Dynamic Congruence Total Knee Replacement vs Posterior-stabilized (K-Mod)
Primary Purpose
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Surgery, Joint Diseases
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Total knee replacement
Biomechanics
NexGen Ps or Bioimplanti K-MOD implant
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteo Arthritis Knee focused on measuring osteoarthritis, knee, congruence, posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- agreement to participate in the study
- BMI (kg/m2) less than 40
- ability to walk for 10 meters
- knee flexion more or equal of 90 degrees
Exclusion Criteria:
- unwillingness to participate in the study
- osteoarthritis due to the rheumatological disease
- disorders associated with nerve-muscle signal transmission
- neurological disorders associated with dizziness, nystagmus or other conditions that might influence balance during activity
Sites / Locations
- Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
NexGen
K-Mod
Arm Description
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Zimmer Biomet NexGen prosthesis
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Bioimplanti K-MOD prosthesis
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time of swing phase
Change from baseline part of swing phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Change from baseline part of swing phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Time of stance phase
Change from baseline part of stance phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Time of double-stance phase
Change from baseline part of double-stance phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Stride length
Change from baseline length of stride during gait, measured in meters
Cadence
Change from baseline number of strides per minute of walking
Mean gait velocity
Change from baseline mean values of gait speed, measured in meters per second
Range of maximal hip extension for both limbs during ending part of mid-stance phase
Change from baseline range of maximal hip extension for both limbs during ending part of mid-stance phase, measured in degrees
Range of pelvic drop in frontal plane on the opposite site of the bearing limb
Change from baseline range of pelvic drop in frontal plane on the opposite site of the bearing limb, measured in degrees
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04524312
First Posted
August 19, 2020
Last Updated
September 26, 2020
Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04524312
Brief Title
Dynamic Congruence Total Knee Replacement vs Posterior-stabilized
Acronym
K-Mod
Official Title
Does Dynamic Congruence Design Improve Gait After Total Knee Replacement in Comparison to Posterior-stabilized One? - Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 26, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 26, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study compares and evaluates differences in movement analysis, patient-reported outcome between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with use of either Zimmer Biomet NexGen with posterior stabilization and Bioimplanti K-Mod cruciate-retaining with dynamic congruence
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to assess and compare kinematic and time-space gait parameters in patients after total knee arthroplasty, who will undergo the surgery with the use of either posterior-stabilized (PS) or dynamic congruence (DC) implants.
Materials and methods To this study 56 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty will be recruited. Study protocol is designed as a prospective, blinded, parallel-group, superiority trial, with balanced randomization [1:1]. All participants will be operated in single clinical orthopedic department, by single high-volume surgeon, who performed more than 3000 total knee arthroplasties in his professional career.
Before the surgery patients will fulfill the author's questionnaire concerning their age, height and body mass, level of activity and VAS (Visual Analogue Scale).
After the surgery 1 to 3 years postoperatively three-dimensional gait analysis will performed with use of BTS SMART device. This device uses passive markers technology and registers the movement by six cameras. To perform full gait analysis several data concerning patients anthropometry will be collected (lower limb length, knee and ankle joint width, width and depth of the pelvis). Whole gait analysis will be performed by experienced single clinical biomechanist accordingly to the Davis protocol. Markers will be installed on the patients' limbs on the following points: base of sacral bone, greater trochanter of the femur, lateral femoral condyle, head of the fibula, lateral malleoli, head of the V metatarsal bone).
Participants will walk barefoot for 10 meters quadruple times. Following time-space and kinematic parameters will be assessed:
Time-space parameters Single stance time (T1) [%] Swing time (T2) [%] Double-stance time (T3) [%] Step length (SL) [m] Mean gait velocity (Vm) [m/s] Cadence (C) [number of steps/min]
Kinematic parameters:
Operated knee range of flexion during swing phase [°]
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Surgery, Joint Diseases
Keywords
osteoarthritis, knee, congruence, posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participant will not be informed which type of prosthesis was used in their particular case.
Outcomes Assessor will not be informed which type of prosthesis was used in particular patient.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
NexGen
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Zimmer Biomet NexGen prosthesis
Arm Title
K-Mod
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Bioimplanti K-MOD prosthesis
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Total knee replacement
Intervention Description
Participant will undergo total knee replacement performed via anterior parapatellar approach with either Posterior-stabilized or retaining cruciate-retaining with dynamic congruence implant
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Biomechanics
Intervention Description
Participants will be asked to perform biomechanical assesment before and following surgery at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6-months postoperatively
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
NexGen Ps or Bioimplanti K-MOD implant
Intervention Description
Participant are randomly allocated to receive one of the NexGen PS or Biomplanti K-MOD total knee implant for treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time of swing phase
Description
Change from baseline part of swing phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Change from baseline part of swing phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Time of stance phase
Description
Change from baseline part of stance phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Time of double-stance phase
Description
Change from baseline part of double-stance phase time during gait, measured in percentage
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Stride length
Description
Change from baseline length of stride during gait, measured in meters
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Cadence
Description
Change from baseline number of strides per minute of walking
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Mean gait velocity
Description
Change from baseline mean values of gait speed, measured in meters per second
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Range of maximal hip extension for both limbs during ending part of mid-stance phase
Description
Change from baseline range of maximal hip extension for both limbs during ending part of mid-stance phase, measured in degrees
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
Title
Range of pelvic drop in frontal plane on the opposite site of the bearing limb
Description
Change from baseline range of pelvic drop in frontal plane on the opposite site of the bearing limb, measured in degrees
Time Frame
Time Frame: 1-3 years after surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
agreement to participate in the study
BMI (kg/m2) less than 40
ability to walk for 10 meters
knee flexion more or equal of 90 degrees
Exclusion Criteria:
unwillingness to participate in the study
osteoarthritis due to the rheumatological disease
disorders associated with nerve-muscle signal transmission
neurological disorders associated with dizziness, nystagmus or other conditions that might influence balance during activity
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bartosz M. Maciąg, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Medical University of Warsaw
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
City
Warszawa
State/Province
Mazowieckie
ZIP/Postal Code
03-984
Country
Poland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Dynamic Congruence Total Knee Replacement vs Posterior-stabilized
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs