Eating Disorder Prevention Programs
Primary Purpose
Eating Disorders
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention Program
Healthy Weight Intervention
Expressive Writing Control Condition
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Eating Disorders focused on measuring Adolescence, Prevention and Control, Bulimia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Self-reported body image concerns
Sites / Locations
- University of Texas at Austin
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
No Intervention
Arm Label
Dissonance intervention
Healthy Weight Intervention
Expressive writing control intervention
Assessment-only control condition
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised, Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale, Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale-Revised
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00042185
First Posted
July 24, 2002
Last Updated
September 26, 2013
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00042185
Brief Title
Eating Disorder Prevention Programs
Official Title
Austin Body Acceptance Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2001 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study evaluated 2 eating disorder prevention programs designed to increase body satisfaction among adolescent females with body image concerns.
Detailed Description
Adolescent girls with body dissatisfaction (N=481; SD=1.4) were randomized to a dissonance-based thin-ideal internalization reduction program, healthy weight control program, expressive-writing control condition, or assessment-only control condition. Dissonance participants showed significantly greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, negative affect, eating disorder symptoms, and psychosocial impairment, and lower risk for eating pathology onset through 2-3 year follow-up than assessment-only controls. Dissonance participants showed greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, and psychosocial impairment than expressive-writing controls. Healthy weight participants showed greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, negative affect, eating disorder symptoms, and psychosocial impairment, less increases in weight, and lower risk for eating pathology and obesity onset through 2-3 year follow-up than assessment-only controls. Healthy weight participants showed greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization and weight than expressive writing controls. Dissonance participants showed a 60% reduction in risk for eating pathology onset and healthy weight participants showed a 61% reduction in risk for eating pathology onset and a 55% reduction in risk for obesity onset relative to assessment-only controls through 3-year follow-up, implying that the effects are clinically important and enduring.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eating Disorders
Keywords
Adolescence, Prevention and Control, Bulimia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
450 (false)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Dissonance intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Healthy Weight Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Expressive writing control intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Assessment-only control condition
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention Program
Intervention Description
In this intervention, participants voluntarily engaged in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critiqued the thin-ideal ideal. These exercises were conducted in sessions and in homework activities. For example, they wrote a counter-attitudinal essay about the costs associated with pursuit of the thin-ideal and engaged in a counter-attitudinal role-play in which they attempted to dissuade facilitators from pursuing the thin-ideal.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Healthy Weight Intervention
Intervention Description
In this intervention, participants were encouraged to make gradual healthy and lasting changes to their diet and physical activity to balance their energy needs with their energy intake, and thereby achieve a healthier weight and body satisfaction. With support from the facilitator and group members, they initiated an individual lifestyle change plan to reduce intake of fat and sugar and to increase exercise using behavioral modification principles. Food and exercise diaries were used to identify behaviors to target in this lifestyle modification and to monitor change. Motivational enhancement activities were used to promote motivation for behavior change.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Expressive Writing Control Condition
Intervention Description
In this condition, which is based on the work of Pennebaker (1997), participants wrote about emotionally significant topics in three individual weekly 45-minute sessions. They were told that research indicates that body dissatisfaction is linked to emotional issues and that expressive writing helps resolve these issues. Sample topics included relationships or goals. They were told that their work would not be read and were asked to write continuously for the duration of the session about an emotionally important topic.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised, Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale, Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale-Revised
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Self-reported body image concerns
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Texas at Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78712
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14979770
Citation
Stice E, Shaw H. Eating disorder prevention programs: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):206-27. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.206.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15023093
Citation
Stice E, Fisher M, Martinez E. Eating disorder diagnostic scale: additional evidence of reliability and validity. Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):60-71. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.60.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Eating Disorder Prevention Programs
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs