search
Back to results

Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Primary Purpose

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Health Economics

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Disease management of gastroesophageal reflux disease
Sponsored by
US Department of Veterans Affairs
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease focused on measuring Proton pump inhibitor

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with GERD symptoms treated with PPIs. For the purpose of this study, GERD symptoms include heartburn or acid regurgitation. Symptoms of dyspepsia (epigastric pain, nausea, bloating, early satiety) may be present, but may not be used as the sole criteria for inclusion into the study. Asymptomatic (no heartburn or acid regurgitation) on PPI therapy. Exclusion Criteria: Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease including esophageal stricture, hemorrhage due to erosive esophagitis, Barrett�s esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, or extra-esophageal manifestations of reflux disease (pulmonary or laryngeal disease due to acid reflux). Concurrent diagnoses of other gastrointestinal diseases including gastric or duodenal ulcer, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory disorders, or gastric cancer. Esophagitis secondary to non-acid peptic causes: infections (viral, bacterial, fungal), or medications causing esophageal erosions. Inability to maintain follow-up, either due to excessive distance to the VA primary care facility or lack of telephone services. Unwillingness to participate in the study.

Sites / Locations

  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Arm 1

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
March 27, 2003
Last Updated
April 6, 2015
Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Collaborators
Oregon Health and Science University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00057174
Brief Title
Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Official Title
Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2007
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
undefined (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
June 2004 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Collaborators
Oregon Health and Science University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a series of two prospective studies based on the Department of Veterans Affairs drug treatment guideline for the pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Our hypothesis is that novel strategies for medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can decrease resource utilization without adversely affecting patient quality of life. The strategies tested in this project included 1) step-down management, whereby patients rendered asymptomatic on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are treated with less expensive medication, and 2) intermittent therapy, defined as administration of medication only for recurrence of GERD symptoms. We chose to examine an intermittent strategy of PPI administration since in addition to the VA guideline requiring step-down therapy, over-the-counter PPIs administered by intermittent therapy became available for use by patients during the study period.
Detailed Description
Background: This is a series of two prospective studies based on the Department of Veterans Affairs drug treatment guideline for the pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Our hypothesis is that novel strategies for medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can decrease resource utilization without adversely affecting patient quality of life. The strategies tested in this project included 1) step-down management, whereby patients rendered asymptomatic on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are treated with less expensive medication, and 2) intermittent therapy, defined as administration of medication only for recurrence of GERD symptoms. We chose to examine an intermittent strategy of PPI administration since in addition to the VA guideline requiring step-down therapy, over-the-counter PPIs administered by intermittent therapy became available for use by patients during the study period. Objectives: The objectives of this project are to determine the efficacy of step-down therapy and intermittent therapy in patients with GERD, and the impact of these strategies on direct healthcare costs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Additionally, we will examine patient factors predictive of non-response to these management strategies that may be alternatives to traditional continuous PPI administration. Methods: Two separate studies were conducted in our population of patients with GERD symptoms (heartburn or acid regurgitation) rendered asymptomatic on PPIs. Both studies randomized subjects to an intervention strategy (Step-down or Intermittent therapy) or to a control group in which PPIs were continued on a daily basis. Step-down therapy: Step-down subjects discontinued PPIs and were prescribed histamine2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) for 2 weeks, and if still asymptomatic, H2RAs were discontinued. If symptoms recurred, H2RAs were reinitiated, and if still symptomatic, subjects were prescribed PPIs at the dose that initially alleviated their symptoms. Intermittent therapy: Intermittent therapy subjects discontinued daily use of PPIs and were prescribed short courses of PPI (daily for 8 weeks) for recurrence of GERD symptoms. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of subjects remaining free of GERD symptoms while on their prescribed therapy (step-down group: no symptoms on H2RAs or no GERD medication; intermittent therapy group: no PPIs for �2 weeks after discontinuation, and < 3 symptom recurrences requiring PPIs; control groups: no GERD symptoms on PPI). Follow up was conducted for 6 months after randomization. In addition to the primary efficacy measure, we examined total resource utilization (pharmacy and non-pharmacy), HRQOL, and potential predictors of non-response to step-down or intermittent therapy (requirement of daily PPI to control symptoms). Logistic regression and random-effects models adjusted for covariates and clustering effects. Status: Enrollment and follow-up have been completed. Efficacy measures are reported above. Outcome measures including comparison of direct health care costs, health-related quality of life, and determinants of non-response to step-down or intermittent therapy are being examined.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Health Economics
Keywords
Proton pump inhibitor

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Single
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
484 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Disease management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with GERD symptoms treated with PPIs. For the purpose of this study, GERD symptoms include heartburn or acid regurgitation. Symptoms of dyspepsia (epigastric pain, nausea, bloating, early satiety) may be present, but may not be used as the sole criteria for inclusion into the study. Asymptomatic (no heartburn or acid regurgitation) on PPI therapy. Exclusion Criteria: Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease including esophageal stricture, hemorrhage due to erosive esophagitis, Barrett�s esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, or extra-esophageal manifestations of reflux disease (pulmonary or laryngeal disease due to acid reflux). Concurrent diagnoses of other gastrointestinal diseases including gastric or duodenal ulcer, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory disorders, or gastric cancer. Esophagitis secondary to non-acid peptic causes: infections (viral, bacterial, fungal), or medications causing esophageal erosions. Inability to maintain follow-up, either due to excessive distance to the VA primary care facility or lack of telephone services. Unwillingness to participate in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Inadomi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48105
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12374519
Citation
El-Serag HB, Graham DY, Richardson P, Inadomi JM. Prevention of complicated ulcer disease among chronic users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: the use of a nomogram in cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14;162(18):2105-10. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.18.2105.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12540773
Citation
Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM. Empiric beta-blockers for the prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: cost effective or clinically applicable? Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):249-52. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50089. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15933680
Citation
Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM. Dysphagia drives doctors to diagnose a disease: pitfalls in interpreting observational studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jun;61(7):809-11. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00544-4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16011672
Citation
Rubenstein JH, Vakil N, Inadomi JM. The cost-effectiveness of biomarkers for predicting the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jul 15;22(2):135-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02536.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16091065
Citation
Rubenstein JH, Davis J, Marrero JA, Inadomi JM. Relationship between diabetes mellitus and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug 1;22(3):267-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02544.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12556808
Citation
Rhee J, Scheiman J, Inadomi J. "Spontaneous" passage of a pancreatic duct stone. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):278-80. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.62. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15929751
Citation
Chey WD, Inadomi JM, Booher AM, Sharma VK, Fendrick AM, Howden CW. Primary-care physicians' perceptions and practices on the management of GERD: results of a national survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1237-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11677201
Citation
Inadomi JM, Jamal R, Murata GH, Hoffman RM, Lavezo LA, Vigil JM, Swanson KM, Sonnenberg A. Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 2001 Nov;121(5):1095-100. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.28649.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
14499769
Citation
Inadomi JM, McIntyre L, Bernard L, Fendrick AM. Step-down from multiple- to single-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): a prospective study of patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation completely relieved with PPIs. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):1940-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07665.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15699893
Citation
Inadomi JM. Update on the cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal neoplasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan;19(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/00001574-200301000-00008.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12141885
Citation
Inadomi JM. On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(9):565-76. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00001.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12558356
Citation
Inadomi JM, Sampliner R, Lagergren J, Lieberman D, Fendrick AM, Vakil N. Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):176-86. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00009.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12797675
Citation
Inadomi JM. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2003;(237):17-21. doi: 10.1080/00855910310001430.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15765438
Citation
Inadomi JM, Fendrick AM. PPI use in the OTC era: who to treat, with what, and for how long? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Mar;3(3):208-15. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00717-7.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Inadomi J, Fendrick AM. Dyspepsia: Physicians Information and Education Resource. PIER. 2003 Jan 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12860585
Citation
Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J, Cowen ME, Carpenter D, Vijan S. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 14;163(13):1601-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.13.1601.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs