Early Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures
Primary Purpose
Spinal Tuberculosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
no debridement
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Tuberculosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Frankel grading was grade D and E
- Severe back pain
- Abscess combined with high pressure symptoms
- Larger sequestrum formation or sinus
- Significant spinal instability.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Frankel grading was grade A,B and C
- Conservative treatment
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
spine surgery
Arm Description
The objective was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The operative time in minutes
blood loss in milliliter
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in mm/h
kyphotic angle in degree
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02638272
First Posted
December 9, 2015
Last Updated
December 18, 2015
Sponsor
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02638272
Brief Title
Early Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures
Official Title
Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Whether radical debridement is necessary for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is still questionable. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.
Detailed Description
Seventy-four thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis patients with a neurological function of grade D and E underwent surgeries from January 2009 to January 2014. All patients were divided into group A and group B by taking the drawing of lots. In group A, radical debridement, bone graft and instrumentation were performed. In group B, isolated posterior instrumentation without debridement were performed in all cases and drainage of iliopsoas abscess via laparoscopy in 2 cases. The operative time, blood loss, visual analogue score (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), kyphotic angle, Frankel grading, fusion rate and complications were evaluated.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Tuberculosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
74 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
spine surgery
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The objective was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
no debridement
Intervention Description
It is a spinal surgery performed with isolated posterior instrumentation without debridement.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The operative time in minutes
Time Frame
5 years
Title
blood loss in milliliter
Time Frame
5 years
Title
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in mm/h
Time Frame
5 years
Title
kyphotic angle in degree
Time Frame
5 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
67 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Frankel grading was grade D and E
Severe back pain
Abscess combined with high pressure symptoms
Larger sequestrum formation or sinus
Significant spinal instability.
Exclusion Criteria:
Frankel grading was grade A,B and C
Conservative treatment
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Early Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs