search
Back to results

Early Detection of GEnetic Risk (EDGE)

Primary Purpose

Genetic Predisposition

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Population-level screening
Sponsored by
University of Washington
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Genetic Predisposition focused on measuring Primary Care, Genetic Testing, Risk Assessment, Hereditary Cancer, Implementation

Eligibility Criteria

25 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for Patients:

  • Age 25 or older
  • An active patient at a participating clinic (had at least one visit in the past 12 months)
  • Comfortable reading and writing in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who do not meet inclusion criteria.

Sites / Locations

  • Billings Clinic
  • MultiCare Health System

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Point of Care

Direct Patient Engagement

Stakeholder Interviews and Surveys

Arm Description

In the point of care (POC) arm, patients will be approached at the time they come in to the clinic for a routine visit with their primary care provider. We will screen patients for familial cancer risk using electronic tablets in the waiting room or, in the case of a telehealth visit, through telephone contact before the visit. Patients identified as high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers.

In the direct patient engagement (DPE) arm, patients will be identified by reviewing clinic records to create an "active" patient list (i.e., those who have had a visit in the past year). We will contact patients by postal mail and email to provide a link to the online risk screening tool. The patient outreach is not tied to a specific visit and the online screening can be completed at any time. Patients identified as high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers.

Samples of patients, providers, and clinic leaders will be assessed at several points throughout the study - baseline and multiple follow-ups. We will use a mixed methods approach, with both quantitative assessments (surveys) and qualitative assessments (interviews). Baseline assessments will provide initial data on the patient population and current clinic functioning and help in implementation planning. The midpoint and final assessments will provide estimates of change in patients, providers, and clinic leaders as a result of the implementation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rates of screening
Fraction of the active clinic patient population that completes screening
Rate of testing
Fraction of the active clinic patient population that undergoes testing.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Implementation barriers on the clinic-level
To identify changes, problems, and inefficiencies in clinical flow and interactions during and after the implementation of genomic testing for cancer risk across primary care clinics.
Genetic Literacy and Comprehension (GLAC)
GLAC scale for genetic literacy.
Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)
ILS scale.
Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
ICS scale.
Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA)
ORCA scale.
Intervention characteristics (ex: evidence strength and quality)
Self-developed measure.
Trust in Physician Scale (TIPS)
TIPS scale for Physician trust.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (PSQ-18)
PSQ-18
Communication with family members
Self-developed measure.
Reasons for completing (or not completing) genetic testing
Self-developed measure.
Reasons for completing (or not completing) screening.
Self-developed measure.
Quality of life scale
Self-developed measure to measure patient quality of life.
Health literacy
Self-developed measure patient's health literacy.
Cost-benefit analysis - cost-effectiveness
Sel-developed measure to evaluate the value (cost-effectiveness) at each site
Cost-benefit analysis - budget impact
Self-developed measure to measure the affordability of each screening strategy at each site

Full Information

First Posted
December 29, 2020
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04746794
Brief Title
Early Detection of GEnetic Risk (EDGE)
Official Title
Implementing the Moon: Getting Genomic Testing to the Public
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 25, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study intervention involves having patients complete a familial cancer risk assessment survey. Those who are found to be at high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers. A "previvor" plan will be created to assist patients and their providers in completing the appropriate follow-up for those with a mutation identified.
Detailed Description
Current practice guidelines from ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics) provide referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. Identifying patients with high genetic risk for breast, ovary, colon, or other cancers has important clinical ramifications for an individual's healthcare, but genetic risk if often not identified because of testing barriers at several levels. Barriers at the provider level include inadequacies in risk recognition, patient referrals and availability of genetic professionals to provide counseling in a traditional testing paradigm. Barriers at the level of the patient include poor understanding of the availability and benefits of testing and inadequate access to testing services. How to best implement appropriate genomic testing and follow-up care into an operating healthcare system is not known. Issues of communication, clinical flow, reportable actions, and transmission of information and support are of critical importance, and must change and grow to accommodate the new information contained within genomic testing. Studies to date of the implementation process have been conducted in high resourced facilities, under optimal conditions, often not at the system level. Aims include: Compare the efficacy and implementation of two strategies for identifying members of a primary care clinic's population who have a family or personal history of cancer and offering high-risk individuals to obtain genetic testing for cancer susceptibility mutations in a randomized trial. The two methods are: 1) Point of Care (POC) approach: A tablet-based screening for family/personal history of cancer will be offered to all patients aged 25 and up coming in for a routine appointment at the clinic. 2) Direct Patient Engagement (DPE): Letters will be sent to all individuals aged 25 and older in a clinic's population, inviting them to visit a web site for screening for family /personal history of cancer. In both strategies, those determined to be high-risk will receive online education about genetic testing and an invitation to obtain such testing through a web-based platform. Outcomes will be the fraction of the active clinic patient population that completes screening and the fraction of the active clinic patient population that undergoes testing. Hypothesis 1: DPE screening will result in a higher proportion of active patients who screen for familial cancer risk compared with POC screening. Hypothesis 2: Of screened patients, POC patients will produce a higher proportion of tested patients compared with DPE. Identify changes, problems, and inefficiencies in clinical flow and interactions during and after the implementation of genomic testing for cancer risk across primary care clinics. Evaluate the effects of two methods of implementation of genomic screening for cancer risk on patient, provider, and health system leader reports of benefits and harms, satisfaction, perceived quality of care, including across gender, racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and genetic literacy divides. Evaluate the value (cost-effectiveness) and affordability (budget impact) of each screening strategy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Genetic Predisposition
Keywords
Primary Care, Genetic Testing, Risk Assessment, Hereditary Cancer, Implementation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20184 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Point of Care
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In the point of care (POC) arm, patients will be approached at the time they come in to the clinic for a routine visit with their primary care provider. We will screen patients for familial cancer risk using electronic tablets in the waiting room or, in the case of a telehealth visit, through telephone contact before the visit. Patients identified as high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers.
Arm Title
Direct Patient Engagement
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In the direct patient engagement (DPE) arm, patients will be identified by reviewing clinic records to create an "active" patient list (i.e., those who have had a visit in the past year). We will contact patients by postal mail and email to provide a link to the online risk screening tool. The patient outreach is not tied to a specific visit and the online screening can be completed at any time. Patients identified as high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers.
Arm Title
Stakeholder Interviews and Surveys
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Samples of patients, providers, and clinic leaders will be assessed at several points throughout the study - baseline and multiple follow-ups. We will use a mixed methods approach, with both quantitative assessments (surveys) and qualitative assessments (interviews). Baseline assessments will provide initial data on the patient population and current clinic functioning and help in implementation planning. The midpoint and final assessments will provide estimates of change in patients, providers, and clinic leaders as a result of the implementation.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Population-level screening
Intervention Description
The study intervention involves having patients complete a familial cancer risk assessment survey. Those who are found to be at high risk will be offered genetic testing for a panel of hereditary cancers. A "previvor" plan will be created to assist patients and their providers in completing the appropriate follow-up for those with a mutation identified.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rates of screening
Description
Fraction of the active clinic patient population that completes screening
Time Frame
1.5 years
Title
Rate of testing
Description
Fraction of the active clinic patient population that undergoes testing.
Time Frame
1.5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Implementation barriers on the clinic-level
Description
To identify changes, problems, and inefficiencies in clinical flow and interactions during and after the implementation of genomic testing for cancer risk across primary care clinics.
Time Frame
1.5 years
Title
Genetic Literacy and Comprehension (GLAC)
Description
GLAC scale for genetic literacy.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)
Description
ILS scale.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
Description
ICS scale.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA)
Description
ORCA scale.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Intervention characteristics (ex: evidence strength and quality)
Description
Self-developed measure.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Trust in Physician Scale (TIPS)
Description
TIPS scale for Physician trust.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (PSQ-18)
Description
PSQ-18
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Communication with family members
Description
Self-developed measure.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Reasons for completing (or not completing) genetic testing
Description
Self-developed measure.
Time Frame
up to 2 years
Title
Reasons for completing (or not completing) screening.
Description
Self-developed measure.
Time Frame
up to 1.5 years
Title
Quality of life scale
Description
Self-developed measure to measure patient quality of life.
Time Frame
up to 1.5 years
Title
Health literacy
Description
Self-developed measure patient's health literacy.
Time Frame
up to 1.5 years
Title
Cost-benefit analysis - cost-effectiveness
Description
Sel-developed measure to evaluate the value (cost-effectiveness) at each site
Time Frame
up to 5 years
Title
Cost-benefit analysis - budget impact
Description
Self-developed measure to measure the affordability of each screening strategy at each site
Time Frame
up to 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Patients: Age 25 or older An active patient at a participating clinic (had at least one visit in the past 12 months) Comfortable reading and writing in English Exclusion Criteria: Those who do not meet inclusion criteria.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elizabeth M Swisher, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Washington
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Billings Clinic
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59101
Country
United States
Facility Name
MultiCare Health System
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Early Detection of GEnetic Risk (EDGE)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs