search
Back to results

Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

Primary Purpose

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Sponsored by
Applied Spine Technologies
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis focused on measuring Lumbar Spine, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis, Dynamic Stabilization, Motion Preserving, Arthroplasty, Randomized, Investigational, Back Pain, Leg Pain

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Radiographic:

  • Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, central, lateral recess, or foraminal;
  • Evidence of the cal sac and/or cauda equina compression, nerve root impingement, hypertrophic facets with canal encroachment, with or without spondylolisthesis, if present, no more than grade 1

General:

  • The greater of the patients right and left VAS leg pain score is ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm scale;
  • Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom Severity score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5;
  • Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical Function score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4;
  • Intermittent neurogenic claudication
  • At least six months of non-surgical management.
  • Skeletally mature patients at least 21 years of age;
  • Willing to provide written consent for participation and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization;
  • Willing to undergo all study procedures including physical therapy and adhere to the follow-up schedule; and
  • No additional surgical treatment is required outside the investigational or control at the time of surgery.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Initial Screening:

  • Prior surgery at any lumbar level including the level being treated except for: Lamino/Foraminotomy, Microdiscectomy, IDET, and Percutaneous Discectomy.
  • Prior surgery at any lumbar level within one year of enrollment;
  • No more than one prior surgery at any lumbar level;
  • Previous acute trauma at the treated level within two years of enrollment;
  • Primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain, e.g. torn disc, herniated disc inflamed or irritated disc, or other disc pathology;
  • Symptomatic cervical and/or thoracic neurological compromise;
  • Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy, caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis;
  • Other neurological pathology that could confound study results;
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome;
  • Contraindicated for MRI;
  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 40);
  • Peripheral vascular disease requiring intervention (≥ 50% stenosis of vessel);
  • Active systemic or surgical site infection;
  • Any significant medical conditions that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing;
  • History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant within 24 months post-surgery;
  • Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus;
  • Immunocompromised such as but not limited to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , genetic deficiencies of the complement system, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease, Thymic Hypoplasia;
  • Receiving immunosuppressive therapy
  • Receiving long-term steroid therapy. Autoimmune disease;
  • Active hepatitis;
  • Malignancy of any type within the last five years;
  • Previous known allergy to the materials contained in the Stabilimax NZ™ device including nickel, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, iron, titanium, or Teflon™;
  • Participation in another clinical study within four weeks of enrollment, or;
  • Receiving Worker's Compensation or is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition;
  • Patients who are prisoners.

Radiographic:

  • Gross instability, defined as greater than 3 mm translational motion on flexion/extension studies;
  • Degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis higher than grade 1
  • Degenerative scoliosis > 10° at any level(s) in lumbar spine
  • Lateral listhesis on A-P X Ray
  • Spondylolysis at any level in lumbar spine
  • Isthmic Spondylolisthesis at any level in lumbar spine
  • Spondylolisthesis at more than one lumbar level;
  • DEXA score equal to or below -2.5 T;
  • Pathological vertebral fracture;
  • Metastases to the spinal vertebra; Paget's disease of bone; Osteomalacia; Pars defect or facet fracture;
  • Facet arthropathy at the level(s) to be treated is less than grade 2 and greater than grade 3 according to the Fujiwara scale;
  • More than moderate disc degeneration defined as: > 66% loss of disc height compared to the normal, superior adjacent level; and/or moderate to Severe Osteophyte formation;
  • Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis;
  • Estimated interpedicular distance of less than 30 mm.

Sites / Locations

  • Surgical Specialty Hospital
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
  • Tri-City Medical Center
  • Littleton Adventist Hospital
  • New Britain General Hospital
  • Morton Plant Mease
  • Largo Medical Center
  • University Community Hospital at Carrolwood
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Upstate Medical Center
  • North Carolina Specialty Hospital
  • Blanchard Valley Hospital
  • Sacred Heart Medical Center
  • Lehigh Valley Hospital
  • Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Presbyterian Plano Center for Diagnostics & Surgery
  • University of Utah Hospital
  • DePaul Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with the Stabilimax NZ

Posteriolateral instrumented fusion

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Decrease in leg pain of 20 mm on a VAS pain scale; Decrease of ≥ .5 on ZCQ for both Symptom Severity and Physical Function; No major device-related complications; and No surgical revision, reoperation, removal, or supplemental fixation at treated level

Secondary Outcome Measures

Reduction in OR Time, Blood Loss, Hospital Stay. Improvement in quality of life and return to work. Improvement in the incidence of adverse events. Radiographic evidence of nonfusion.

Full Information

First Posted
September 13, 2007
Last Updated
August 10, 2010
Sponsor
Applied Spine Technologies
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00529997
Brief Title
Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Official Title
Clinical Study Comparing Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine With the Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System to Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion - In Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Company has ceased operation
Study Start Date
February 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2010 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2010 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Applied Spine Technologies

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the Stabilimax NZ® is at least as safe and effective as the control therapy of fusion in patients receiving decompression surgery for the treatment of clinically symptomatic spinal stenosis at one contiguous vertebral levels from L1-S1. Safety and effectiveness will be assessed by means of primary study endpoints which address improvements in pain and function in the absence of major device related complications. The study hypothesis criteria for demonstrating safety and efficacy requires scientific evidence that patients classified as satisfying the primary study endpoint post device implantation is at least as good for Stabilimax NZ® recipients as that for patients undergoing fusion with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation at the 24 month followup assessment.
Detailed Description
Degenerative spine disease is a normal part of the aging process. This degeneration can sometimes cause significant pain and limit normal movement. The pain can be from many sources. For patients being enrolled into this study the pain has been diagnosed to be primarily as a result of a condition called spinal stenosis. The current standard of care for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis is a surgical procedure that relieves the pressure on the spinal cord and nerves is called decompression surgery. The surgeon removes the tissue and bone that are causing the narrowing thus relieving the pinching of the spinal cord and nerve roots. After surgery, the patient may have a spine that is too unstable. In other words the muscles and ligaments around the spine have to work too hard to maintain normal posture and to control movement. For many years those patients with unstable backs have received fusion therapy. Fusion is the development of bone between the vertebra to stabilize the spine and prevent motion. This is done by inserting a bone graft around the vertebra being treated and placing a rigid brace called a fusion device to prevent movement. Eventually bone will form between the vertebra and the spine will become "fused". In this study we will be conducting research to evaluate a new, investigative medical device that is designed to brace and support the spine just like fusion but without fusing in the patient's spine. Devices that do this are called "motion preserving" or "dynamic stabilizing" spinal devices. The investigational device that is being evaluated in this study is called the Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spinal Stabilization System. The Stabilimax NZ® is inserted and fixed to the vertebra by means of pedicle screws in exactly the same way a fusion device is inserted and attached. The only difference is that for the Stabilimax NZ® no bone graft will be placed around or between the vertebra to promote bone growth for fusion. Patients in the study will receive either the Stabilimax NZ® or will receive a fusion procedure. The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial using a 2:1 investigational:control randomization scheme. The study will enroll 480 patients at approximately 20 investigational sites across the United States.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Keywords
Lumbar Spine, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis, Dynamic Stabilization, Motion Preserving, Arthroplasty, Randomized, Investigational, Back Pain, Leg Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
480 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with the Stabilimax NZ
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Posteriolateral instrumented fusion
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
Intervention Description
Surgical Implantation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decrease in leg pain of 20 mm on a VAS pain scale; Decrease of ≥ .5 on ZCQ for both Symptom Severity and Physical Function; No major device-related complications; and No surgical revision, reoperation, removal, or supplemental fixation at treated level
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reduction in OR Time, Blood Loss, Hospital Stay. Improvement in quality of life and return to work. Improvement in the incidence of adverse events. Radiographic evidence of nonfusion.
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Radiographic: Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, central, lateral recess, or foraminal; Evidence of the cal sac and/or cauda equina compression, nerve root impingement, hypertrophic facets with canal encroachment, with or without spondylolisthesis, if present, no more than grade 1 General: The greater of the patients right and left VAS leg pain score is ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm scale; Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom Severity score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5; Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical Function score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4; Intermittent neurogenic claudication At least six months of non-surgical management. Skeletally mature patients at least 21 years of age; Willing to provide written consent for participation and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization; Willing to undergo all study procedures including physical therapy and adhere to the follow-up schedule; and No additional surgical treatment is required outside the investigational or control at the time of surgery. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Initial Screening: Prior surgery at any lumbar level including the level being treated except for: Lamino/Foraminotomy, Microdiscectomy, IDET, and Percutaneous Discectomy. Prior surgery at any lumbar level within one year of enrollment; No more than one prior surgery at any lumbar level; Previous acute trauma at the treated level within two years of enrollment; Primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain, e.g. torn disc, herniated disc inflamed or irritated disc, or other disc pathology; Symptomatic cervical and/or thoracic neurological compromise; Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy, caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis; Other neurological pathology that could confound study results; Cauda Equina Syndrome; Contraindicated for MRI; Morbid obesity (BMI > 40); Peripheral vascular disease requiring intervention (≥ 50% stenosis of vessel); Active systemic or surgical site infection; Any significant medical conditions that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing; History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales Women who are pregnant, lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant within 24 months post-surgery; Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus; Immunocompromised such as but not limited to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , genetic deficiencies of the complement system, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease, Thymic Hypoplasia; Receiving immunosuppressive therapy Receiving long-term steroid therapy. Autoimmune disease; Active hepatitis; Malignancy of any type within the last five years; Previous known allergy to the materials contained in the Stabilimax NZ™ device including nickel, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, iron, titanium, or Teflon™; Participation in another clinical study within four weeks of enrollment, or; Receiving Worker's Compensation or is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition; Patients who are prisoners. Radiographic: Gross instability, defined as greater than 3 mm translational motion on flexion/extension studies; Degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis higher than grade 1 Degenerative scoliosis > 10° at any level(s) in lumbar spine Lateral listhesis on A-P X Ray Spondylolysis at any level in lumbar spine Isthmic Spondylolisthesis at any level in lumbar spine Spondylolisthesis at more than one lumbar level; DEXA score equal to or below -2.5 T; Pathological vertebral fracture; Metastases to the spinal vertebra; Paget's disease of bone; Osteomalacia; Pars defect or facet fracture; Facet arthropathy at the level(s) to be treated is less than grade 2 and greater than grade 3 according to the Fujiwara scale; More than moderate disc degeneration defined as: > 66% loss of disc height compared to the normal, superior adjacent level; and/or moderate to Severe Osteophyte formation; Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis; Estimated interpedicular distance of less than 30 mm.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Guyer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Texas Back Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Musante, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Triangle Orthopedics Associates
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Neel Anand, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Surgical Specialty Hospital
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tri-City Medical Center
City
Oceanside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92056
Country
United States
Facility Name
Littleton Adventist Hospital
City
Littleton
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80122
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Britain General Hospital
City
New Britain
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06052
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morton Plant Mease
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Largo Medical Center
City
Largo
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33770
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Community Hospital at Carrolwood
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Upstate Medical Center
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Carolina Specialty Hospital
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blanchard Valley Hospital
City
Findlay
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45840
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sacred Heart Medical Center
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lehigh Valley Hospital
City
Allentown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center
City
Bristol
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37620
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Presbyterian Plano Center for Diagnostics & Surgery
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Hospital
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
DePaul Medical Center
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23505
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.appliedspine.com
Description
Sponsor Web Site

Learn more about this trial

Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs