search
Back to results

Eating Disorder Prevention Programs

Primary Purpose

Eating Disorders

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention Program
Healthy Weight Intervention
Expressive Writing Control Condition
Sponsored by
University of Texas at Austin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Eating Disorders focused on measuring Adolescence, Prevention and Control, Bulimia

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 19 Years (Child, Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria: Self-reported body image concerns

Sites / Locations

  • University of Texas at Austin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Dissonance intervention

Healthy Weight Intervention

Expressive writing control intervention

Assessment-only control condition

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview

Secondary Outcome Measures

The Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised, Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale, Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale-Revised

Full Information

First Posted
July 24, 2002
Last Updated
September 26, 2013
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00042185
Brief Title
Eating Disorder Prevention Programs
Official Title
Austin Body Acceptance Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2001 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study evaluated 2 eating disorder prevention programs designed to increase body satisfaction among adolescent females with body image concerns.
Detailed Description
Adolescent girls with body dissatisfaction (N=481; SD=1.4) were randomized to a dissonance-based thin-ideal internalization reduction program, healthy weight control program, expressive-writing control condition, or assessment-only control condition. Dissonance participants showed significantly greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, negative affect, eating disorder symptoms, and psychosocial impairment, and lower risk for eating pathology onset through 2-3 year follow-up than assessment-only controls. Dissonance participants showed greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, and psychosocial impairment than expressive-writing controls. Healthy weight participants showed greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, negative affect, eating disorder symptoms, and psychosocial impairment, less increases in weight, and lower risk for eating pathology and obesity onset through 2-3 year follow-up than assessment-only controls. Healthy weight participants showed greater decreases in thin-ideal internalization and weight than expressive writing controls. Dissonance participants showed a 60% reduction in risk for eating pathology onset and healthy weight participants showed a 61% reduction in risk for eating pathology onset and a 55% reduction in risk for obesity onset relative to assessment-only controls through 3-year follow-up, implying that the effects are clinically important and enduring.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eating Disorders
Keywords
Adolescence, Prevention and Control, Bulimia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
450 (false)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dissonance intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Healthy Weight Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Expressive writing control intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Assessment-only control condition
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention Program
Intervention Description
In this intervention, participants voluntarily engaged in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critiqued the thin-ideal ideal. These exercises were conducted in sessions and in homework activities. For example, they wrote a counter-attitudinal essay about the costs associated with pursuit of the thin-ideal and engaged in a counter-attitudinal role-play in which they attempted to dissuade facilitators from pursuing the thin-ideal.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Healthy Weight Intervention
Intervention Description
In this intervention, participants were encouraged to make gradual healthy and lasting changes to their diet and physical activity to balance their energy needs with their energy intake, and thereby achieve a healthier weight and body satisfaction. With support from the facilitator and group members, they initiated an individual lifestyle change plan to reduce intake of fat and sugar and to increase exercise using behavioral modification principles. Food and exercise diaries were used to identify behaviors to target in this lifestyle modification and to monitor change. Motivational enhancement activities were used to promote motivation for behavior change.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Expressive Writing Control Condition
Intervention Description
In this condition, which is based on the work of Pennebaker (1997), participants wrote about emotionally significant topics in three individual weekly 45-minute sessions. They were told that research indicates that body dissatisfaction is linked to emotional issues and that expressive writing helps resolve these issues. Sample topics included relationships or goals. They were told that their work would not be read and were asked to write continuously for the duration of the session about an emotionally important topic.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised, Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale, Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale-Revised
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Self-reported body image concerns
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Texas at Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78712
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14979770
Citation
Stice E, Shaw H. Eating disorder prevention programs: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):206-27. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.206.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15023093
Citation
Stice E, Fisher M, Martinez E. Eating disorder diagnostic scale: additional evidence of reliability and validity. Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):60-71. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.60.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Eating Disorder Prevention Programs

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs