or ticagrelor. Participation in another clinical study, interfering with this protocol Uncertain neurological outcome e.g. resuscitation Intubation/ventilation Cardiogenic shock prior to randomization Known intracranial disease (mass, aneurysm, AVM, hemorrhagic CVA, ischemic CVA/TIA < 6 months prior to inclusion or ischemic CVA with permanent neurological deficit) Gastro-intestinal / urinary tract bleeding < 2 months prior to inclusion Refusal to receive blood transfusion Planned major surgery within 6 weeks Stent implantation < 1 month prior to inclusion Expected mortality from any cause within the next 12 months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
R. J. van der Schaaf, MD, PhD
Phone
+31-20-5992387
Email
r.j.vanderschaaf@olvg.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
N. S. Vos, MD
Phone
+13-20-5992387
Email
n.s.vos@olvg.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. J. van der Schaaf, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
OLVG
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1091 AC
Country
Netherlands
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. J. van der Schaaf, MD, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12517460
Citation
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10547403
Citation
Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Reiffers S, Miedema K, Ottervanger JP, van 't Hof AW, Suryapranata H. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1413-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411901.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7829790
Citation
Stone GW, Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, O'Keefe J, Hartzler GO, Overlie P, Donohue B, Chelliah N, et al. Predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trail. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):370-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00367-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8433726
Citation
Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JH, Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 11;328(10):680-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11096682
Citation
Mintz GS. Remodeling and Restenosis: Observations from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Studies. Curr Interv Cardiol Rep. 2000 Nov;2(4):316-325.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11472712
Citation
Zhu MM, Feit A, Chadow H, Alam M, Kwan T, Clark LT. Primary stent implantation compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 1;88(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01645-9. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17544528
Citation
De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, Antoniucci D, Biondi-Zoccai G, Kastrati A, Chiariello M, Marino P. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2008 May 7;126(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.03.112. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15831652
Citation
Suryapranata H, De Luca G, van 't Hof AW, Ottervanger JP, Hoorntje JC, Dambrink JH, Gosselink AT, Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ. Is routine stenting for acute myocardial infarction superior to balloon angioplasty? A randomised comparison in a large cohort of unselected patients. Heart. 2005 May;91(5):641-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.056705.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16971717
Citation
Laarman GJ, Suttorp MJ, Dirksen MT, van Heerebeek L, Kiemeneij F, Slagboom T, van der Wieken LR, Tijssen JG, Rensing BJ, Patterson M. Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1105-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062598.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17901079
Citation
Kastrati A, Dibra A, Spaulding C, Laarman GJ, Menichelli M, Valgimigli M, Di Lorenzo E, Kaiser C, Tierala I, Mehilli J, Seyfarth M, Varenne O, Dirksen MT, Percoco G, Varricchio A, Pittl U, Syvanne M, Suttorp MJ, Violini R, Schomig A. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007 Nov;28(22):2706-13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm402. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18394731
Citation
De Luca G, Stone GW, Suryapranata H, Laarman GJ, Menichelli M, Kaiser C, Valgimigli M, Di Lorenzo E, Dirksen MT, Spaulding C, Pittl U, Violini R, Percoco G, Marino P. Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 3;133(2):213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.040. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14638542
Citation
Degertekin M, Serruys PW, Tanabe K, Lee CH, Sousa JE, Colombo A, Morice MC, Ligthart JM, de Feyter PJ. Long-term follow-up of incomplete stent apposition in patients who received sirolimus-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. Circulation. 2003 Dec 2;108(22):2747-50. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000103666.25660.77. Epub 2003 Nov 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15500897
Citation
McFadden EP, Stabile E, Regar E, Cheneau E, Ong AT, Kinnaird T, Suddath WO, Weissman NJ, Torguson R, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Waksman R, Serruys PW. Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Lancet. 2004 Oct 23-29;364(9444):1519-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17275-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18725485
Citation
Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Joner M, Ladich E, Kutys R, Mont EK, Gold HK, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis at culprit sites after drug-eluting stent placement for acute myocardial infarction patients: an autopsy study. Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1138-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762047. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21251625
Citation
Vink MA, Dirksen MT, Suttorp MJ, Tijssen JG, van Etten J, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. 5-year follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a follow-up study of the PASSION (Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14967732
Citation
Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Kim YH, Lee SW, Song JM, Han KH, Kang DH, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Incidence, mechanism, predictors, and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation. Circulation. 2004 Feb 24;109(7):881-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000116751.88818.10. Epub 2004 Feb 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19463469
Citation
Gonzalo N, Barlis P, Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Ligthart J, Regar E. Incomplete stent apposition and delayed tissue coverage are more frequent in drug-eluting stents implanted during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than in drug-eluting stents implanted for stable/unstable angina: insights from optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May;2(5):445-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.01.012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10841250
Citation
Herdeg C, Oberhoff M, Baumbach A, Blattner A, Axel DI, Schroder S, Heinle H, Karsch KR. Local paclitaxel delivery for the prevention of restenosis: biological effects and efficacy in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1969-76. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00614-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17101615
Citation
Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18536865
Citation
Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Two year follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008 Oct;97(10):773-81. doi: 10.1007/s00392-008-0682-5. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19487593
Citation
Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, Heuer H, Hengstenberg C, Maikowski C, Werner GS, Antoni D, Kleber FX, Bocksch W, Leschke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Speck U, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2009 Jun 16;119(23):2986-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839282. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19309715
Citation
De Labriolle A, Pakala R, Bonello L, Lemesle G, Scheinowitz M, Waksman R. Paclitaxel-eluting balloon: from bench to bed. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):643-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21895.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20052480
Citation
Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Mar;99(3):165-74. doi: 10.1007/s00392-009-0101-6. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25256200
Citation
Vos NS, Dirksen MT, Vink MA, van Nooijen FC, Amoroso G, Herrman JP, Kiemeneij F, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, van der Schaaf RJ. Safety and feasibility of a PAclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty in Primary Percutaneous coronary intervention in Amsterdam (PAPPA): one-year clinical outcome of a pilot study. EuroIntervention. 2014 Sep;10(5):584-90. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A101.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8124786
Citation
De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1013-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8637515
Citation
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J Koolen JJ, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 27;334(26):1703-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606273342604.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11447079
Citation
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, Kulecki K, Bech JW, De Winter H, Van Crombrugge P, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001 Jul 10;104(2):157-62. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.2.157.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11413082
Citation
Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JC, Escaned J, Stella PR, Boersma E, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ, Wijns W. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001 Jun 19;103(24):2928-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.24.2928.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19144937
Citation
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22924638
Citation
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov;367(18):1768. Mobius-Winckler, Sven [corrected to Mobius-Winkler, Sven].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3760377
Citation
Legrand V, Mancini GB, Bates ER, Hodgson JM, Gross MD, Vogel RA. Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Nov;8(5):1022-32. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80377-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3403826
Citation
Zijlstra F, Fioretti P, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? A comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measured coronary flow reserve and exercise/redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Sep;12(3):686-91. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(88)80057-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20579537
Citation
Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, Maccarthy PA, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21481828
Citation
Nam CW, Hur SH, Cho YK, Park HS, Yoon HJ, Kim H, Chung IS, Kim YN, Kim KB, Doh JH, Koo BK, Tahk SJ, Fearon WF. Relation of fractional flow reserve after drug-eluting stent implantation to one-year outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 15;107(12):1763-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.329. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15657233
Citation
Klauss V, Erdin P, Rieber J, Leibig M, Stempfle HU, Konig A, Baylacher M, Theisen K, Haufe MC, Sroczynski G, Schiele T, Siebert U. Fractional flow reserve for the prediction of cardiac events after coronary stent implantation: results of a multivariate analysis. Heart. 2005 Feb;91(2):203-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.027797.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22154731
Citation
Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24211503
Citation
Jeremias A, Maehara A, Genereux P, Asrress KN, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Davies JE, Escaned J, Fearon WF, Gould KL, Johnson NP, Kirtane AJ, Koo BK, Marques KM, Nijjer S, Oldroyd KG, Petraco R, Piek JJ, Pijls NH, Redwood S, Siebes M, Spaan JAE, van 't Veer M, Mintz GS, Stone GW. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 8;63(13):1253-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.060. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19717185
Citation
Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, Kornowski R, Hartmann F, Gersh BJ, Pocock SJ, Wong SC, Nikolsky E, Gambone L, Vandertie L, Parise H, Dangas GD, Stone GW; HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators. Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1149-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61484-7. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19801025
Citation
Cortese B, Picchi A, Micheli A, Ebert AG, Parri F, Severi S, Limbruno U. Comparison of prolonged bivalirudin infusion versus intraprocedural in preventing myocardial damage after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Oct 15;104(8):1063-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22922416
Citation
Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gershlick AH, Giannuzzi P, Halvorsen S, Huber K, Juni P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Lenzen MJ, Mahaffey KW, Valgimigli M, van 't Hof A, Widimsky P, Zahger D. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31126887
Citation
Vos NS, Fagel ND, Amoroso G, Herrman JR, Patterson MS, Piers LH, van der Schaaf RJ, Slagboom T, Vink MA. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The REVELATION Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1691-1699. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 21.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs