Early Tracheostomy in Ventilated Stroke Patients 2 (SETPOINT2)
Primary Purpose
Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tracheostomy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- informed consent from legal representative
- non-traumatic cerebrovascular disease
- Estimated ventilation need for at least 2 weeks
- The clinical judgement of the attending neurointensivist
- principle indication for tracheostomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Premorbid modified Rankin Score (mRS)>1
- Artificial ventilation for more than 4 days
- Severe chronic pulmonary disease requiring supplemental oxygen, or evidence of CO2 retention on admission serum analysis (HCO3≥30)
- Severe chronic cardiac disorder
- Any emergency situation compromising the patient's well-being or ability to undergo tracheostomy in the study time-frame
- Intracranial pressure (ICP) persistently > 25cmH2O
- Difficult airway management, anticipated problems with extubation / re-intubation,
- Need for a permanent surgical tracheostomy
- Contraindications for a percutaneous tracheostomy (see below)
- High oxygenation requirements: Positive end-expiratory pressure > 12, or fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.6)
- Pregnancy
- Participation in any other interventional trial
- Life expectancy < 3 weeks
- Patient/family unlikely to opt for at least 3 weeks of aggressive therapy prior to consideration of transition to comfort measures/discontinuation of life support measures
Sites / Locations
- UHHeidelberg
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Early Tracheostomy
Prolonged Intubation
Arm Description
Patients randomized to early tracheostomy receive (preferably dilatative) tracheostomy within 5 days from intubation. Intervention: Procedure: Early Tracheostomy
Patients randomized to this arm will be tried to wean off the ventilator and get (an) extubation trial(s) if regarded feasible. In case of failure or non-feasibility, they receive tracheostomy after intubation day 10. Intervention: Procedure: Late Tracheostomy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Functional outcome
Dichotomized functional outcome (a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-4 (favorable outcome) vs 5,6 (poor outcome)) at 6 months after admission to ICU
Secondary Outcome Measures
Mortality
This secondary endpoint is assessed as time and type of death during the ICU-stay and 6 months after admission.
Hospital Length of stay
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days spent at the recruiting hospital from admission to discharge.
Duration of ventilation
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h.
Duration and Quality of Weaning
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under the possible application of a weaning protocol, and spent within specific phases of such a protocol.
Time of Analgosedation Dependence
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics which are also specified.
Time of ICU dependence
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to a pre-defined status that would allow discharge from ICU (absence of active infection, vasopressors, pulmonary and cardial instability etc.)
Vasopressor Dependence
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under vasopressors during ICU-stay
Number and type of complications
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number and types of complications arelated to tracheostomy (i.e. bleeding, mispositioning, malfunction, replacement demand,etc.).
Functional Outcome
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the above named timepoints.
Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale Score
evaluation of consciousness and sedation score
Riker Sedation-Agitation-Score
evaluation of consciousness and sedation score
Burden scale for Family caregivers BSFC-s
assessment of the caregiver burden at the time of discharge from the NCCU and after 6 months
Patient reported outcome questions
assessment of the patient and caregiver burden after 6 month
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02377167
First Posted
January 28, 2015
Last Updated
November 3, 2020
Sponsor
University Hospital Heidelberg
Collaborators
MaineHealth, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02377167
Brief Title
Early Tracheostomy in Ventilated Stroke Patients 2
Acronym
SETPOINT2
Official Title
Stroke-Related Early Tracheostomy Versus Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial 2
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital Heidelberg
Collaborators
MaineHealth, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients with severe ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, who require mechanical ventilation, have a particularly bad prognosis. If they require long-term ventilation, their orotracheal tube needs to be, like in any other intensive care patient, replaced by a shorter tracheal tube below the larynx. This so called tracheostomy might be associated with advantages such as less demand of narcotics and pain killers, less lesions in mouth and larynx, better mouth hygiene, safer airway, more patient comfort and earlier mobilisation. The best timepoint for tracheostomy in stroke, however, is not known. Preliminary data from a pilot study of early tracheostomy in patients with hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke suggest that such patients may also have improved survival and long-term functional outcomes, but a large, multicenter clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Detailed Description
Background: According to United States data from the National Inpatient Sample, about 1.3% of 1.5 million patients (20,300) hospitalized with ischemic stroke from 2007-2009 underwent tracheostomy - while the number of tracheostomies performed for hemorrhagic stroke is unknown. Historically, mechanically ventilated patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes have had poor functional outcomes, and care of such patients is extremely expensive. Effective interventions to improve survival, improve functional recovery, decrease costs, and increase cost-effectiveness are urgently needed. Early tracheostomy of selected medical and surgical patients allows for dramatically decreased sedation and analgesia, and is associated with improved outcomes. Preliminary data from a pilot study of early tracheostomy in patients with hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke suggest that such patients may also have improved survival and long-term functional outcomes, but a large, multicenter clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Method: SETPOINT 2 is a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome observer-blinded, multicenter, two-armed, comparative trial. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either the experimental group - who undergo percutaneous tracheostomy (PDT) as soon as feasible and within 5 days after intubation ("early tracheostomy") or to the control group ("standard of care" group), in which PDT is performed after day 10 from intubation if the application of an in-house weaning protocol did not lead to successful extubation. Otherwise, no differences in intensive care treatment are intended, and each participating institution's standard operating procedures will be applied to ensure uniform management decisions in fields such as weaning, ventilation, analgesia and sedation, transfusion, and neurological monitoring and management. Blinding to the treatment assignment is impossible for treating physicians, patients and legal representatives as well as for most of the investigators. However, the primary endpoint of long-term outcome and causes of mortality will be assessed by trial-independent adjudicators blinded to the timing of tracheostomy.
The study started as an investigator initiated study which was conducted with limited external funding. Some funding (about 50 000 Euros) was provided from third party funds by the principal investigator and other foundations to provide for data management by the IMBI and other organizational aspects of the study. The principal investigator and the US co-principle investigator-David B. Seder, M.D.) together applied for research funding to several foundations and medical associations and in December 2016 received confirmation of funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Based on this award, some additional endpoints (e.g. neuromonitoring, patient and family experience) were added as secondary endpoints in this study. The core version of this study remained unchanged. There will be no industry funding of the SETPOINT 2 study. This is not an investigation of any specific medical products or medications.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
380 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Early Tracheostomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to early tracheostomy receive (preferably dilatative) tracheostomy within 5 days from intubation.
Intervention: Procedure: Early Tracheostomy
Arm Title
Prolonged Intubation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to this arm will be tried to wean off the ventilator and get (an) extubation trial(s) if regarded feasible. In case of failure or non-feasibility, they receive tracheostomy after intubation day 10.
Intervention: Procedure: Late Tracheostomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Tracheostomy
Intervention Description
Tracheostomy is performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy with tracheostomy kit by neurointensivists whenever possible. If anatomically or otherwise indicated, surgical tracheostomy is applied.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional outcome
Description
Dichotomized functional outcome (a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-4 (favorable outcome) vs 5,6 (poor outcome)) at 6 months after admission to ICU
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mortality
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as time and type of death during the ICU-stay and 6 months after admission.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Hospital Length of stay
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days spent at the recruiting hospital from admission to discharge.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Title
Duration of ventilation
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Title
Duration and Quality of Weaning
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under the possible application of a weaning protocol, and spent within specific phases of such a protocol.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of weaning, an expected average of 6 weeks
Title
Time of Analgosedation Dependence
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics which are also specified.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Title
Time of ICU dependence
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to a pre-defined status that would allow discharge from ICU (absence of active infection, vasopressors, pulmonary and cardial instability etc.)
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Title
Vasopressor Dependence
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under vasopressors during ICU-stay
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Title
Number and type of complications
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number and types of complications arelated to tracheostomy (i.e. bleeding, mispositioning, malfunction, replacement demand,etc.).
Time Frame
10 days post tracheostomy
Title
Functional Outcome
Description
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the above named timepoints.
Time Frame
admission and discharge
Title
Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale Score
Description
evaluation of consciousness and sedation score
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Title
Riker Sedation-Agitation-Score
Description
evaluation of consciousness and sedation score
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Title
Burden scale for Family caregivers BSFC-s
Description
assessment of the caregiver burden at the time of discharge from the NCCU and after 6 months
Time Frame
at discharge and after 6 month
Title
Patient reported outcome questions
Description
assessment of the patient and caregiver burden after 6 month
Time Frame
after 6 month
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 years or older
informed consent from legal representative
non-traumatic cerebrovascular disease
Estimated ventilation need for at least 2 weeks
The clinical judgement of the attending neurointensivist
principle indication for tracheostomy
Exclusion Criteria:
Premorbid modified Rankin Score (mRS)>1
Artificial ventilation for more than 4 days
Severe chronic pulmonary disease requiring supplemental oxygen, or evidence of CO2 retention on admission serum analysis (HCO3≥30)
Severe chronic cardiac disorder
Any emergency situation compromising the patient's well-being or ability to undergo tracheostomy in the study time-frame
Intracranial pressure (ICP) persistently > 25cmH2O
Difficult airway management, anticipated problems with extubation / re-intubation,
Need for a permanent surgical tracheostomy
Contraindications for a percutaneous tracheostomy (see below)
High oxygenation requirements: Positive end-expiratory pressure > 12, or fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.6)
Pregnancy
Participation in any other interventional trial
Life expectancy < 3 weeks
Patient/family unlikely to opt for at least 3 weeks of aggressive therapy prior to consideration of transition to comfort measures/discontinuation of life support measures
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UHHeidelberg
City
Heidelberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23204058
Citation
Bosel J, Schiller P, Hook Y, Andes M, Neumann JO, Poli S, Amiri H, Schonenberger S, Peng Z, Unterberg A, Hacke W, Steiner T. Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy versus Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial (SETPOINT): a randomized pilot trial. Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):21-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669895. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35506515
Citation
Bosel J, Niesen WD, Salih F, Morris NA, Ragland JT, Gough B, Schneider H, Neumann JO, Hwang DY, Kantamneni P, James ML, Freeman WD, Rajajee V, Rao CV, Nair D, Benner L, Meis J, Klose C, Kieser M, Suarez JI, Schonenberger S, Seder DB; SETPOINT2 and the IGNITE Study Groups. Effect of Early vs Standard Approach to Tracheostomy on Functional Outcome at 6 Months Among Patients With Severe Stroke Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: The SETPOINT2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 May 17;327(19):1899-1909. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4798.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26763913
Citation
Schonenberger S, Niesen WD, Fuhrer H, Bauza C, Klose C, Kieser M, Suarez JI, Seder DB, Bosel J; SETPOINT2-Study Group; IGNITE-Study Group. Early tracheostomy in ventilated stroke patients: Study protocol of the international multicentre randomized trial SETPOINT2 (Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical care Trial 2). Int J Stroke. 2016 Apr;11(3):368-79. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616638. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Early Tracheostomy in Ventilated Stroke Patients 2
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs