search
Back to results

Educational Video to Improve Nursing Home Care in End-stage Dementia (EVINCE)

Primary Purpose

Advanced Dementia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Advance care planning intervention
Control group
Sponsored by
Hebrew SeniorLife
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Advanced Dementia focused on measuring advanced dementia, advance care planning, nursing home

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 65
  • A diagnosis of dementia (any type)
  • Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score of 7
  • Nursing home length of stay > 30 days
  • Proxy is available who can speak in English
  • Proxy must either live within a 60 mile radius of Boston or be available to come to the residents nursing home within 2 weeks of recruitment in order to conduct the in-person baseline interview.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents with cognitive impairment due to causes other than dementia (e.g. head trauma) and in short-term, sub-acute SNFs will be excluded

Sites / Locations

  • Hebrew Rehabilitation Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Advance care planning intervention

Usual care

Arm Description

At baseline, health care proxies in the intervention arm will be shown a 12-minute Advance Care planning video that describes 3 levels of treatment in advanced dementia: comfort basic and intensive. After viewing the video, the proxies will be asked their preferred level of care for the resident and this choice will be communicated to the residents primary care team in a written form.

Residents in control nursing homes with receive the usual advance care planning that occurs in their nursing home.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Documented Decisions to Forgo Hospitalization
The proportion of residents with this outcome will be considered cumulatively at 6 months, including those who died; i.e., a composite of the percent of residents alive at six months who had a decision not to hospitalize and those who died before six months with this outcome prior to death. This cumulative outcome will only be based on time points following baseline as the baseline chart review data is conducted before the baseline proxy interview (i.e., before the proxy has seen the video in the intervention arm or heard options verbally in the control arm). (Decisions to forehospitalizations will be examined in a similar fashion at 3, 9, and 12 months, however the six month time frame is the primary trial outcome)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Acquisition of Decisions Not to Hospitalize
This is a sub primary outcome. The modified ITT population will be the subgroup of residents who begin the study without a documented decision to forego hospitalization, and the outcome will be acquisition of a documented decision to forego hospitalization over the 12 month follow-up period. The analysis will utilize Cox proportional hazards regression. Results will be summarized using a hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval as well as plots of the cumulative incidence by group.
Acquisition of Preference for Level of Care
The proportion of proxies who have chosen comfort care (versus intermediate or intensive care) based on telephone interviews will be considered cumulatively at each assessment. At 6 months the outcome will include the proportion of proxies choosing comfort care up to and including the 6 month interview. Cumulative proportions will include data from the baseline interview for the control group, and baseline immediate post video interview for intervention group.The proportion of proxies choosing comfort care will be compared between the intervention and control groups using an extension of logistic regression based on general estimating equations (GEE) to account for clustering at the NH level at each time period.

Full Information

First Posted
January 21, 2013
Last Updated
October 2, 2019
Sponsor
Hebrew SeniorLife
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health (NIH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01774799
Brief Title
Educational Video to Improve Nursing Home Care in End-stage Dementia
Acronym
EVINCE
Official Title
Educational Video to Improve Nursing Home Care in End-stage Dementia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hebrew SeniorLife
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health (NIH)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a 5-year cluster RCT of a video Advance Care Planning intervention vs. control among 360 nursing home residents with advanced dementia (N=180/arm) in 20 matched nursing homes (10 intervention/10 control). Clinical outcomes will be collected at baseline, and quarterly (up to 12-months) regarding goals of care preferences, advance care planning, and treatments received. The primary outcome is decisions not to be hospitalized at 6 months.
Detailed Description
The over-riding goal of the EVINCE study is to conduct a cluster RCT of a video Advance Care Planning intervention in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. A total of 360 nursing home residents with advanced dementia (N=180/arm) in 20 matched nursing homes (10 intervention/10 control) will be recruited. These residents' proxies with also be recruited for a total sample size of 720 residents and proxies (resident/proxy dyads). Outcomes will be compared between residents in the intervention vs, control nursing homes at baseline and every 3 months up to 12 months. At baseline proxies of residents in the intervention nursing homes will view a 12-minutes video describing three level of care options in advanced dementia (intensive, basic and comfort) and their choice will be communicated to the resident's primary care providers. Residents in the control nursing homes will receive the usual advance care planning practiced in those facilities. UPDATE SEPT 19, 2014: During the first 18 months of the study, recruitment of resident/proxy dyads was lower per facility than anticipated at the time of study design. Therefore, the number of matched pairs of NH recruited was increased. As of September 19, 2014, 19 NH pairs (38 NHs) were recruited and randomized with a plans to continue to up to 30 pairs as needed. NHs were originally randomized using a paired approach matched for for-profit status and whether or not the NH had a special care dementia unit (SCU). In March 2014, the state of Massachusetts changed legislation defining an SCU. Many of the changes focused on specifics of staff training. As a result, SCUs in several participating facilities did not meet the new criteria and lost this official designation, although the actual clinical structure of the existing units did not change. Nonetheless, we opted to maintain the initial matching criteria of the first 19 NHs which included SCU based on the definition before the Massachusetts legislation change, but dropped this matching criterion after the legislation change. Thus, beginning with matched pair 20, NHs were matched solely on for-profit status. UPDATE MARCH 2016 To reach subject recruitment numbers, additional facilities were recruited. As of this date, 60 NHs (30/arm) have been recruited, randomized and have had subject enrolled. To achieve additional for power for Outcome 2, (aquisition of new decisions to forego hospitalizations) the target sample size was increased to 400.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Advanced Dementia
Keywords
advanced dementia, advance care planning, nursing home

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
804 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Advance care planning intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
At baseline, health care proxies in the intervention arm will be shown a 12-minute Advance Care planning video that describes 3 levels of treatment in advanced dementia: comfort basic and intensive. After viewing the video, the proxies will be asked their preferred level of care for the resident and this choice will be communicated to the residents primary care team in a written form.
Arm Title
Usual care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Residents in control nursing homes with receive the usual advance care planning that occurs in their nursing home.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Advance care planning intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Control group
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Documented Decisions to Forgo Hospitalization
Description
The proportion of residents with this outcome will be considered cumulatively at 6 months, including those who died; i.e., a composite of the percent of residents alive at six months who had a decision not to hospitalize and those who died before six months with this outcome prior to death. This cumulative outcome will only be based on time points following baseline as the baseline chart review data is conducted before the baseline proxy interview (i.e., before the proxy has seen the video in the intervention arm or heard options verbally in the control arm). (Decisions to forehospitalizations will be examined in a similar fashion at 3, 9, and 12 months, however the six month time frame is the primary trial outcome)
Time Frame
by six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acquisition of Decisions Not to Hospitalize
Description
This is a sub primary outcome. The modified ITT population will be the subgroup of residents who begin the study without a documented decision to forego hospitalization, and the outcome will be acquisition of a documented decision to forego hospitalization over the 12 month follow-up period. The analysis will utilize Cox proportional hazards regression. Results will be summarized using a hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval as well as plots of the cumulative incidence by group.
Time Frame
by 12 months
Title
Acquisition of Preference for Level of Care
Description
The proportion of proxies who have chosen comfort care (versus intermediate or intensive care) based on telephone interviews will be considered cumulatively at each assessment. At 6 months the outcome will include the proportion of proxies choosing comfort care up to and including the 6 month interview. Cumulative proportions will include data from the baseline interview for the control group, and baseline immediate post video interview for intervention group.The proportion of proxies choosing comfort care will be compared between the intervention and control groups using an extension of logistic regression based on general estimating equations (GEE) to account for clustering at the NH level at each time period.
Time Frame
6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Acquisition of Other Documented Advance Care Planning
Description
The proportion of residents who acquired a documented advance directive to forego tube-feeding will be compared in the intervention versus control group.
Time Frame
by 6 months
Title
Burdensome Treatments
Description
Burdensome treatments include: Hospitals transfers (hospitalizations or emergency room visits), tube feeding or parenteral therapy. The rate of burdensome treatments per 1000 resident days was compared between the intervention and control arms.
Time Frame
by 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age > 65 A diagnosis of dementia (any type) Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score of 7 Nursing home length of stay > 30 days Proxy is available who can speak in English Proxy must either live within a 60 mile radius of Boston or be available to come to the residents nursing home within 2 weeks of recruitment in order to conduct the in-person baseline interview. Exclusion Criteria: Residents with cognitive impairment due to causes other than dementia (e.g. head trauma) and in short-term, sub-acute SNFs will be excluded
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susan L Mitchell, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Hebrew SeniorLife
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Angelo Volandes, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02131
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified data form study are available through link porvided
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Now, indefinetly
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
open
IPD Sharing URL
https://ifar-dataverse.hsl.harvard.edu/dataverse/evince
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29868778
Citation
Mitchell SL, Shaffer ML, Cohen S, Hanson LC, Habtemariam D, Volandes AE. An Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):961-969. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1506.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Educational Video to Improve Nursing Home Care in End-stage Dementia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs