search
Back to results

Dry Needling vs Injection in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders

Primary Purpose

Temporomandibular Disorders

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dry needling and placebo injection
Injection and placebo dry needling
Dry needling and injection
Placebo dry needling and placebo injection
Sponsored by
Josue Fernandez Carnero
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Temporomandibular Disorders focused on measuring dry needling, Temporomandibular Disorders

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Craniofacial pain
  • Myofascial temporomandibular disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous injection (3 months) or dry needling intervention on the masseter
  • Temporomandibular disc joint pathology
  • History of trauma, infection in the temporomandibular joint in the last 6 months
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Clínica Universitaria de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Dry needling

Injection

Placebo

Dry needling + Injection

Arm Description

Trigger point dry needling on an active myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.

Trigger point injection of lidocaine on an active myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.

Combines sham dry needling + sham injection.

Combines experimental dry needling and injection

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain perception (Change is being assessed)
Self reported Visual Analog Scale. Minimum value is 0 (best); Maximun value is 10 (worst).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Believability of placebo
Patients beliefs about group allocation: A scale of cale of four options (Experimental Dry needling / Experimental Injection / Placebo Comparator / Active Comparator) in which patients had to indicate which intervention they believe they have received during the treatment sessions.
Disability
Self-reported disability questionnaire: Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI). The CF-PDI contains 21 items divided into 2 subscales according to their content and exploratory factor analysis: "pain and disability" and "jaw functional status."
Pressure pain threshold (Change is being assessed)
Digital algometer measure of the pressure pain threshold on the masseter muscle
Conditioned pain modulation
Pressure pain thresholds measure on the distal phalanx of the thumb before and during the application of a noxious stimulus ( Ischemic pain)
Temporal summation (TS)
Initially, a needlle stimulus is measured locally and distally. Then, the TS is triggered by 10 consecutive pressures on the PPT at the pressure determined at each location. For each pulse, the pressure was gradually increased at a rate of 2 kg/s at the determined PPT and held for 1 s before being released (with an interval of one second between each stimulus).
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
The level of depressive symptomatology was measured by the Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); a 21-item self-report rating scale that assesses affective, cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. Each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Anxiety (STAI questionnaire)
The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) is a questionnaire that measures trait anxiety (a personality factor that predisposes the patient to suffer from anxiety) and the state of anxiety (environmental factors that protect or generate anxiety). Each of the two sub-scales (trait anxiety and state anxiety) consists of 20 items, ranging from 0 (nothing) to 3 (a lot).
Kinesiophobia (TAMPA scale)
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. To assess the fear of movement and pain-related fear. The 11 items are scored 1-4, with total scores ranging from 11 to 44. The addition of all the points obtained from each of the items results in the level of kinesiophobia, with higher scores indicating greater perceived kinesiophobia
Fair avoidance beliefs (FAB questionnaire)
Fear-avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire . The instrument consists of two subscales, a four-item physical activity subscale, and a seven-item work subscale. Each item is scored from 0 to 6 and summed to produce the subscale score. Possible scores range from 0-28 to 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater fear avoidance beliefs.
Pain catastrophizing (PCS)
Pain catastrophizing Scale (PCS). This tool is a 13-item questionnaire designed to measure the three components of pain-related catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness, resulting in a unique score. Each item is responded to on a 5-point scale (0 not at all, 4 all the time) relating the degree to which the individual experiences a thought or feeling of a painful situation.
Expectation of improvement
Patients´ expectations of pain improvement after the intervention. Patients report their estimated pain perception after the treatment by completing a Self reported Visual Analog Scale. Minimum value is 0 (best); Maximun value is 10 (worst).
Central sensitization inventory
It serves to identify the symptoms related to central sensitization. It consists of 25 items that are scored from 0: never to 4: always reaching a maximum score of 100. Results are interpreted as follows: subclinical = 0 to 29; mild = 30 to 39; moderate = 40 to 49; severe = 50 to 59; and extreme = 60 to 100.

Full Information

First Posted
November 13, 2020
Last Updated
November 23, 2022
Sponsor
Josue Fernandez Carnero
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04726683
Brief Title
Dry Needling vs Injection in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders
Official Title
Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Injection in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Start Date
November 23, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 23, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 15, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Josue Fernandez Carnero

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main objective is to compare the effectiveness of dry needling in improving pain and disability versus placebo, and versus infiltration, inpatients with myofascial temporomandibular dysfunction in the short, medium and long term.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Temporomandibular Disorders
Keywords
dry needling, Temporomandibular Disorders

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
58 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dry needling
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Trigger point dry needling on an active myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.
Arm Title
Injection
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Trigger point injection of lidocaine on an active myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Combines sham dry needling + sham injection.
Arm Title
Dry needling + Injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Combines experimental dry needling and injection
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Dry needling and placebo injection
Intervention Description
Dry Needling is applied with a filiform needle to penetrate the skin and stimulate the underlying myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle. Dry needling is combined with placebo injection, in which the tip of a beveled needle is cut and the process of injection is simulated without penetrating the skin.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Injection and placebo dry needling
Intervention Description
Lidocaine injection applied in the myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle. Lidocaine injection is combined with placebo dry needling, in which the tip of a filiform needle is cut and the dry needling technique simulated without penetrating the skin
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Dry needling and injection
Intervention Description
Dry Needling is applied with a filiform needle to penetrate the skin and stimulate the underlying myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle. Dry needling is combined with lidocaine injection applied in the myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo dry needling and placebo injection
Intervention Description
Placebo dry needling, in which the tip of a filiform needle is cut and the dry needling technique simulated without penetrating the skin. Placebo dry needling is combined with placebo injection, in which the tip of a beveled needle is cut and the process of injection is simulated without penetrating the skin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain perception (Change is being assessed)
Description
Self reported Visual Analog Scale. Minimum value is 0 (best); Maximun value is 10 (worst).
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Believability of placebo
Description
Patients beliefs about group allocation: A scale of cale of four options (Experimental Dry needling / Experimental Injection / Placebo Comparator / Active Comparator) in which patients had to indicate which intervention they believe they have received during the treatment sessions.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Disability
Description
Self-reported disability questionnaire: Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI). The CF-PDI contains 21 items divided into 2 subscales according to their content and exploratory factor analysis: "pain and disability" and "jaw functional status."
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Pressure pain threshold (Change is being assessed)
Description
Digital algometer measure of the pressure pain threshold on the masseter muscle
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Conditioned pain modulation
Description
Pressure pain thresholds measure on the distal phalanx of the thumb before and during the application of a noxious stimulus ( Ischemic pain)
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Temporal summation (TS)
Description
Initially, a needlle stimulus is measured locally and distally. Then, the TS is triggered by 10 consecutive pressures on the PPT at the pressure determined at each location. For each pulse, the pressure was gradually increased at a rate of 2 kg/s at the determined PPT and held for 1 s before being released (with an interval of one second between each stimulus).
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Description
The level of depressive symptomatology was measured by the Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); a 21-item self-report rating scale that assesses affective, cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. Each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Anxiety (STAI questionnaire)
Description
The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) is a questionnaire that measures trait anxiety (a personality factor that predisposes the patient to suffer from anxiety) and the state of anxiety (environmental factors that protect or generate anxiety). Each of the two sub-scales (trait anxiety and state anxiety) consists of 20 items, ranging from 0 (nothing) to 3 (a lot).
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Kinesiophobia (TAMPA scale)
Description
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. To assess the fear of movement and pain-related fear. The 11 items are scored 1-4, with total scores ranging from 11 to 44. The addition of all the points obtained from each of the items results in the level of kinesiophobia, with higher scores indicating greater perceived kinesiophobia
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Fair avoidance beliefs (FAB questionnaire)
Description
Fear-avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire . The instrument consists of two subscales, a four-item physical activity subscale, and a seven-item work subscale. Each item is scored from 0 to 6 and summed to produce the subscale score. Possible scores range from 0-28 to 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater fear avoidance beliefs.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Pain catastrophizing (PCS)
Description
Pain catastrophizing Scale (PCS). This tool is a 13-item questionnaire designed to measure the three components of pain-related catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness, resulting in a unique score. Each item is responded to on a 5-point scale (0 not at all, 4 all the time) relating the degree to which the individual experiences a thought or feeling of a painful situation.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Expectation of improvement
Description
Patients´ expectations of pain improvement after the intervention. Patients report their estimated pain perception after the treatment by completing a Self reported Visual Analog Scale. Minimum value is 0 (best); Maximun value is 10 (worst).
Time Frame
Baseline to one week
Title
Central sensitization inventory
Description
It serves to identify the symptoms related to central sensitization. It consists of 25 items that are scored from 0: never to 4: always reaching a maximum score of 100. Results are interpreted as follows: subclinical = 0 to 29; mild = 30 to 39; moderate = 40 to 49; severe = 50 to 59; and extreme = 60 to 100.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Craniofacial pain Myofascial temporomandibular disorders Exclusion Criteria: Previous injection (3 months) or dry needling intervention on the masseter Temporomandibular disc joint pathology History of trauma, infection in the temporomandibular joint in the last 6 months Coagulation disorders Pregnancy
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clínica Universitaria de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
City
Alcorcón
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28922
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Dry Needling vs Injection in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs